TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

MSDNC is the worst, and the good news is that very few people watch them because they've lost credibility. What Nicole Wallace said about that young man is disgraceful, she should be forced to resign, and Rachel Maddow should be forced to resign as well. Nobody watches her anyway, and she's lost all credibility. What they said the other day about that young person who is suffering is grounds for resignation.

As a journalist for over 30 years and a person of color for over 50 years, I want to say to Megyn Kelly, go yourself. I typically avoid discussing her because she thrives on attention and has built the latter part of her career on being a troll.

Hundreds of intelligence community members work at social media companies. Mainstream news outlets confirmed my reporting on the laptop story. The censorship was due to the truth being a threat to power. The US government's influence on corporations undermines the first amendment. Our response will determine the future of a free press. Thank you. Translation: Many intelligence community members work at social media companies. News outlets confirmed my reporting on the laptop story. Censorship was due to the truth being a threat. The US government's influence on corporations undermines freedom of speech. Our response will determine the future of a free press. Thank you.

Speaker 0 describes an encounter where a person tells her, “good luck to your husband dealing with you,” and she responds, “my husband loves me.” The other person replies that “that’s why we’re trying to get him fired,” indicating to Speaker 0 that this is not an isolated incident but part of an organized group aiming to destroy both her and her husband’s livelihoods because of her political criticisms of a foreign government. Speaker 0 emphasizes her husband has nothing to do with her career, works in athletics at a school, loves his students, and is not going to issue a statement condemning his wife. Speaker 0 explains that the group’s goal is to destroy her husband’s livelihood for failing to condemn her publicly. She notes that the husband wants no part in politics and is not responsible for her career. She decides to file a police report and asks for identifying information about a woman she encountered, including video of the woman and her dog, to corroborate the incident. Speaker 0 highlights the woman’s alleged attempt to sic her dog on Speaker 0 and her dog, pointing to the dog’s behavior as evidence. She asks the woman if it was appropriate to use her dog in that way, and the woman denies it, insisting she did not sick the dog on them. The conversation shifts as Speaker 0 presents a separate video that she claims proves her account. The other person attempts to interrupt, insisting, “You’re trying to get me fired,” and Speaker 0 counters that everyone is trying to get her fired and that the other person is part of that group. Speaker 1 admits that others are trying to get Speaker 0 fired and acknowledges that the other person is “part of that everybody.” Speaker 0 reiterates that the woman tried to sic her dog on them and threatens her husband’s livelihood, asserting she will not be intimidated. Speaker 0 emphasizes she will continue her commentary and will not apologize for her actions or stance, even if the confrontation involves threats or stalking behavior online. Throughout, Speaker 0 frames the situation as an organized effort to silence and ruin both her and her husband over her political critique of a foreign government, while defending her husband’s innocence and his separation from her professional life. She asserts resolve to document the incident and press charges, and to persist with her public commentary despite the confrontation.

Thank you for your immense courage and the personal sacrifices you've made to defend freedom of speech. You've faced significant challenges but have never wavered in your convictions. Your strength has paved the way for countless others to express themselves freely. Thank you for your unwavering commitment. It has been a privilege, far more than a burden, and that continues to be the case.

I'm sorry for getting emotional, but I truly believe my show had value and that it mattered. Thank you to everyone. I felt a sense of guilt for going so hard on issues like Black Lives Matter, anti-Asian hate, defending immigrants, calling out subversive actions against the Constitution, defending inconvenient books like the 1619 Project, and speaking out about the bombing of babies in Gaza. But ultimately, I'm not sorry. I'm not sorry that I stood up for these things because they align with what I believe is right. As a church girl, I was taught that these values are of God, and I'm proud of my show for standing up for them.

Speaker 0: Many people owe Linda Yacarino an apology. Initially, she faced criticism and was called names when she joined X. However, she has proven herself by risking her reputation for free speech and humanity. Despite facing attacks from Media Matters and powerful individuals, Linda remains steadfast and has released impressive statements. Those who spoke ill of her should apologize. Linda deserves recognition for her excellent work. Thank you, Linda.

Speaker 0 presents a Nehemiah analogy: he builds a wall while the townspeople shout at him to come down, and he repeated, “I cannot come down. I am busy building.” She says she feels the same: no time to address the noise, and their silence does not mean complacency. She asserts that Turning Point USA and the handpicked staff loved by her husband are not involved in the alleged conspiracy, and they are busy building. She emphasizes that grieving in their own way, they are trying hard to find answers after something evil happened. Any lead is sent to authorities, with calls to dig into it and not leave any rock unturned, aiming for justice for her husband, herself, and her family more than anyone else. Her breaking point comes when others come after them: “Come after me. Call me names. I don’t care. Call me what you want.” She will not tolerate targeting of her family, Turning Point USA family, or the Charlie Kirk show family, especially when people profit from attacking those she loves. She declares righteous anger, saying this is not okay, a mind virus, and that she believes in the judicial system. She notes their team is working hard, and she apologizes for any language, insisting it’s not okay. Speaker 1 remarks that they have never seen her like this, to which Speaker 0 responds that her reaction is righteous anger. She stresses that their team is human, not machines, and has faced more death threats and kidnapping threats than ever before. The team is exhausted; every time the threats are brought up, they must relive trauma from the day her husband was murdered. She acknowledges that her team is rocked to the core and must endure ongoing public scrutiny and conspiracies. She questions whether the online hostility has intensified because she shines a light on issues, asking what people expected from her. They note that some target her accessories, normalizing an atmosphere of personal attacks. She quips about a “conspiracy collection,” suggesting that those who want to pick her apart can do so—this had been happening even before her husband’s murder. Speaker 0 concludes that the abuse was occurring prior to Charlie’s murder, and both she and her partner have endured persistent, harrowing criticism and threats for years.

A congresswoman questioned Miss Mar about her public statements and social media posts, which the congresswoman characterized as left-wing ideology and opposition to free speech. The congresswoman cited Mar's past role as head of Wikipedia, which she claimed doesn't tell the truth, and statements calling Donald Trump a "deranged racist and sociopath" and America "addicted to white supremacy." The congresswoman also criticized Mar for chastising the use of "boy and girl" and for calling the First Amendment the "number one challenge in American journalism." The congresswoman asked Mar if it was up to her or NPR to crack down on bad information and decide the truth. Mar stated she is a strong believer in free speech. The congresswoman then referenced a 2021 Atlantic Council event where Mar said she took a very active approach to disinformation and misinformation as CEO of Wikipedia, censoring information through conversations with government during the COVID pandemic and the 2020 election. The congresswoman asked if those governments included the Biden administration. Mar stated that Wikipedia never censored any information.

Liz Crokin, known for breaking the Pizzagate story, has faced relentless targeting but remains committed. Initially skeptical, the speaker later discovered the truth behind the story and admires Liz's unwavering dedication.

There are big programming changes happening. Joy Reid's show is ending and she is leaving the network altogether, which is hard to accept because I have immense respect and affection for her. I think it’s a mistake to let her go. It's also concerning that two non-white hosts in primetime are losing their shows, along with Katie Fang. While the new anchors will be great, the behind-the-scenes staff are facing layoffs and being asked to reapply for their jobs, which is creating anxiety and disruption. The press is under attack, and while changes happen, it’s most painful to see what happens to our coworkers, who we deeply respect and depend on. We need to treat people well, find good colleagues, do good work with them, and support them. We can do much better.

Speaker 0 states that after yesterday's episode in which they went “kind of for the jugular” with Turning Point USA, they believe everybody in the entire world has had enough.

Speaker 0: Apology tour due to online criticism and advertisers leaving. Speaker 1: Bob Ives was interviewed today. Stop. Speaker 2: I don't want advertisers who try to blackmail me with money. Go fuck yourself. Speaker 1: I understand. Bob, if you're here, let me ask you. Speaker 2: That's how I feel. No advertising. Speaker 1: What are your thoughts?

I thank you for being here, Mr. Mayorkas. Your actions have been watched closely, and it is believed that you have lied. The American public sees this too. You are seen as a threat to freedom and rights, but thankfully the first amendment exists to stop you. Your accusations are untrue.

I love this show because we can discuss important topics freely. Recently, I received some criticism for saying Elon Musk was pro-apartheid. I don't know for sure if he was, but he did grow up while apartheid was happening. Maybe he was, maybe he wasn't – he might have been too young. So, please don't sue me! It feels like others can say anything they want, but we have to be very careful. That's why this show and platform is so important.

I am not sorry for the value my show had. I went hard on many issues, from Black Lives Matter and the targeting of Asian Americans to defending immigrants and objecting to actions subversive to the Constitution. I defended books and highlighted the significance of 1619. I even spoke out about Gaza and our right to object to the bombing of babies. I'm not sorry for standing up for these issues because they are of God. As a church girl, I was taught that these things matter. I am proud of my show.

Let's be honest, the mainstream press doesn't care about free speech. They're mouthpieces for the government and deep state, pushing agendas from the intel community to the Biden administration. Their performative activism is sickening. The White House should remove these so-called journalists and replace them with new media. I'm disgusted by their elitist attitudes, epitomized by individuals like Natalie. They don't deserve their positions.

Speaker 0: I’m a little pissed at the New York Times, honestly. But since you’re listening, I believe in your mission. When you write a technically completely illiterate article, you lose a lot of credibility if people are technical. That article about us being a surveillance thing is like where it’s all implied, what we do. The problem is you lose credibility with anyone who goes on the thing. That’s damaging for our democracy. Speaker 1: ask you this. And I’ll Speaker 0: look left and right. One thing I would say to people in the audience: you know you’re a lot of you think I’m right. And you know your spouse, your relative, your child, the person at work would be horrified if they knew it. You better speak up, because everyone who thinks I’m a ridiculous fascist, they’re speaking up. They write about it every day. If you do not speak up, the people who are disagreeing with me or think I’m stupid a lot, I disagree with myself. So, you have to speak up. And you cannot blame the far left, far right idiots. When they speak up for their views, do you speak up for your views? Where? Do you tell your colleague, I bet you at The New York Times a lot of people read that article about us and were ashamed. Did you go to your editor and say, how can you write something that’s technically illiterate? The guy might be a fascist, but this is technically illiterate. Okay. Speaker 1: Let me ask you different question. Speaker 0: Did you or didn’t you? Because I’m the only one speaking up. You’re gonna get a world of technical illiteracy on the right, on the left, and in the middle. Speaker 1: Alex, help me with this. A lot of Speaker 0: people

Speaker 0: Apology tour, if you will. There was criticism and advertisers leaving. We talked to Bob Ives today. Stop. Speaker 2: Don't advertise. If someone tries to blackmail me with money, go fuck yourself. Speaker 1: It is clear. Hey, Bob. If you're in the audience. Speaker 2: That's how I feel. Don't advertise. Speaker 1: How do you think then?

MSDNC is the worst, but the good news is that very few people watch them anymore. They've lost all credibility. What Nicole Wallace said about that young man is disgraceful. She should be forced to resign, and Rachel Maddow should be forced to resign too. Nobody watches her anyway, and she's lost all credibility. They should both be forced to resign for what they said the other day about that young person who is suffering right now.

I'm sorry for getting emotional, but my show had value. In the end, thank you. I felt guilty for going hard on issues like Black Lives Matter, the targeting of Asian Americans, defending immigrants, calling out subversive actions against our liberty, defending inconvenient books like the 1619 Project, and speaking out about the bombing of babies in Gaza. But I'm not sorry. I'm not sorry that I stood up for those things because those things are of God. I was taught those values in church, and I'm proud of my show.

My sister Barbara and I fought for truth, and I am grateful to the American people for standing by me. Our culture as Americans is rooted in freedom, which we deeply value and are willing to sacrifice for. We cannot take it for granted. We are awake to the importance of this in our country. Thank you to all the digital soldiers and to America.

I'm sorry for getting emotional, but my show had value, and in the end, it mattered. Thank you. I felt guilty for going hard on so many issues, but where I land is that I'm not sorry. Whether it was Black Lives Matter, the targeting of Asian Americans, defending immigrants, discussing the President's actions against the Constitution, defending inconvenient books like the 1619 Project, or talking about Gaza and our right to object to the bombing of babies, I stood up for these things because they are of God. As a church girl, I was taught these things were of God, so I'm not sorry. I'm proud of my show.

The speaker addresses the public perception of an apology tour and clarifies their stance. They express their disapproval of advertisers trying to blackmail them with money and emphasize that they don't want them to advertise. The speaker discusses the potential need to shift away from advertising in their business model. They mention Linda Yaccarino's role in selling advertising and argue that the advertising boycott will harm the company. The speaker predicts that advertisers will blame them for the company's demise due to their inappropriate statements on the platform. They challenge Earth's response to this accusation.

The speaker addresses the public perception of an apology tour and clarifies their stance. They express their disapproval of advertisers trying to blackmail them with money. The speaker suggests that the business model may need to shift away from advertising if it means being beholden to those with opposing views. They mention Linda Yaccarino's role in selling advertising. The speaker believes that the advertising boycott will ultimately kill the company, and they plan to document it. They anticipate that advertisers will blame them for the company's demise due to their inappropriate statements. The speaker challenges Earth's response to this accusation.