TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

An official UN report from 2000 outlines a strategy for addressing declining populations in developed nations through mass migration. It suggests that countries like Italy and Germany would require millions of migrants by 2050 to maintain their working-age populations. This isn't merely about immigration; it's about demographic transformation and control. Current migration crises in the U.S. and Europe reflect this agenda, as governments allow large influxes of migrants, straining resources and altering social dynamics. The report indicates that such demographic shifts could dilute national identities and centralize power, leading to increased surveillance and loss of sovereignty. This orchestrated migration is seen as a means to create chaos, allowing elites to expand their control under the guise of addressing population issues. The plan outlined in the report is now being executed, revealing a broader strategy for global governance.

During the COVID crisis, there has been a conspiracy theory suggesting that population control is an underlying agenda. Official US government documents dating back to 1973 reveal that population control to limit global growth at 8 billion is US policy. The documents propose various methods such as birth control, abortion, and technological advancements to reduce population. The logic behind this policy is to suppress population growth in least developed countries, which could compete with US interests in extracting resources. This theory is influenced by the idea that the Earth has limited resources and can only sustain a certain number of human beings. The fact that the global population was approaching 8 billion in 2020 adds to the conspiracy theory.

Henry Kissinger, world famous as US Secretary of State and National Security Advisor under Nixon and Ford. NSSM 200, the Kissinger Report, was a top secret 1973 memorandum about the planet’s resources. Kissinger proposed a plan to consolidate the smooth flow of valuable resources from various countries to the US. He stated that taking other countries’ resources was easy when countries were stable, but unstable countries were difficult to access. The question, he posed, was how to stabilize less developed countries. He argued that the world’s most valuable resources such as oil, natural gas, gold and minerals were in less developed countries. In his report he wrote: Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interest of The United States. This was presented as a rationale for population policy, including abortion and birth-control measures, to create stability and access to resources. Kissinger advised that in order to create stability one needs population policy, including legalizing abortion, giving families money if they use contraception, and if necessary, accepting sterilization and abortion. If that wasn’t sufficient, population policy could entail forced birth control, forced sterilization and forced abortions. Furthermore, he advised withholding aid, disaster aid and food aid if a less developed country refused to implement US population control programs. The content claimed that this was a method to pillage a country’s resources, create stability by reducing the population, and remove anti-imperialist youth. The result, it is claimed, was a massacre worldwide documented in research papers ignored by mainstream media and the UN. Two examples cited are China and Peru. China: It is claimed that China’s one-child policy started in 1979 and changed in 2015 to a two-child policy if the first child is a girl. With the financial help of the United Nations Population Fund, UNFPA, China developed state-of-the-art tracking systems to monitor women’s monthly cycles. It is claimed that if a fetus was not allowed by the government, the woman would be arrested and forced to have an abortion. The speaker states that the UN supported, funded, and facilitated China’s population control program, including a $100,000,000 donation to UNFPA and a $12,000,000 computer complex to monitor the program, along with technical expertise and personnel. It is claimed that abortions were used as a weapon of mass destruction and that hundreds of millions of lives were exterminated. The UNFPA allegedly defended China’s actions and was awarded by the UN for China’s population control program. The policy is described as preventing hundreds of millions of births and conducting hundreds of millions of abortions under the one-child policy, with reports of high female suicide rates and a skewed sex ratio. Peru: Between 1995 and 1997, over a quarter of a million Peruvian women were sterilized as part of President Fujimori’s family planning goals financed by the US, described as the Voluntary Surgical Contraception Campaign, with reports of coerced sterilizations and threats to withhold food for refusing sterilization. It is claimed that many women were traumatized, with poor hygiene in hospitals causing deaths or severe harm. The transcript argues that in every less developed country, UN concern was not development, health or women’s empowerment, but reversing unchecked population growth. Kissinger is described as laying out protocols for modern times, and various allegations are presented about his background and alleged roots, including claims about his family name and ethnicity. NGOs: The transcript discusses NGOs connected to the UN, noting that NGOs are tax-exempt and 501c organizations, with examples including the Population Council, funded by John D. Rockefeller III and associated with eugenics and depopulation aims. It claims the Population Council supported et al. projects such as intrauterine devices in several countries, and published material advocating measures like adding fertility-control agents to water and compulsory sterilization. It argues that there are 37 NGOs worldwide advocating negative population growth under the banner of sustainability and overpopulation concerns. Planned Parenthood: The transcript asserts that Planned Parenthood, founded by Margaret Sanger, has internationally scaled activities with abortions, and claims about tissue procurement and compensation. It cites statements about compensation for tissue specimens and mentions editing to discuss tissue donation, with a claim that Planned Parenthood profits or receives funding from major foundations and governments. It states that the Trump administration ended US funding for Planned Parenthood in 2019. Ending note: The transcript mentions Kissinger’s removal from the Pentagon Defense Policy Board and promises to continue discussing the UN, its NGOs, and alleged threefold purposes: pillaging resources, money laundering, and population control, with the aim to expose the alleged depopulation program.

Henry Kissinger's top secret report, the Kissinger report, outlined a plan to stabilize less developed countries in order to access their valuable resources. This involved implementing population control policies such as legalizing abortion, contraception, sterilization, and forced birth control. The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) supported China's one-child policy, which resulted in forced abortions and a gender imbalance. Peru also experienced forced sterilizations as part of a family planning program. Numerous NGOs connected to the UN advocate for negative population growth and engage in eugenics and depopulation efforts. Planned Parenthood, funded by various organizations, performs abortions and sells fetal body parts. The UN and its NGOs are involved in pillaging resources, money laundering, and population control.

The negative impact of population growth on planetary ecosystems is becoming evident, with concerns about energy and water exploitation and dangerous levels of atmospheric pollution. Unless nations collaborate to address population growth, overconsumption, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life will be threatened. The UN should help stabilize population and stimulate economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations. Economic growth is essential to improve living standards, but unrestrained growth threatens the environment. The Rio de Janeiro conference focused on sustainable growth and global development, noting that growth is efficiently managed by the private sector, but regulation by national governments and international bodies is needed. The UN should be among the catalysts and coordinators of this process.

In 2007, the US government planned to aerial spray toxins over 7 million people in Northern California. Public outcry revealed the dangers and stopped the project. This is just one instance of over 30 times the US government has covertly experimented with toxic chemicals on its own citizens. Mass covert sterilizations, often via vaccines, have occurred in Brazil, Puerto Rico, Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines, under programs linked to organizations like the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Health Organization. Furthermore, spermicidal GMO corn was field-tested by Novartis and Syngenta with US government backing, framed as a solution to overpopulation. Given these facts, and the current global fertility decline, I believe we must consider the possibility of a direct depopulation agenda to fully understand and address the challenges we face.

In 2005, fertility rates in most US states were high, but in 2021, they have significantly declined. The country's fertility rate is now at an all-time low, with 43 states recording their lowest rates in over 30 years. This has led to a decrease in population growth, and approximately 1 in 4 pregnancies end in miscarriages. The speaker questions why there is little discussion about this issue. They suggest exploring the potential links between high birth control consumption, environmental impact of abortion pills, exercise rates, diet, and the pharmaceutical industry's influence on fertility. The speaker expresses concern and emphasizes the need for attention to this matter.

Third world populations are growing, while European birth rates are declining. Several factors contribute to this trend. First, feminism has led many women to prioritize careers over family. Second, climate change propaganda discourages having children. Third, globalist narratives promote a child-free lifestyle as liberating. Wealthy individuals often have fewer children due to materialism, and many cite financial concerns as a barrier to parenthood. Additionally, societal guilt and negative messaging about heritage discourage white families from growing. Governments rarely incentivize higher birth rates among their own populations. Cultural shifts, reduced religious affiliation, and loss of community support also impact family size. These trends suggest a deliberate effort to diminish white populations, leading to low birth rates. However, change is possible, and individuals can still choose to have larger families.

The world's population is currently 6.8 billion and is projected to reach 9 billion. Progress in healthcare and vaccines could help reduce this growth by 10-15%. The goal is to bring the population growth rate down to zero, which involves addressing various factors.

The discussion revolves around sterilization and population control, suggesting that there are too many people on the planet. It claims that a significant portion of the population, particularly in Africa, is deemed expendable and subjected to suppression and experimentation. The narrative implies a systematic approach to population reduction, framing it as a form of chemical warfare rather than a traditional conflict.

The speaker discusses the Club of Rome, an organization that aims to bring down industries and agricultural development in the United States. They claim that the Club of Rome believes overpopulation is a curse caused by the United States and proposes getting rid of half the world's population. The speaker also mentions the Zero Growth Post Industrial Plan, which targets the middle class in the United States as an obstacle to a world order. The plan suggests crushing industries to bring down the middle class. Additionally, the speaker mentions the Global 2000, a blueprint for mass genocide that aims to destroy half the world's population by 2050.

Henry Kissinger's 1973 report, NSSM 200, outlined a plan to stabilize less developed countries in order to access their valuable resources. This involved implementing population control measures such as legalizing abortion, contraception, sterilization, and forced birth control. The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) supported and funded China's one-child policy, resulting in forced abortions and sterilizations. Peru also experienced forced sterilizations as part of a family planning program. Numerous NGOs connected to the UN, such as the Population Council and Planned Parenthood, advocate for population control and eugenics. These organizations receive funding from various sources, including the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The UN's true agenda is to exploit resources, engage in money laundering, and promote depopulation.

The speaker discusses depopulation and presents evidence to support the claim that it is a real agenda. They mention government policies such as the National Security Study Memorandum 200 and Global 2000, which outline strategies for reducing the global population. The speaker also quotes Zbigniew Brzezinski, a former adviser to President Jimmy Carter, who suggests that it is easier to kill people than to control them. They argue that various methods, including control of food, air, water, and reproductive services, are being used to target all races. The speaker acknowledges that people are waking up to this agenda, which has caused the government to consider eliminating all individuals who oppose them.

The project explores the origins of population control, its founders, and the intersection of the military-industrial complex, philanthropy, and academia. Research is based on Phyllis Pietro's book, "World Population Crisis, The United States Response," with a foreword by George H.W. Bush, noting his father's involvement with Planned Parenthood. The research uses visual representation to map connections between organizations and individuals involved in population control. Milestones are tracked from the 1920s to the 1970s, highlighting influential figures and organizations. International Planned Parenthood's development is traced from the American Birth Control League, noting the involvement of figures like Corolla Warburg Rothschild and Margaret Sanger. In the 1950s, the UN became involved, and the Draper Committee was formed post-World War II to address global issues, including population. The committee included industrialists, high-ranking military officials, and members of Skull and Bones, the Council on Foreign Relations, and people connected to the military industrial complex. These individuals were also linked to International Planned Parenthood and the Population Crisis Committee. The speaker claims Planned Parenthood served US hegemony and instituted control over the planet.

During the COVID crisis, there has been a conspiracy theory suggesting that population control is one of the hidden agendas. Official US government documents dating back to 1973 support this theory, revealing that population control to limit global growth at 8 billion is US policy. The documents propose various methods such as birth control, abortion, and technological advancements to reduce population. The logic behind this policy is rooted in the belief that limited resources require drastic measures to cap population growth. Additionally, it is suggested that population suppression in underdeveloped countries is desired to exploit their mineral resources without competition. This theory aligns with the fact that in 2020, the global population was nearing 8 billion, adding weight to the conspiracy claims.

An adviser to President Jimmy Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski, highlighted the shift in control from killing to population reduction. Global 2000, authorized by Carter, outlines using food and reproductive services as weapons. Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger emphasized prioritizing population control in US foreign policy. The government aims to eliminate billions due to losing control over an informed populace. Regardless of race, those who resist are targeted for removal. Trust in government and science is waning as people question and seek knowledge.

Zbigniew Brzezinski, an adviser to President Jimmy Carter, once said that it is easier to control a million people than to physically kill them. However, in today's world, it is easier to kill a million people than to control them. This idea is reflected in Global 2000, a government policy authorized by President Carter, which discusses using food and reproductive services as weapons. The goal of the government is to remove billions of people from the planet because they feel they have lost control over the masses. People are becoming more aware and questioning their government and the science presented to them. The government sees those who stand up against them as a threat and aims to eliminate them, regardless of their race.

The transcript presents a critical examination of Bill Gates, portraying him as transforming from a software magnate into a global health power broker whose wealth and influence have reshaped public health, vaccine development, and population policy. It argues that Gates’ philanthropic activities are not purely charitable but are deployed to extend control over health systems, global research agendas, and even the reproductive choices of people worldwide. Key claims and points are detailed across several strands: - Public image and power shift: Bill Gates is described as no longer a “public health expert” yet becoming a central figure in billions of lives, guiding medical actions and vaccine strategies. The program asserts that Gates’ reinvention through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been aided by a sophisticated public relations apparatus and by directing media coverage of global health issues. - Foundation scale and reach: The Gates Foundation is depicted as the world’s largest private foundation, with assets reported as tens of billions of dollars and a broad remit in global health, development, growth, and policy advocacy. Its influence extends to funding media outlets, think tanks, and reporting units across multiple outlets (BBC, NPR, Our World in Data, ABC, among others), creating what the program calls “tentacles” across global health. - Partnerships and funding of global health initiatives: Gates is credited with initiating and funding major global health vehicles, including: - Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, with seed funding and ongoing commitments that have shaped vaccination markets. - The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and other public-private partnerships that coordinate vaccine development and immunization programs. - Support for CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations), the World Health Organization’s vaccine initiatives, and other pandemic preparedness efforts. - The World Health Organization’s funding profile, described as heavily dependent on Gates Foundation support, with Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus noted as a non-medical doctor connected to Gates-backed initiatives. - The “Decade of Vaccines” and vaccine policy: Gates is credited with launching a decade-long vaccine initiative, including a pledge of billions of dollars to vaccine development and distribution. This is linked to the creation of a global vaccine action plan and to Gavi’s role in establishing vaccine markets. The narrative asserts that vaccines have been used to steer global health policy and to secure roles for private firms in public health decision-making. - Vaccine development concerns: The program raises concerns about the safety and speed of vaccine development, criticizing the eighteen-month timeline Gates advocates for a universal vaccine, and questioning the use of new technologies (DNA and mRNA platforms) and rapid deployment with limited testing. It highlights potential safety risks, including historical vaccine-associated disease enhancement and concerns about broad immunization in a short period. - Vaccine safety and regulation: It is claimed that vaccine safety at scale is hard to guarantee and that liability protections for vaccine makers and public health officials have been enacted (e.g., a U.S. declaration granting liability immunity for COVID-19 countermeasures), a point framed as enabling risk-bearing without accountability. - Population control framing: A central thread is the assertion that Gates seeks to reduce population growth through health improvements, vaccines, and reproductive health services. The transcript traces Gates’ interest in contraception and population issues to his family background and to Rockefeller-era eugenics historical contexts, arguing that discussions about fertility, contraceptive technologies, and demographic trends have long-term population implications. It cites specific Gates Foundation activities in reproductive health, including funding for innovative birth-control delivery methods, depot injections, implanted devices, and efforts to develop digital identity tied to health services as tools within a broader population-control framework. - Digital identity and biometric ID: The narrative emphasizes Gates’ involvement with biometric identification through Gavi and ID2020, noting partnerships with Microsoft and the Rockefeller Foundation, the Aadhaar system in India, and the World Bank’s ID4D initiative. It argues that vaccination programs, biometric identity, and cashless payments are being integrated into a comprehensive “population control grid,” enabling state and private actors to track, truncate, or deny access to services based on identity and health status. - Data, surveillance, and privacy concerns: The piece contends that the push for digital IDs, digital health records, and biometrics will erode privacy and enable broad government and corporate surveillance, linking health data to financial services, voting, housing, and welfare. It highlights projects involving digital certificates, immunity passports, and real-time health data collection via microneedle patches and barcode-like skin markers, suggesting these innovations could be used to control access to services. - Epstein connections and broader conspiracy context: The program references alleged connections between Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, including flight logs and involvement in philanthropic funding discussions, framing these ties as part of a broader pattern of influence. It also points to prior associations with notable figures (Buffett, Rockefeller, Soros) and critiques of Gates as aligning with a “population control” ideology. - The underlying motive and conclusion: Throughout, the narrative asserts that Gates’ wealth is being used not for charity alone but to build an overarching system of control—over health institutions, research funding, public policy, identification, and financial systems. It contrasts his public image as a generous philanthropist with alleged hidden agendas, suggesting that the real aim is to shape global governance and human behavior through vaccination, identification, and digital infrastructure. - Final framing and call to action: The closing sections urge viewers to recognize Gates’ influence as part of an ideology rather than a single person’s plan. It frames the situation as a broader movement that could continue beyond Gates personally, urging awareness and action to resist what the program deems a population-control regime embedded in global health and digital identity initiatives. In sum, the transcript portrays Bill Gates as a central figure driving a multifaceted, globally interconnected program—through the Gates Foundation, Gavi, CEPI, and related partnerships—that allegedly reconfigures vaccine policy, global health governance, reproductive health, biometric identification, and digital payments into a cohesive system of population control and surveillance, using philanthropy as a veneer for power and control.

Their plan is to reduce the global population to 500 million by killing 7 billion people. They believe most lives are not worth living and that the world would be better without the masses. They want America to be the first in this new world order, as Henry Kissinger said. They have foreign troops on the ground and anticipate some resistance, but believe that the people will eventually beg for help as chaos ensues. They see this as the birth pangs of a new world.

During the COVID crisis, there has been a theory that population control is an underlying agenda. Official US government documents dating back to 1973 reveal that population control to cap global growth at 8 billion is US policy. The logic behind this is to suppress population growth in least developed countries that the US wishes to exploit for resources. This theory is based on the idea that the Earth has limited resources and can only sustain a certain number of human beings. The goal is to use various means, including birth control and abortion, to limit population growth. These documents support the theory and raise questions about the intentions behind it.

Speaker 0: It is a report that concludes that The United States official foreign policy signed into law in 1975 by president Ford, and when I say signed into law, it's called a presidential directive, is the reduction of population in 12 foreign twelve twelve specific foreign countries. Not the control of population, the reduction of population. And so it explains the ways we're gonna do this is through medicalizing birth control, never was before. You didn't need a doctor to get a condom, and to go around and talk to villages everywhere and say, you want a reproductive health freedom, don't you? You know what most women want on the planet Earth? Babies. They're they're not looking for reproductive health freedom was a term for have fewer babies. Right? There is a very potent move in official US foreign policy to reduce population in other countries. Now why? Philippines or or Indonesia. Why? They state it directly in the Kissinger report because it's classified. They wanted to reduce those countries' development so that they wouldn't need their own raw materials because we want them, the metals, etcetera. It is dark as shit, the Kissinger reports. It's not and it's not classified anymore. You can, you know, ask chat GPT about it to give you quotes from it. And so this whole business of population reduction is now another third rail I'm stepping on. Right? Nobody wants it. What are you you're nuts. No. A lot of people want it. A lot of people believe, obviously, Bill Gates, that 8,000,000,000 people was the number where we must turn it around, which is where we are supposedly now. And the Kissinger report, I was a kid. I didn't write it. I didn't make it up. You can find it on Wikipedia. It's a real thing. And all the presidential directives that came from it. Would these countries like the idea that we show up and we say, hey. We've got a new tetanus vaccine for you, but it happens to also have in it secretly something that will reduce fertility in your women as we did in India, as we did in Peru. In both India and Peru, we also did forced sterilization surgeries. US paid for them. True story. Speaker 1: So the the one vaccine was the DTP vaccine. Is that what it was? Speaker 0: The the one I'm talking about. The the Speaker 1: the The one that had h c g in it? It was just tetanus. But there was a vaccine that was in Bobby Kennedy's book Yeah. Where they were talking about women in Africa, where they were unknowingly given Yeah. This vaccine against That's that's diphtheria, tetanus, and Speaker 0: Well, it was the tetanus part Right. That that they were that they were pitching. And by the way, tetanus is a challenge in those countries more than it is in The United States. But, yeah, they were call they were naming them wellness drugs. Speaker 1: And they had h c g Speaker 0: in it. That's correct. Speaker 1: And that h c g, and they were more administered to women than they were to men. Speaker 0: Oh, of course. And they were five. They would administer administer five of the injections. Speaker 1: And they did it under this the guys were the the the narrative was that women were more vulnerable. So you have to give the vaccination to women. Yeah. And it was preventing them from getting pregnant. Speaker 0: It was preventing them from getting pregnant, and they had World Health Organization, which basically has this as a mission. Man, I wish they would sue me for saying this, but they they have this as a mission, which is population reduction from the beginning. They had worked on that HCG. Speaker 1: There's Gates famously, Speaker 0: of course, Speaker 1: in the speech saying Speaker 0: We can do that with vaccines. Speaker 0: Yeah. By the way, in the Kissinger report, for those of you not seeing this and only hearing it, that was me drinking my pause was me drinking water. I did not have a stroke. In the Kissinger report, they list the strategies and how much funding they'll give to each strategy. One of the strategies is to medicalize birth control, meaning have trusted people in the villages, etcetera. Another one is to pay young men to have a vasectomy. Just outright pay you know, write a check-in villages so they get $60 and they get a nice weekend of buying beer, but they never have kids. But another one of them is injections that reduce that temporarily reduce male fertility. Now here's an interesting thing about that one. It's in the Kissinger report. Injections that temporarily reduce male fertility. The COVID vaccine reduces sperm count in men for three months admitted by Fauci. It's not a secret. But the CDC's response was, yeah, but it's only for three months. And But they were asking us to take one every fucking three months. Well, also the miscarriages. Miscarriages and stillbirths. My point is that it's no it's no surprise that these persistent thoughts that I think good people believe meaning, I think there are good people who believe that population reduction is important. The fact is, of course, that now we are barely at replacement, you know, at replacement value right now in terms of many populations.

This is Eugenics. In 1974, we have a National Security Memorandum 200. This is the National Security Council. "creating conditions conducive to fertility decline." "Beyond seeking to reach and influence national leaders, we're going to improve worldwide support for population related efforts should be sought through increased emphasis on mass media in other population education and motivation programs by the UN, USIA, which is the United States Information Agency, and USAID." "Isoimmunization against human chorionic gonadotropin with tetanus toxoid." By 1982, USAID policy governing the use of agency funds for sterilization provides that USAID funds can only be used to support voluntary sterilization activities if the following six conditions are met. "The US government led, it did lead, a program that forcibly sterilized thousands of Peruvian women." "UNFPA donated 10,000,000 for the forced sterilization campaign." In 2014 in Kenya, tetanus vaccines were given to not the entire population, just women ages about 14 to 49. The Kenya Catholic Bishops said, "tetanus vaccine is birth control in disguise." HCG found in WHO's tetanus vaccine in Kenya. In October 2014, six additional vials were obtained... "HCG was found in half the samples." In 2019, "lowered probability of pregnancy in females in The USA aged 25 to 29 who received a human papillomavirus vaccine injection." The article was retracted. In 2024, the FDA final rule permits an institutional review board to waive or alter certain informed consent elements or to waive the requirement to obtain informed consent under limited conditions for certain FDA regulated minimum risk clinical investigations. We come full circle of Canada. We have minimal risk informed consent waivers. "Well, the mRNA vaccine is minimal risk."

The National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) was a report by America's National Security Council that aimed to establish a strategy for reducing population growth in third world countries. The report concluded that no country has successfully reduced population growth without resorting to abortion. Planned Parenthood was one of the agencies funded to carry out the population control agenda. NSSM 200 also mentioned withholding food aid after disasters unless countries accepted the American idea of birth control. Examples of this include Guyana and Haiti, where aid was conditional on legalizing abortion and birth control. While birth control funding increases, support for economic development, clean drinking water, schools, and medical clinics decreases. This approach is criticized for its double standards when compared to aid provided to other countries.

Zbigniew Brzezinski, an adviser to President Jimmy Carter, once said that it is easier to kill a million people than to control them. This idea is reflected in the government policy called Global 2000, authorized by Carter, which discusses using food and reproductive services as weapons. In 1974, Henry Kissinger, the 32nd Secretary of State, stated that depopulation should be a top priority for US foreign policy towards the Third World. The government believes that the population is growing beyond their control and wants to remove billions of people from the planet. People are becoming more aware and questioning their government and the science they present. The government has decided to eliminate those who resist and refuse to conform, regardless of their race.

An alliance of global powers decided that individual freedoms were a threat to humanity and took action to control population growth. They implemented programs to lower birth rates, including birth control methods and abortion. The women's liberation movement and acceptance of homosexuality were encouraged to further reduce population growth. However, population still increased in some areas. To address this, the ruling elite considered a deadly war using nuclear weapons or a natural disease like the bubonic plague. They decided to develop a microbe that would attack the immune system and introduce it through vaccines. The ruling elite would have a prophylactic and cure, while the general population would be affected. The cure would be announced later, after enough people had died.