TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Benghazi was a logistics hub for arming anti-Assad terrorists. Russia exposed this operation by attacking the CIA center, putting a stop to it. The Western media didn't report on it. The efforts to overthrow Assad continue, but now weapons are primarily coming from Croatia. This poses a threat to Russia, so they are waging war against America by targeting our weak economy, specifically the oil-backed dollar.

Vladimir Putin is believed to be a war criminal assisting another war criminal in killing his own people. Russia's interference in the 2016 election was detailed in a report by the Republican Majority Senate Intelligence Committee, chaired by Marco Rubio. Partnering with Putin on cybersecurity is akin to partnering with Assad on chemical weapons. As long as Assad is in Syria, there will be radical elements. Countries that support Assad are accomplices in war crimes. As long as Assad is in power, radical elements will fight against him. Assad should be removed through a combination of Syrian alternatives, not foreign forces. Israel is a strategic ally, and Benjamin Netanyahu defends shared values. Some Democrats are criticized for boycotting Netanyahu's visit to Congress. The Obama administration's nuclear deal with Iran was a mistake. Putin is getting desperate and crushing information with censorship laws and press restrictions. Russia is recruiting fighters from Syria for urban combat in Ukraine, potentially escalating the conflict. Putin will double down and lock down, suppressing dissent. He views human nature manipulatively and aims to restore the Soviet Union. Ceasefires are opportunities for him to reload and pick more targets. Any man in Ukraine who picks up a rifle is now considered a military target.

After four years of brutal urban combat in Aleppo, Russia entered the war at the invitation of the Syrian government. Initially, their involvement was limited to a small number of ground forces, including military police and advisers, while their air force significantly bolstered the Syrian air capabilities. By the time Russia joined, the Syrian forces had already weakened the terrorist groups. The Russian air support helped secure Aleppo as a major victory in the Syrian war. Blaming Russia for the destruction in Aleppo is misguided, as they were not present during the earlier years of conflict. This narrative appears to be part of a broader propaganda effort.

Russia was initially hesitant to engage in the Syrian conflict, which began in 2011 when the U.S. coordinated with Al Qaeda and other groups. The CIA's secret operation, Timber Sycamore, provided Al Qaeda with anti-tank and anti-air weapons, making them a proxy force for U.S. interests alongside ISIS. The U.S. aimed to overthrow the legitimate Syrian government by using these proxies, including various terrorist factions. In Aleppo, the Syrian Army, supported by Hezbollah and some Iranian-organized troops, led the efforts to reclaim territory. A similar strategy is currently observed in Ukraine.

I've looked into both Assad and the opposition, but the problem is we don't know who the opposition really is. They could be even worse than Assad. We supply them with weapons and resources, but we're essentially in the dark about who they are. Why are we involved in this conflict at all? Of course, getting rid of ISIS is important, but Assad seems like the lesser of two evils. We've backed the wrong side before, and it ended in disaster. Russia seems to support Assad, so maybe we should let them handle ISIS and let them fight it out.

These killers are not resistance fighters, as some would have us believe. True resistance fighters do not kill children, young men, and women, or decapitate babies. These are simply killers, and they did not emerge out of nowhere. They have been accompanied, aided, trained, and financed by certain individuals and we know who they are. We know that Qatar is involved, as the leader of these killers is being hosted there. It is the same country that funds the PSG and other major companies.

I was shocked to learn that President Obama had programs to overthrow the Syrian regime. The CIA's Timber Sycamore program armed Al Qaeda to start another regime change war in the Middle East. The DOD's train and equip program spent over half a billion dollars training "moderate rebels" who were actually aligned with Al Qaeda. Regime change wars in Syria, like in Iraq, Libya, and Egypt, risk the rise of Islamist extremists like Al Qaeda. We now have an Islamist extremist in charge of Syria who celebrated the 9/11 attack and is persecuting religious minorities like Christians. Every American deserves to know if our government supported our enemy, Al Qaeda.

We allied with Al Qaeda and ISIS, using them against the Syrian government. Terrorists from 100 countries joined them, engaging in organized rape and creating slave markets. They were allowed to kill husbands, own wives and children, and rape widows and young children. This led to a horrific campaign of violence and exploitation in Syria.

The speaker argues that most U.S. interventions are driven by a power calculus rather than defense. “We view this as a power situation for The US” and it’s about “a perception of US power and US interest, and objectives of US global hegemony.” He contends that the Ukraine conflict is not simply about Putin invading Ukraine but “something a lot different that has to do with American power projection into the former Soviet Union.” If the United States acts as the police, he says, one cannot imagine how cynical “bullshit” is used to justify actions: “defending the people of Benghazi” is cited to bomb Libya and kill Muammar Gaddafi, with motives linked to Sarkozy’s dislike of Gaddafi and Hillary’s apparent appetite for bombing, while Obama was “convinced” by his secretary of state to back the NATO expedition. He argues the Libya operation had nothing to do with Libyans and “unleashed fifteen years of chaos,” cheating the UN Security Council because, like other actions, it was built on false pretenses. The same pattern, he claims, was used in attempts to overthrow Syria and in conspiring to overthrow Viktor Yanukovych in Ukraine in February 2014. The speaker maintains the problem is that “we’re not nice guys. We’re not trying to save the world. We’re not trying to make democracies.” He cites a committee of neocon luminaries, jokingly calling it “the Committee for the People of Chechnya,” to illustrate a strategy of weakening Russia by supporting a jihadist movement inside Russia—presented as a power game rather than principled intervention. He emphasizes that this is a game of power, not defense of real things. If one truly wanted to defend real objectives, he says, they should go to the UN Security Council and persuade others, because other countries are not crazy and do not want mayhem, whereas “we play games.” He concludes by reflecting on Iraq, stating it was “a game before we went in” and noting that “Powell could not move his lips without lying that day.” The implication is that, if the United States pursued its true interests, it would seek collective action through the UN Security Council, making it a collective security issue rather than unilateral action.

ISIS was initially funded by our friends and allies in the region. They targeted religious fundamentalists and zealots who were willing to fight against Hezbollah. The aim was not to recruit people for a better world, but to find individuals who would fight to the death against Hezbollah.

De spreker stelt dat Boko Haram en ISIS proxy legers van de Verenigde Staten zijn. Hij beweert dat de VS Afghanistan binnenviel via in Pakistan opgeleide Moedjahedien, waarna Rusland te hulp werd gevraagd. Volgens de spreker hebben Hezbollah, het Palestijnse leger, Rusland en Iran Syrië en Irak bevrijd van ISIS. De VS houdt nu het oosten van Syrië bezet en steelt daar de olie, samen met Koerdische partners. Boko Haram, Al Qaida en ISIS zijn Amerikaanse proxy legers, met steun van Turkije en Israël in het conflict in Syrië. **Translation:** The speaker states that Boko Haram and ISIS are proxy armies of the United States. He claims that the US invaded Afghanistan via Mujahideen trained in Pakistan, after which Russia was asked for help. According to the speaker, Hezbollah, the Palestinian army, Russia and Iran liberated Syria and Iraq from ISIS. The US is now occupying eastern Syria and stealing oil there, together with Kurdish partners. Boko Haram, Al Qaeda and ISIS are American proxy armies, with support from Turkey and Israel in the conflict in Syria.

Speaker 0: The speaker questions the pretexts for international interventions, starting with Yugoslavia. “В какой предлог? Что, санкции Совета безопасности, что ли? Где Югославия, где США? Уничтожили страну.” The speaker acknowledges internal conflict in Yugoslavia but asks who gave the right to strike the European capital, insisting, “Никто. Просто так решили,” with satellite powers following and cheering. They label this as “всё международное право.” Next, the speaker asks about the pretext for entering Iraq (referred to as “Рак”). They describe the action as “Разработка оружия массового уничтожения” used to invade, destroy the country, and create “очаг международного терроризма,” only to later claim that a mistake had been made. They recount the line: “нас разведка подвела. Ничего себе! Разрушили страну разведка подвела.” They say, “И всё объяснение,” arguing that “Оказывается, не было там никакого массового оружия поражения, никто не готовил.” They state, “Наоборот, когда-то было всё как положено уничтожили.” Finally, they ask about Syria: “А в Сирию как зашли? Что санкций Советой безопасности? Нет. Что хотят, то и делают.” The speaker contends that in Syria, as with the previous cases, the actions were taken without regard to UNSC sanctions, with force used to satisfy unspecified objectives. In summary, the speaker challenges the legitimacy of military interventions by citing Yugoslavia, Iraq, and Syria, highlighting claimed pretexts of weapons of mass destruction, UNSC sanctions, and the perceived disregard for international law, suggesting that decisions are made arbitrarily while authorities and precedents are cited as justification.

In the conversation, Syed Mohammed Marandi, a professor at Tehran University and former adviser to Iran’s nuclear negotiation team, addresses multiple interwoven geopolitical issues, centering on Iran, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, and the broader strategic rivalry with the United States and its allies. Syria and ISIS release - Marandi asserts that the Damascus regime, described as al-Qaeda/ISIS-aligned factions, would not tolerate Kurdish forces backed by the United States. He notes prior violence against Alawites, Christians, and Druze as context for the current disturbing images from Syria. - He argues the United States is not a reliable partner for its allies, pointing to past episodes such as Obama’s refusal to support Arbil when ISIS threatened the Kurdish government, and Soleimani’s rapid military response to save the city. - He states that ISIS prisoners have been released in Syria, implying that thousands of ISIS members are now free and could destabilize Syria and possibly Iraq. He emphasizes that both Jolani (an ISIS-linked figure) and the Kurdish groups in northeast Syria are allied to the United States, making it unclear who released the prisoners but suggesting that those actors are aligned with the U.S. - The broader implication is that the release increases instability in Syria and potentially across the region. Border security and spillover fears - The discussion turns to Iraq’s border with Syria, with Marandi weighing whether U.S.-backed jihadist forces might spill into Iraq or Lebanon. He suggests a likelihood that ISIS/Al-Qaeda remnants could be used to pressure Lebanon and Iraq to prevent closer Iranian influence. - He notes that Iran’s potential responses could include its missile and drone capabilities, should security worsen on a front involving its allies in Lebanon and Iraq; however, Iran currently refrains from large-scale involvement in Syria but would consider action if threats to Iran or its allies escalate. Regime change, fragmentation, and U.S.-Israel aims - The conversation shifts to Iran post-riots, with questions about U.S./Israel strategies for regime change. Marandi contends the plan is to destabilize and fragment Iran, not to establish a unified post-regime scenario. - He cites alleged Israeli and Western involvement in organizing riots as evidence of a broader conspiracy to create chaos and justify military action. He claims Mossad and other intelligence agencies were on the ground, and public statements from former CIA officials acknowledged Israeli involvement. - He describes the riot phase as highly organized, with foreign funding (including Bitcoin), online recruitment, and careful targeting of police and infrastructure. He portrays the protests as initially legitimate grievances that devolved into violent chaos fueled by external coordination, with widespread destruction and deaths, including the killing of police officers. - In contrast, he highlights large pro-government demonstrations, especially a national day of demonstrations that he says showed widespread popular support for the Islamic Republic and condemnation of rioters. He points to extensive media coverage highlighting peaceful protests, while arguing that the riot narrative dominated Western coverage. Internal Iranian dynamics and public opinion - Marandi emphasizes the fragmentation among Iranian opposition groups: MEK, monarchists, Takfiri remnants near the Pakistan border, and Kurdish separatists, all of whom he asserts lack credible popular support. - He argues that even if the regime were at risk, fragmentation would prevent any single faction from stabilizing the country post-regime change. He suggests this aligns with his view of broader Israeli aims to weaken and fragment Iran and neighboring states, as seen in Syria and Iraq. Military capability and deterrence - He asserts Iran’s substantial missile and drone capabilities and asserts that Iran could defend allies in Lebanon and Iraq if needed. He notes Iran’s long-term preparedness against U.S. threats, including underground bases and extensive drone/missile stocks. - He contends that if war occurred, it would have wide regional and global economic consequences, potentially destabilizing oil markets and prompting broader geopolitical upheaval. He argues that U.S. restraint may be influenced by the risk of a global economic meltdown. Russia, China, and Starlink - Regarding technological assistance for countering communications, he mentions rumors of Russian or Chinese involvement in aiding Iran's internet disruption and Starlink-related issues, acknowledging uncertainty but highlighting a growing trilateral closeness among Iran, Russia, and China in the face of U.S. pressure. media narratives and leadership - He criticizes Western media for portraying protests as peaceful, while Israeli claims and cyber/disinformation around the events are presented as demonstrations of foreign involvement. He maintains that internal Iranian unity—visible in large-scale demonstrations—contrasts with the portrayal of a fractured nation. - He closes by suggesting that while some European leaders may align with U.S. policies, the overall strategic outlook remains uncertain, with a warning that Trump’s approach could escalate tensions rather than yield stability.

Russia initially resisted involvement in Syria, where the US supported Al Qaeda through covert operations. The CIA supplied weapons, including anti-tank and anti-air missiles, to Al Qaeda in Idlib province. The US used proxies like Al Qaeda and ISIS to overthrow Syria's government. In Aleppo, the Syrian Army, Hezbollah, and Iranian-backed troops were key players. Similar proxy tactics are seen in Ukraine.

The discussion centers on what the speakers describe as a systematic massacre of Christians in Syria, along with violence against other minority communities. They claim churches and monasteries have been targeted, with Christian villages and others like Alawite villages set on fire and attacked, and note fires seen from miles away. They argue the Syrian government is not stopping the violence and is instead embracing the new leadership described as an ISIS terrorist, citing a photo of the leader at the United Nations with a “clean kept beard and hair gel.” They assert Christians are protest­ing in the streets, saying they are “soldiers of Christ,” while saying Christians are “sitting targets” without help. Professor Joshua Landis, of Syria Comment and the Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Oklahoma, explains the shift in Syria’s power dynamics. He recounts that in 2011, the Nusra Front emerged as a Syrian branch of Al Qaeda, formed with US support to the opposition against Assad. He notes that in December, nine months prior, the head of Al Qaeda reportedly swept into Damascus, took over, and “became president,” with the United States lifting sanctions and embracing him to sign a peace agreement with Israel. Landis emphasizes the minorities in Syria—Alawites (about 12%), Druze (3%), Kurds in the north—are terrified as a “Sunni supremacist” and fundamentalist regime takes power and treats minorities with disdain. He cites massacres against minorities: 17,000 Alawites killed in March, nearly 2,000 Druze killed in July, and ongoing violence. He also highlights Christian persecution, mentioning the Mar Elias church bombing in June that killed 30 parishioners and wounded over 50; the church was burned, and he notes conflicting claims about the bomber’s affiliations. He adds that Washington has lifted sanctions and encouraged the new president, while not compelling moves toward democracy or decentralization to protect minorities. The hosts question why Western media and governments remain largely silent, noting a lack of coverage by Trump or major outlets, and remark that the situation parallels civil wars in Iraq and Lebanon where minorities suffered as states collapsed. Landis argues that after the overthrow of regimes like Saddam Hussein’s, Christians in Iraq were reduced from about 3% to nearly none, due to civil strife and the rise of extremist movements, with Christians often facing persecution and forced jizya. The conversation turns to broader regional stakes, including concern that Kurdish allies, who helped defeat ISIS, may be abandoned as US troops draw down, leaving Kurdish populations vulnerable. The host urges viewers to share the segment with government representatives to demand attention to the plight of Christians in the Middle East. The discussion closes with Landis reaffirming the gravity of the situation and the absence of strong Western political will to intervene.

"the CIA and Saudi Arabia together, in covert operations tried to overthrow Assad." "It was a disaster" and it "also brought in Russia." The speaker calls this "the permanent state" and says "We have made a proxy war in Syria" that has "killed 500,000 people, displaced 10,000,000," and "I predicted it seven years ago that there was no way to do this and that it would make a complete chaos." He urges, "get out." Another speaker adds, "six hundred thousand dead and 14,000,000 displaced," and says the United States should be part of the solution. He notes this happened because of us, cites "timber sycamore"—"The CIA operation together with Saudi Arabia"—"shrouded in secrecy" and "never debated by Congress, never explained." Ending the fight means stopping overthrow of a government and rebel support; "contrary to international law, contrary to the UN Charter"; risk of "an imminent confrontation with Russia." "Go to the UN Security Council ... with Russia on a strategy for ending the fight."

The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOAR) reported that Western coalition helicopters were airlifting foreign ISIS fighters out of Deir Zor in Syria. Two sources told the speaker that the US coalition was airlifting foreign ISIS fighters into Afghanistan. The speaker didn't understand this at the time. The speaker believes the US needed to leave behind a dirty fighting force to blow up mosques, schools, and infrastructure to continue chaos after US forces left. This would impede the development of pipelines and roadways, preventing China, Russia, Iran, and Pakistan from connecting with Afghanistan. The speaker believes ISIS is potentially a US construct, and ISIS K is a US CIA construct.

The war in Syria originated not from Bashar Al Assad, but from a decision in Washington in 02/2011 to overthrow Assad, a desire originating from Jerusalem and the Israeli government for over 25 years, with Netanyahu aiming to reshape the Middle East in Israel's image by overthrowing opposing governments. This aligned with the CIA and the U.S. government, leading to Operation Timber Sycamore, a program where the U.S. and regional countries trained rebels, including jihadists, to overthrow the Syrian regime. This resulted in chaos and 600,000 deaths. The CIA's goal in 02/2011 was for a jihad group to take power in Syria after being armed by the U.S. Peace in the region requires real diplomacy, not CIA operations, and an end to Israel's militarization of the Middle East. The Syrian war is one of six wars Israel has promoted, including in Lebanon, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan. In 02/2001, Wesley Clark was shown a Pentagon paper outlining a plan for seven wars in five years. The only war that hasn't occurred is a U.S. war with Iran.

There were significant human rights violations against Christians in Syria, in both Sunni and Shia controlled areas. The potential for things to get worse is there, but the upside is that the Iranian crescent is dead, meaning the Iranian regime is in real trouble because their biggest proxies like Hamas, Hezbollah, and Assad are gone, and Shia influence is waning. Turkey is encroaching on Northern Syria to create a buffer zone, while Israel controls the Golan Heights and has moved into a buffer zone at Mount Hermon. The Syrian government has abdicated to a rebel alliance. Russia and Iran are weak, as evidenced by the collapse of their alliance in Syria, indicative of their interior weakness. This is a direct result of blows Ukraine and Israel delivered. Net net, this is probably a good thing, but there are no great things in the Middle East.

The speaker stated the world would be better off with Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi in power. Iraq used to kill terrorists immediately, but now it's the "Harvard of terrorism." The speaker said that while Hussein was a horrible guy, Iraq was better then than it is now, as it is currently a training ground for terrorists. The speaker stated nobody even knows Libya, and there is no Iraq and no Libya anymore because it's all broken up. Human rights abuses are happening now and are worse than under Hussein or Gaddafi. Libya is a catastrophe, Iraq is a disaster, and the whole Middle East blew up around Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

Globalist elites control governments via financial markets, institutions, and mainstream media. They don't represent the interests of Europeans or most Americans, but their own, and their agenda is to destroy Russia. They want to replace Putin because Russia is the last major European power with a national identity, language, and culture based on orthodox Christianity, making it the enemy of globalists. Globalists have flooded Western countries with non-Europeans to dilute, weaken, and destroy national identity and culture, and eliminate Christianity's cultural power. They want to do the same to Russia, which has enormous mineral, agricultural, oil, gas, and rare metal resources. Destroying the Russian government, removing Putin, and entering Russia would allow them to strip its resources and enrich themselves further. Russia is holding out.

Speaker 0 claims that ISIS is a CIA creation, equating it with other groups like those in Islamberg and Fethullah Gulen. He states that John McCain was “over there with the ISIS officials.” He asserts that ISIS originated from the Al Nusra Front and the Syrian Liberation Front, which combined to morph into ISIS, and that “We created them. We still direct them.” He asserts that injured ISIS warriors are transported to Israel, treated at Israeli hospitals, and brought back to battle. Regarding motives, he says the ultimate goal is money and wealth, noting that real wealth comes from natural resources. He contrasts this with currency, saying money is fabricated and not backed by anything. He lists natural resources—gold, oil, and heroin—as wealth, claiming heroin is “the third most valuable commodity in the world right now,” and cites this as another reason for being in Afghanistan. He describes the endgame as a game being played to win, not an endless play. He states that the money cartel from the United States, referring to an Anglo-American establishment (British and US), controls the endgame. He argues that by depriving Russia of natural resources, its power is depleted, and the same logic applies to China. The overarching objective, according to the speaker, is total economic control of the world.

For the past decade, foreign powers have sought to destroy Syria. "Israel wants to reclaim Southern Syria, Turkey wants to reclaim Northern Syria, and the Persian Gulf states want a secure route for a natural gas pipeline to Europe." The "American Empire" seeks to destroy any nation that fails to open its economy to Western corporations. The preferred method... "to destroy a nation by agitating and arming minority groups while sending thousands of foreign mercenaries" and "funded by foreign intelligence agencies via massive arms smuggling that supplied billions of dollars in weapons to so called rebels." "American weaponry included expensive shoulder fired surface to air missiles and large anti tank weapons, like the American TOW system." By the end of 2,015, the Syrian government had lost control of most of its territory. "Russia announced that any aircraft that bombed Syrian forces would be shot down." "Israel expanded its Druze militias in Southern Syria" and "American aircrafts and artillery supported Kurdish forces" into Eastern Syria. "The White Helmets" were "founded in 2013 by a British ex military officer" and "funded to the tune of $100,000,000 by The US, UK, and Europe"—they "purport to be rescuing civilians" yet "no one in Eastern Aleppo has heard of them." "The covert war on Syria killed over 400,000 people and pushed 5,000,000 refugees." "Seven years has been a disaster under Obama" with "CIA and Saudi Arabia together" fueling a "proxy war" that brought ISIS; get out. The plot to destroy Syria failed as it reconquered most of its territory.

Making war on civilians is a serious crime in the law of war. Throughout the conflict in Syria, there was a complex relationship with groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS, sometimes fighting them while also using them against the Syrian government. Many Islamic terrorists from various countries joined these groups, knowing they could lawfully kill civilian husbands and take their wives and children. This led to an organized campaign of rape across Syria, with slave markets emerging in rebel areas that listed prices for women. Disturbingly, the highest prices were for young children, as pedophiles sought to exploit them under the prevailing laws that allowed repeated assaults on widows and children.

If you're on Twitter, be warned: gruesome videos from Syria are circulating, a result of CIA intervention and tax dollars funding "moderate rebels." These rebels are now attacking minority communities that Bashar al-Assad used to protect. Figures like Barry Weiss, John Bolton, the Bushes, Obama, and Hillary Clinton bear responsibility, as this was their CIA project under the Obama administration, aimed at turning Syria into another Libya. They achieved their goal: a failed state with torture and human sacrifice. This could have been prevented, as past interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya failed. The situation worsened after Trump's election. Biden gave the green light before Trump took office. The CIA approached Trump in 2016 to overthrow Assad, but he refused. The corporate media and establishment are also culpable in this disaster.