reSee.it - Related Video Feed

All vaccines, including COVID vaccines, are causing harm to children. There has never been a study comparing fully vaccinated kids following the CDC schedule to unvaccinated kids. The difference in health outcomes is dramatic, with unvaccinated kids being consistently healthier. A 10-year study by Dr. Paul Thomas, which was retracted unethically, showed that vaccinated kids were more likely to get the diseases they were vaccinated against. Being unvaccinated should be applauded because vaccines are causing chronic diseases in America. A study with over 1,000 unvaccinated people showed significantly better health outcomes compared to fully vaccinated individuals. The CDC promised to conduct a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals but never followed through. No vaccine is safe or effective, and no study has proven otherwise.

The speaker believes all vaccines are suspect. As an emergency medicine physician, the speaker thought vaccines only contained a dead or attenuated virus and saline. In September 2000, after reading a package insert and researching vaccines, the speaker was mortified to learn that a child receiving all scheduled vaccines gets almost 13,000 micrograms of aluminum, almost 600 micrograms of mercury, and over 200 chemicals. The speaker states that this is why vaccines have never been proven safe, and vaccination is like injecting foreign matter into a baby.

Speaker 1 states they would not give their children the measles, mumps vaccine, claiming that while many used to die from these diseases, by 1964, only 300-400 Americans died, mostly malnourished children. They claim the World Health Organization says vitamin A is a cure for measles and that contracting measles as a child leads to greater resistance to cancers, atopic diseases, allergies, and heart disease. Speaker 1 denies causing a measles outbreak in Samoa, stating the prime minister had already banned the vaccine after deaths, and that the deaths were due to a bad vaccine from Australia given to people who already had measles. They maintain that autism is caused by vaccines, citing a CDC study that showed a 1350% elevated risk for autism among children who received the hepatitis B vaccine in their first 30 days. They allege that studies claiming vaccines don't cause autism are fraudulent, citing a fugitive scientist, Paul Thornson, and that the CDC is dishonest and controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. They reference their book, "Let the Science Speak," which they claim contains 1,400 references and over 400 studies linking autism and neurological injuries to vaccines.

A doctor studied every patient born into their practice over ten and a half years, comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children. The study, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, included over 500 unvaccinated children and over 3,700 partially vaccinated children. The doctor claims the data showed that the more vaccines a child received, the worse their health outcomes were regarding infections, ADD/ADHD, neurodevelopmental issues, eczema, allergies, and anemia. The doctor states that within five days of the study's online publication, the Oregon Medical Board suspended their license, deeming them a threat to public health. The doctor says they have allowed parents to decide about vaccines, emphasizing informed consent.

Speaker 0 asserts that there is no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule and labels themselves an anti-vaxxer because no vaccine has been properly tested for safety. They state that, in the book Vax Facts, you are more likely to die from the vaccine than from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and that this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. They acknowledge that death from the vaccine is still a death and “super rare,” but claim you are much more likely to die from the vaccine. They ask which do you want: a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease, noting that for many of these diseases, the risk is zero.

We analyzed all patients in my practice, no cherry-picking. Stratified by vaccines, 500 had 0, 3,700+ had some. Results showed more vaccines correlated with worse outcomes: infections, ADD, ADHD, neurodevelopmental issues, eczema, allergies, anemia. Data is powerful. Access to this info would have changed my choices for my daughter. Every parent deserves all information for informed decisions. Translation: We examined all patients in the practice without bias. Results showed a correlation between more vaccines and negative outcomes. Access to this data would have influenced my decisions for my daughter. All parents should have access to complete information for informed choices.

In my practice, we examined every baby and office visit without cherry-picking. We had over 500 babies with no vaccines and 3,700+ with some. Unvaccinated kids showed fewer illnesses and chronic conditions compared to vaccinated ones. The data, displayed in graphs, revealed that more vaccines correlated with worse health outcomes like infections, ADHD, and anemia. This compelling data led to the suspension of my license within 5 days of its release.

The speaker described observing a growing trend of patients choosing not to vaccinate over the next decade and sought to determine if he could prove differences. He collected data from his practice, examining every baby born there, and published the findings in an international journal of public health. The study, described as peer reviewed and robust, reported massive increases in several health outcomes among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated, including four to five hundred percent more allergies, autoimmune conditions, and neurodevelopmental issues, as well as infections of all kinds. Following the online publication of the study, he received a call from his attorney instructing him not to see any patients, not to write any prescriptions, and not to enter the office. He was told, “Your license has been emergently suspended. You are a threat to public health.” He stated, “Today is the last time I will be doing clinical medicine in Oregon.” He added, “Knowing that you guys are keeping it going, the heart of this place lives on.”

The CDC has not conducted studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children over time. In my practice, we analyzed data from all patients over 10.5 years, comparing those who followed the CDC vaccine schedule with those who did not. We included over 500 unvaccinated children and around 3,700 who received some vaccines. The findings were surprising; unvaccinated children experienced significantly fewer health issues, including infections and chronic conditions. The data showed a clear trend: the more vaccines a child received, the worse their health outcomes, including conditions like ADHD and allergies. Shortly after publishing this data, my medical license was suspended, with claims that I posed a threat to public health.

Speaker 0 argues that there are multiple studies showing that a healthy child born today is healthier if they go without any vaccines. He cites that ten percent of Medicaid recipients in Florida had no Medicaid visits for vaccines and suggests that the parents likely opted out of taking vaccines, noting that those were the healthiest children. He references Paul Thomas, who examined five thousand patients in his pediatric practice and states that the kids who took no vaccines were the healthiest. He also mentions studies in the Amish and others, asserting that it is clear in the modern day that going natural—meaning no vaccines whatsoever—in a healthy child, the child is healthier.

All vaccines, including COVID vaccines, are causing harm to children. There has never been a study comparing fully vaccinated kids following the CDC schedule to unvaccinated kids. The difference in health outcomes between these two groups is dramatic, with unvaccinated kids being consistently healthier. A 10-year study by Dr. Paul Thomas, which was retracted unethically, showed that vaccinated kids were more likely to get the diseases they were vaccinated against. A study by the control group with over 1,000 unvaccinated people also revealed significantly better health outcomes compared to fully vaccinated individuals. Despite promises, the CDC has never conducted a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. No vaccine is safe or effective, and no study has been able to prove otherwise.

The speaker claims that no childhood vaccine has ever undergone a safety trial using a double-blind, placebo-based study. They assert that this type of study, involving a saline injection as a placebo, is the only way to determine the safety of a pharmaceutical product. Furthermore, the speaker states that there has never been a study comparing the health outcomes of children who receive the full schedule of 72 (or potentially up to 90) vaccines to those who receive none. Because of the lack of safety studies and comparative data, the speaker chooses not to inject themselves or their children with vaccines. They want evidence that vaccines are safe and make people healthier.

"Chronic disease has gone from twelve point eight percent in our children in the nineteen eighties to over fifty four percent of our kids now." "72 times we are altering the immune system of our children with our vaccine program." "There'd be one easy study to rule it out, compare vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children." "But we don't know because they've never done the study." "The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis." "Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections." "Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated." "Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities, zero tics, and zero other psychological disabilities."

We analyzed every patient in my practice without excluding anyone. We categorized over 500 unvaccinated children and more than 3,700 vaccinated ones. The findings were surprising: unvaccinated children experienced fewer illnesses and chronic conditions. The data clearly showed that as vaccination rates increased, so did health issues like infections, ADD, ADHD, neurodevelopmental problems, eczema, allergies, and anemia. The contrast between vaccinated and unvaccinated children was striking. If I had known this information before my daughter was born, I would have made different choices. Every parent wants the best for their child and deserves access to all relevant information to make informed decisions. I share this in hopes that it helps others.

The speaker hired an expert to analyze data from 2,700 variably vaccinated and 560 unvaccinated patients in their practice, age-matched for comparison. The speaker claims the data, available at doctorsandscience.com, reveals significant differences in health outcomes. According to the speaker's slides, unvaccinated children had lower rates of asthma, allergic rhinitis, eczema, sinusitis, gastroenteritis, respiratory infections, otitis media, conjunctivitis, other infections, breathing issues, and behavioral issues like ADD/ADHD. The speaker states there were no cases of ADD/ADHD in unvaccinated patients over 10 years. The speaker suggests vaccines shift the immune system towards allergy and autoimmunity, leading to more infections. The speaker argues that the association between vaccines and negative health outcomes is not coincidental, citing multiple studies and mechanisms of action, including aluminum and immune activation from too many vaccines too soon. The speaker states that the medical board revoked their license in response to this study.

The speaker states the World Council for Health is calling for a complete moratorium on childhood vaccines, the first international organization to do so. According to the speaker, 1986 US legislation indemnified vaccine manufacturers, stating vaccines have unavoidable harm. The speaker claims that when vaccines are given in multiple rounds, there is a strong signal towards neuropsychiatric disorders like attention deficit disorder, Asperger's, autism, seizures, allergic diseases, asthma, atopic dermatitis, and sudden infant death syndrome. Conversely, the speaker cites papers by Mawson, Hooker, Miller, Thomas, and an older Amish study that allegedly show children with no vaccines have the best outcomes.

The speaker claims colored vaccines are dangerous, with no clinical benefit and over 10,000,000 deaths worldwide. They suggest avoiding vaccination altogether, citing studies showing unvaccinated kids are healthier. They criticize censorship by the government and medical boards, leading to job loss and license revocation for speaking out against the narrative. The medical journals are also deemed corrupt. Speaker 1 mentions not every batch causes harm, as they themselves took a few shots without issue.

Does vaccination make me healthier? And the answer from all of the unvaccinated control group studies to date is no. Vaccination increases your risk of suffering a lifelong debilitating disorder by over one thousand percent, 10 times greater. In our unvaccinated control group study of fourteen twenty eight Americans, we did not find a single case of diabetes. How is that possible? This is the power of an unvaccinated control group. It is statistically significant. It shows causation and causation is my interest as a lawyer. Autoimmune disorders. We could not find them in any significant number in the unvaccinated. We didn't find heart disease. We didn't find cancer. We didn't find sudden infant death syndrome. All of these conditions that are prevalent among the vaccinated population are simply absent among the unvaccinated.

The speaker states they searched for years for a pre-licensing safety trial of the 72 vaccine doses effectively mandated for American children. They claim that every other medication requires a safety trial comparing health outcomes in a placebo group versus a vaccine group before FDA licensing. The speaker assumed this was also done for vaccines. They state they found out that vaccines were exempt from this requirement.

The speaker cites the World Council for Health, stating that parents are urged to adopt a "common sense, safer to wait approach," which means deferring on the childhood vaccine schedule. The speaker asserts that five studies in the modern day show that "children who take no vaccines, none" are born healthy and remain healthier than children who receive vaccines. The claims include lower rates of food allergies and peanut allergies, attributed to the peanut excipients in vaccines. Additional cited outcomes for unvaccinated children include lower rates of asthma, allergic dermatitis, and a reduced need for tympanostomy tubes. The speaker also claims lower rates of attention deficit disorder, Asperger’s disease, and lower rates of autism spectrum disorder "by a mile." The overall assertion is that "massive excessive vaccination is likely harming our children today."

The speaker claims the whooping cough vaccine increases the lifetime risk of contracting pertussis multiple times. They state the risk of death from pertussis is less than two in a million, while the risk of death from the vaccine is more than one in seventy-six thousand, making the vaccine 30 times more likely to cause death than the disease itself. Because of this information, the speaker would not risk their baby's life with the vaccine. They prefer to boost their child's immune system naturally to fight off any infection, relying on natural, innate immunity rather than a faulty product with no safety testing.

Speaker 1 states that less than one percent of the public is totally unvaccinated. The Amish are given as an example of a largely unvaccinated group. Speaker 1 claims it is very rare to find an autistic child in the Amish community, and that ADD, autoimmune disease, PANDA PANS, and epilepsy are also rare. Speaker 1 asserts the U.S. government has studied the Amish for decades, but has not released a report. Speaker 1 believes the reason for this is that the report would show that not following government guidelines leads to better health outcomes. Speaker 1 concludes that the report would be devastating to the narrative and would show that the CDC has been harming the public for decades by burying data.

Speaker 0 argues that adverse events from regular vaccines are far more common than people imagine, including allergies. They state their personal allergy to wheat is likely the result of an adjuvant that caused their immune system to react to something normal in their gut in a way from which they will never be free. They also point to their children: one son has significant seasonal allergies that interfere with daily life, and another son has an allergy to dairy which they believe goes back to an allergy to mother's milk, noting that he spit up regularly after breastfeeding and that this perplexed them at the time. They describe this as a huge waste of a precious resource and remark that it seems like evolution messed up, especially given that ancestors faced scarcity and would not want to surrender nutrients when food was plentiful. They now think that the dairy allergy developed very early, probably from an adjuvant in a childhood vaccine. In tying these observations together, Speaker 0 uses their education and what they describe as painful education to make a concluding point. If they could start over, they would not give any vaccines to their newborn children. They clarify that they are not claiming it is impossible that some vaccines could be more beneficial than they are harmful, but they now know that they cannot trust safety testing. Therefore, even if there were indications that something might be net beneficial, they would have to wonder what is hidden or not known. Overall, the speaker presents a personal narrative linking vaccines to the development of allergies in themselves and their children, uses this to argue a broader distrust of vaccine safety testing, and concludes that, given their current understanding, they would choose not to vaccinate newborns despite acknowledging that some vaccines might be beneficial in certain scenarios. The emphasis is on perceived higher-than-expected adverse events, potential connections to adjuvants, the impact on allergies, and a strong reevaluation of newborn vaccination decisions based on safety testing concerns.

My name is Dr. Brian Hooker, a vaccine safety scientist. The law shields vaccine manufacturers, and the vaccine schedule has grown to 73 doses by 2023. FDA approved vaccines with minimal safety testing, and CDC never studied the overall impact on children's health. Research shows vaccinated children are more likely to have developmental delays, ear infections, and asthma compared to unvaccinated children. Unvaccinated children have lower rates of autoimmune, neurodevelopmental, and other disorders.

First speaker: The question is about how many people are totally unvaccinated, and whether this is mainly among parents who stepped up. The claim is that it’s a very small percentage because many people blindly followed the vaccination recommendations for children. Second speaker: It’s less than one percent of the public who are unvaccinated. The Amish are given as a perfect example of a large group that is largely unvaccinated. The speaker asserts that you won’t find an autistic child who was unvaccinated, and that such chronic diseases as ADD, autoimmune diseases, PANDA/PANS, and epilepsy are very rare in the Amish community. The speaker claims that the US government has studied the Amish for decades, but there has never been a public report. The reason given is that such a report would show that not following the guidelines leads to healthier outcomes, and therefore there would be a disclosure that would be devastating to the narrative. According to the speaker, there is no public report because it would reveal that the CDC has been harming the public for decades and is bearing all the data privately.