TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Google Maps has updated its images of the burnt areas in Maui. The speaker questions how certain spots were set on fire while the surrounding grass and baseball fields remained untouched. They also mention burnt cars in an area where the buildings are fine. The speaker wonders why some houses stayed intact while others were completely demolished and burnt down. They invite viewers to join their live session at 4 o'clock for further discussion.

Speaker 0: We couldn't stop the fire. The water was shut off, and even the firemen couldn't refill their trucks. The fire grew, sparks boiled over, and we were defeated. We had no water, so we had to leave. When we came back, everything was burnt down. Speaker 0: I was worried about his safety. When someone called and said he lost the house, it was devastating. I was planning to retire, but now I have to start a new journey. It makes me want to cry, but I still love it here. That's why you ask if I would move to Honolulu.

The speaker explains that only the fence, garbage can, and air conditioning unit were damaged by the fire, not the house itself. They point out their neighbor's house and their own house, both of which are unaffected. They show a charred cover of their garage door keypad, indicating that it was heavily burned. However, the rest of the building remains untouched.

Speaker 0 describes smart meters in the context of a book, showing a plant and a smart meter, and notes that “that side's all cooked.” They claim that this illustrates what “they don’t tell people.” The speaker asserts that a smart meter catches fire and that a utility company denies homeowner damage claims, with insurance not covering fires. They reference “all these fires” and say there have been fires across the country linked to smart meters. They question how safety is tested, claiming that “this is a plastic dummy” and “that’s a phone” used to demonstrate safety, followed by the statement “And then what about plants exposed to Wi Fi? Look at this. No Wi Fi.” The speaker contrasts the apparent demonstration with alleged real-world risk to plants from wireless technology. The speaker adds a claim about the Navy, stating that it “knew 5,000 studies on the dangers of wireless technology.” They offer an example as “one good one” and connect Wi-Fi to thyroid issues, asserting “Thyroid issues, Wi Fi.”

The speaker explains that only the fence, garbage can, and air conditioning unit were damaged by the fire, not the house itself. They point out that their neighbor's house and the other neighbors' houses are also unaffected. They show the charred cover of their garage door keypad, indicating that it was heavily burned, but the rest of the building remains untouched.

Smart utility meters are being installed on millions of homes, but some homeowners claim they are causing health issues. Carol Garcia, a homeowner in Rochester Hills, says she experiences symptoms like bloody noses, headaches, and insomnia since the meters were installed. She blames the meters, which use electromagnetic frequency to transmit energy usage data. Other Metro Detroiters have also reported similar symptoms. However, DTE, the energy company, insists that the meters are safe and secure, using low power radio transmissions. Garcia believes that the public is unaware of the potential health effects. A state representative has expressed concerns about the issue.

The Coffey Park fire in Santa Rosa destroyed many homes, yet many trees, including highly flammable eucalyptus and bay trees, remained largely unburned. The ground showed signs of intense heat, but the trees were unaffected, with only the bases charred. This suggests a unique fire behavior, where flames targeted structures rather than vegetation. Metal objects melted, indicating high temperatures, but trees showed no signs of external burning. Instead, some trees appeared to burn from the inside out, with heartwood cooked but leaves intact. The presence of white ash and the nature of the burns imply an unusual heat source, possibly microwave-based flames, rather than a typical wildfire.

A smart meter caught fire at a house in Pasadena, but the main part of the house, which lacked a smart meter, remained undamaged. The back of the house, where the smart meter was located, suffered significant fire damage. Witnesses reported that PG&E employees arrived quickly, with one removing the smart meter while firefighters worked. This incident follows a similar occurrence in Kermit, where an electrical surge at a smart meter reportedly caused a fire.

After their house burned down, one speaker says, "I'd give her my weed whacker and ask her to do it herself, see if she could handle it." A notice of noncompliance from the City of Los Angeles Fire Department arrives: "sorry that your house burned down, but go clear your brush or you're gonna be fined $750" and "you'll have to pay for our crew to do that." He laughs at first, thinking it a joke. They realize they're not alone—"All these red dots are other homeowners whose homes were burned in some way," about 300 homes and 300 families in the same situation. They ask, "Is this outrageous?" and answer, "It is." They wonder what this says about how the fire department and city are working, calling it "a misplaced attention to the wrong in the wrong area."

A power line near my house caught fire and I tried to put it out with my water hose, but it didn't work. I hope everyone got out of their houses safely. The fire spread to the other side, but luckily our power was restored. The power line that caused the fire is still burning and the fire trucks haven't arrived yet.

A power line near my house caught fire and I tried to put it out with my water hose, but it didn't work. I hope everyone got out of their houses safely. The fire spread to the other side and our power was just restored. The power line that caused the fire is still burning and the fire trucks haven't arrived yet.

Today, we discuss the reasons to opt out of smart meters. In California, there are 13 million smart meters installed, raising concerns about their potential to cause wildfires. A PG&E meter reader mentioned that if smart meters catch fire, they can be remotely turned back on. Reports from Ontario highlight incidents where smart meters exploded near gas lines, leading to denied damage claims by utility companies. The Ontario Fire Marshal linked smart meters to multiple fires, suggesting a widespread issue. Notably, homes without smart meters in Los Angeles remained unharmed, while those with smart meters suffered extensive damage.

Smart meters have been linked to intentional fires in urban areas, as ongoing lawsuits suggest. During the Paradise Fire, aerosol spraying was observed directly over the smoke canopy, potentially fueling the flames. Strong winds and the bellows effect caused immense heat and horizontal flames, leading to the torching of structures. The absence of fuel ladders in some neighborhoods resulted in burnt houses but intact canopies. These fires are believed to be connected to climate engineering and the creation of high-pressure heat domes. A study even suggests intentionally burning northern latitude forests to mimic the cooling effects of a volcano. The release of particulate matter from these fires can provide temporary cooling for several months.

A retired mechanical engineer has secured his analog meter with a lock and chain and a notice reading, "Attention. Do not install smart meter," because he believes smart meters are dangerous. He claims smart meters emit high-frequency radio waves that penetrate the body and can cause health problems. He says these radio waves go through concrete walls. Because his bedroom is next to the meter, he is worried about his and his children's health. He also claims that smart meters catch fire due to very high voltage inside.

Flying over burned areas, you'll notice one home standing among 20 destroyed ones due to having the right roof. Since taking office, FEMA has assisted Texas extensively.

I noticed something interesting in America. There are pinpoint marks where the fires started, indicating the hottest points. Surprisingly, not everything around these points is burnt, but the fire still spread. These pinpoint marks were intentionally targeted to ensure that specific areas burned. The government's narrative should not be trusted, as it is filled with lies.

Speaker 0 describes smart meters as more than just electricity meters, asserting they function as personal surveillance devices. They claim smart meters sense when devices are turned on or off, measure watt usage (even for small devices like an electric toothbrush), and transmit that data wirelessly through neighbors’ meters to the power company. The data allegedly records electric consumption every minute, stored forever on computers the public cannot access, revealing when someone is home, asleep, on vacation, hosting visitors, using lamps or tools, running a business from home, or bootlegging energy off the grid. The speaker asserts this creates a vivid profile of private living patterns and indicates at-home presence on the night of a murder. The speaker contends this is not electrical metering but personal surveillance—a warrantless search daily. They claim personal life information travels from the meter to the power company, to the government, police, and insurance companies, and to anyone who partners with the power company to access it. The speaker further asserts that even without a direct data-sharing agreement, information can be intercepted via the wireless signal from the meter, because smart meters are radio transmitters. They identify a one-watt radio station licensed by the FCC as the transmitter sending all electrical life details to a data center. Examples are given of authorities in Ohio, Texas, and British Columbia using smart meter data to pinpoint marijuana grow houses, enforce business licenses, and punish private home activities, implying surveillance beyond what residents accept. The claim is made that the power company can sell personal life data to anyone, and that unusual power usage patterns can be used as probable cause to raid a home for growing marijuana or running a computer server without a license. The speaker describes this level of surveillance as “about as big brother as it gets,” with utility workers going door-to-door to install meters. They express a personal opinion that smart meters should be removed from homes, arguing that power companies cannot claim the right to install surveillance devices on residences. They equate smart meters with wiretapping and note wiretapping is illegal in all U.S. states and federal territories. The speaker asserts that allowing a smart meter is tantamount to walking around with a constant webcam on one’s head and accuses the industry of relying on implied consent—the idea that permission is granted if the utility can change the meter, even if residents don’t understand the scope of what’s happening. As a practical step, the speaker advises telling utilities not to change the meter, noting that older meters were billed successfully. They claim to have sent a certified letter denying installation of a smart meter and mention a copy of their letter is available in the video’s description for viewers to adapt. They state post office certified mail is used to obtain a receipt. The speaker concludes that if the meters are installed on every house in America, it would cease to be America.

I worked as a meter reader for PG and E for nine and a half years before being fired for speaking out about issues with smart meters. PG and E is aware that their systems can catch fire when remotely turned back on after a customer pays their bill, yet they are covering this up. When I joined, the metering budget was $70 million for about 1,000 meter readers, but PG and E and the Public Utility Commission mislead customers about the system's cost, claiming it to be $2.2 billion or even $10 billion. Additionally, PG and E shouldn't charge extra for meter reading since it's already done at a lower cost. Notably, meter readers are the only ones conducting surveys for the gas department. Thank you.

In Pasadena, the owner of a house reported that the front part of the house does not have a smart meter, and it remained unharmed. In contrast, the back part of the house, which had a smart meter, was completely destroyed by fire. The front house and surrounding trees are intact, while the back house is entirely burnt down.

I know I'm not supposed to be here, but this is my parents' home. They just lost their fire insurance after 75 years, and now at 90 years old, they're facing this crisis. It's frustrating to see how insurance companies treat residents who support California. I live in Sierra Madre, and my parents are also here, but their house is still standing. I'm doing what I can with a hose, but it’s tough. I was born and raised in this house, and I’m a nurse with over 30 years of experience in emergency care. Thankfully, people got out safely, but many weren't so lucky. It's important to share these stories, especially as many people are now uninsured against fires.

Recent numbers reveal that the fire in Paradise, California has resulted in 88 deaths, 631 missing individuals, and the destruction of over 13,000 homes. Within the first four hours, more than half of the damage occurred, with multiple fires erupting simultaneously. Independent journalists have reported on the unusual nature of this fire, including warped steel frame foundations, completely torched vehicles, and intense heat that melted aluminum and glass. Surprisingly, some objects remained untouched by the extreme temperatures, such as plastic trash cans and pristine carports. Investigators suspect that an electrical generator and a smart meter may have played a role in starting the fires. Additionally, anomalies like guardrails catching fire and selective scorching of forest areas have raised questions. Official sources have remained silent on this perplexing situation.

California plants ban plants due to wildfires. 'the government shut off the water when the fire was happening,' and 'they wanna ban plants.' They claim 'smart meters were catching on fire every time there's a fire,' and that 'the insurance companies even know,' adding that 'if your house catches on fire from a smart meter, the insurance companies actually will not cover you.' The speaker cites lawsuits claiming 'faulty PG and E smart meters started their house fire,' and says the meter 'pulses 14,000 to 190,000 times per day,' a claim PG and E admitted in court. They reference a 2019 document 'how insurance companies know this' and contend 'smart meters actually jack up your electric bill by two to three times the price.' They advocate 'analog meter instead of a smart meter' and note California considers per mile road charge as gas tax revenue is expected to decline.

I've noticed some oddities regarding the LA fires. First, insurance companies stopped offering fire coverage three months before the fires began. Many reports suggest that electrical wires from the power grid may have caused these fires, and the water supply has been cut off. It's strange that the trees remain standing while the houses are destroyed. Additionally, when searching for "2028 smart LA city," it seems there's a plan to build a smart city in LA, which would be easier if there are no existing buildings. This is just for educational purposes, and I hope everyone stays safe. Thank you.

The speaker points out that the destruction caused by the fire was not consistent with a wildfire. They highlight the untouched homes surrounded by completely destroyed ones and question how the fire could selectively target certain areas. The speaker suggests that powerful laser weapons may have been used, as evidenced by the precise destruction and lack of debris. They also mention the presence of black SUVs and the possibility of smart meters playing a role. The speaker urges viewers to spread awareness and stop accepting lies. The transcript ends with gratitude for support and a request to circulate the information.

Hi there. I know I'm not supposed to be here, but this is my parents' home. They just lost their fire insurance after 75 years, and they're 90 years old. Now they have no coverage while dealing with this situation. Thank you, California insurance companies, for your support. It's frustrating to see why people leave California. I live in Sierra Madre, and my parents are also there. I know the area is under evacuation, but I had to come back. Under the circumstances, I’m willing to face the consequences. It’s unbelievable what’s happening to the neighbors. My parents' house is still standing, and I have a hose, but it doesn't compare to what my beloved neighbors are going through.