reSee.it - Related Video Feed

My name is Trip Kester and I am here to publicly support the resolution before us. The Constitution is clear and has been enforced for centuries. It states that we are endowed with certain inalienable rights by our Creator, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Governments are established to secure these rights, but if they become destructive and infringe on our liberties, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish that government. I urge you all to join other counties in upholding the same oath I took to defend the Constitution. Regardless of your decision, I will protect the people of this county and not enforce unconstitutional laws. Let's do the right thing and support the people's liberties. Thank you.

I am an American citizen with the right to bear arms. I will carry my gun as I please, without needing a permit. I will disregard any law that violates my rights, even if it means going to prison. It is the duty of every American citizen to carry a gun everywhere they go. If you are not carrying a gun or have one within reach, you are wrong.

The speaker argues that when a government criminalizes dissent and punishes people for criticizing it, it becomes a tyranny rather than a legitimate government. They claim that this kind of surveillance state is aimed not at safety but at punishing citizens for noticing government actions, and that this behavior marks a fundamental breach of human rights. The speaker rejects the idea that this is a right-wing issue, insisting it is a basic observation about rights and freedom. They compare the situation to a surveillance-heavy regime and suggest that even countries widely recognized as tyrannies have not reached the level of control described, while also noting that their own country has become a surveillance state. The point is that the purpose of surveillance is punitive rather than protective, and the speaker asserts that no privacy equates to no freedom. In a personal anecdote, the speaker describes going to a tobacco shop to buy cigarettes and finding none available. A Pakistani shopkeeper shows them a cabinet with cigarettes that have disturbing imagery on the packaging, which further unsettles the speaker. The price of a deck of 20 cigarettes is cited as $60, and the speaker expresses disbelief and frustration about being lectured on smoking while other controversial issues, such as fentanyl, are perceived as being allowed or facilitated by the government. The speaker emphasizes that although smoking is unhealthy, it should be a matter of individual choice, not public moralizing or coercive regulation. The speaker reflects on the broader implications of being forced to do things for one’s “own good,” questioning whether such coercion is truly protective or a prelude to obedience. They warn that if the state insists on injecting people with untested compounds or uses force to compel compliance, individuals may become trained to obey even when they disagree, leading to a loss of personal autonomy and freedom. A central assertion is that, at a fundamental level, such a government does not align with the country’s true nature or the rights of its citizens. The speaker urges resistance to what they describe as government overreach, insisting that the government’s actions are not legitimate and that the people have no obligation to tolerate it. They declare, “They are the criminals. You are not the criminals,” and emphasize that the country belongs to the people, not to those who wield power.

We must wake the people up to the choice between freedom, democracy, and the rule of law, or enslavement. It's either the globalitarian misanthropists or the people. As elected representatives, our duty is to serve the people's best interest. Those who don't stand with the people deserve no place in government. We promise to continue fighting for freedom, democracy, and the rule of law. We ask the people to refuse mask mandates, mRNA shots, and curfews. By saying no, we take away their power. It may be hard, but once you stand up to them, you'll feel free. Don't let them grind you down. Stand up for yourselves and tell them to go to hell.

Perryville and 10, the speaker brought Supreme Court case law defending the First Amendment, and U.S. law code title 18 section 241 (conspiracy against rights), section 242 (deprivation of rights under color of law), and section 245(b)(2) (federally protected activities). They left these materials with the group. The speaker then discussed ICE, DHS, and “why was it formed,” linking it to a “catalyst event” that “directly caused the Patriot Act,” describing the Patriot Act as “virtually shredded the constitution” and as establishing DHS “as nine eleven.” The speaker claimed “overwhelming and undeniable evidence” that Israel, Jews, and “Israel loyalists” were responsible for 9/11, and said Michael Chertoff, described as an Israeli Talmudic Jew, drafted the Patriot Act. The speaker claimed the Patriot Act was “prepped past a short six weeks after 09/11/2001.” They stated DHS was established in 2003, consolidated 22 federal agencies, and “birthed ICE.” The speaker said Michael Chertoff was the second secretary of DHS, and “founded Chertoff Group LLC,” profiting “hundreds of millions” of tax dollars from TSA “airport surveillance and body scan machines.” The speaker claimed “every single secretary of DHS” was “either a Jew or a Jew loyalist slash Zionist.” The speaker said DHS “worked directly with Jewish refugee NGOs” including “Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society,” the “International Rescue Committee,” and “Refugee International.” The speaker claimed DHS “paid Jewish NGOs directly with US tax dollars to import foreigners from throughout the world.” They said under former secretary Mayorkas, described as a “dual citizen with Israel and a Jew,” DHS imported “over 80,000 refugees after the Afghan withdrawal,” and they also referenced “millions of migrants from elsewhere.” The speaker said “Mayorkas' impeachment was dropped” due to “anti Semitic conspiracy theories known as the Klerge plan,” and they referred to a “177 page UN document titled Replacement Migration.” The speaker stated, “Immigration is the tool of the Zionist occupied government in order to justify the full establishment and implementation of a permanent authoritarian surveillance police state,” and claimed they are “utilizing the Patriot Act and Palantir as a weapon against the American people.” The speaker also claimed that ICE receives training, policies, procedures, and protocols directly from the IDF, and that ICE has “hundreds, if not thousands, of IDF foreign military members operating within the agency.” The speaker stated, “These United States Of America are not only occupied,” and claimed there is “currently a foreign paramilitary domestic terrorist organization operating under the guise of a federal agency on our streets, by definition.” They said, “We are currently in the beginning phases of Bolshevik Revolution two point o.” They quoted the Second Amendment: “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The speaker referred to swearing “a note to support and defend the constitution of The United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” and asked “Did you?” They then said they were “officially dropping this off,” mentioned it might “get me assassinated,” and referred to “the clerk.”

Paul Revere is introduced, and the speaker says there is “no hostility” while presenting “the facts” about Buckeye, Arizona and related law enforcement and technology connections. The speaker claims Buckeye police are sent to the AZ DPS for academy training. They state AZ DPS has a long-standing relationship with JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security of America) and participates in a law enforcement exchange program called LEAP, described as facilitating training between US law enforcement and Israeli security and intelligence. The speaker then claims Buckeye Police swapped technology from Motorola Solutions, Inc. to Axon (for body cams, dash cams, radios, and related equipment). They claim Gregory Brown, chairman and CEO of Motorola Solutions, is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and is heavily invested in Palantir, which they connect to Peter Thiel and Alex Karp. The speaker further claims Motorola maintains an Israeli subsidiary (Motorola Solutions Israel Limited), recruits and employs Israeli intelligence from IDF and intelligence unit 8200, and that Flock cameras are being placed throughout the town and city “under the guise of safety,” including throughout the entire country. They claim Andreessen Horowitz (A16Z) is the lead investor in Flock and also in Skydio drones that Buckeye has had since 2023. The speaker states Andreessen Horowitz recruits Israeli intelligence for early-stage startups, and references that Ben Horowitz’s grandparents were Russian Jews who were dedicated members of the American Communist Party. The speaker then says Buckeye City Council approved a $1.5 million, six-year contract with Brink Drones, founded by Blake Resnick (described as a Peter Thiel Fellowship recipient), and that Brink received those funds to start. The speaker claims Aaron Price Wright invested in Brink, became a partner at Andreessen Horowitz, and spent much of her career at Palantir. The speaker also says City Council approved a $525,000 DHS drone request to receive seven drones from DHS, which the speaker says get their drones from the DoD, and the DoD contracted with Israeli drone company Extend, which the speaker quotes from the Jerusalem Post as specializing in “one way close quarter combat kill drones.” The speaker claims Carbine is an Israeli cybersecurity and cloud-native emergency response startup providing software to police and 911 dispatchers throughout Arizona and the United States. They assert that these companies are tied to Israeli military intelligence, Palantir, and Jeffrey Epstein, and they link this to explosive pagers and allegations involving genocide, 9/11, and COVID bioterrorism. The speaker says they attempted to set up a meeting with Sheriff Jerry Sheridan three times and did not receive a call back, adding that former Sheriff Joe Arpaio told them Sheridan traveled to Israel as a veteran. The speaker references an oath to support and defend the Constitution and says it does not include asking local government representatives or law enforcement for permission. They then state Buckeye has been “officially notified” of guilt of felony crimes under US law code: Title 18, Section 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights), 242 (Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law), 1621 (General Perjury), and 2381 (Treason), and they conclude by saying, “Let’s not do that.” Afterward, the speaker thanks Mr. Rivera and indicates moving to “agenda item three.”

I believe in upholding the Constitution and protecting people's rights. The Declaration of Independence reminds us of our God-given rights, and it's our duty to defend them. I urge you to join other counties in supporting this cause. Regardless of your decision, I will not enforce unconstitutional laws. My priority is to protect the people of this county. I hope you will make the right choice and show that we stand together in defending our liberties. Thank you.

I urge everyone to uphold the Constitution and protect our God-given rights. We must stand against any government overreach and defend our liberties. I will not enforce unconstitutional laws and will protect the people of this county. Let's join other counties in supporting our community and refusing to infringe on their freedoms. Thank you.

The speaker discusses the redress of grievance process, which they claim was destroyed in 1906 when the organized militia disbanded. They mention an incident in Michigan where individuals with guns broke into the state house. The speaker argues that these individuals have the right to do so and that they are rising up to get their grievances addressed. They criticize the media for calling them protesters instead of acknowledging their rights. The speaker also accuses the governor of breaking the law and illegally depriving them and others of their rights. They clarify that they are not protesting but petitioning for a redress of grievances.

The speaker asserts that “we own everything”—our jails, our courts, and our public servants who operate in our buildings and seats, paid with our money. No new structures are needed; instead, a core group in each state should be well versed in state and federal constitutions to exercise inherent rights and hold public servants accountable. The speaker references the grand jury concept and claims state constitutions authorize citizens to hold officials accountable, alter or reform government, abolish it, restore republics, and institute new governments that benefit the people, who are entitled to protect their rights and happiness. The call is for “We The People” to act against treasonous public servants, with the expectation that once some people take a stand, others will follow. The speaker contends that many public servants don’t understand their true job or the constitutional framework, and that overthrowing corruption will cause others to “fall in line.” They acknowledge many people want to do what’s right but fear standing up or being labeled; thus, proactive citizens must act to restore the republic. Citing the Epstein files as a wake-up point, the speaker argues that politics is a rigged, two-party system where Republicans and Democrats are one party, each pandering to different sides, and that voting is an illusion of choice and freedom. They criticize the notion that people vote for bills they don’t understand because they lack constitutional knowledge, trust in people in suits and degrees, and do not recognize the system’s designed nature. The talk expands to a broad indictment of the system, from clerks to top officials with guns and badges, claiming most are in it for power or the illusion of power, though some entered to do good but have also been brainwashed into accepting the system as reality. The speaker argues for a systematic shift from passive participation to action by “We the People,” citing psychological and medical warfare as historical design. They stress that voting has long been rigged and that public attention is diverted by entertainment, such as sports and the NFL, which they describe as rigged for show. The speaker asks listeners to imagine all the people in one stadium uniting to use the law to hold public servants accountable, indicating that many would rather be slaves than join the effort, but others will stand up. Plans include starting to assemble a grand jury and building a network to act quickly to “fix things,” with urgency to remove nonperforming officials from their positions. They exhort readers to remember these are our jails, our buildings, our public servants, and to begin throwing them out if they refuse to do their jobs. The speaker invokes the founders’ spirit, alleging widespread redaction of Epstein-related information and accusing those involved of complicity. The guidance is to stop merely talking, exercise constitutionally protected rights, and rely on “We the People” to restore the republic, arguing that true governance comes from the people.

We promise to stand with the people, fighting for freedom, democracy, and the rule of law. We urge you not to comply with mask mandates, mRNA shots, or curfews. By saying no, you take away their power and feel a sense of freedom. You may even feel justified in telling them to go to hell. Once you've done that, they no longer have power over you. Stand up for yourselves and don't let them grind you down. You are worth it. Thank you.

The Constitution begins with "We the people," emphasizing that the government must protect citizens' rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. If the government fails in this duty, citizens have the right to resist. There is a call to action regarding the protection of children, highlighting the dangers of using them as shields or subjects for testing. When the government targets children, it declares war, and citizens must respond. Local leaders are accountable to the people, and rights not specified in the Constitution are reserved for them. The 14th Amendment ensures due process and equal protection, asserting that any medical intervention without consent is a violation of rights.

They want to take my freedom, but I won't let them take yours. They aim to silence me, but I won't let them silence you. I will stand firm to protect our nation. On November 5, 2024, justice will prevail. Together, we will reclaim our country and restore its greatness. Thank you all, and God bless.

The speaker discusses a recently published Homeland Security Task Force website, hstf.gov, describing it as an onrushing, dystopian plan that involves a multi-agency force at local, state, and federal levels. They emphasize this is not ICE and insist it represents a regime rather than a single agency, likening it to stormtroopers or Hunger Games “peacekeepers” who would operate in every city, county, town, or borough. Key points highlighted include: - The executive order purportedly requires all individuals in the country without documentation to register themselves, including facing self-incriminating questions, with a claim that the government will eliminate documents needed to deport someone and that due process is over. The executive order is said to directly call out and link to other executive orders as part of a broader plan. - The speaker references an executive order described as “strengthening and unleashing America’s law enforcement to pursue criminals and protect innocent citizens,” which supposedly links to others and to the website, presenting a puzzle-like chain of documents and websites. - It is claimed that military assets would be used in ordinary towns, involving training of nonlethal capabilities, with personnel and nonlethal weapons possibly deployed on streets to prevent crime. - The rhetoric asserts that the regime will use this framework to charge state and local officials criminally if they obstruct criminal law, or if they engage in discrimination or civil rights violations under the guise of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives that purportedly restrict law enforcement activities and endanger citizens. - The speaker contends that this program would compel compliance from law enforcement at state and local levels or face criminal charges, and describes the situation as the makings of a civil war or the shredding and burning of the Constitution. - A universal alarm is issued: any American who believes in the Constitution should “rise up in the streets,” and the speaker urges listeners to look at the website themselves, arguing that federal, state, and local law enforcement would work as one. - The overall characterization is that this is a regime, not ICE, and that the actions described resemble Gestapo-like powers, marking the beginning of a restructuring that threatens constitutional rights. The speaker uses strong language to frame the task force as a nationwide, coordinated, militarized effort that would erode due process, expand surveillance and control, and subvert civil liberties, urging immediate public opposition.

The speaker states that many rights could be gone, including those related to unreasonable search and seizure, the 5th amendment, and the 6th amendment right to an attorney. The speaker mentions the first amendment and the second amendment, stating they are in favor of the second amendment and do not believe anyone's guns should be taken away. The speaker claims someone wants to terminate the Constitution of the United States.

We are addressing members of the military and the intelligence community who take risks daily to keep Americans safe. Senator Alyssa Slotkin, Senator Mark Kelly, Representative Chris DeLuzio, Congresswoman Maggie Goodlander, Representative Chrissy Houlihan, Congressman Jason Crow, and others speak directly to you, acknowledging the immense stress and pressure you face. They state that Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk, as this administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens. They remind you that you swore an oath to protect and defend the Constitution. The threats to our constitution aren’t just abroad but also at home. Our laws are clear: you can refuse illegal orders, you must refuse illegal orders, and no one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our constitution. They recognize it is hard and a difficult time to be a public servant, but emphasize that whether you’re serving in the CIA, the Army, the Navy, or the Air Force, your vigilance is critical. They assure you that they have your back. Now, more than ever, the American people need you to stand up for our laws, our constitution, and who we are as Americans. Don’t give up. Don’t give up. Don’t give up. Don’t give up the ship.

We must wake people up to the choice between freedom, democracy, and the rule of law, or enslavement. There is no in-between. As elected representatives, it is our duty to serve the people's best interests. Those who do not stand with the people deserve no place in government. We promise to continue fighting for freedom and against globalitarian misanthropists. We ask the people to refuse mask mandates, mRNA shots, and curfews. By saying no, we take away their power and feel a sense of freedom. Stand up for yourself and tell them to go to hell. Thank you.

The speaker discusses the importance of magistrates and the need to check the federal government to prevent tyranny. They mention that the Declaration of Independence grants citizens the right to revoke the government's power if it fails to protect their rights. The speaker emphasizes the influence of leaders on the country, particularly through the education of children. They also highlight that any rights not specified in the constitution belong to the people. The speaker argues that forcing something into someone's body without consent is akin to rape.

We promise to stand with the people, fighting for freedom, democracy, and the rule of law. We urge you, the people, to resist mask mandates, mRNA shots, and curfews. By saying no, you take away their power and feel a sense of freedom. You may even feel justified in telling them to go to hell. Once you do, they no longer have power over you. Stand up for yourselves and don't let them grind you down. You are worth it. Thank you.

The speaker believes there have been attacks on the Constitution, particularly the First Amendment, with Democrats claiming it enables disinformation. The speaker argues the First Amendment exists because the founders came from countries where free speech was punished. The speaker asserts the Second Amendment is there to stop tyranny and protect freedom of speech. They have debated this, especially with people in LA who want to take away guns. The speaker asks if anyone can guarantee the U.S. will never have a tyrannical government, and since no one can, people need to keep their guns to prevent it.

The speaker reminds viewers of the US Constitution's requirement to protect borders. If the government fails, citizens can defend themselves. Neglecting borders aids foreign invasion, considered treason. The speaker questions why US military members aren't upholding the Constitution, as they have the right to do so. Translation: The speaker emphasizes the importance of protecting borders according to the US Constitution. Citizens can defend themselves if the government fails to do so, which is considered treason. The speaker questions why members of the US military are not fulfilling their duty to uphold the Constitution, as they have the right to do so.

"I'm a constitutionalist." "All I care about is my constitutionally protected rights and the future of my children." "we don't have a gun problem here in this nation. We have a problem with mental health and we have a problem with evil." "It doesn't matter if evil utilizes our gun, a car, a baseball bat, a machete, or a rock." "It's an operation to circumvent your constitutionally protected rights." "America, if you give up your guns, you're not gonna have any rights." "You need to stand up and you need to tell these corrupt career politicians to get fucked."

In the United States, we have hardworking factory workers, farmers, engineers, coal miners, and hunters. Many people in Wisconsin alone are registered deer hunters who wake up early and endure freezing temperatures to hunt. Americans strongly support their second amendment rights to protect their families and homes. If anyone comes to harm us, they will face the fury and rage of a nation that wants to be left alone. Those who mess with the God-fearing people in the Bible Belt will face consequences like those in Biblical times. This nation is tired of being stepped on and lied to. We stand on the foundations of the constitution and are ready to defend it, even if it means sacrificing our lives.

The speaker wants the police to publicly state that the current situation is incorrect and that they will not enforce it. They believe that citizens have the right to bear arms and should not be arrested for it. They mention having seen this happen multiple times before.

The speakers discuss the importance of the constitution and the need to check the power of the federal government. They mention that the government's purpose is to protect citizens' rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. If the government fails to do so, citizens have the right to revolt. They also express concern about the use of children in dangerous situations and the violation of constitutional rights through mandates. The speakers emphasize that any action not specifically mentioned in the constitution should be left to the individuals.