reSee.it - Related Video Feed

"Vigilante justice is a completely inappropriate response to the rioting in the street. There is no justification for what happened in Kenosha. Obviously. And vigilante justice is a crime and and should be punished as a crime." "Obviously. In Kenosha this week, tragically, we saw a 17 year old, young man with an AR 15 walk into the protest and kill two protesters, murder them. Back to Kenosha, we have heard crickets from this White House on the right wing 17 year old man who murdered two protesters." The speakers frame the events as vigilante violence and criticize the White House's reaction to the Kenosha incident.

“While I didn't agree with his ideas, shooting someone that we disagree with, even if they're vociferous and loud and out there, is so colossally wrong headed.” “you won't find me shedding any tears.” “We cannot think or talk that way.” “That is not okay.” I lost my brother through gun violence. “There's no winning. We'll never win this way. There's no idea that if we cheer on our opponents being hurt or harmed in any way, that we win as a society. And we all lose.” This is a tragedy that not only the person who is killed experiences, but the entire family and community around that person. “Where do we go when violence is the only solution? … the final solution.” “People are walking around with weapons of war. This is a weapon of war.” “I don't know what killed him.” “But more often than not, we're seeing people killed with weapons of war … It was a sniper rifle.” “That's what these weapons are for.” “If that's why he was murdered. I'm assuming that's what it was. We don't know.”

Speaker 0: When I was actually walking out here, somebody sent me a photo of a CNN headline about what happened in Minneapolis. And this is the headline. I'm just gonna read it. Outrage after ICE officer kills US citizen in Minneapolis. Well, that's one way to put it, and that is the way that many people in the corporate media have put this attack over the last twenty four hours. And I say attack very, very intentionally because this was an attack on federal law enforcement. This was an attack on law and order. This was an attack on the American people. The way that the media by and large has reported this story has been an absolute disgrace and it puts our law enforcement officers at risk every single day. What that headline leaves out is the fact that that very off ICE officer nearly had his life ended, dragged by a car six months ago, thirty three stitches in his legs. So you think maybe he's a little bit sensitive about somebody ramming him with an automobile? What that headline leaves out is that that woman was there to interfere with a legitimate law enforcement operation in The United States Of America. What that headline leaves out is that that woman has is part of a broader left wing network to attack, to docks, to assault, and to make it impossible for our ICE officers to do their job. If the media wants to tell the truth, they ought to tell the truth that a group of left wing radicals have been working tirelessly, sometimes using domestic terror techniques to try to make it impossible for the president of The United States to do what the American people elected him to do, which is enforce our immigration laws. The president stands with ICE. I stand with ICE. We stand with all of our law enforcement officers. And part of that is recognizing that you people in the media, not everybody in this room, but many people in this room have been lying about this attack. She was trying to ram this guy with his with her car. He shot back. He defended himself. He's already been seriously wounded in law enforcement operations before, and everybody who's been repeating the lie that this is some innocent woman who was out for a drive in Minneapolis when a law enforcement officer shot at her, you should be ashamed of yourselves. Every single one of you. Questions? Thank you, mister Vice

The speaker argues that the Second Amendment is a right, not a privilege, but with restrictions that include having an ID and a permit on hand. He notes that current reports claim Alex Pretty did not have either on, implying he was not carrying legally. Beyond legality, the speaker emphasizes a responsibility to carry a firearm with foresight and understanding of the situation, recommending that someone who carries take a training class for their state, and even suggesting taxpayers fund it if possible because it’s a right. Regarding the shooting incident, the speaker states that only one person could have absolutely prevented Alex Pretty from being shot that day: Alex Pretty himself. He asserts he does not think the shooting was necessary to save a life, but he watched the incident from behind Pretty and not as an arresting officer or as the person who might have fired. He questions why Pretty had 10 rounds, arguing that if someone is shot, the shooter should have aimed to kill because they are trying to kill you; he attributes this to police training and the reasonableness doctrine. The speaker references the Supreme Court’s reasonableness doctrine, explaining that a police officer may protect themselves when someone has resisted arrest, disobeyed orders, and shown the means to harm. He concedes Pretty should not have been shot, noting there were ten minutes prior to the event with alternative actions that could have been taken, but he did not see those ten minutes. He describes Pretty as a protester versus an agitator, noting Pretty arrived with a cell phone and stood in the middle of a street during an operation, which the speaker labels as common sense. He asserts that carrying a weapon and entering the middle of a police operation is lawful, but suggests another prevention: a police cordon by the Minneapolis Police Department to prevent people like Pretty from entering the middle of the operation, instead of standing 100 feet away with a sign. The speaker acknowledges potential liability for any federal agent who acted prematurely or shot when they shouldn’t have, but reiterates that Pretty had no business where he was at that moment and did resist arrest. He states that in Minnesota, a carry permit is revoked at the moment of resisting arrest. Finally, the speaker blames politicians for letting the event happen, naming Donald Trump and Tim Walz as figures discussed. He calls for Border Patrol agents to secure the border and for the Minneapolis Police Department to be present to manage crowds. He mentions Jose Huerta Chuma, describing a violent rap sheet including domestic assault, and argues that sympathy for someone who is willing to risk the safety of others should diminish. He emphasizes a desire for no one to get hurt and urges people to use common sense, especially when carrying a weapon.

"Talk to me about the environment in which a shooting like this happens." "we don't know any of full details of this. We don't know if this was the supporter shooting their gun off in celebration or so. We have no idea about this." "He's been one of the most divisive, especially divisive, figures in this who is constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups." "I always go back to hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions." "And I think that's the environment we're in, that people just you can't stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and not expect awful actions to take place." "And that's the unfortunate environment we're in."

The following story contains graphic footage of violence. A white gunman opened fire Tuesday night on people protesting the police shooting of unarmed black man Jacob Blake in Kenosha, Wisconsin. The attack was carried out by a teenage white vigilante. Somebody white male. The white boy. White supremacist. Terrorist. He murdered protesters. I didn't do anything wrong. I defended myself. What we saw is white male privilege and white male entitlement. That white supremacist patriarchy. A system of white supremacy. The only reason why any of this is allowed is because of the whiteness of it all. Very white nationalist. White vigilante. White fear. White privilege. I didn't wanna have to kill anybody that night. Oh, baloney. White tears. I have nightmares every night. And what is the nightmare? It's just reliving the events of what happened. These are scenes playing out in a small city in America's Midwest.

Representative Markwayne Mullin recounted a conversation with the police officer who fatally shot a woman at the Capitol on January 6th. Mullin stated he doesn't know for a fact, but he guarantees the officer had never used his weapon in that manner before and didn't want to. Mullin said the officer was physically and emotionally distraught after the event, and Mullin told him he did what he had to do. Mullin stated the officer's life has also changed because using lethal force for the first time never leaves you. He added the officer was doing his job because members were still in the balcony, and if someone presents a weapon and gives commands that are ignored, there is no choice but to discharge the weapon in self-defense or risk it being used against you and endangering others.

I I'd be interested to hear what the conversation was that led up to the shots being fired because that's to me, it's silly. Guys out here just doing a job and then gets harassed and ultimately, you know, shot by somebody not even involved.

A driver was pulled over for an expired inspection sticker and admitted to not having a driver's license. The driver stated he was armed and refused to provide his name or vehicle registration. He requested a supervisor and insulted the officer. The driver claimed he served with the officer and special forces, losing his brother and everything else. He said he was brought to the country and is "dying every fucking single day" with four children, unable to get a job or disability due to racism, and his license was taken for lack of insurance. The officer reported the subject was armed and reaching for his weapon. The driver denied reaching, but the officer insisted he saw him do it. The driver offered the officer something, then shots were fired, and the driver stated he was hit.

A family in Miami Dade is grieving after police shot and killed their father, Osvaldo Quelly, on their property. The family claims Osvaldo and his son were trying to protect their property from trespassers when plainclothes police in unmarked vehicles arrived and opened fire. The son states that officers shot at them without identifying themselves, even as he ran back onto his property. He says his father never brandished his weapon. The family alleges that Osvaldo was left to die without medical assistance from the officers. Police claim they were responding to a call about a possible stolen car and that a firearm was recovered at the scene. Family members deny this version of events. They are seeking justice and a full accounting of the events leading to Osvaldo's death. Authorities state that the incident is under investigation.

Speaker 0: 'you guys are basically stealing people's stuff and not paying them, and then he wound up murdered.' Speaker 1: 'Also a great tragedy. He committed suicide.' Speaker 0: 'Do you think he committed suicide?' Speaker 1: 'It was a gun he had purchased.' Speaker 0: 'There were signs of a struggle, of course. The surveillance camera, the wires had been cut.' Speaker 0: 'No indication at all that he was suicidal. No note.' Speaker 1: 'And his mother claims he was murdered on your orders.' Speaker 0: 'the city of San Francisco has refused to investigate it beyond just calling it a suicide.' Speaker 1: 'I immediately called a member of congress from California, Ro Khanna, and said, this is crazy. You gotta look into this. And nothing ever happened.'

Speaker 0 argues that “they are not here to cause safety in this city” and that “what they are doing is not to provide safety in America.” They claim those actions are “causing chaos and distrust,” and that such actions are “ripping families apart,” and “sowing chaos on our streets,” adding that in this case they are “quite literally killing people.” The speaker contends that the opposing side has already begun to frame the incident as an action of self-defense, and, after having seen the video themselves, states directly that this portrayal is “bullshit.” They insist that the situation does not reflect self-defense but rather that “this was an agent recklessly using power that resulted in somebody dying, getting killed.”

The video discusses the unveiling of Lieutenant Michael Byrd as the Capitol Hill police officer who shot Ashley Babbitt. Aaron Babbitt shares his thoughts on Byrd's interview, questioning his actions and motives. Byrd claims he shot Babbitt in self-defense to protect others. The interview raises concerns about transparency and racial factors in the case. Aaron Babbitt plans to file a lawsuit against the Capitol Police. Viewers are directed to a website to support the legal fight for justice for Ashley.

Ashley Babbitt's family plans to file a multimillion dollar wrongful death lawsuit against the Capitol Police Department. They believe the officer who shot Babbitt had no right to use his weapon. According to their lawyer, Babbitt was unarmed and couldn't see the officer due to furniture blocking her view. The officer allegedly didn't give a verbal warning before firing. Babbitt's family argues that while her actions may have been unlawful, they didn't warrant her death. Witnesses express shock and anger at the officer's actions, calling Babbitt's shooting unjustified. They believe she should be seen as a hero for standing up against the government.

Rodney Hinton watched body camera footage of his son Ryan's death, which showed Ryan exiting a stolen car with a handgun, dropping it, picking it up, and then being fatally shot by police. Despite this, the family's lawyer, from the Cochrane firm, argued the shooting was unjustified, claiming Ryan received a "death penalty" for open carrying in Ohio. Hours later, Rodney Hinton intentionally ran over and killed Hamilton County Deputy Larry Henderson, who was directing traffic. Hinton is now charged with aggravated murder. The speaker asserts Hinton knew the police were justified in shooting his son after viewing the footage. The speaker claims that if Hinton wanted revenge, he should have blamed himself for his son's actions. The speaker concludes that Hinton committed premeditated murder against an innocent officer unconnected to his son's death.

The officer did not want to use lethal force and had never encountered such a situation before. After the incident, he was visibly shaken, and I reassured him that he did what he had to do. It’s tragic that a young woman lost her life, and her family is affected, but the lieutenant's life has also changed forever. He didn't come to work intending to use his weapon; he was forced into that situation to protect others. When commands were ignored, he had to act in self-defense to prevent the weapon from being taken and used against him, which could have endangered more lives. Though many had evacuated, there were still individuals in the area, and his actions likely saved additional lives.

We're addressing claims made by a witness in a recent story. This witness alleged our officer shot a suspect, Jalen Robinson, in the back as he was surrendering, but that's not what happened. Dashcam and body camera footage shows Robinson, who fled a traffic stop, turned and shot at our officer. The officer attempted to use a taser, but it was ineffective. Robinson shot the officer in the stomach. The released footage clearly shows Robinson facing the officer, pointing a handgun before the officer drew his weapon. The officer was hit but saved by his vest. Officers returned fire, hitting Robinson, who later died despite medical assistance. Our officers have the right to defend themselves. The Mississippi Bureau of Investigations (MBI) is now handling the case, gathering evidence and witness accounts, including from the witness who made the false claims. The officers involved are on paid leave pending the investigation.

The speakers in the video are discussing an incident involving a dog that was shot by an officer. The dog had medical issues and was blind and deaf. The owner argues that the officer should have used other methods to handle the situation instead of resorting to lethal force. The officer defends his actions, stating that he did not know the dog's condition and attempted to catch it using a lasso. The owner accuses the officer of mishandling the situation and not following proper procedures. The conversation becomes heated as they debate the officer's actions. The officer apologizes for the incident but maintains that he did what he thought was necessary.

"What you're watching here, you're gonna watch the reaction." "Something is hitting that shirt before it goes through his neck." "There could easily be a white vest under it." "Or what I just realized here is you guys have black letters on there." "That round could have very possibly touched one of those black letters." "The shirt looks like after the fact, but he did even have this mic on here." "There is no way to get that angle of that shot." "the vest goes through this, hits something inside, ricochets back out, comes out the top." "it most likely was a long rifle." "I'm still not convinced of the trans shooter." "There have been lies that the FBI has told us." "Kyle's Kyle does this stuff for a living." "Drop some comments below."

An officer pulled over a driver for an expired inspection sticker. The driver stated he had a gun and no driver's license. He refused to provide his name or registration. The driver expressed frustration with the American system, claiming he served with special forces and lost his brother. He said he was brought to the U.S. and is "dying every fucking single day" because he can't get a job or disability and his license was taken for lack of insurance payment. He said he should have served with the Taliban and is now more concerned about Americans than the Taliban. The officer noticed the driver reaching for his weapon and called for backup. The officer told him not to reach for anything. Shots were then fired. The officer reported he was hit.

I'm here with Ashley Davitt's mother who believes that the black police officer actor and Ashley Bobbitt should be featured on the show. They question whether the bullet that hit Ashley Bobbitt was actually fired by the black police officer actor. They also point out that the police officers present did not make any effort to save her life after she was shot. They criticize the lack of reaction from bystanders and express their disbelief that people continued to film the incident. They plan to call out this situation and support stophate.com. Ashley's mother asserts that her daughter was exercising her first amendment rights and was unjustly shot by capital police lieutenant Michael Hurd without consequences.

Warning: the following story contains graphic footage. A white gunman opened fire Tuesday night on people protesting the police shooting of unarmed Black man Jacob Blake in Kenosha, Wisconsin. The attack was carried out by a teenage white vigilante. The shooter is described as a white supremacist, terrorist, and white nationalist. He murdered protesters. "I didn't do anything wrong. I defended myself." The speakers cite "white privilege" and "white male entitlement" as motives, calling it "the white supremacist patriarchy" and "a system of white supremacy." They describe "This little murderous white supremacist" and label it "mass murder." Phrases include "White vigilante," "White fear," "White privilege," "I didn't wanna have to kill anybody that night," and "White tears" with "White male tears." The piece ends: "These are scenes playing out in a small city in America's Midwest."

There was a shooting near 27th and Wisconsin on Wednesday. Gunshots were exchanged, and a man with a long gun was seen on camera. I returned gunfire and was fatally struck at the scene. Unfortunately, I managed to injure another officer before I died. Why does it matter if someone is gay or trans? Everyone is quick to judge my nephew without knowing what he was going through. This doesn't excuse my actions, but I was a good person. It's unbelievable how white men can commit mass shootings and walk away, while I was killed. People are joking about my shooting skills, but I served in the army and could have killed many if I wanted to.

Video shows Eduardo Machado, a clerk, assassinating David, a police officer, inside a store after David and his father-in-law pull up to get a hot dog at 04:08. Machado walks out as David enters, retrieves a jacket from the white car behind the crime scene van, then returns inside. He walks up behind David and fires multiple shots into David's head. When David goes to the ground, the gun jams; he stands over him, clears it, and then fires another seven or eight shots. "There’s 10 or twelve, fifteen shots into David's head." He then walks out, puts the jacket and we believe the firearm back in the car, changes his shirt. The clerk in the store was in the bathroom; he comes out, assumes there's some kind of robbery or something, and he starts to walk away with our shooter. Our shooter’s in custody now. "The video is crystal clear over everything that occurred." "This was clearly, clearly, the video shows this was an out and out assassination." He holds out his hand from point blank range and just opens fire.