TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker argues that online discourse on Israel is split into two extreme camps and that US politics mirrors this division, creating a harmful national distraction. To heal the relationship and conversation, four steps are proposed: 1) Global perspective: The United States is a 350,000,000-strong powerhouse; Israel is tiny with 9,000,000 people and few natural resources. The US has spent at least $30,000,000,000 defending Israel since 10/07/2023, and about $300,000,000,000 overall; two THAAD batteries in Israel represent a quarter of the world’s supply. Prominent claims: "The United States needs Israel" and "Israel could not survive without The United States." 2) Self-respect: stop being treated as a client state; cited incidents include Pollard and Israeli officers in the Pentagon; Netanyahu's "I control Donald Trump" remark. 3) Citizenship: end dual citizenship; APAC to register under FAIR. 4) Theology: reject Christian Zionism; "the chosen people in Christianity are those who choose Jesus."

"The Israel On Campus Coalition is at the center of the lobby's response to BDS." "Stand With Us and the ICC have a particularly close relationship." "Canary Mission is highly, highly effective to the extent that we monitor the students for justice in Palestine and their allies." "90% of the people who pay attention to this space very closely have no idea what we're actually doing, which I like." "Adam Milkin? Milstein has become a central figure in the lobby. His foundation funds numerous pro organizations. He also sits on the boards of APAX National Council, the Israel On Campus Coalition, and Stand With Us." "You said you see the vision, and you tell us go and do it. And we took your orders, and we made it happen. And we took your money."

Christian influencers. The speaker discusses "the woke right," saying, "I call it the woke reich," and adds, "they're insane," though "they're actually meeting on some of the things." He argues we must "secure that part of our the base of our support in The United States" which is "being challenged systematically," noting "a lot of this is done with money. Money of NGOs, vast. Money of governments, vaster." We must "fight back," and "Our influencers" should be engaged: "you should also talk to them... they're very important." The strategy is to "use the tools of battle" and adapt as weapons change; "you can't fight today with the swords" or "cavalry." New tech like drones may appear. The most important battleground is "social media," and the "most important purchase" is "glass followers"—"Five followers. TikTok. TikTok. One. Number one." Then: "we have to fight the fight... to take give direction to the Jewish people and give direction to our non Jewish friends," and asks, "Are we gonna succeed with everyone? No. Will there be a strong"

Speaker 0 asserts that another revolution is coming, aiming to achieve a broader peace, describing Israel’s conflict as an eight-front war—Jews against Rome, with the United States as the new Rome—and stating that Rome and Jerusalem clashed over values, a tragedy the Jews lost but must win next time. Speaker 1 adds that Jews against Rome have shifted from defense to offense. Speaker 2 notes that weapons evolve and swords do not work today, implying the need for new tools; Speaker 1 emphasizes that the battle requires the genius that created Apollo, pagers, and penetrated Hezbollah to prepare for this fight. Speaker 2 argues the most important battlefields are social media, with the next war to be decided online as much as offline. Speaker 0 designates this as the eighth front: the disinformation campaign. Speaker 3 and Speaker 0 discuss the scale of online manipulation, claiming billions of dollars are invested in the information battlefield by NGOs and governments, and asserting that money drives the effort. Speaker 6 and Speaker 7 describe policies to prohibit harmful stereotypes about Jews and to deplatform those who propagate them; they claim monitoring online spaces, including social media, messaging apps, video games, and cryptocurrency, and sharing intelligence with the FBI. Speaker 7 and others reference a spectrum of platforms and formats—podcasts, short-form video, Wikipedia, LLMs—and condemn antisemitism online, including “Hitler admires, Stalin admires, Jew haters,” while insisting on countermeasures. Speaker 8 and Speaker 9 discuss TikTok as a focal point, asserting that for every thirty minutes spent on TikTok, users become 17% more antisemitic, with carnage imagery from Gaza influencing perceptions; there is a stated problem with TikTok shaping youth attitudes. Speaker 10 and Speaker 6 describe redefining terms like Zionist as a proxy for Jews and Israelis, framing such language as hate speech; Speaker 11 indicates a desire for counterintelligence and critiques current curriculum, while Speaker 1 notes co-authoring Sunday school curricula with the ADL. Speaker 11 and Speaker 6 discuss developing technology to train LLMs and to combat antisemitism, with collaboration announced with OpenAI, Alphabet, Anthropic, Meta, and Microsoft; Speaker 10 notes a network of two dozen Jewish organizations feeding intelligence. Speaker 1 outlines a program to measure, monitor, and disrupt extremist content, with a full-time team of 40 analysts; Speaker 12 mentions monitoring campuses, digital networks, activist groups, and public officials, and that PhDs and academics support the effort. Speaker 13 and Speaker 14 discuss unifying data into a single platform, investing in intelligence, and mobilizing organizations to share information and fight common enemies; Speaker 12 emphasizes constant recording and reporting, aiming to mobilize allies. Speaker 15 and Speaker 9 reflect harsh strategies against antisemitism, including deportation and criminal measures, while Speaker 9 notes threats against those who push antisemitic conspiracy theories. Speaker 16–17 recount legal actions against antisemitic rhetoric and antisemitism lawsuits; Speaker 18 describes the J7 diaspora network meeting to share information and best practices; Speaker 19–20 advocate reform of education and even limiting the First Amendment to protect it, arguing for control over speech. Speaker 3 and Speaker 20 discuss enforcement and punishment for anti-Israel or antisemitic speech; Speaker 1 highlights training 20,000 officers annually in extremism and hate via partnerships with law enforcement going back to the FBI’s origins. Speaker 29 calls opponents “a small bunch of wannabe Nazis” and asserts intent to pursue justice; Speaker 0 closes by proclaiming that history remembers action, not denial of hatred, and that we are on the cusp of a new age where technology’s powerful benefits can drive positive outcomes in agriculture, health, transportation, and other fields, enabling Israel to become a primary power rather than a secondary one.

We're in the fight of our lives, and this is how we will fight back. First, we must use social media because that's what young people follow. And I must tell you tell them that you must tell them the truth. Israel must finally get serious about public relations. If Israel can't tell its amazing story to the world, then its enemies will, and they've done it now. We must expose every renegade teacher and their unions. We must expect more courage from our political officials, not excuses. We must rebuild education around truth, not slogans and lies. We will have to reinvent how we teach the history of the Jewish people because it's not working. Too many young people have never heard of the Holocaust. The World Jewish Congress has produced some excellent films that explain what happened. We want to show them in classrooms everywhere in The United States. And any candidate running for a seat in this building, whether for congress or senate, whose platform includes antisemitism, We will target them as they target us. Accordingly, we'll start a fund to help their opponents. We cannot pass we cannot passively sit by and let anti Zionists determine our future. None of this will will be easy. It will take time and effort from all of us, and Jews cannot fight this fight alone. Frankly, we shouldn't have to because this is not a Jewish issue. It's a democratic issue. It's a moral issue. It's a human issue. Let us let us build a coalition so strong, so united, so determined that no extremist movement can fracture it. And above all, let us let us be bridge builders, unshakable, unapologetic, but so that the next generation inherits a world defined not by hatred, but by humanity.

Stop Antisemitism was built for confronting the global explosion of Jew hatred unleashed since the attacks of ten seven. Since that day, we have featured more than 1,000 antisemites on our platforms—not theorized about them, not quietly documented them, but featured them publicly, clearly, and with evidence. The results speak for themselves: approximately 400 of these Jew haters have faced real consequences including firings, suspensions, and expulsions. More than 300 remain in an active investigatory state across universities, corporations, DEI departments, unions, hospitals, nonprofits, and yes, federal government agencies. And five arrests to date tied directly to threats and violence of antisemitic conduct we helped expose. This is what accountability looks like. This is what action looks like. This is what pushing back hard looks like against the tidal wave of hate that has consumed The United States and global population. From our founding, Stop Antisemitism has operated on one guiding belief: Antisemitism thrives when there are no consequences. So we created consequences, a lot of them. We created visibility. We turned the spotlight towards those who targeted our community, making silence impossible. On campuses where Jewish students were hunted through libraries, where professors glorified Hamas and Hezbollah terrorists, where mobs shut down our buildings and administrators hid under desks, we stepped in. We documented the offenders. We worked with attorneys, lawmakers, and victim families, and we ensured the message was not unmistakable: If you target Jewish students, your actions will not disappear into the darkness. We will shine a light on you that thanks to Google and SEO, follow you for the rest of your life. When you look for a job, when you look for a spouse, when you look for a nanny, when you look for anything, our work will always be documented. Again, thanks to Google and SEO. In corporations where DEI leaders smeared Israel, excused Hamas, we pressured CEOs; some resigned, many were terminated, but policies were changed thankfully from governmental to art institutions. Online, where anonymous accounts spread violent threats, we traced patterns, elevated evidence, and worked with authorities leading to arrests from Florida, South Carolina, New York, California, and Texas. And we're not slowing down sadly. Today, Stop Antisemitism, I'm proud to say, runs one of the most robust antisemitic enforcement operations in The United States, monitoring campuses, digital networks, activist groups, and public officials, documenting incidents in real time and mobilizing millions of people, of allies that are quietly by our side. But the fight is bigger than the exposure, and it's about securing a future—A future where Jewish students can walk across a quad without being screamed at. A future where employers understand that anti Semitism is not activism. It's bigotry and it will cause you to lose your job. A future where fact, not propaganda, shapes policy. A future where global institutions from Google to chat, GPT, from governments to universities to media, finally treats Jew hatred with the seriousness of other minority-targeted hate. To get there, we need three things: action, real action as I listed; accountability; relentless vigilance, because antisemitism does not take breaks. It doesn't wait for elections. It doesn't disappear because we are exhausted and tired, and when I tell you myself and my team are exhausted and tired, that's the least of it. Stop antisemitism has never been more essential, more strategic, or more effective than it is now, but we cannot do this alone. The demand, the volume of tips, the number of investigations, sadly, it continues to grow instead of decrease. If we want a safer future for the Jewish people, this is the moment to stand together and act. We have to push harder to make it clear that Jewish safety is a nonnegotiable. Tonight, I'm asking you to always be in the fight with us, not just in spirit, but in true action. Participate in calls to action. Write letters to your governmental officials. Speak to the teachers and the college administrators that are making, if it's not your friends and kids, it's making other community members feel unsafe. When we act, lives change, And antisemites learn, sometimes for the very first time in their lives and history, that targeting Jews will come at a price, and together we can ensure that Jew hatred never goes unanswered again. As a former refugee from The USSR, I say this with all of my heart, God bless The United States, God bless Israel, and I'm Israel High. Thank you so much.

APAC, AIEF, ADL, mainstream media, IFCJ, CFoI, CUFI, and many other lobbying groups in Washington DC spend millions promoting Zionist causes and influencing Congress. They target critics of Israel, use large budgets for lobbying, and support Israeli settlements. These organizations play a significant role in shaping US policy towards Israel.

The Anti-Defamation League's (ADL) ultimate goal is to effectively defund certain groups by having PayPal turn off their fundraising ability. The ADL aims to use its expertise and access to monitor these groups and stop them permanently. The ADL also intends to share its findings with other companies, law enforcement, and elected officials to implement a comprehensive strategy.

We need to invest in intelligence to understand who are the anti-Semites, who's funding them, what's their plans, who are the leaders. Then once we have that, we can define who is an enemy we can attack. Obviously, we're not gonna go against Islam or leftists in The United States. It's too big. We need to define very specific organization, individuals, actions that we can fight against. For example, when we talk about Islam or leftist, it's clear that Qatar is behind all that. So we need to focus on Qatar, Muslim Brotherhood, CARE in The United States. When we talk about radical left, we need to focus on the Democratic Socialists of America, which are not Democrats. They're just socialist Marxists that are using democratic means to take over the Democratic Party. Mamdani is a Democratic Socialist of America. So we need to focus on DSA. We need to focus on other radical movement, anarchist movements, People City Council of the PP Forum, a lot of organization that are being sponsored by China and by Marxist billionaires. And once we have all this information, we need to empower and mobilize an ecosystem of many organizations that we can incentivize them to work together, to share, and to fight against our common enemies. We need to invest in pro-Israel organizations, and we need to invest in pro American organization.

The presentation outlines how a mosque-affiliated organization can engage with politics through a hierarchy of entities while staying within legal constraints, and it encourages active civic participation and strategic funding to protect the community. Key points: - 501(c)(3) mosque organization: May not engage in partisan political work or lobbying, but can encourage civically engaged behavior such as registering to vote and going to the polls. The benefit of a C3 is tax-exempt status and tax-deductible donations. - 501(c)(4) social welfare/lobbying organization: Outside the masjid, a C4 can lobby, fight legislation, propose legislation, and mobilize people across all levels of government (school boards, city councils, state legislatures, federal). Donations to a C4 are not tax-deductible, but the organization can influence policy and legislation. - PACs (Political Action Committees): These collect money and give to candidates, with contribution limits (e.g., up to $5,000 to a candidate). They can raise funds for candidates but have ceiling restrictions. - Super PACs (independent expenditure committees): Created following a Supreme Court decision about eleven years ago, Super PACs are the most influential in campaigns. They can raise unlimited funds and spend on TV ads, mailers, and digital ads in support of a candidate as long as they do not coordinate with the candidate’s campaign. Additional information about CARE and its structures: - CARE (the C3 organization defending Muslim rights for 30 years) has 70 attorneys and remains available to assist anyone facing discrimination or intimidation due to being Muslim, including outreach through its DFW office. - CARE created CARE Action, a C4 lobbying organization to elevate the political influence of the Muslim community, particularly after the Gaza genocide; there is a chapter in the DFW area with active leadership and contacts. - CARE also established a Muslim super PAC, Unity and Justice Fund. The speaker notes that vocal restrictions limit further discussion but encourages engagement with Muslim organizations for involvement. - The speaker emphasizes that business-as-usual has not prevented genocides and that different, more effective forms of engagement are needed, including redirecting resources to better protect the future of the ummah in America. - The relationship between the Muslim community in the United States and the Muslim world is not ideal, and Muslims in the U.S. bear responsibility because they live in America and participate in its political framework. Participation through voting and organized civic action is framed as essential, since public leadership is tied to electoral outcomes. - The speaker invites further connection with CARE and KAIR staff for questions and opportunities, noting limitations due to C3 status and promising to seek solutions from now until November and beyond. The overall message: The community should move beyond limited engagement and leverage the C3, C4, PACs, and Super PACs framework to protect rights, influence policy, and ensure active participation in the political process, with CARE and Unity and Justice Fund serving as concrete pathways for involvement.

The speaker frames his role as a writer who supports those who fight, expressing a preference to be on the front line but acknowledging that his path is through the pen. He notes that for the past twenty years he has written one book each year. He mentions that some of his books have reached the Amazon top 10, while none have made the New York Times bestsellers list. His latest project, finished this year, is entitled “twenty nineteen.” It is a “checkbook.” He states that with this pen and his checkbook, he provides ammunition, and that he will depend to provide ammunition to organizations like ZOA, which are on the front lines in the battle confronting the enemies of Israel and the Jewish people, and defending them against the attacks of Islamists who wish to destroy Israel and the radical leftist and Jew haters who seek to eliminate the Jewish people everywhere. He thanks the fighters in the room and the people who support them, and he urges them to continue to use their pen to support ZOA so that it can continue to fight its mission on the front lines for battling for Israel and for the Jewish people. The message emphasizes a commitment to supporting Israel and the Jewish community through writing and financial means, underscoring the speaker’s belief in the power of writing and funding as tools in the perceived battle on behalf of Israel and Jews.

And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do, because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open border neoliberal quasi Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now it's coming for Jews, and they're like, what on earth happened? And it's not just the colleges. It's the nonprofits. It's the movies. It's Hollywood. It's all of it. It's like time for you guys to wake up and say no more. Draw a line in the sand. I don't care if you hate me.

The speaker states that Israel produces incredible weapons and shares them with the United States, and also produces intel that is invaluable for the United States. They reference the five I’s and note there is a sixth eye: Israel. This sixth eye is described as a very powerful eye, and it is said that Israel shares its intelligence with American intelligence services, contributing to a very strong bond between the countries. The bond is described as not only a bond of values and of their shared Judeo-Christian civilization, but also a war of civilization against the barbarians that they are fighting. In addition to shared values, the speaker emphasizes a bond of utility and great success, stating that the partnership is very, very strong, though challenged from time to time. The speaker urges the listener to talk to people in higher places in the Pentagon, implying that if one spoke with those who share intelligence or weapon systems, they would discover that they appreciate enormously what America gives to Israel, and they appreciate what Israel gives to America.

The speaker outlines the range of stakeholders that are important to their work, emphasizing a broad and diverse audience. They identify business as a very important audience, alongside politics, highlighting the role of ongoing engagement across multiple governmental contexts through continuous partnerships with many governments around the world. The speaker also notes NGOs and trade unions as key groups to consider, along with media, which is acknowledged as an important stakeholder category. Further, the speaker highlights that experts, scientists, and academia are crucial for informing a forward-looking perspective, particularly when considering future directions and solutions. The statement underscores the belief that the future will be shaped largely by technological developments, implying a need to incorporate cutting-edge innovations and technical expertise in strategic discussions and decision-making. In addition to these conventional sectors, the speaker mentions religious leaders as part of the stakeholder landscape, signaling recognition of faith-based perspectives and moral or ethical considerations in broader dialogues. Social entrepreneurs are singled out as well, described as very important, suggesting that venture-driven approaches to social impact are seen as a significant component of the ecosystem. Overall, the speaker communicates a philosophy of inclusivity and broad collaboration, integrating political, business, civil society, media, scientific, religious, and entrepreneurial voices. The emphasis on continuous partnerships with governments worldwide indicates an ongoing, collaborative approach to governance, policy, and implementation across different regions. The repeated references to a future oriented by technological development signal a strategic priority placed on innovation and science as drivers of forthcoming solutions, informing how they engage with the various stakeholder groups and respondents to emerging challenges. In sum, the speaker presents a multi-stakeholder framework that spans business, politics, governments, NGOs, trade unions, media, experts, scientists, academia, religious leaders, and social entrepreneurs, all contributing to a future shaped by technological progress and collaborative problem-solving.

Speaker 0 stated that 'you and the Likud party are cut from the same ideological cloth as Trump and the GOP in America,' citing Charlie Kirk as a mentor and 'Evangelicals' as the reason Israel has public support; he asked for a backup plan 'if we lose evangelical support for the state of Israel' to stay strong 'outside of the diaspora.' Speaker 1 replied: 'Christian influencers' are key and described the 'woke Reich' as opposing the base in the US, noting money from NGOs and governments funds the challenge; we must fight back with 'our influencers' and 'the weapons that apply to the battlefields'—especially social media. The most important purchase is 'class Followers' with 'Five followers. TikTok. No. Barts? TikTok.' 'Oh. TikTok. Number one.' and 'X' is also crucial. 'We have to talk to Elon. He's not an enemy. He's a friend.' If we get those two things, 'we get a lot,' though there will be counterpoint: 'Are we gonna succeed with everyone? No.'

And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do, because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open border neoliberal quasi Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now it's coming for Jews, and they're like, what on earth happened? And it's not just the colleges. It's the nonprofits. It's the movies. It's Hollywood. It's all of it. It's like time for you guys to wake up and say no more. Draw a line in the sand. I don't care if you hate me.

Speaker 0: 'you and the Likud party are cut from the same ideological cloth as Trump and the GOP in America.' 'Evangelicals, from all my research, evangelicals are the reason that Israel has been supported in public sphere outside of just Jews.' 'what's another game plan if we lose evangelical support for the state of Israel.' 'What's our backup plan to be strong, like, outside of the diaspora?' Speaker 1: 'Christian influencers.' 'The woke reich.' 'We have to fight back.' 'the weapons change over time. You can't fight today with the swords.' 'the most important ones are the social media.' 'the most important purchase that is going on right now is class Followers.' 'Five followers.' 'Followers. TikTok. Number one.' 'X. X. That's Successful. Good.' 'We have to talk to Elon. He's not an enemy. He's a friend.' 'Are we gonna succeed with everyone? No. Will there be a strong counterpoint? Yes.'

And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do, because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open border neoliberal quasi Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now it's coming for Jews. It's not just the colleges. It's the nonprofits, it's the movies, it's Hollywood, it's all of it. It's like time for you guys to wake up and say no more, draw a line in the sand. I don't care if you hate me.

Speaker discusses Christian influencers and says the woke left and the woke Reich are insane, but they're actually meeting on some things. They say the United States base is being challenged systematically, funded by NGOs and governments; we must fight back. We have to fight back using the tools of battle, with social media being the most important battlefield. "The weapons change over time." The most important purchase now is "class Followers. Five followers. TikTok. TikTok. One. Number one." and "X. Mhmm. X." They urge talking to Elon, "He's not an enemy. He's a friend." If we can get those two things, "we get a lot." "We have to fight the fight" to "take, give direction to the Jewish people and give direction to our non Jewish friends." Are we gonna succeed with everyone? No. Will there be a strong counter yes.

Speaker 0 discusses political strategy and messaging. He says he calls the woke left and the woke reich a brilliant label, noting that they’re insane but meeting on some issues. He asserts that part of the base in the United States is being challenged systematically, with funding from NGOs and governments playing a role. He emphasizes the need to fight back and to engage influencers, suggesting to talk to that community because they are very important. He states that battles are fought with the weapons available for the time, noting that swords and cavalry aren’t effective today. He mentions new technologies such as drones, but does not elaborate. He argues that the most important tools are social media, with the most important currency being followers. He identifies TikTok as number one and hopes a certain development will go through because it can be consequential. He also identifies X as another critical platform and calls it successful. He advocates talking to Elon Musk, saying he’s not an enemy but a friend, and that they should talk to him. He believes that securing both TikTok followers and X followers would yield significant gains. He acknowledges that he could discuss other strategies, but the point is to fight the fight. He believes this will provide direction to the Jewish people and to their non‑Jewish friends or those who could become friends. He concedes that success with everyone is not guaranteed and that there will be a strong counter, but the focus remains on engaging on those fronts.

The speaker argues that the United States has, for about a century, supported Israel not only for strategic reasons but through a broad, coordinated influence network. The question is raised: why have we fought regime-change wars on Israel’s behalf, why do we back Israel in Gaza, and why do we provide foreign aid? The speaker states the answer is not solely because of APAC. The central claim is that there exists a vast network inside the United States—a “fifth column.” This network stretches from Silicon Valley and Stanford on the West Coast to Harvard and Columbia on the East Coast, including major businesses like BlackRock and large hedge funds, mainstream media, banking and finance, and Hollywood, all the way to Washington, D.C. through lobbying groups such as APAC and J Street and mega donors like Sheldon Adelson. The speaker describes this as a Jewish oligarchy that operates across industries and elite sectors, working either directly under Israeli intelligence or on behalf of Israel, to push America to support Israel’s well-being. The justification offered is that because they are Jewish, they care about the Jewish state; because they are Jewish, they have a special allegiance to Israel. The speaker asserts that after October 7, there was particular sympathy, and influence was used in various spheres—CBS, Harvard, Columbia, Silicon Valley, government, and Congress. The reference is made to a representative who served in the IDF and appeared in his IDF uniform, illustrating the claimed special affinity. The argument continues that when called upon, this network uses its influence across media, finance, academia, Hollywood, technology, and government. The stated purpose of this influence is to benefit their Jewish community at large and to benefit Israel.

Speaker 0: And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do, because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open border neoliberal quasi Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now it's coming for Jews, and they're like, what on earth happened? And it's not just the colleges. It's the nonprofits. It's the movies. It's Hollywood. It's all of it. It's like time for you guys to wake up and say no more. Draw a line in the sand. I don't care if you hate me.

Jonathan asks for commentary on Nick Fuentes, what countermeasures are effective, and what the government’s role should be in being critical of such a platform. The respondent explains that Nick Fuentes’ second name is Joseph, and that Fuentes is a Hispanic person described as an open, unapologetic racist, homophobe, and anti-Semite. He notes that Fuentes has been incredibly effective at spreading his message thanks to X and social media, which act as super spreaders of anti-Semitism and hate, making Fuentes like patient zero. He points out that it didn’t help when former President Trump had Fuentes over for dinner at Mar-a-Lago, and he criticizes those in power who don’t renounce Fuentes. JD Vance has done so, but the current right faces a challenge with elevated bad voices like Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens, while there are good voices on the right such as Ted Cruz, Ben Shapiro, and Mark Levin who push back on figures like Speaker Johnson and the revolting lunatics. To defeat rising anti-Semitism on the right, he believes it must come from the right; to defeat rising anti-Zionism on the left, it must come from people on the left. At AADL, the goal is to provide data and tools and to operate behind the scenes rather than publicly targeting Fuentes or Hassan Piker; the speaker even calls Hassan Piker “Hamas Piker” and notes his large platform on Twitch, Steam, YouTube, and Instagram. The speaker emphasizes working to get platforms to enforce terms of service to pull down the most offensive hate speech, or compel action from the platforms. However, he also stresses the need for people on the right to take down figures like Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, and for people on the left to support similar efforts. The second speaker adds that in a sermon about the nuance of every human being, they did not mean Nick Fuentes.

And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do, because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open border neoliberal quasi Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews.

We are the Secure Community Network, working to build a proactive security shield for the Jewish community in North America. Our focus is on intelligence sharing, physical security solutions, training, and incident response. With a team of experts, including FBI and Department of State members, we aim to protect and allow Jewish life to flourish for future generations.