reSee.it - Related Video Feed

All childhood vaccines will soon contain mRNA, making them gene therapies that alter genetics. The vaccines won't require reapproval or go through any additional processes. The focus is on integrating mRNA into every vaccine, which is concerning because it involves tinkering with genes. The speaker urges people to be cautious and not get any vaccines, emphasizing their strong opposition to it. The speaker believes that there is a significant amount of money involved in this shift towards gene therapies.

The speaker expresses caution regarding the long-term side effects of modifying people's DNA and RNA. They state there is a risk associated with directly encoding the ability to produce antibodies into a person's DNA and RNA. The speaker is concerned about potential mutations or other downstream risks.

Every childhood vaccine will be mRNA, becoming gene therapies that alter genetics without re-approval. COVID vaccines were profitable data and experimentation tools, but the real danger is the continued genetic tinkering via mRNA integration into all vaccines. The speaker is now anti-vaxx and will not get any more vaccines for themselves or their family because all vaccines are being redesigned to include gene therapies, driven by profit.

The speaker expresses concern about vaccinating children, as it may have long-term effects on future generations. They mention recent studies showing epigenetic effects of glyphosate, where consuming it can impact future generations. While these studies have been conducted on rats, the speaker believes it can be extrapolated to humans. They emphasize the importance of considering the future and potential unknown effects of mRNA vaccines on future generations. The second speaker agrees, highlighting the lack of knowledge about medium and long-term consequences of injecting substances without sufficient understanding. They argue against mandatory vaccination, stating that while not everyone will die from vaccines, some will suffer adverse effects that are unacceptable. These effects may include unknown side effects and potential generational impacts.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these vaccines. They argue that when the body is instructed to make a piece of foreign non-human protein, every cell that expresses it is seen as an invasion, leading the immune system to attack and potentially harm the body's own cells. The speaker also claims that all four companies producing COVID-19 vaccines intentionally chose the spike protein, which is biologically active and potentially toxic, as a component of their vaccines. They find this choice unusual and believe it to be a deliberate decision.

Speaker 0 asks: "Do you think there's evidence that the changes to people to their genetic structure wrought by these vaccines could be passed on to their children?" Speaker 1 responds: "The McCullough Foundation, of which I am the vice president, we just published a person who had cancer of the bladder, which is a very severe cancer, in that tumor, so in the bladder cells that had become dysplastic, that messenger RNA was found in the cancerous cells of this tumor. So it seems to be integrating. Now the question is, is it integrating in a way that is can be passed on to the offspring, or is it so dysfunctional that it's killing the host before it can be passed on? And and I don't know that we yet know that, but remember, the science is the topography of ignorance. I mean, there's a lot about this that is is very, very concerning. There's also a study that this messenger RNA seems to have transcribed into liver cells."

The speaker argues that genetic vaccines are totally unacceptable and defines the introduction of transgenes into the human body as gene therapy, questioning how this can be considered acceptable practice for creating vaccines. They assert that encapsulating messenger RNA in nanoparticles and administering it leads to off-target effects, with the effects starting from the ovaries to the brain, liver, spleen, and bone marrow. They emphasize that the biggest problem is going to the bone marrow and the reproductive organs like the ovaries, and then every possible organ. Regarding spike proteins, the speaker states that spike proteins are still detected in the rash after more than a year, which they interpret as evidence that messenger RNA is producing spike proteins. They contend that there is no way for a year-old spike protein to remain in the rash and be detected. Personal choices are also mentioned: they did not choose to get vaccinated because they think it was a foolish decision from the beginning. They have not even opted for the flu shot because they consider it an unwise choice.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these vaccines. They argue that when the body is instructed to make a piece of foreign non-human protein, every cell that expresses it is seen as an invasion, leading the immune system to attack and potentially harm the body's own cells. The speaker also points out that all four companies producing COVID-19 vaccines chose the same part of the virus, the spike protein, which they believe is biologically active and potentially toxic. They suggest that this choice was intentional and not a coincidence.

All childhood vaccines will soon be mRNA-based gene therapies, without requiring reapproval. This means that getting any type of vaccine will alter a person's genetics. The focus is now on integrating mRNA into all vaccines, which raises concerns about tinkering with genes. The speaker strongly opposes vaccines and vows not to get any more, emphasizing the financial interests involved in this shift.

The speaker warns parents about the mRNA vaccine technology, presenting three key points. 1) Viral gene and spike proteins: The speaker claims that a viral gene will be injected into children’s cells, and this gene forces the body to produce toxic spike proteins. These proteins, according to the speaker, can cause permanent damage in critical areas such as the brain and nervous system, the heart and blood vessels (including blood clots), and the reproductive system. The speaker asserts that the vaccine can trigger fundamental changes to the immune system. 2) Irreparable damage: The speaker emphasizes that the damages, once they occur, are irreparable. Specific examples given include lesions in the brain, heart tissue scarring, and a genetically reset immune system. The speaker also mentions potential reproductive damage that could affect future generations of the family. 3) Adequate testing of novel technology: The speaker states that the vaccine uses novel technology and has not been adequately tested. The statement begins to say, “We typically need at least,” but the transcript ends before completing that thought.

Vaccines have a place, but the population has been scared into accepting them. It's frustrating that vaccines are being promoted as gene therapy to children who are not at risk. It's ethically questionable to recommend something dangerous to a certain group to protect the elderly. Personally, as a 70-year-old, I don't want young people getting vaccinated for my sake. If something happened to them, I would feel guilty.

The speaker discusses signals of transgenerational harm, clarifying they are not referring to transgender issues but harms that span generations. They cite CDC data to support a claim that, beginning right after mass vaccination of childbearing-age women in early 2021, there is a statistically significant inflection point in infant mortality. They state that infant mortality rates had been steadily decreasing for thirty years, but in 2021, after mass vaccination, the rate “shoots right up,” and it “hasn't gone down since.” As of 2025, they assert, babies are dying at seventy-seven percent excess, with Mississippi reportedly declaring a state of emergency over the situation. The speaker further claims that mothers are not taking the shots anymore. They suggest that some of the genetic material from the vaccination appears to integrate into the body and may be passed on, describing it as a legacy effect. They emphasize that most people took the shots in 2021, and express concern that there could be effects through the generations as a result.

The speaker expresses caution regarding the long-term side effects of modifying people's DNA and RNA. They state there are unknown risks associated with directly encoding the ability to produce antibodies into a person's DNA and RNA. The speaker is concerned about the potential for mutations or other downstream risks.

The speaker expresses fear and hesitation about vaccinating their baby due to concerns they have read about the potential long-term effects of introducing foreign microorganisms into their child's bloodstream. They mention various possible consequences, ranging from allergies and asthma to more serious conditions like cancer and sudden infant death syndrome. The speaker questions why children are getting these diseases and emphasizes the need to think twice before vaccinating. The conversation briefly touches on the biochemical legacy of vaccination and the importance of considering the potential effects.

Parents, before you consider vaccinating your child, it's important to understand the facts. This genetic vaccine injects a viral gene into your child's cells, causing their body to produce harmful spike proteins. These proteins can lead to permanent damage in critical organs like the brain, nervous system, heart, blood vessels, and reproductive system. Unfortunately, these damages are irreversible. Additionally, this vaccine's long-term effects are unknown, making it a risky experiment. Contrary to what you may be told, your children are not a threat to their grandparents. In fact, their immunity after recovering from COVID is crucial in protecting your family and the world. Overall, there is no benefit to vaccinating your children against the small risks of the virus, considering the potential lifelong health risks of the vaccine.

The speaker describes a severe post-vaccination experience, saying the vaccine “took my immune system and just shook it around again,” and noting that “that’s still going on.” They reference reading evidence about adverse reactions, including “damage to the immune system,” and acknowledge they were not made aware of these risks beforehand. They recount losing the use of their hands for about three weeks and realizing they were “in real trouble.” The speaker was invited by Robin Monarchy to discuss the experience, and by that time they realized they “weren’t the only one that was suffering.” They contrast this personal ordeal with a sense of media over-saturation, saying they have “stopped watching TV.” They share a cartoon memory of a guy interviewing two Quakers who ask, “How come none of your community has got COVID?” and the Quakers respond, “Well, we don’t watch TV,” remarking, “It’s so true, man,” and noting that “so much of the sickness is in our heads now.” They describe feeling trapped between trusting what “your heart tells you is right” and what appears to be the prevailing narrative, and they emphasize the difficulty of communicating their feelings to family. The speaker mentions taking a risk by speaking out, noting they were “pleased to see that it went around without too much of flack,” but they did experience some backlash, particularly from people they least wanted to upset. A central concern expressed is fear about what vaccination could do to their children, describing it as perhaps “the biggest part of the reason” for speaking out and talking to their daughters about the possibility that they “may not be able to have kids.” They acknowledge that at that point in life, their daughters “don’t probably care,” implying a tension between present concerns and future implications. The speaker concludes with that vaccination remains a source of personal risk and disclosure within their family discussions.

The speaker raises concerns about the contamination of current vaccines with DNA and the unknown consequences of this contamination. They argue that efforts should be made to eliminate DNA contamination, even if it means higher production costs. The speaker mentions a researcher from MIT who discovered that mRNA vaccines were contaminated with DNA, despite DNA not being listed as a component. They criticize the authorities for testing vaccines without DNA contamination on a small group of people, but then vaccinating billions of people with contaminated vaccines. The speaker highlights the potential risks of DNA contamination, including the possibility of cancer. They conclude by stating that vaccines from the second process should undergo more rigorous studies before being commercialized.

Alisa did not vaccinate her child because she is scared of both vaccinating and not vaccinating. She read warnings about introducing alien microorganisms into children's blood, citing potential long-term effects ranging from allergies and asthma to cancer, leukemia, multiple sclerosis, and sudden infant death syndrome. She felt it was wrong to vaccinate and believes people should think twice. One speaker questions the biochemical legacy of vaccinations and how long the effects last. Another speaker states that putting something into a baby's bloodstream requires careful consideration. They claim information about vaccines isn't really known or researched, and cite the original birth control pill as an example of something once considered safe that later proved detrimental to health.

Speaker 0: The entire human genome has been poisoned with a gene that has never been in the human genome ever in history. Reverse transcriptase doesn't only cause cancer. If something is reverse transcribed and alters the DNA of a sperm or an egg, that DNA change, if that sperm or egg survives and turns into a human being, lasts forever. Speaker 1: This is the magnitude of evil we are dealing with. We are dealing with people who have the money, the power to pollute the entire human genome. I think because of this, we're gonna lose about a billion children. So any mother any mother to be, even if she is not pregnant yet, if she gets an mRNA vaccine, those mRNAs are gonna go to the ovaries. There's DNA that stays silent, that is never transcribed into proteins until the next generation. And it'll only show up when that adult tries to have another child. Five billion people have been injected so far on this planet. Half of them are women. Two and a half billion. Half of them will be women who are young enough to have children. There are one point two five billion carriers of mutations in the egg cell line of their bodies. One point two five million women who are capable of giving birth to children who carry something that has never been seen before in the human species, in the entire human genome.

Speaker 0 cautions about the long-term side effects of directly modifying a person’s DNA and RNA to encode antibodies. They raise concerns that such genetic or molecular modifications could lead to unforeseen consequences over time, including potential mutations or other risks that might arise downstream as a result of encoding these antibodies.

The speaker discusses the presence of DNA in the Pfizer vaccine and expresses concern about its potential consequences. They explain that they sequenced the DNA in the vaccine and found it surprising that any DNA was present. The speaker suggests that this DNA could be causing rare but serious side effects, such as death from cardiac arrest. They also mention that the DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, potentially leading to genome modification, autoimmune attacks, or even future cancer. The speaker acknowledges that these concerns are theoretical but believes they warrant further investigation.

We are facing a significant threat from those who have the means to contaminate the entire human genome. The mRNA vaccines could potentially affect future generations, as the injected genetic material may remain dormant until the next generation tries to have children. With billions of people already vaccinated, including millions of women capable of giving birth, there is a concern that these vaccines could introduce never-before-seen mutations into the human species. The true impact will only be known when problems arise in the offspring and subsequent generations. This is the enormity of the problem we are confronting.

The speaker discusses concerns about the negative effects of vaccines on children, citing a study that linked paralysis in Indian children to a polio vaccine. They criticize the Gates Foundation for pushing vaccines without medical expertise, leading to harm in vulnerable nations.

Speaker 1 expresses concern about the presence of SV40 sequences in vaccines, suggesting it is not accidental and could lead to cancer due to insertional mutagenesis. They argue that gene therapies were delayed due to the risk of cancer from insertional mutagenesis. The speaker believes that alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are safe and questions why the FDA redacted data on endotoxin levels for 75 years. They emphasize the unusual nature of the current situation and urge the protection of citizens by not administering experimental products to pregnant women and babies. The speaker pleads for one state to take a stand and set an example for others. No questions are asked.

The speakers believe mRNA vaccines were released prematurely, especially for a mutating virus, and should not have been mandated, particularly for children. They argue that vaccinating against a virus with spike mutations is ineffective, as the vaccine (ABC) won't match the virus (FGH). They claim the vaccine kills bifidobacteria, weakening the immune system and leading to repeated COVID infections. They suggest that treatments and vitamins are preferable. The speakers warn about "designer bugs," created by mixing microbes through CRISPR technology, which can be patented, leading to a cycle of new viruses and vaccines. They suggest this approach could extend to every virus, requiring constant vaccination and further weakening immunity, making people susceptible to various viruses. They believe the ultimate goal is to control the population through fear and mandatory vaccinations, potentially leading to a future where people live in protective bubbles.