TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Weeks of controversy over allegations of an improper romantic relationship between Fulton County District Attorney Fonny Willis and a special prosecutor in the 2020 election interference case culminated in a lengthy court filing from Willis. The filing, more than 170 pages, includes Willis’s admission of a “personal relationship” with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, but she asserts that relationship should not impact their roles in the case. In January, a defendant in the ongoing 2020 election case moved to disqualify Willis, arguing that she appointed Wade as a special prosecutor and that she financially benefited from the relationship. Willis’s latest motion disputes that portrayal. Eleven Alive previously reported that Wade paid for airline tickets for the pair to travel to San Francisco and Miami; Willis, however, writes that financial responsibility for personal travel is divided roughly evenly between the two, with all expenses paid using individual personal funds. The outlet had also reported that Wade was paid more than $500,000 more than the two other special prosecutors on the case; Willis contends Wade earned more money because he “made much more work.” Legal experts Daryl Cohen and Clark Cunningham offered differing views on how the filing might affect the case going into the February 15 hearing. Cohen suggested the judge could determine that the matter does not require disqualification but that the parties are under intense scrutiny. Cunningham anticipated the disqualification issue would not be resolved at the hearing and described the matter as very complicated. The February 15 hearing will be the first time these allegations are publicly addressed in open court. In a related matter, the US House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan released a letter indicating he subpoenaed documents from Willis. The subpoena seeks documents related to the DA’s use of federal funds after a conservative outlet published accusations that Willis fired an employee who attempted to halt the misuse of federal funds intended for youth gang prevention programs. The documents are also linked to the January 6 investigation. Atlanta News First political reporter Doug Reardon reported from outside the Fulton County Courthouse that the open records requests were issued through Georgia’s open records law. The judge, Robert McBurney, previously admonished Willis for not complying within required time frames, with the court asserting that Willis must turn over documents requested by the conservative nonprofit Judicial Watch. The judge stated that Willis had five days to produce the documents and that, according to him, the court had effectively declared a violation of the Open Records Act. Some communications, he noted, are of public interest and not protected by privilege.

Judicial Watch has been engaged in open records lawsuits for over 30 years, and this situation is unprecedented. A government official has been found in default by a court in a straightforward open records case. This raises concerns about Fannie Willis' capabilities or potential corruption.

The speaker suggests that in every January 6th case, the FBI has withheld evidence that could have helped the defendant. They believe defense attorneys should have access to a whistleblower's complaint, which reveals that compensation is tied to these cases. The speaker suggests that defense attorneys should question the agents involved about whether their bosses received bonuses for opening these cases. The other speaker agrees and finds it unbelievable that there are incentives to increase the number of Americans in jail.

Yesterday, we told you that new documents we got showed that Fonny Willis was recording was working secretly behind the scenes with the Biden justice department, the Biden White House, and the j six democrats to create a double jeopardy, double drain on Donald Trump's supporters by creating a similar indictment to Jack Smith, but in Georgia to move resources and lawyers and and attention span and divide it. We have we're supposed to have a justice system that avoids double jeopardy, but in this case, you can see the plot being created by these lawyers and by the collaboration. Today, we raise a question or we provide some evidence to a question that Jim Jordan raised about a year ago, the House Judiciary Committee Chairman. He believed that Fonny Willis' prosecution of Trump was being underwritten by the justice department because he saw a stream of funding. What we see, what we've provided to the public, is an unusual situation. In the middle of Willis building your case against Donald Trump and 18 of his allies and and to charge them with conspiracy in and racketeering in Georgia to double up on what Jack Smith charged in Washington, The justice department comes to Fonny Willis and says, hey. We just want you to apply for this grant, and we're gonna take this grant, which is normally competitive. We're gonna make it noncompetitive. Basically, you're the only one that's gonna get the money. Just fill out the paperwork and take your cash, about $2,000,000. It's that classic Washington grant, go help kids, not really much specificity, but they move it from competitive to sole source, meaning that it's wired just for her. It looks like the old Boss Hogg way of doing business or Tammany Hall way of doing business. And I think for Jim Jordan or Barry Loudermilk who was on our show last night investigating January 6 from the judiciary committee, this is a pretty serious issue for them to investigate. This looks like a gift grant to Fonny Willis while she's doing the bidding of Joe Biden to pursue and tie down Donald Trump and his friends in a criminal prosecution in Atlanta. It looks just like Tammany Hall, Chicago style politics, and there's now a complete body of documents for congress to look at this. It's it's a pretty pretty clear case of what's going on.

Just the News reports a story based on thousands of pages of documents obtained over years with the help of America First Legal, focusing on Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her prosecution of a state case against Donald Trump that mirrored the federal case led by Jack Smith. The documents, they say, show that Willis was in deep collusion with the Justice Department, with the January 6 Democrats, and with the Biden White House. The claim is that the Biden White House said it would waive Donald Trump’s executive privilege for Willis, and the Justice Department said it would waive and approve Willis’s 2E requests to obtain federal workers to help build a case against a national figure at the state level. The report asserts the “fix was in” and that this constitutes the strongest evidence to date of coordinated action to pursue Trump across jurisdictions. The asserted significance is that the Democrats intentionally and strategically created a double jeopardy, double drain machine to go after Trump, potentially infringing civil liberties by pursuing prosecutions in multiple venues for the same or related conduct. The narrative claims this involved the Biden White House, the Biden DOJ, and the January 6 Democrats pressing Willis to create a system where Trump could be targeted in more than one place, a scenario described as a “double jeopardy, double drain.” The report suggests this development is now focused in Miami and anticipates further disclosures. Looking ahead, the program teases next steps: tomorrow they plan to reveal whether there was a financial incentive or “financial follow the money” stream to Willis tied to her pursuit. They note that if this pattern occurred in Georgia, there are similar election cases in Wisconsin and Arizona, raising questions about federal taxpayers funding state efforts to smear Trump and create multi-state double jeopardy scenarios. The discussion frames these elements as part of a conspiracy case beginning to unfold in Miami. Upcoming segments are promised to include new election integrity revelations from figures like Tulsi Gabbard, Kash Patel, and Pam Bondi. These revelations are expected to concern intrusions and issues targeting the 2026 election, with the aim of informing Senate members—potentially swaying those on the fence about the Save or related measures. The program signals that these developments will be explored in upcoming appearances, including guests such as Barry Loudermilk.

CNN reported that the FEC has fined Hillary Clinton's campaign and the DNC over the Trump-Russia dossier research. This follows months of anticipation. You mentioned on Truth Social that the Democrats lied and now face consequences. This is just the beginning. The Durham investigation is intensifying, with increasing evidence being revealed. The timing of the FEC's announcement suggests a connection to Durham's findings. It's clear that the Clinton campaign not only lied but also violated federal election law, which led to the probable cause finding and the decision to pay the fine. They want to suppress the story.

Speaker 1 mentions waiting for Bonnie Willis to respond. They discuss a whistleblower in her office who raised concerns about misuse of funds. Willis fired the whistleblower, prompting a subpoena for related documents. Willis made US Marshals serve the subpoena. They joke about Willis' behavior and mention CPAC. They express appreciation for CPAC's support of conservative principles. Translation: The speakers discuss Bonnie Willis not responding, a whistleblower's concerns, a subpoena for documents, and Willis' behavior. They joke about CPAC and express gratitude for its support of conservative principles.

Congressman Jim Jordan has set a deadline for Fulton County DA Fonnie Willis to provide documents related to allegations of collusion with the Biden administration during her investigation of President-elect Trump. Jordan claims Willis conspired with the Justice Department and questions her motives regarding Trump's interference in Georgia's 2020 election. In response, Willis accuses Jordan of violating the US Constitution in an attempt to disrupt her prosecution of Trump and his co-defendants.

The FBI is being criticized for not being transparent with Congress about their actions regarding a whistleblower's allegations. The whistleblower came forward because they were unsatisfied with how the FBI handled the information. The FBI is accused of covering up and not being forthcoming with Congress, who has the authority to oversee and investigate such matters. Congress should have access to the investigative materials, but the FBI is withholding them.

My message to those who defy congressional subpoenas on the January 6th committee is that I hope the committee takes action and holds them accountable, including possible prosecution.

Donald Trump and Fulton County District Attorney Fawney Willis are engaged in a heated dispute. Trump is running an ad in Atlanta, accusing Willis of having a relationship with someone she was investigating. However, there is currently no evidence to support this claim. In response, Willis sent an email to her staff instructing them not to comment on the allegations or any negativity directed towards her or the office. She emphasized that employees are not allowed to make public comments on social media or any other platform. The leaked email has raised suspicions.

Trump's judge, Eileen Cannon, released unredacted court filings showing coordination between the White House, DOJ, and National Archives in indicting Trump. Documents reveal the GSA demanded Trump's team retrieve boxes of documents, possibly containing classified info, from DC. Biden's White House, DOJ, and National Archives may be conspiring to charge Trump for keeping classified material. Jack Smith tried to hide this info. Biden, accused of mishandling classified info, mocked Trump's legal issues. Biden's administration met with National Archives and DOJ to prosecute Trump shortly after he left office.

Why isn't FBI Director Chris Wray publicly defending his department's actions regarding the January 6th investigation? His resignation implies a lack of apolitical integrity within the FBI, suggesting that each presidential administration dictates priorities, rather than upholding a consistent, unbiased approach. This leaves the impression that wrongdoing occurred. The prioritization of the January 6th investigation over other crucial cases, like those involving child sex trafficking and serial killers, has negatively impacted agents' morale. However, some pushback exists; DC judges, including those appointed by both Republican and Democratic presidents, have openly criticized the Department of Justice's actions, refusing to allow these cases to be dismissed. Their outspokenness provides a counterpoint to the perceived silence from other quarters.

Nancy Pelosi's concern for her image during the Capitol trespassing incident is discussed, with claims that she deliberately avoided security measures and ignored important phone calls. The speaker suggests that it's time to hold Pelosi accountable and bring her before a committee. The conversation then shifts to Donald Trump's upcoming trial and the defense strategy he could employ, including issuing subpoenas for witnesses. The judge presiding over the case is criticized for potential bias due to past associations with Fusion GPS and Hunter Biden. The speaker argues that the judge should recuse herself. The conversation concludes with the speaker highlighting the importance of recusal based on the judge's previous actions in a similar case.

The speaker discusses the police commissioner's refusal to let Nancy Pelosi testify and accuses the January 6th committee of destroying evidence. They express frustration over the committee's announcement of evidence destruction, particularly related to Nancy Pelosi. The speaker questions why she wasn't allowed to testify and mentions offering a sum of money.

While I was pretrial in DC after January 6, I was denied access to evidence initially. Eventually, I gained access to evidence.com, which provided me with more information than most, including lawyers. After securing my bond, I retrieved evidence that supports the claim that President Trump is correct: Nancy Pelosi is directly responsible for the events of January 6. This is not just a conspiracy theory; it’s a fact. I can prove Pelosi's involvement. More details will follow.

Fannie Willis recently revealed she has records of her communications related to the January 6 operation against Trump, following a Judicial Watch lawsuit. Initially, she claimed no such records existed, but a court found her in default for not responding to the lawsuit. Instead of complying with the court's suggestion to release the records, she is attempting to use legal exemptions to withhold them. This situation suggests she was involved in collusion with the Pelosi operation, shows a disregard for the rule of law, and undermines the public's right to know. Legal actions will continue to challenge this.

The award to Liz Cheney from President Biden is inappropriate. Cheney, selected by Nancy Pelosi to lead a one-sided committee investigating January 6th, is accused of obstructing justice and tampering with witnesses. She allegedly hid evidence that could exonerate Donald Trump, including statements from his deputy chief of staff about seeking National Guard support. The push for a pardon suggests she is in legal jeopardy and should be investigated. Her award stems from her perceived assistance to Democrats, despite her unpopularity. Cheney's actions have shifted her controversial foreign policy stance from the Republican Party to the Democratic Party, which some Republicans view as a benefit.

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton announced that they had to seek a default judgment in Georgia against Fannie Willis, who did not respond to their lawsuit for records of her communications with the Biden administration and Congress regarding her actions against Trump. Fitton highlighted that in over 30 years and hundreds of FOIA lawsuits, no government agency or official has ever failed to appear in court for one of their cases. This situation is unprecedented and indicates Willis's efforts to conceal what Fitton describes as collusion aimed at targeting Trump.

The White House confirmed Letitia James and Fannie Willis visited before suing Trump. Willis appointed her alleged lover to prosecute Trump, paying him $650,000 in taxpayer money. Nathan Wade conspired with the White House, billing them for meetings. Willis also collaborated with Adam Schiff on the January 6th case. Republicans were barred from the committee, which later destroyed evidence. Is the Biden White House orchestrating Trump's prosecution? - Armstrong Williams. Translation: The White House confirmed that Letitia James and Fannie Willis visited before suing Trump. Willis appointed her alleged lover to prosecute Trump, paying him $650,000 in taxpayer money. Nathan Wade conspired with the White House, billing them for meetings. Willis also collaborated with Adam Schiff on the January 6th case. Republicans were barred from the committee, which later destroyed evidence. Is the Biden White House orchestrating Trump's prosecution? - Armstrong Williams.

A federal judge approved a class action lawsuit against Nancy Pelosi filed by approximately 500 January 6th defendants. The defendants are suing Pelosi for $350 million, claiming she set a trap for them, allowed them to enter, and then jailed them. If the defendants win, it would bankrupt Pelosi and prove the events of January 6th were a setup.

The judge overseeing the Trump Georgia election interference case has scheduled a hearing for February 15th to investigate allegations of misconduct by district attorney Fani Willis. Willis and one of her prosecutors are being examined for a potential improper relationship and misuse of public funds. While Willis has not confirmed or denied a romantic relationship, she referred to the prosecutor as a great friend. She believes that the criticism against her and the prosecutor is racially motivated. This development has sparked Republican attacks, including from Governor Kemp, and has fueled claims of political persecution against Trump.