reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims the Zionists in London cabled Justice Brandeis to influence President Wilson to get the U.S. into World War I, despite the U.S. having no reason to be involved. The speaker asserts the U.S. was "railroaded" into the war so Zionists could obtain Palestine, a fact allegedly hidden from the American people. After the U.S. entered the war, Zionists allegedly sought written confirmation from Great Britain regarding Palestine, resulting in the Balfour Declaration. The speaker characterizes the Balfour Declaration as a "receipt" and a promise to pay the Zionists for getting the U.S. into the war, labeling it as "phony as a $3 bill." The speaker concludes that this is where all the trouble started.

The speaker claims Winston Churchill's mother was Jewish and that Churchill was financed by a secret group called The Focus, primarily composed of Jewish industrialists and bankers, from 1936 onward. This group allegedly influenced Churchill to adopt an anti-Nazi stance, leading to his rise to Prime Minister and Britain's involvement in a war that was not in its best interest. The speaker suggests Britain should have allowed Poland and the Jews to resolve their issues with Germany independently. He cites a letter from Chaim Weizmann to Churchill in 1941, stating that Zionist support for the British cause and their ability to bring the United States into the war were contingent on the creation of a Jewish army in the Middle East. The speaker asserts that Churchill became a "gentile frontman" for Jewish interests, naming Robert Monde, Robert Valley Cohen, and Berna Baruch as examples. He also claims Neville Chamberlain believed American and world Jews forced England into the war. The speaker quotes the Jewish magazine Sentinel of Chicago as stating that the war was brought about by Jews. Churchill allegedly rejected peace offers from Germany, even when Britain was isolated, as confirmed in a letter to Stalin.

Speaker 1 argues that the United States lacks full sovereignty because an intentional “supranational architecture” created in the last 10 years surrounding World War II remains in place above the nation. They claim this architecture “came into play before world war ii ever ended,” and say their belief—supported by “real documents” they include in a book—is that World War III and much of what is happening now was planned before the end of World War II. Speaker 1 traces this to the Dulles brothers—“three americans,” including “two wall street lawyer brothers from Sullivan and Cromwell, known as the Dulles brothers,” and another Wall Street lawyer, McKittrick, who ran the Bank of International Settlements during World War II. They further claim that architects from the EU (Europe, including Germany), the city of London, and multiple banking institutions helped create a supranational architecture and supranational intelligence agency architecture that has “worked for it ever since,” with the people of the United States “pay[ing] for it all since World War II.” They also say that “these 18 months near the end of World War II ended the sovereignty of the United States of America,” and that the country is still “stuck in that today.” Speaker 0 expands the claim to other countries, saying the end of World War II also ended Japan’s sovereignty, that Japan has been occupied “even to this day,” and that the U.S. dictates terms including that Japan must “buy U.S. treasuries” and “float the dollar no matter what happens to your economy.” Speaker 0 also cites Taiwan as another example and asks how these impacts extend to the rest of the world. Speaker 1 answers by stating “Switzerland was not neutral,” and says that World War I “seems to me to have been a false flag.” They reference Smedley Butler’s post–World War I warning that “all wars are banker's wars” from the book *War is a Racket*, and claim that endless war for profit became an “operating manual” for a “supranational architecture” they call an “international banking cartel” and its global public-private partners. Speaker 1 links this to the creation of the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), describing it as set up for reparations after World War I, but claiming that BIS “refunded Hitler's army.” They say the Dulles brothers, particularly John Foster Dulles, worked for international banks and represented relationships between Nazi Germany and the United States, including Standard Oil of New Jersey and IG Farben, and helped rebuild Germany’s military after World War I to allow for World War II. Speaker 1 further claims that BIS served as a meeting point during World War II among “Nazi bankers” and “American bankers,” including the city of London and German bankers, while a continent was “pillaged” and “60 million people” were affected. They say Switzerland conducted “business as usual,” taking in money from the Nazis that was taken from Czechoslovakia and elsewhere into BIS. They also claim that Alan Dulles ran the OSS out of Switzerland “hand-in-hand with the Nazi bankers and the Nazi intelligence people” and that the “Bank of England” created the post–World War II international financial architecture that “fed off of the same families” associated with the Federal Reserve under Wilson.

The speaker argues that he used his “personality” to prevent starting wars, and claims he was the first president in decades who “started no new wars.” He repeatedly emphasizes that under him the U.S. had “peace” and “prosperity,” and that they “never got into a war” while he was president. He says there was no need for wars involving “foreign lands” and countries “you’ve never heard of,” claiming those countries “don’t even want us there.” He states, “We will expel the war mongers from our government,” and contrasts his record with critics who predicted he would “start a war.” He references the deaths from “horrible wars” in the Middle East and claims opponents support war, saying “They love wars” and “like a war… love killing people.” He declares he is “the only president” who did not start a war and argues that Donald Trump would also keep the country out of war: “We had no wars with Donald Trump as your president.” The speaker also mentions Hillary Clinton’s claim that Trump’s rhetoric would get the U.S. into a war, responding that his own “rhetoric’s gonna keep us out of wars,” and asserting that this is what happened.

Before 1914, Germany and Russia prevented Jewish world mastery because they weren't fully under Jewish control, unlike Western democracies. Germans and Russians had scorn for Jews, posing a threat of a leader like Frederick the Great. To counter this, the speaker claims the Jews pushed to overthrow monarchies, disguising it as a call for a sovereign people. The speaker alleges that Germany's guilt in WWI was failing to organize a strong enough defense to deter attacks or ensure victory. The speaker claims that in 1912, the Reichstag's refusal to raise three army corps, influenced by "democratic Marxist Jews," led to Germany's defeat. The speaker asserts that these same individuals disarmed Germany while inciting other nations to arm themselves. The speaker calls for recognition of the war's causes, labeling those responsible as "November criminals" who betrayed Germany. The speaker advocates for their execution. The speaker concludes by stating that honoring the sacrifices of those lost in the war requires building a new Germany.

I believe that without the Jewish international press and propaganda incitement, peace among nations would be quickly achieved. Attempts to provoke war and tarnish our relationship with the United States are fueled by political and financial interests. If another world war were to occur, it would result in the destruction of the Jewish race in Europe. This is not just a struggle for German freedom and security, but a battle for the future of Europe and the entire civilized Western world. Translation: The speaker discusses the impact of Jewish international press and propaganda on peace efforts, as well as the potential consequences of another world war on the Jewish race in Europe. The conflict is portrayed as not just a German struggle, but a battle for the future of Europe and the civilized Western world.

In his farewell address, the speaker warns about the dangers of the military industrial complex, a vast armaments industry that has significant influence in economic, political, and spiritual aspects of society. He emphasizes the need to guard against unwarranted influence and the potential rise of misplaced power. This warning is considered one of the most profound statements made by an American president. The speaker's message is similar to George Washington's warning against foreign entanglements. He urges the protection of our liberties and democratic values from the weight of this combination.

Throughout history, a group has aimed to control others by destroying religions and governments, while keeping people in perpetual debt and believing they are happy. This group is succeeding because people are unaware of their tactics. To fight back, we must understand our enemy and their weapons. If we don't, we will continue to lose the war. Our country was founded by dangerous men, and if we lose that spirit, we will lose our country. Without exposing people to different viewpoints, a civil war is imminent. We are a vassal state of the United Nations, as confirmed by a Supreme Court judge. It's time to wake up and realize the truth.

The speaker asserts that secrecy is repugnant in a free society, and the dangers of unwarranted concealment outweigh those cited to justify it. They state that increased security should not expand to official censorship, and no official should use these words to censor news, stifle dissent, or cover up mistakes. The speaker asks every publisher, editor, and newsman to reexamine their standards and recognize the country's peril. Although no war has been declared, the speaker claims the nation's way of life is under attack, and the danger has never been more clear or imminent. The speaker calls for a change in outlook and tactics by the government, people, and the press, because the nation is opposed by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means, infiltration, subversion, and intimidation. This system combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations, and conducts the Cold War with a wartime discipline.

In the 1930s, Hitler was given power by the wealthy, powerful, and complacent elite who thought they could control him. They believed his extreme views were just for show. However, like other dictators, Hitler brought death and despair. Millions of Germans thought it couldn't happen there. In 1933, Germany was wrong. The speaker questions if the same mistake will be made today. Hitler asks if he will become a dictator, to which he denies.

The United States is in a state of war against the communist system. It is crucial to educate people on patriotism and the dangers of socialism. If the American people do not realize the threat, they will lose their freedoms. The population must pressure the government to stop supporting communism. The only solutions are to educate oneself and act quickly to save freedom.

New York City would be destroyed if a war broke out, making it uninhabitable for centuries. Russia's survival depends on preventing NATO from advancing into Ukraine. American leaders prioritize personal gain over the well-being of the country. Speaking out against war comes at a cost. Ukraine's conflict does not affect the US, yet risks lives needlessly. Military officials prioritize career advancement over the interests of the American people.

Throughout history, a group aims to control people by destroying religions, governments, and enslaving them to debt. They manipulate through propaganda, keeping people ignorant and happy in their system. The American people are unaware of this enemy, leading to their defeat. To win, a free press is needed to awaken the masses from their sheep-like state before a civil war erupts. The country was built by bold individuals, and without reclaiming that spirit, it will be lost.

The speaker emphasizes that the US will need to send their sons and daughters to war just like they currently do. They stress that this is a natural consequence and that people will die, which they find to be a terrible thing.

The communist threat to America involves a gradual takeover through economic and political changes, leading to socialism and loss of sovereignty. Key tactics include increased government spending, higher taxes, inflation, socialistic controls, centralized power in Washington, federal control of education, and manipulation of public opinion for peace on communist terms. The ultimate goal is to merge the US with Soviet Russia. The American people must awaken to this threat before it's too late.

Speaker 0 explains that there are three possible ways the communists might take over the United States. The first is a peaceful coup d'etat like Czechoslovakia in 1948. The second is by fomenting civil war in the United States and aiding the communist side with military force. The third and most relied upon method is a gradual, insidious takeover that slips over the American people before they realize it, occurring gradually but surely with increasing speed. A part of this plan is to induce the gradual surrender of American sovereignty piece by piece to international organizations, with the United Nations as the most prominent example. Another part is the transformation of the United States into a socialist nation, similar to pre-police-state Russia, before any enforcement is introduced. To explain the aim, he quotes a directive by which some of the largest American foundations have been secretly but visibly working for years, aimed at changing the economic and political structure of the United States so it can be comfortably merged with Soviet Russia. The ten communist aims for the United States are outlined as follows: 1) greatly expanded government spending for every conceivable means of wasting American money. 2) higher and then much higher taxes. 3) an increasingly unbalanced budget despite higher taxes. 4) wild inflation of the currency. 5) government controls of prices, wages, and materials supposedly to combat inflation. 6) greatly increased socialist controls over every operation of the economy and daily life, accompanied by a corresponding rise in the size of the bureaucracy and the reach and cost of domestic government. 7) far more centralization of power in Washington and the practical elimination of state lines, with a drive toward reducing state boundaries to resemble county lines within states. 8) a steady advance of federal aid to and control over the educational system, leading to complete federalization of public education. 9) a constant hammering of the American consciousness regarding the horrors of modern warfare and the supposed necessity of peace on communist terms. 10) a willingness to allow step-by-step appeasement by the government, amounting to a piecemeal surrender of the rest of the free world and of the United States itself. In summary, the speaker argues that America is rapidly losing a cold war in which freedom, the country, and existence are at stake, often without public awareness, while the communists are assumed to be aware of what is happening. The one thing the communists fear, according to the speech, is that the American people will wake up too soon to what has been happening, and the remedy is for the American people to learn the truth in time.

Speaker 1 asserts that Hitler was the aggressor of World War II, beginning the war by driving east with the intention of destroying communist Russia. He states that Britain intervened and declared war to prevent Hitler from achieving that objective, and as a result, Britain “today” has to maneuver back and forth between America and Russia. He claims that Britain has “lost the empire,” that 25,000,000 Europeans were killed, and that he is proud to have done his utmost to stop what he describes as a suicidal war that “has destroyed Great Britain.” Speaker 0 acknowledges this sequence and asks for the precise words spoken in 1939, requesting to know what Speaker 1 claimed at that time, specifically referencing the assertion that the conflict was “simply a Jewish financier's quarrel.”

Robert Welch delivers a two-part address, introduced as a condensation of the Blue Book originally presented at the John Birch Society’s 15th birthday dinner in New York on 12/07/1973, followed by a shorter second part titled And Fifteen Years Ahead. William J. Grady, a longtime Birch leader and former corporate executive, introduces the setting and helps set the stage for the first part. Setting and framing - The stage scene recalls a 1958 Indianapolis gathering at Margaret Dice’s home, where 11 of 17 invited attendees attended despite severe weather and airline strikes. Welch delivered a two-day monologue that became the Blue Book; the condensed version now presented is drawn directly from that 1958 text. - The essence of the first part is a verbatim condensation (with occasional listener-notes indicating omissions) designed to preserve the original thread of thought. The audience is asked to imagine themselves as the 11 men listening in 1958. Part I: The 1958 monologue condensed - The central premise: the communist conspiracy poses a grave, pervasive threat to the United States and must be understood in its full, long-range scope. The talk emphasizes that the danger is both international and domestic, and that the conspiracy uses many methods, including bribery, lies, coercion, and patient gradualism. - The three-step communist strategy (as attributed to Lenin) frames the discussion: 1) Take Eastern Europe. 2) Expand into Asia and around the globe. 3) Encircle and take over the United States (and thus complete global conquest). - The movement’s three-part progress is assessed as already advancing: Eastern Europe and East Germany completed the first step; Asia is two-thirds to completion of the second; the third step—overrunning the U.S.—has begun, with the implication that 2/3 of the total program is either completed or well underway. - How they operate: direct military force is not the primary method; instead, they rely on subversion, espionage, manipulation of civil society, and the infiltration of influential organs (press, education, government). They can also prod indirect conflicts to benefit the cause, while masking their influence behind conventional public institutions. - The role of gradualism and surrender of sovereignty: the plan includes the slow surrender of American sovereignty to international bodies (like the United Nations) and the transformation of the U.S. into a socialist economy and political system. The talk calls out ten aims of this strategy, including increased government spending and taxes, inflationary pressure, price and wage controls, expanded socialistic controls, growth of bureaucracies, centralization of power, federal control of education, emphasis on peace at communist terms, and appeasement policies that yield partial concessions. - The speaker asserts that Americans are losing track in a “cold war” that could lead to subjugation, while blaming a Western media and political establishment for obscuring the truth. He cites grim examples of communist violence (e.g., reports from Korea and the Spanish Civil War) to illustrate the cruelty of the regime they claim to be aligning with. - Section two shifts to a broader diagnosis: the Western European civilization is afflicted by a cancer-like disease—the cancer of collectivism. The West’s vulnerability is linked to a long history of reliance on state power and social welfare that weakens individual initiative. Welch argues that the United States must avoid adopting Europe’s fate and instead pursue a vigorous, independent, American liberalism that refuses to surrender to collectivism. - Spiritual and moral critique: the root cause of vulnerability is stated as a loss of faith, not only in God but in human purpose and moral absolutes. Welch laments a moral vacuum and the rise of amorality, warning that without a bedrock of faith and a sense of absolute values, civilization risks collapse. - Section three argues that restoring moral order requires a renewed sense of mission grounded in faith and responsibility. Welch commends fundamentalists and champions John Birch as an exemplary figure, while warning that the numbers of true believers are shrinking. He emphasizes the need to resist both secular and doctrinal deviations that dilute moral seriousness. - Section four outlines a practical, albeit aggressive, plan to counter the conspiracy: organize reading rooms; expand circulation of conservative periodicals; widen radio and local broadcasting support; deploy letter-writing campaigns; organize fronts; expose infiltrators; mobilize speakers; extend activity internationally; and push political influence to energize the broader movement. He acknowledges the proposal’s “fantastic” nature but insists the times demand “fantastic” measures to avert catastrophe. - Welch critiques political leadership as insufficient to save the country; he argues for dynamic personal leadership capable of unifying a broader movement beyond party politics. He analyzes Barry Goldwater and Richard Nixon, concluding that they are insufficient as sole leaders because their power is constrained by political pathways and factional dynamics. He stresses that true salvation requires a larger, sustained movement guided by a deep set of beliefs and a willingness to sacrifice personal interests. - The concluding argument emphasizes the necessity of dynamic leadership coupled with a larger, enduring, nonpolitical movement that can mobilize public support and act decisively against the conspiracy. He insists the only chance to stop the conspiracy rests on awakening a broad, committed base, expanding education and outreach, and building a durable structure to press for decisive reforms. Part II: Fifteen years ahead (and the John Birch Society’s program) - The 1974 segment begins with Bob Welch reporting a successful fundraising moment (a thousand-dollar pledge from Ben) that signaled the society’s financial viability and ability to endure hostile conditions. - Some points to remember: the Birch Society has remained on its original course, remains unique as a nationwide nonreligious adult-education organization, and has pioneered methods to combat the conspiracy through education and truth rather than conventional political confrontation. - The organization’s achievements include countering several major conspiracy-driven projects, exposing figures linked to subversive activities, and building an extensive educational apparatus (books, pamphlets, magazines, films, and a large speakers bureau) that reaches broad audiences. - Section B contrasts the conspiracy’s methods with Birch’s activities, arguing insiders rely on subversion and fear rather than open debate. It also notes the internal vulnerability of the conspiracy—its dependence on fear and falsehood—and highlights weaknesses in major powers and political figures who are aligned with or opposed to the conspiracy. - Section C asserts that World War I and II were engineered by insiders to advance communist power, and that isolationism is miscast as treason by the conspiracy. Welch argues for a recalibration of U.S. foreign policy toward genuine national interest, minimal entanglements, and an emphasis on domestic strength and independence from international bodies. The message celebrates American self-reliance and warns against excessive meddling in global affairs. - Section D offers a concluding call for a fifteen-year program emphasizing: complete independence from the United Nations, reestablishing monetary gold convertibility, reducing government by at least 50%, withdrawing U.S. troops from overseas unless Congress authorizes protection of American life and property, and gradually rolling back government functions that do not belong to the state. A comprehensive educational campaign would accompany these steps to persuade the public. Closing - Welch returns to the belief that with dynamic personal leadership and a broad, committed movement, it is possible to rid the country of communism within years and then pursue a constructive program for less government and more responsibility, ultimately creating a better world. He expresses gratitude to the audience for patience and attention and invites continued support for the John Birch Society’s mission.

The speaker contends that the war is a conflict that should never have begun and attributes its initiation to the 2020 US presidential election being rigged. They assert that the war would not have started if that election had not been rigged. They declare that it was a rigged election and assert that “Everybody now knows that. They found out.” The speaker further states that “People will soon be prosecuted for what they did.” They describe the situation as breaking news, though they add that it should be breaking news as well. The speaker reiterates that “Those are rigged elections.”

Speaker 0 argues that the Israeli war for the greater Israel project is the catalyst for the collapse of American power worldwide due to unconditional U.S. support. He says the United States is on a road to an economic crisis, a financial catastrophe not experienced since the 1930s, and that until it becomes that bad, people will not voice their views in Washington. He contends that the Senate, the House, and the White House are all firmly in the grip of the lobby. He predicts that when the collapse comes, which he expects sometime this year, it will be “god awful hell to pay for the Israelis, and it’s going to be the end of this administration, and probably the end for most of the people on the hill.” He describes a movement from abundance—oil, cash, and everything—to scarcity, forecasting that the living standard won’t be enjoyed for long and that the country will resemble Great Britain after World War II: hopelessly in debt, retreating forces abroad to cut expenses, and unable to recover. He warns of a larger war and asks how long a blockade will last before others force it to end, whether it could become a global event, noting that the secretary of war has stated there will be a global blockade. He cites General Kane discussing boarding ships and blockading vessels coming out of the Persian Gulf and heading into the Strait of Malacca, calling the idea “stupidity on stilts” and predicting it will turn a current conflict into a global phenomenon and likely a global war. He insists there will be no good outcomes for the United States or its people, and that he does not blame Americans for their complacency, acknowledging that Americans are human beings and will only respond when hurt immediately or when they see clear pains such as shortages. Speaker 1 agrees, saying many people are not intentionally burying their heads in the sand, but they will awaken when they notice changes on grocery shelves, at the gas pump, inflation rising, housing prices falling, mortgage rates increasing, and all the pressures tied to lack of food on the table. He hopes for waking up beforehand but does not anticipate it. He then shares a recent, disturbing note from Natalie: Benjamin Netanyahu posted on social media about Lebanon, showing bombs hitting infrastructure across Lebanon.

Speaker 0 argues that Freemasons, the New World Order, Skull and Bones, the Bohemian Grove, the North American Union, martial law, military checkpoints, US concentration camps, and a one world government will come to Americans unless action is taken now. The time is here; act now, America, before it's too late. Speaker 1 defines false flag operations as a distract-and-unify tactic for the government to push a hidden agenda. Globalization, control of oil, and suspension of civil liberties are used to gain more control, with fear being the game. He urges liberals, conservatives, and independents to join together as Americans and make their voices heard. He claims attackers want people split and distracted, and warns of an escalated attempt by the administration to scare the public into thinking Iran is a threat. He cautions to look for another false flag operation to justify fighting Iran, and to check for other mock drills occurring during the same time as real events; citing the nine-eleven attacks and the London bombings as examples where similar exercises happened the day of the attacks. He asks questions, demands answers, and asks who benefits. He asserts there is no interest in creating a stable environment in Iraq. He states the Pentagon has lost track of guns and ammunition and questions whose hands they fall into, arguing that disorder and chaos are being sought as distractions, with the conflict expected to last years. He predicts continued bases in Iraq under the pretext of security and national interest, and repeats the question: who benefits? Speaker 2 notes that in 2005 ExxonMobil achieved a record profit of $35,000,000,000, and an economist estimated that $7,000,000,000 of that amount was due to market conditions created by the war. Speaker 1 continues that under the pretext of security and fear of being attacked, the government will suspend freedom of speech, the right to assemble, and protection from illegal searches and seizures; they will ask law-abiding citizens to turn in their guns and to bear arms; they will establish martial law with the army policing the citizens, which is described as illegal. Speaker 3 adds that fear of nuclear, biological, or chemical attacks on US territory might trigger drastic measures. NFL News 12 Jeff Bell reports that clergy would help the government with their biggest problem, which is "us." Speaker 1 repeats: remember, ask yourself, who benefits? Speaker 3 reiterates that their biggest problem is "us," not external enemies, and that those who follow the markets see increasing housing foreclosures and banks calling in loans. People who couldn’t afford loans would have houses bought back by those who built them for pennies on the dollar. This would allow a small elite to regain control, weaken the dollar, realize a North American union, and establish a broader global economy. The repeated question remains: who benefits? Speaker 2 concludes with the confession: “The truth is, I hope I'm wrong.”

The speaker states that secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society, and that "we" are opposed to secret societies, secret oaths, and secret proceedings. "We" are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence, using infiltration, subversion, and intimidation. This system has conscripted vast resources into a tightly knit, highly efficient machine combining military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, mistakes buried, dissent silenced, and no expenditure is questioned. The speaker is asking for help in the task of informing and alerting the American people, confident that with this help, man will be free and independent.

The speaker criticizes the United States for provoking and threatening nuclear powers, claiming that Americans are unaware of their own foreign policy. They argue that the military-industrial complex benefits from these actions, while the American people suffer from job losses and corruption. The speaker highlights the excessive military budget and the numerous military bases surrounding China. They assert that China is not an enemy, but rather the military-industrial complex is the true adversary. The speaker also mentions the conflicts in Ukraine and Syria, attributing them to economic interests and imperialism. They conclude by emphasizing the need to recognize the true motives behind these actions.

The speaker says people are confused and upset because they feel U.S. foreign policy is “stalemated,” with conflicts becoming broader and harder, and explains this is happening because, in their view, “what the American people want is victory.” They argue there is a “bizarre notion” in foreign policy that Americans are deeply worried about the immediate cost of war to the enemy and that Americans cannot handle the “ugliness of war,” requiring conflicts to be “totally antiseptic.” They clarify they are not describing American willingness to endure casualties: “No one in America wants American casualties,” which they call a “tragedy and a horror.” However, they say Americans understand war involves casualties and are willing to undergo them in pursuit of an end and “a victory for America.” They also reject the idea that Americans would avoid striking specific targets—citing the example that America “can’t hit Kharg Island” because Iranian people would be deprived of oil resources—saying the American people are “not particularly concerned about that.” Instead, the speaker claims Americans are more concerned with “why we’re there, not winning.” They propose an approach of “An eye for everything”: if “you touch a ship in the Strait of Hormuz,” then the response would be to kill the head of the IRGC, kill “Khalibov,” and kill the “entire leadership class.” They add that this would include destroying “South Pars” and destroying “Kharg,” stating “One drone, and that’s what happens.” They conclude that this is “the way you win,” both “in the middle” and generally.

I have often been ridiculed for my prophecies, especially by the Jewish race. If a world war is instigated by international Jewish financiers, it will lead to the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe. Workers of all classes and nations must unite against their common enemy. The previous administration involved the nation in prolonged wars under false pretenses, causing economic strain. The promised victories have not been achieved, raising doubts about the feasibility of continued military engagement.