TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Andrew Weissman, a former top Mueller prosecutor, believes deportations of alleged gang members are not legal, stating the US isn't at war with Venezuela or the gang, and it must be proven those deported are part of the gang. He also questions the statute's constitutionality. In response, another speaker calls Weissman a moron and degenerate who has devoted his career to putting innocent Americans in jail. He claims Weissman was involved in the Mueller coup against President Trump and is now shilling for people who rape and murder Americans. He states that the Turnde Aragua gang tortured and murdered Jocelyn Nungari. He argues those deported are illegal aliens, foreign terrorists, and alien enemies with no right to be in the country. He asserts the law used for deportation was signed by the founding generation and that Trump is sending gang members out of the country.

I am insulted that Dan Crenshaw is a congressman and don't think he should be one again. Republican states seem to have the least sincere Republicans. The next time he talks about threats, he should just be quiet. He's a neo con and the most left-wing member of Congress I've ever met. He's a Republican who has no interest in the United States and doesn't even pretend to. People are easily misled by posturing people in Washington, which is why Dan Crenshaw has a job. He focuses on other people's problems while neglecting his own. He is an enemy of everything that you voted for.

I have a duty to be here, representing 200,000 people from Northwest Georgia who elected me. Your actions are hindering my ability to fulfill that obligation and show a complete disregard for the Constitution.

Crooked Joe and his thugs are falsely accusing me of the same abuses of power they are committing. They want to imprison their political opponents, especially me, and control the American people. However, I am standing up to them, and millions of Americans are joining the Republican party in support.

The speaker believes the government is "inundated with traitors" and illegal aliens. As an example, the speaker cites their experience testifying before Congress on child sex trafficking. During the testimony, Congresswoman Delia Ramirez allegedly slandered the speaker, calling them a white nationalist, bigot, xenophobe, and racist, and presented an X post with a noose, implying the speaker is dangerous. The speaker claims that Ramirez then spoke emotionally about women being raped on the border, stating her mother was raped crossing from Guatemala into America while pregnant with her. The speaker asserts that Ramirez's statement is an admission that she is an illegal alien, as her mother was not a legal citizen when she was born. The speaker further alleges that Ramirez is married to a legal alien and that a search through DHS did not find evidence that she is a naturalized citizen.

She's the dumbest congresswoman ever to be in Congress, proving it daily. I can't believe any member of Congress, regardless of party, would want to educate criminal illegal aliens. These are individuals in the country illegally, convicted of violent crimes, and ordered removed by an immigration judge after due process, all at taxpayer expense. Any congressperson who doesn't want ICE to do the job that Congress has mandated and funded them to do is failing in their duty.

A man confronts a congressman, questioning his prior support for Kilmar Braco Garcia, who has been charged with facilitating the transport of illegal immigrants. He asks if the congressman still supports Garcia and whether he believes Garcia is entitled to due process, given his alleged illegal status. The man repeatedly asks if Garcia entered the country legally and accuses the congressman of being made a fool. He references accusations that Garcia beat his wife and questions whether the congressman supports "illegal gangbangers" in Maryland. He asks the congressman to condemn human smuggling and accuses him of being a "fascist." He questions whether the congressman believes in due process and demands to know how Garcia was allowed into the United States. He asks if the congressman is retracting his support for Garcia. The man then asks if the congressman supports deporting criminal illegal immigrants, referencing Elon Musk. He presses the congressman on whether he supports removing criminal illegal immigrants from the country.

She's the dumbest congresswoman ever, proving it daily. I can't believe any member of Congress, regardless of party, would want to educate criminal illegal aliens. These are individuals in the country illegally, convicted of violent crimes, and ordered removed by an immigration judge after due process, all at taxpayer expense. If a congressperson doesn't want us to do the job Congress has mandated and funded us to do, that's a problem.

The exchange centers on accusations of hyperbolic statements and the accuracy of quoted posts. Speaker 0 challenges Speaker 1's credibility, citing a series of posts and asking whether the statements were read correctly. - On 02/11/2026, Speaker 0 cites a Blueski post: “my words or your words, not mine. The democrats video telling service members to ignore illegal orders didn't go far enough. They should have also urged them to refuse unethical orders, whether illegal or not. There are many things deemed legal that are still obviously unethical, and everyone should hold themselves to this higher law,” and asks, “Did I read that correctly?” Speaker 1 confirms reading it and asks if Speaker 0 disagrees with it, questioning whether people should do unethical things in their capacity of [unknown context]. - On 12/31/2025, Speaker 0 references a post reading, “in front of god and country. … They referring to Republicans think they control their way into us accepting ethnic cleansing,” and asks, “Did I read that correctly?” Speaker 1 responds that it related to a DHS security post advocating a 100,000,000 deportations, stating that “A 100,000,000 deportations would be ethnic cleansing,” adding, “You would be True. One third of the country. So, yes, there are people within the Department of Homeland security.” Speaker 0 asks whether this is hyperbolic and requests more time. - On 02/05 (implied), Speaker 1 notes, “advocating a 100,000,000” but the sentence is cut off in the transcript. Speaker 0 comments, “reputations is … cleansing,” while continuing to engage in the discussion with the chair and audience; Speaker 0 asks for thirty more seconds. - On 03/02, Speaker 0 quotes Speaker 1: “if you rule against Trump's population purge agenda, no hyper permanently there, the nativists will name you, threaten you, and come after you. These judges are much braver than the ICE agents who hide behind masks while violating the constitution. They are much braver.” Speaker 1 clarifies, “They put their names on their rulings, and they stand behind their constitutional rulings. When I talk about population purge, I'm talking about the fact that they're trying to deport US born citizens, people born here. They are trying to deport them as well. So it's not a mass deportation agenda. It is also an agenda intended to reduce the population of The United States, including US born people.” - Speaker 0 responds, “Thank you.” Speaker 1 adds, “These are not hyperbolic statements. I appreciate you reading my account. Here's the good news.” The conversation escalates in tone as Speaker 0 interjects with disbelief, asking, “What planet … parachute him from?” Speaker 1 replies, “No. No.” Speaker 0 comments, “Hey, guys. You're you you You trigger my gag reflex,” and Speaker 1 closes with, “Mr. Bieber.”

My colleagues are trying to undermine and defund the FBI because they are investigating Donald Trump. Attacking the FBI and independent journalists undermines our democracy. By attacking these institutions, they can violate the law without consequences. The credibility of the FBI is being eroded by those on the other side of the aisle, and this needs to stop.

I've asked the DOJ where the line is regarding impeding or interfering with law enforcement. Some members of Congress are educating people on how to evade law enforcement, claiming they're educating about constitutional rights. But in reality, they're telling people who are in the country illegally, have committed crimes, and been ordered removed by a federal judge to not open their doors and hide from ICE. As a member of Congress, they should let us enforce the laws that have been enacted. If someone physically prevents an arrest, that's obstruction, but where's the line when it's just telling people to hide? I want to know where that crosses into impeding law enforcement, so I've asked the Department of Justice to define that line.

I am insulted that Dan Crenshaw is still a congressman. Republican states seem to have the least sincere Republicans. When Crenshaw speaks about threats, I don't want to hear it. He's a NeoCon, like Nikki Haley, but from Texas. I know a Republican member of Congress who is the most left-wing person I've ever met, and they don't care about the United States. I won't name names, but it's Dan Crenshaw. People are easily fooled by the posturing in Washington, which is why Crenshaw has a job. Crenshaw, you focus on others while your own children suffer. You are against everything we stand for.

We're winning the support of the American people, despite what the Washington establishment thinks. My Democratic colleagues prioritize bureaucracy and excessive spending over taxpayers. They favor illegal immigration over the rule of law, teachers' unions over students, criminals over victims, transgender athletes over women's sports, and Hamas over Israel. They may feel victorious within their own circles, but they're out of touch with the public. I believe the tide is turning, and the American people are on our side. We're fighting for what's right, and justice will prevail.

I’ve just been informed that I’m being removed from my committees. Last week, I introduced a bill to eliminate sanctuary state protections for pedophiles in California, which the Democrats opposed. They cut off my microphone, and now the speaker of the state assembly has removed me from my committee. However, I see this as a badge of honor. It signifies that I’m doing the right thing by advocating for the people of this state and protecting children from being victimized by illegal immigrants. I’m ready for whatever comes next.

We're just turning the tables by asking legitimate questions, like how did these members of Congress get so rich? I might consider filing assault charges against Democrat members and their staff. The issue is that the DC District Attorney would have to bring those charges, and there's a clear double standard in D.C. It happened on federal property in D.C., so the D.C. District Attorney has jurisdiction. I have a right protected under the First Amendment to simply ask questions. I was the one taking the punches and pushes, not blocking anyone, just trying to get an answer. The only aggression is asking aggressive questions they don't like. I asked Ayanna Presley if she condoned FEMA sending $59 million to house illegals in New York City while people in North Carolina are in tents. I got a death stare. These Democrat congresspeople think they're gods, but I'm here in D.C. now, and I'll do this routinely.

I was removed from my committees for proposing a bill to remove sanctuary state protection for pedophiles in California. The Democrats didn't like it. But I see it as a badge of honor. I'm fighting for the people and children victimized by illegal immigrants. Bring it on. More to come.

DHS is allegedly using public intimidation and considering arresting members of Congress who are fulfilling their legal and constitutional duty to conduct oversight. According to the speaker, members of Congress are legally required to be granted access to ICE and CBP facilities to conduct investigations and oversight. They cannot be legally inhibited from accessing these facilities. The speaker claims that DHS, Tom Homan, and Secretary Kristi Noem are the ones breaking the law, not members of Congress like Representative Robert Menendez. The speaker warns that if anyone lays a finger on representatives like Bonnie Watson Coleman, there will be consequences.

There are people pretending to request asylum in our country, but instead they are smoking weed and doing drugs without any regard for our laws. This is happening because the Democrats invited them in and our cities are being overrun. We have taken God and the rule of law out of our country, resulting in crime, drugs, an invasion on our southern border, and the destruction of America. This is all by design from the left who hate our country. It's up to American citizens to take action and stop it.

A congressman is asked if he filed impeachment articles against President Trump to get out of nearly $800,000 of campaign debt, given his history of scamming people. He is asked if he is scamming the American people. The congressman responds that there have been unconstitutional activities that need to be addressed. He is then questioned again about his history of scamming people and his campaign debt. Finally, he is told that if he hates President Trump so much, he should go back to India.

Mayor Wu, does ICE arresting a child rapist threaten everyone's safety? No. Does ICE arresting a murderous MS-13 gang member threaten everyone's safety? No. I'd like to point out that you, Mayor Michelle Wu, have said that ICE's efforts actually threaten the safety of everyone. You're a hypocrite.

I thank you for being here, Mr. Mayorkas. Your actions have been watched closely, and it is believed that you have lied. The American public sees this too. You are seen as a threat to freedom and rights, but thankfully the first amendment exists to stop you. Your accusations are untrue.

I held an online forum to educate my constituents about their constitutional rights, specifically regarding protection against illegal search and seizure. My job is to share critical information with those I represent. Tom Homan was upset because he felt I was advising people here illegally, but I was advising all my constituents. Homan threatened to report me to the Department of Justice, but I haven't heard from them. I plan to reach out to the DOJ to ask if they intend to open an inquiry based on Homan's threats. I want to know if this administration intends to use political intimidation to silence its critics.

People like you should go to hell. Everyone knows what you're about. You can't do anything to me; I'm protected because of my ties to the Trump administration. I know there's antisemitism because I helped Trump win the election. If you were in America, I'd find you and go after your family. That's why you're hiding in Mexico.

The speaker states that Senator Van Halen mistakenly believes an MS-13 terrorist is his constituent, when in fact, the individual is President Bukele's constituent, citizen, and resident. The speaker emphasizes the individual is not from Maryland, but an illegal alien from El Salvador with a deportation order, who is only in the U.S. due to the Democrats' veneration of due process for illegal invaders. The speaker asserts that it is legally impermissible for him to remain in the country and that they honored the law by removing him. The speaker suggests that if the Democratic party demands the return of illegal gang members and terrorists, their support will dwindle until only MS-13 members remain as their base.

If you're going to attack me after begging to be on my show, especially regarding my stance against Democrats wanting illegals to vote, you can go fuck yourself. You're being played if you listen to Bill O'Reilly. He doesn't even know about the SAVE Act, which would require proof of citizenship to register to vote. Most of these hosts are too lazy to do their own research and just read what their producers put in front of them. O'Reilly is a loser who's mad that others who left Fox have built successful careers while nobody likes him. Remember when he blamed Trump for January 6th? He's a douchebag. He has no idea what he's messing with. Everyone hates him.