reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 describes capabilities to disrupt an individual from the cellular level to the system level, targeting a specific individual with little attribution or trace, and leaving prior to attribution. The aim includes disrupting individuals and the social fabric, up to influencing through various levels. Speaker 1 claims that targeting demonstrators can make them suicidally depressed, so they no longer demonstrate, with one pulse frequency causing people to be too upset to act, preferring sleep or bed. He says we are in a new cold war and that countries are developing this technology, with microwave transmitters going up everywhere because someone could use them for other effects; the system is up and running. Speaker 2 notes MIT was awarded around 2005-2006 a half a million dollars for acoustic heterodyning, enabling sending a signal from two points into an individual so they literally hear a voice in their head that nobody around them hears. Speaker 1 adds that stimulating the cochlea with a resonant frequency is easy, and voices can be heard physically, not imagined, with any conversation and for any person; it can be a soft angelic voice, a god, or something that scares you like a devil. Speaker 2 states that DARPA led contracts in 2011-2012 to the University of California for electronic telepathy, monitoring brain activity at a distance to determine thoughts, and developing complex signals to send into another’s brain to transmit a message; the technology described is where the field stands today. Speaker 0 emphasizes the brain as the twenty-first century battlespace, with neurocognitive science weaponized in military, personal, and professional lives; the weaponization is valid, valuable, and already an operational play; the brain is the current and future battle space. New aspects include in-close use, targeting individuals with possible direct attribution or covert engagement with non-attribution, and a formal definition of a weapon involving directed energy affecting physiology peripherally and brain health, with embassy incidents in Havana and possibly China cited. Transcranial neuromodulation is discussed as a method to modulate brain networks and implant brain-machine interfaces, including DARPA’s N3 program (non-invasive neurosurgical neuromodulation) led by Doctor Al Mundy, aiming to place minimal electrodes to read and write into real-time brain function remotely, affecting attitudes, beliefs, thoughts, emotions, and activities. Speaker 1 explains an infrared device linked to a pencil-thin microwave source to target a specific gland or brain region, eye, or heart to cause targeted suffering. Speaker 3 states intelligence communities are gaining too much influence over governments, moving toward a Stasi-like state, warning that agencies threaten fundamental human rights and calling for verification and oversight to keep agencies in line, implying that governments will experiment on individuals if pursued. Speaker 1 asserts that over the last forty years, governments have lied to protect industry and profits, and that the industry and supporting government parts will cause more civilian deaths and suffering than all terrorist groups, possibly more than World War II, with a claim that this is genocide and that those responsible are untouchable and outside the law, tied to IGNAP, WHO, and national health agencies as the same people. Speaker 3 expresses disappointment in the American public for not being more irritated, contrasting with Germans who remember totalitarian history (Stasi, Gestapo, SS), noting sensitivity in Germany. Dr. John Hall is mentioned in this context. Speaker 4 references a memorandum from the president about whether current legislation protects individuals and whether ongoing experimentation exists, noting loopholes in informed consent; horror experiments like Willowbrook, MK Ultra cited, funded by DoD and intelligence agencies, questioning IRB oversight and informed consent; a rise in complaints about electromagnetic weapons, including microwave auditory effects, silent sound spectrum, EEG cloning, remote lab-to-home transmission; testimony that 1,500 victims report identical electromagnetic exposure complaints. Speaker 5 introduces Katherine Nestor from Pennsylvania, who recounts non-consensual testing, COINTELPRO-like stalking, remote neural monitoring, and electromagnetic torture causing psychological and physical damage; she urges immediate action and congressional hearings, referencing Dr. Amy Gutmann and new work for the Commission for Human Subject Protection. Speaker 3 introduces Connie Marshall from Louisville, Kentucky, a formal mayoral candidate and eight-year victim of directed energy assaults, listing symptoms: body overheating/cold, seizures, heart pain, earaches, itching behind eyes, swelling, involuntary movements, exhaustion, rapid heart rate, hair loss, mind paralysis, hypnotic states, drone/satellite tracking, controlled dreams, sleep deprivation, voice-to-skull, extreme muscle spasms/cramps, eye pupil circles, continuous monitoring, destruction of devices, and being watched 24/7.

- Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the possibility that a friend was murdered and suggest that both victims died suddenly from fast-moving cancer, a method they say the agency uses overseas to eliminate people. Speaker 1 admits he cannot prove this but notes the sudden deaths. - The conversation asserts that the US government has technology to infect people with fast-moving cancer and to perform cognitive and directed-energy warfare. Speaker 0 states the government has the technology to infect with fast-moving cancer and to do so absolutely. - In 1997, Speaker 1 describes a hearing on asymmetric threats where he chaired the research committee and focused on four threats: drones, cyberattacks, electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and cognitive warfare. He asserts that cognitive warfare is now being labeled by some as Havana syndrome and that directed-energy weapons are the underlying technology. - Speaker 2 recounts a recent homeland security hearing about foreign adversaries using direct weapons against US citizens, enabling incapacitation. He emphasizes the chilling nature of the briefing and criticizes current domestic leadership as foolish, corrupt, incompetent, and wicked. - Speaker 3 notes that up to 40% of the Air Force equipment budget in the 1990s was classified, making much of it “black.” He emphasizes that military and security research often precedes civilian medical science, and that servicemen were used in experiments without fully informed consent, referencing NK Ultra-era disclosures of thousands of service members used as subjects. - Speaker 4 discusses MKUltra, describing a Canadian experiment involving psychic driving with massive LSD doses, eye-tracking, and memory loss, funded by MKUltra and affecting civilians. He mentions Project Midnight Climax, where Johns were observed in brothels while subjected to LSD, and notes similar experiments by the British Royal Air Force and Army. The results of Midnight Climax are unknown, with no published after-action reports. - Speaker 3 adds that Secretary of Energy O’Leary stated under Clinton that over a half a million Americans had been used in human experiments over four decades without informed consent, including mind control, with no accountability. He argues that mind-control technology has advanced, and questions who should govern its use, given the lack of legal frameworks. - The discussion covers mind-effects research and the lack of treaties governing such technologies. They reference a European Parliament security and disarmament resolution (1999) addressing mind-effects and mind-control technology, and Russian Duma resolutions (2002) seeking similar safeguards. Zabigniew Brzezinski’s Between Two Ages is cited regarding electronically stroking the ionosphere to influence behavior over geographic areas, connecting it to HARP and other electromagnetic carriers capable of mass or individual influence. - Speaker 6 explains historical demonstrations of electronic mind control, starting with Jose Delgado’s remote manipulation of a charging bull using radio energy and electrodes, and notes later work showing noninvasive techniques to influence behavior using low-power magnetic fields. Speaker 7 reiterates Delgado’s animal studies and the potential for noninvasive methods to affect emotions and memory, with broader implications for humans. - Speaker 3 discusses the progression of research funded by DARPA and others toward higher-resolution control of brain activity, enabling controlled effects that override senses and create synthetic memories, raising questions about future justice and evidence. They describe European Parliament and NATO/US military interest in mind-control technologies and the absence of robust legal protections. - Speaker 9 presents advances in AI-enabled brain-reading and memory-altering devices, including mind-reading and emotion decoding, while Speaker 10 and Speaker 12 discuss privacy concerns, brain-data privacy laws (Colorado’s law adding brain data to privacy protections), and the availability of consumer devices that decode brainwaves. They warn that brain data can be misused by insurers, law enforcement, advertisers, and governments, with private companies often sharing data without clear disclosure. - The segment concludes with a note that devices can infer attention and thoughts, and that DARPA’s N3D program aims for noninvasive neuromodulation with implantable electrodes read/write capabilities. It references 1980s–1990s discussions of RF energy as a potential nonlethal mind-control technology, and a 1993 Johns Hopkins conference listing low-frequency weapons as attractive options.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and that thousands of innocent hemophiliacs have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly show that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and that thousands of innocent hemophiliacs have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly prove that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry it regulates.

The speakers discuss the dangers of pharmaceutical companies and the suppression of alternative treatments like ivermectin. They mention the spike protein's impact on DNA, the Tuskegee Experiment, and the public's blind trust in government and corporations. The conversation highlights the manipulation and deception prevalent in the healthcare industry throughout history.

This discussion centers on a significant scandal in science and history, specifically criticizing the actions of certain individuals within the National Institutes of Health. The focus is on figures like Gallo, Fauci, Hazeltine, and Essex, who are accused of serious wrongdoing, including genocide. There is a strong condemnation of their practices, particularly regarding a drug produced by Burroughs Welcome, which is alleged to be harmful. The speaker expresses a desire for legal confrontation with these individuals and organizations to address these accusations.

The speaker reflects on their past warnings about the weaponization of nature and the dire consequences it has had on humanity. They express gratitude for the opportunity to have a public conversation about this issue. They discuss the history of coronavirus, including its isolation in 1965 and subsequent modifications and experiments. They highlight the unethical actions of organizations like the CDC and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, who patented and manipulated the virus. They emphasize the need to end gain of function research and corporate influence in science. The speaker concludes by calling for accountability and a halt to the weaponization of nature.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and thousands of innocent people, including hemophiliacs and their family members, have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly prove that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to regulate.

The speaker claims that the AIDS virus was experimented with at Fort Detrick before it became known to the public. They suggest that the virus was deliberately created and spread through a vaccination campaign in Africa and Brazil, targeting black populations. The speaker warns black people in the United States not to trust the government or the Democrat Party, as they believe these entities see them as expendable.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and that thousands of innocent hemophiliacs have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly show that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and thousands of innocent people, including hemophiliacs and their family members, have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly prove that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to regulate.

Speaker 0 describes the ability to disrupt an individual from the level of their cell to their system, and to disrupt individuals on a variety of levels from individuals up to the social fabric; to target a specific individual, change or eliminate that individual with very little attribution and trace, and leave prior to attribution. Speaker 1 explains that targeting demonstrators could make them suicidally depressed, so they are too upset to demonstrate; with one pulse frequency, people could become so suicidal they won’t act as demonstrators, preferring sleep or bed. They argue we are in a new cold war, with countries developing this technology and microwave transmitters going up everywhere because someone could use them for other effects; the system is up and running. Speaker 2 notes MIT awarded to Woody Norris in 2005 or 2006 half a million dollars for acoustic heterodyning—sending a signal from two points into an individual so they literally hear a voice in their head that nobody around them hears. Speaker 1 adds that the easiest ones involve stimulating the cochlea with a resonant frequency; voices are easy, and people physically hear them, not just imagine them. It can be any conversation and any voice, from a soft angelic voice to a god, a devil, or anything that scares you. Speaker 2 states DARPA led contracts in 2011–2012 to the University of California for electronic telepathy—monitoring brain activity at a distance to determine what someone is thinking, and developing complex signals to be sent into another brain to transmit a message; this represents the current technology. Speaker 0 asserts the brain is and will be the twenty-first-century battlescape, with neurocognitive science weaponized in military, personal, and professional life; the brain is the current and future battle space. The new aspect is in-close, with targeting at levels allowing direct attribution or covert engagement; a formal definition of a weapon includes directed energy to affect physiology peripherally and brain health, citing US embassy personnel in Havana and possibly in China. They mention transcranial neuromodulation and implanting brain-machine interfaces as part of DARPA programs, notably the N3 program (non-invasive neurosurgical neuromodulation) by Doctor Al Mundy, aiming to place minimal electrodes to read and write brain function in real time, remotely, influencing attitudes, beliefs, thoughts, emotions, and activities. Speaker 1 adds a method for causing a specific psychiatric illness using an infrared device paired with a pencil-thin microwave source to target a specific gland, part of the brain, eye, or heart. Speaker 3 emphasizes that intelligence agencies are gaining too much influence over governments, moving toward a Stasi-like state, threatening fundamental human rights; there must be verification and mechanisms to keep agencies in line, by law and technical means. Speaker 1 contends that if governments want to experiment on people by the thousands, they will; they could diagnose insanity through covert experiments, and low-level microwaves are linked to cancers and ill effects; this began in the 1950s and continues. Speaker 3 expresses frustration at not reaching government members to disclose what they’re doing, noting a shift away from human rights toward money, control, and power. Speaker 1 states that over the last forty years, governments have lied to protect industry and profits, and that the industry and the government segment promoting it will cause more civilian deaths and suffering than all terrorist groups; they claim this could be genocide, sanctioned by major health and research institutions, with a small circle of powerful individuals. Speaker 3 conveys disappointment in the American public for not being more irritated; contrasts with Germans, who remember Stasi and Gestapo; Doctor John Hall is cited. Speaker 4 references a memorandum from the president about protecting individuals and ongoing experimentation; notes loopholes in informed consent, referencing Willowbrook, MKUltra, and radiation experiments conducted without informed consent; mentions DoD and intelligence funding and the challenge of IRBs, with alarming complaints of electromagnetic weapons. Speaker 5 introduces Katherine Nestor from Pennsylvania, stating the commission has discussed abuse of human research subjects, mentioning co intel pro-like stalking, remote neural monitoring, and electromagnetic torture causing psychological and physical damage; she asks for today’s dramatic response and a congressional hearing, urging not to wait seventy years to investigate. Speaker 3 thanks the audience. Speaker 4 (Connie Marshall) identifies as a former Louisville mayoral candidate and an eight-year victim of directed energy weapon assaults, describing body overheating and extreme cold, seizures, heart pain, earaches, eye burning, swelling, involuntary movements, exhaustion, seizures, hair loss, mind paralysis, dream manipulation or trance-like states, drone or satellite tracking, sleep deprivation, voice-to-skull, blue eye circles, constant monitoring, destruction of electrical devices, and 24-hour observation and monitoring despite no criminal history.

The speaker discusses the origins of the AIDS virus, linking it to experiments at Fort Detrick and a vaccination campaign by the World Health Organization in Africa and Brazil. They claim the virus was deliberately created and spread to target black populations. The speaker warns against trusting the government or the Democrat Party, stating that black people are seen as expendable.

The speaker admits to using orphans and mentally handicapped individuals to study experimental vaccines in the 1960s, stating that it was a common practice at the time. They also acknowledge writing a letter expressing the belief that experiments should be performed on those less likely to contribute to society, such as children with disabilities. The speaker confirms using babies of mothers in prison and individuals under colonial rule in the Belgian Congo for vaccine studies, involving almost a million people. They mention changing their views since then.

J. Marion Sims performed surgeries on enslaved black women without anesthesia. The Tuskegee experiment withheld penicillin from black men with syphilis. Puerto Rican women were given experimental birth control pills, resulting in seizures and hemorrhages. At Edgewood Arsenal, over 60,000 troops were exposed to nerve gas and LSD. The Navy sprayed San Francisco with bacteria linked to pneumonia. The Pentagon released weaponized mosquitoes in Florida. Soldiers were infected with biological agents in Operation White Coat. Millions were injected with the SV40 virus. Military planes sprayed mock bioweapons on civilian cities. Pregnant women at Vanderbilt drank radioactive iron. Orphans were fed radioactive milk. MK Ultra used extreme electroshock and sensory deprivation. Lyme disease mutations were researched at Fort Detrick. Vaccines are claimed to have catastrophic fertility side effects, micro clots, graphene, and prion contamination. The US funded gain of function research in Wuhan. Anthony Fauci funneled millions into weaponizing viruses. Government agencies are accused of experimenting, burning records, and denying the truth.

In this video, the speaker discusses the history of the U.S. bioweapons program and its connection to the CIA. They explain how the CIA brought German and Japanese scientists to the U.S. after World War II and conducted unethical experiments on the American public. They also mention how President Nixon shut down the bioweapons program in 1969, but the CIA secretly continued their research. The speaker then goes on to discuss the role of Tony Fauci and the CIA in funding gain-of-function studies and the development of bioweapons. They conclude by urging people to resist government overreach and fight for their freedoms.

Informed consent was often withheld in government-sponsored experiments conducted at hospitals, universities, and military bases in the US. Thousands of experiments aimed to understand the effects of radiation exposure on the human body, but they failed to uphold our national values and humanity. For instance, scientists injected plutonium into 18 patients without their knowledge, and doctors exposed indigent cancer patients to excessive radiation doses, offering no potential benefits. These experiments targeted the most vulnerable citizens, including the destitute and gravely ill, as well as members of the military.

This is a human experiment in violation of the Nuremberg Code. The speaker points out that people have not been informed about this experiment. They compare it to a previous failed vaccine experiment called Pandemrix, which had far fewer side effects. The speaker questions how many more people need to die or get injured before action is taken. They urge the audience to save the nation and accuse those who mislead citizens about the safety of the vaccines of being involved in crimes, possibly even genocide. The speaker emphasizes that a crime becomes intentional when it is committed.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and that thousands of innocent hemophiliacs have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly show that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and thousands of innocent people, including hemophiliacs and their family members, have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly prove that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to regulate.

The US government funded experiments with the AIDS virus at Fort Detrick. The World Health Organization's vaccination campaign in Africa and Brazil led to the spread of AIDS. The virus was crafted from animal viruses, causing many deaths. The speaker warns black people in the US not to trust the government or the Democrat Party.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and thousands of innocent people, including hemophiliacs and their family members, have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly show that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to regulate.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and thousands of innocent people, including hemophiliacs and their family members, have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly prove that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to regulate.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and thousands of innocent people, including hemophiliacs and their family members, have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly prove that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to regulate.

The speaker accuses a company of knowingly selling a product infected with AIDS to other countries after it was taken off the market in the US. They claim that the US government allowed this to happen and thousands of innocent people, including hemophiliacs and their family members, have died as a result. Internal documents allegedly prove that the company was aware of the contamination. The government is criticized for not taking action against the company and for being involved in a cover-up. The speaker also highlights the conflict of interest within the FDA, stating that a significant portion of its budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to regulate.