reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly opens the show discussing the media's gaslighting regarding President Joe Biden's mental acuity and Vice President Kamala Harris's capabilities. She highlights how the media previously portrayed Biden as cognitively fit, only to shift narratives after debates. Kelly criticizes Harris for her lack of transparency and her sudden portrayal as a strong communicator. She also addresses controversies surrounding two Olympic boxers, asserting they are biologically male despite being identified as female, citing medical reports and statements from boxing officials. Kelly then discusses Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, accusing him of misleading the public about his military service, including exaggerating his rank and misrepresenting his deployment history. She claims Walz's actions amount to "Stolen Valor" and criticizes the media for failing to hold him accountable. Kelly emphasizes that Walz's policies, particularly regarding gender identity and minors, have been misrepresented by the press. The conversation shifts to the media's coverage of Harris's campaign, which Kelly and her guests, Emily Jashinsky and Eliana Johnson, describe as overly positive and lacking critical scrutiny. They express frustration over Harris's avoidance of tough interviews and the media's failure to demand accountability for her policy shifts. Jashinsky notes that the media's gatekeeping power is waning, while Johnson points out that Harris's campaign lacks a solid policy platform. Kelly highlights the stark contrast between the media's treatment of Harris and the scrutiny faced by Republican candidates like JD Vance. They discuss how Vance has been criticized for his military service, while Walz's misrepresentations go largely unchallenged. The guests argue that the media's bias is evident in how they cover both candidates, with Harris receiving favorable treatment despite her lack of transparency. As the discussion progresses, they analyze the implications of Harris's rise in the polls and the challenges facing Trump’s campaign. They express concern over Trump's messaging and the need for a more disciplined approach to counter Harris's favorable media coverage. The conversation concludes with a call for Trump to refocus on key issues like immigration and economic policies to regain momentum in the election.

Megan Kelly hosts a special episode discussing allegations against Governor Tim Walls regarding his military service in the National Guard. Several veterans who served with Walls accuse him of "Stolen Valor," claiming he inflated his military rank and abandoned his unit when it was deployed to Iraq. They assert that Walls retired shortly after announcing his congressional candidacy, just before his unit received deployment orders. The veterans, including Tom Barren, Paul Herr, Rodney, and Tom Schilling, share their experiences and express their outrage over Walls' actions, emphasizing the moral implications of abandoning soldiers in combat. Barren highlights that Walls was aware of the impending deployment before he retired, contradicting claims made by Walls and his supporters. Herr and Schilling echo this sentiment, asserting that Walls' departure undermined the morale and integrity of the unit. They emphasize the commitment required in military service and the dishonor brought upon those who served alongside him. The discussion also touches on Walls' repeated claims of being a retired command sergeant major, which the veterans contest, stating he was demoted to master sergeant before his retirement. They argue that his misrepresentation of his rank and service is not just a mistake but a pattern of deceit aimed at political gain. The veterans express their frustration with the media's dismissal of the issue and the political defenses offered by figures like Congressman Adam Smith. They call for Walls to apologize for his actions and acknowledge the dishonor he has brought to the military community. The episode concludes with the veterans reiterating their commitment to truth and integrity in military service, contrasting it with Walls' alleged cowardice and dishonesty.

Megyn Kelly discusses the recent selection of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Vice President Kamala Harris's running mate, likening the process to a reality show. Mark Halperin suggests that Harris chose Walz over Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro due to fewer complications associated with Walz's liberal record and his popularity within the party. Speculation arises that Shapiro's Jewish identity may have influenced the decision, but Halperin believes it was more about the perceived difficulties Shapiro would bring. The conversation shifts to Walz's performance at a rally, where he demonstrated strong speaking skills, prompting Kelly to express concern about his potential influence as a vice presidential candidate. She highlights Walz's radical positions on issues like transgender rights, which she finds alarming. Halperin notes that while Walz's liberal views may be problematic, his ability to unify the party and avoid internal conflicts was likely appealing to Harris. Kelly and Halperin discuss the media's portrayal of Harris and Walz, criticizing the lack of substantive policy discussions and the focus on their personalities. They express concern that Harris's campaign lacks clear policy positions, relying instead on a vague appeal to emotions and identity. The hosts emphasize the importance of addressing the candidates' records and positions, particularly regarding contentious issues like education and healthcare. The discussion then turns to Walz's military history, with Tom Barens, a veteran who served with Walz, accusing him of abandoning his unit during a critical deployment to Iraq. Barens claims that Walz's actions constituted a dereliction of duty and questions his credibility, particularly regarding his claims of military rank. The conversation highlights the significance of military service and the implications of perceived dishonesty in a political context. As the dialogue progresses, the hosts critique the Democratic Party's strategy, suggesting that the media's favorable coverage of Harris and Walz may shield them from scrutiny. They express skepticism about the effectiveness of the Democrats' messaging in appealing to working-class voters, particularly in light of Walz's progressive policies and the challenges facing Minnesota. The segment concludes with a discussion of the broader implications of the upcoming election, emphasizing the need for voters to critically evaluate candidates based on their records and positions rather than superficial qualities. The hosts reflect on the potential impact of the election on various issues, including public safety and education, while acknowledging the complexities of the political landscape.

Megyn Kelly discusses the tightening 2024 presidential race, highlighting a Cook Political Report showing VP Kamala Harris erasing former President Trump's lead in battleground states. She questions how Harris has improved her image, suggesting media complicity in reshaping perceptions. The conversation shifts to Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, who faced accusations of Stolen Valor but responded by expressing pride in his military service without addressing specific claims. The panelists critique Walz's handling of the accusations, emphasizing the need for him to clarify his military record, particularly regarding his rank and deployment history. The discussion reveals a pattern of political figures deflecting criticism by invoking their service records, with panelists noting that while pride in service is commendable, it does not absolve one from scrutiny over the accuracy of their claims. They highlight that Walz's military service has been questioned by members of his unit, and they argue that he should respond to these allegations directly rather than relying on emotional appeals. The panel also discusses the broader implications of Harris's campaign strategy, noting her avoidance of media scrutiny and the potential advantages it provides. They express concern that this tactic allows her to sidestep difficult questions about her record and qualifications. The conversation touches on the effectiveness of political ads targeting Walz's military claims, emphasizing the emotional weight of such accusations among veterans and military families. As the discussion progresses, the panelists analyze polling data indicating Harris's rising favorability and Trump's declining numbers, attributing this shift to Harris's consolidation of the Democratic base and increased support from independents. They caution that Trump's focus on personal grievances and past controversies may hinder his campaign's effectiveness. The conversation concludes with a critique of the media's role in shaping narratives around political figures, particularly regarding their military service and leadership during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. The panelists argue that voters should consider candidates' records and responses to past challenges when making electoral decisions, emphasizing the importance of accountability in leadership.

Megyn Kelly discusses the Democratic National Convention, focusing on the speeches by Michelle and Barack Obama. She highlights Michelle Obama as the standout speaker, emphasizing her ability to connect with the audience while questioning the sincerity of her remarks about hope and the current political climate. Kelly points out that many issues Michelle lamented were unresolved during Barack Obama's presidency, suggesting a disconnect between their messages and reality. Michelle Obama expressed feelings of hopelessness, which Kelly finds ironic given her privileged background. Kelly critiques Michelle's portrayal of herself as a relatable figure while accusing Republicans of prioritizing wealth over ensuring everyone has enough, arguing that this perspective aligns with a socialist mindset. She compares this to past comments made by Barack Obama about wealth redistribution. The discussion shifts to the Obamas' wealth, with Kelly noting their substantial net worth and luxury properties, questioning their stance on wealth distribution. She critiques Michelle's attacks on Donald Trump, suggesting they lack substance and highlight a double standard regarding privilege and opportunity. Kelly also addresses the Obamas' perceived influence over Joe Biden's presidency, interpreting Michelle's remarks as a veiled critique of Biden's leadership. The conversation touches on the Democratic Party's messaging, with Kelly asserting that the Obamas' speeches may distract from the current administration's challenges. The hosts discuss the effectiveness of the convention's messaging and the contrasting performances of various speakers, including Doug Emhoff, Kamala Harris's husband. They express skepticism about the Democrats' ability to connect with swing voters and critique the lack of a clear Republican strategy against Harris. The dialogue continues with a focus on Tim Walz, the Minnesota governor, and his controversies, including his military service claims and handling of COVID-19 policies. Liz Colin, a journalist, provides insights into Walz's misrepresentations and the media's role in covering them. The conversation highlights Walz's radical policies, particularly regarding gender ideology and parental rights, and his connections to China. Overall, the discussion critiques the Democratic Party's messaging, the Obamas' influence, and the controversies surrounding key figures like Tim Walz, emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency in political narratives.

Megyn Kelly discusses allegations surrounding Minnesota Governor Tim Walz's military service record, including claims of Stolen Valor and abandonment of his troops. Tom Barens, a Minnesota National Guard veteran, asserts that Walz misrepresented his service, claiming he served in a combat role during Operation Enduring Freedom when he was actually in a support role in Italy. Walz reenlisted in the National Guard shortly after 9/11 for six years but retired early in May 2005, just before his unit was deployed to Iraq, raising questions about his commitment to his soldiers. Kelly highlights discrepancies in Walz's statements about his military service, including a false claim that he served in Iraq and misleading representations about his rank. Despite serving for 24 years, Walz did not complete the necessary training to retire as a command sergeant major, a title he has claimed. The discussion also touches on how Walz's campaign has faced scrutiny for misrepresenting his military record, with accusations of him not correcting misleading information in media reports. Andrew Klavan joins the conversation, expressing concern over the implications of Walz's actions for veterans and the military community. He emphasizes the importance of honesty regarding military service and the impact of misrepresentation on those who have genuinely served. The conversation shifts to the broader political landscape, including the Democratic Party's handling of issues like the George Floyd protests and the perception of Kamala Harris as a candidate. Kelly and Klavan critique the media's portrayal of political figures and the disconnect between their narratives and the realities faced by everyday Americans. They discuss the challenges of addressing issues like crime and public safety in the context of political leadership, particularly in light of Walz's handling of the Minneapolis riots. The dialogue underscores the need for accountability and transparency in political discourse, particularly regarding military service and leadership during crises.