reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asks when Congress might vote on having the whistleblower appear, claiming Speaker 1 is the only member who knows the whistleblower's identity and whose staff has spoken with them, requesting the same opportunity. Speaker 1 denies knowing the whistleblower's identity and affirms their determination to protect it. Speaker 1 states that after the witnesses testify, there will be an opportunity to make a motion to subpoena any witness and compel a vote.

I request unanimous consent to remove the recognition given by the Speaker of the House to an individual present in the gallery during a joint address to parliament by Volodymyr Zelensky. This removal should be done from the House of Commons Debates of September 21, 2023, and any House multimedia recording. Thank you.

Speaker 0 requests unanimous consent to remove recognition of an individual from the House of Commons Debates and multimedia recording. Speaker 1 asks for unanimous consent but is met with opposition. Speaker 2 expresses disappointment and compares the incident to the importance of learning from history. Speaker 1 interrupts, stating that the discussion is becoming more of a debate.

I request to remove the recognition of an individual during a joint address to Parliament by Volodymyr Zelensky from the House of Commons Debates and Multimedia Recording. Unanimous consent is not achieved.

The speaker asserts that a vote has already occurred, preventing a revote. Amidst rising voices, the speaker demands order and attempts to gain clarification, but is interrupted by yelling. The speaker accuses others of disruptive behavior and a double standard, claiming that offensive remarks against another person would be tolerated.

I request to remove the recognition of an individual during a joint address to Parliament from the House of Commons Debates and Multimedia Recording. We will now seek unanimous consent. Any objections? No objections were raised. Thank you. Translation: I ask to delete the acknowledgment of a person during a joint address to Parliament from the House of Commons Debates and Multimedia Recording. We will now seek unanimous agreement. Any objections? No objections were made. Thank you.

Speaker 1 requests that House Bill 1312 be read at length, as well as every subsequent bill. Speaker 0 acknowledges the request for the bill to be read at length.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about accepting a large IPO deal from Visa while serving as Speaker of the House. Speaker 1 defends the decision, stating there was no conflict of interest. Speaker 0 presses for clarification, but Speaker 1 maintains there was no wrongdoing.

Speaker 0 interrupts and is asked to sit down. Speaker 1 tells Speaker 0 to leave the auditorium. Speaker 2 comments on the situation. Speaker 1 calls Speaker 0 a sick person for turning it into a political issue.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they expect Democrats to support them. Speaker 1 responds that they personally do not. Speaker 0 then asks if Speaker 1 needs the Democrats' help to stay in a leadership position. Speaker 1 answers no, stating that if five Republicans side with the Democrats, they will be out. Speaker 1 acknowledges that this situation is complex.

Speaker 0 announces their plan to run for reelection in 2026. They acknowledge a question about their candidacy and apologize for needing a moment to gather their thoughts.

Speaker 0, acting as G7 chair, states they will exercise their role as chair because they have a few more minutes with the president and his team. Speaker 0 indicates they must then start the meeting to address some big issues.

Speaker 0 confirms making a phone call to the Prime Minister at 3:34 pm. Speaker 1 questions if there is a record of this call that hasn't been disclosed. Speaker 0 clarifies that there is a record of the call but not the content. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 remembers what was said, to which Speaker 0 affirms.

Speaker 0 asks the audience if they believe that the situation is heading in a certain direction. The entire room raises their hands in agreement. Speaker 0 expresses gratitude for everyone's presence.

The speaker asks the senator if they heard the question about running for reelection in 2026. The speaker apologizes and asks if anyone else has a question.

Speaker 0 is asked if they will be running for reelection in 2026. They apologize for not hearing the question properly and ask for someone else to speak up with a different question.

The prime minister, ministers, and MPs are present for an important discussion. The speaker emphasizes the importance of dialogue over yelling. They express gratitude for the opportunity to speak and work together during this challenging time.

Speaker 0 is asked if they will be running for reelection in 2026. They apologize for the interruption and ask for another question.

Speaker is asked if they agree with congressional Republicans' call for resignation, but does not respond when pressed by the speaker of the house.

The senator asked how many votes are needed to pass the bill with the emergency clause, which is 32. Senators then voted on the bill. The speaker emphasized the importance of treating everyone with respect and dignity in the Senate, stating that they will do the same.

Speaker 0 accuses the prime minister of bullying senators and lying about the independence of the senate. Speaker 1 interrupts, asking Speaker 0 to retract a word. Speaker 0 refuses and Speaker 1 asks them to apologize. Speaker 0 again refuses. Speaker 1 asks Speaker 0 to leave, and they eventually comply.

Speaker 0: Reclaiming time from Chairman, Hunter is avoiding my words. Speaker 1: House committees seek relevant info, but GOP misuses subpoenas for political gain, ignoring offers and leaking witness statements. Translation: Speaker 0 reclaims time from the Chairman as Hunter avoids their words. Speaker 1 mentions that House committees are seeking relevant information, but Republicans are misusing subpoenas for political purposes by ignoring offers and leaking witness statements.

Speaker 0 requests unanimous consent to remove recognition of an individual from the House of Commons Debates and multimedia recording. Speaker 1 asks for unanimous consent but is met with opposition. Speaker 2 expresses disappointment and compares the incident to the importance of learning from history. Speaker 1 interrupts, stating that the discussion is becoming more of a debate.

Speaker 0 asks what you are here to talk about, says “Thank you very much,” and asks, “Any votes in the prime minister?”

The speaker requests unanimous consent to enter a letter by Louisiana attorney general Jeff Landry into the record. The letter denounces political violence and calls for respect for all political viewpoints. The speaker emphasizes that unanimous consents are for documents and presents the letter as evidence. Another speaker interrupts to make a unanimous consent request, but it is unclear what they are requesting. The transcript ends with the chair recognizing the gentleman for unanimous consent.