reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker observed the Pentagon after the 9/11 attack while firefighters were still working. According to the speaker, the fire was still burning in some parts of the Pentagon. The speaker saw a large hole in the side of the building. However, the speaker claims that, upon close inspection, there was no evidence of a plane crash anywhere near the Pentagon, only the damaged side of the building. The speaker states that the only remaining pieces were small enough to pick up by hand, with no large tail sections, wing sections, or fuselage visible.

A man lit himself on fire in front of the speaker, who was shocked and called for help. The speaker witnessed the incident up close and emphasized the need for an ambulance.

The speaker woke up to a major explosion, initially mistaking it for thunder. They then observed paper falling outside, assuming it was a ticker tape parade on Broadway. Upon further inspection, they realized the World Trade Center was on fire.

The speaker explains that only the fence, garbage can, and air conditioning unit were damaged by the fire, not the house itself. They point out their neighbor's house and their own house, both of which are unaffected. They show a charred cover of their garage door keypad, indicating that it was heavily burned. However, the rest of the building remains untouched.

There was an explosion in the lobby of a building. The whole lobby collapsed, and it was described as horrible and like hell. There were multiple explosions, including a secondary one. People were waiting to go upstairs when the building blew up. They tried to work their way out and help others escape. They witnessed a plane flying into another building. It was like a movie set and surreal. The building collapsed during the third explosion. The speaker is now trying to find something.

Speaker 0 argues that Saint Anne’s Church in Toronto was not built in 1907–1908 as commonly claimed. He claims there was no documented architectural competition or widely documented evidence that William Howland won a contest, and he asserts there is no proof Howland had formal architectural training, yet the timeline credits him with drawing plans, delivering materials, and completing the structure in less than a year. He describes the building as containing two domed bell towers and being the only Canadian church built in the Byzantine style, with the interior hand-painted murals covering the entire dome, arches, and walls illustrating scenes from the old world. He questions the feasibility of a modern Byzantine-style church being built so quickly and implies the narrative is a “bedtime story for adults.” Speaker 0 notes a fire on 06/09/2024 that gutted the central dome and allegedly destroyed the building and its artifacts, and states they posted about it at the time, predicting that the authorities would be wrong. He then references a November 2025 clip reporting that eighteen months after the fire, police now say it may have been deliberately set, i.e., arson. He highlights that early statements claimed the fire was not suspicious, while later statements describe “evidence of multiple origins of the fire” and that there were audible gasps and tears in the room. He questions why there is zero footage from any angle showing how multiple origins could start simultaneously, and notes there were no suspects, arrests, or final cause reports released publicly. He contends that authorities reclassified the fire as suspected arson in November 2025, but maintains that there has been no resolution or accountability, and suggests the building’s destruction was deliberate. Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 discuss the emotional impact and the shift in narrative. They mention that eighteen months after the fire, police say it may have been arson, and that the initial investigation did not appear suspicious. They acknowledge the shock within the congregation and the suggestion that it could have been a deliberate act, while expressing restraint about speculation. They note the absence of footage and the lack of a clear suspect, and they reference a statement from the Diocese of Toronto about evidence of multiple origins of the fire, which contradicts an earlier claim that no one was inside the building when the fire broke out. Speaker 0 questions why such palaces and structures could not be rebuilt quickly, noting that the insurance payout was reportedly around $9,000,000, yet the church now has about $7,000,000 left for a reconstruction project that would require more funding. He contrasts the claimed rapid construction in 1907–1908 with the current prolonged restoration, and suggests that the public narrative around these buildings—built in a single year, with hand-painted murals, and destroyed by arson—should be challenged. He argues that there is no documentation proving the single-year construction story and asserts that the narrative of ancient “palace” architecture is part of a broader pattern worldwide. He ends by speculating about an overarching conspiracy to erase such buildings from the timeline and invites the audience to consider whether those responsible want them fixed or erased.

The speaker explains destruction was caused by tanks attacking because they were blocked in houses and needed to conquer back the settlement. No one survived in one particular house; nineteen people died, including eight children. From other buildings, many were rescued.

The speaker explains that only the fence, garbage can, and air conditioning unit were damaged by the fire, not the house itself. They point out that their neighbor's house and the other neighbors' houses are also unaffected. They show the charred cover of their garage door keypad, indicating that it was heavily burned, but the rest of the building remains untouched.

A bomb went off in the lobby, then a plane hit the building, followed by another plane hitting the other building. When the speaker was coming through the doors on the other side of the trade center, something blew the glass out of the doors and knocked everyone down, filling the area with smoke. The speaker feels shaken up from the blast and wants water, but there is none available.

The speaker describes the bombing of Dresden, where the center of the city was completely ablaze. The heat was intensely painful, requiring a survival tactic of facing into the wind. The speaker witnessed people being burned alive amidst everything being on fire, including roads and tiles. During the second raid, tornado-force winds swept up vulnerable people, including the old, women, and children, into a central bonfire. The speaker emphasizes the brain struggles to comprehend the scale of the horror. The speaker attributes blame not to the pilots, but to those who ordered and designed the raids and methods of destruction, stating they have never been held accountable.

This is my first time here and I can't believe what I'm seeing. The house of a lady who was peacefully protesting has been set on fire. She was just sitting inside her house, minding her own business. This is where she lives, and they've already taken away all her other land. Now they're blaming the Palestinians for this. The Israeli army is not helping either, as they have limited resources to put out the fire. They want to keep the Palestinians restless, sleepless, and joyless. Some soldiers even come with face paint, as if they're going to war.

The speaker discusses the aftermath of an attack, pointing out impact craters and damage. They mention the administration building being hit, with numerous bomb craters visible. The speaker questions the presence of armed individuals in the area.

The top floor collapsed. The speaker saw it blow and ran. He is 69 years old but was still able to run. He believes there are firemen trapped.

The speaker describes watching a catastrophic event unfold from across the street. They state they witnessed the entire incident, including the moment the building started exploding and debris began flying. They note that parts of what appeared to be a plane could be seen during the explosion. As the structure blew apart, the speaker was afraid because debris was hitting against their window, and they feared a portion of the debris might break through the glass. The fire was visible as the building burned, and the entire building shook as the destruction occurred. The speaker mentions their background, saying they are from California and have experienced earthquakes there. They describe looking up and seeing the window completely filled with flames and debris. They also report hearing more explosions and ask if others can hear additional explosions.

A couple from Portland, Oregon, drove a decommissioned fire truck labeled "Rolling River Fire Department" into the Palisades Fire scene. They accessed the scene for two days before being stopped and arrested. The woman is a National Weather Service wind and fire expert who teaches climate change to juvenile delinquents. They create rap songs called "weather slaps" with lyrics like, "wait until you see it all burn." The man driving the truck is a convicted arsonist who previously burned down country clubs and rich people's houses in Oregon. The speaker believes this was an act of ecoterrorism.

It's 4:30 in Toronto, standing in the damaged library. Books ruined by fire and water. Found a newspaper about Germany seeking peace in 1933. The building was set on fire at 5:30 this morning, but luckily, Joergen escaped with surveillance tapes. The library on the 3rd floor is destroyed, the rest of the building needs to be checked for safety. Starting over will be a challenge.

Tanks are thanked for their attack. There was fighting. Inside a house, 15 people were burned, including eight babies, because they were blocked in. The speaker says they need to conquer back the whole settlement, and this couldn't happen without the tanks. Tanks are thanked for their attack. There was fighting.

Speaker 0 discusses the Alexandra Palace (Alipali) as home to the World Darts Championship since 2008 and connects it to the Crystal Palace fire narrative. The speaker traces a path of fires, claiming the Crystal Palace burned down with 89 fire engines and 400 firemen, and questions how long the building burned before realization, noting Crystal and her dog were the only ones to realize it. They state 100,000 people watched the blaze within a few hours, and describe the cause as a “true cause of the fire will forever be a mystery,” calling part of the narrative a clear lie. They reference 1866, the North Transept, and GEICO insurance as an aside about rebuilding, asserting old-world structures like York Cathedral existed with such elements but that modern times cannot reproduce them. They claim construction details are missing: “In the year 07/1941, they know all about this building,” followed by a claim that the church was destroyed by a fire, yet no prior fires are noticed until now. The narrator attributes reconstruction to Egbert’s librarian and Ian Bald, insisting the “truth” is that these stories are narratives, not actual events. The speaker asserts that the original building of Alexandra Palace begins with a company name that is “definitely AI generated” (the Great Northern Palace Company), and contrasts it with the Crystal Palace’s Owen Jones. They allege the Great Northern Palace Company built the Alexandra Palace in 1859, that the Palace Construction Company could not fund it, and that materials were recycled from the large 62 International Exhibition Building. They argue the two buildings have the same material and that the explanation is that pieces were taken from the other building. Key timeline claims include: - In 1863, a project to explain why the palace sits on a hill, later built on a ridge over 300 feet high. - The project started in 1865 and finished in 1873, sixteen days later the whole thing burns down; 4,700 items claimed as “historic value” are destroyed. - The entire building is said to be destroyed from the inside while outer walls survive, yet rebuilt and reopened in 1875, with a brand-new Alexandra Palace featuring a concert hall, art galleries, a museum, electro hall, a library, a banqueting room, and a large theater. - A horse racing course and a Japanese village are mentioned as part of the complex. - They note a pattern of many fires and reconstruction projects, while asserting some fires (pre-19th century) are nods to a hidden group and not real events. The speaker highlights a specific 1980 incident: Haringey Council took over trusteeship and insured it for 31,000,000, and “six months after they insured it, for 31,000,000, a fire started under the organ that completely spread,” destroying half the building, with outer walls surviving. They question the odds of the organ being destroyed while it was dismantled, and point out the eight-year reopening vs the two-year reopening claimed for 1873 to 1875. Overall, the speaker argues that fires across these buildings are part of a deliberate, largely untrustworthy narrative, with repeated mentions of “old world” construction, AI-generated names, and insurance-driven destruction. They promise to continue exposing what they see as lies and invite the audience to wait for more.

The speaker describes witnessing the collapse of the World Trade Center and hearing what sounded like gunshots. They saw the building being taken down and people running away. The speaker observed explosions and then turned around to run for their life. Another speaker adds that the only way a building can collapse with acceleration is through controlled demolition using precisely timed and placed explosives.

The speaker witnessed the collapse of a building, which was taken down floor by floor. They described hearing loud bangs, like bullet shots, and saw the building being hit multiple times. The bombs caused people to start running, and the speaker also ran for their life as the World Space Center collapsed. Another speaker explains that the only way a building can collapse with acceleration is if it has pre-engineered and precisely timed explosives. This suggests that the collapse was controlled.

The speaker observes a fire being put out, with the back part still burning. They mention a live stream and provide an update on the situation. The speaker notes the tragic nature of the event.

The speaker is in Washington D.C. at Black Lives Matter Plaza, near the White House. The speaker says the plaza is being torn up, much like BLM allegedly ravaged, murdered, and torched the country. The speaker says the street used to be painted Black Lives Matter, but workers are replacing the yellow lettering with the original bricks. The speaker claims St. John's Episcopal Church was lit on fire by BLM, along with the White House, in an attempt to kill Donald Trump, who had to escape to a security bunker. The speaker says it is time to desecrate BLM's altars and show the country what actual healing looks like. The speaker believes there should never be another time when divisive, terroristic political movements take over the nation's capital and get painted on the streets. The speaker calls for a full investigation of the BLM organization, claiming it defrauded and spent hundreds of millions of dollars on lavish mansions for themselves and didn't help a single Black person.

There is a Pentecostal church at 1382 Ohlona Place that has some unusual damage. The public will be allowed to visit the area soon, but there has been no investigation or testing done yet. The damage does not appear to be from a fire, but rather looks like it was sliced in half by a laser. Inside the church, there is a precision line cut along the roof, but the rest of the building is undamaged. The embers from the roof fell straight to the ground, and there is a rectangular shape cut out of the roof. The speaker is unsure of what could have caused this and is sharing the information in hopes of finding answers.

A tree fell on the power lines, causing a fire. Residents fought to keep the fire from spreading, but the water supply was shut off, making it impossible to control. Despite their efforts, the fire grew and destroyed homes. The speaker expressed feelings of defeat and helplessness as they watched their house burn. They had no water and had to evacuate, only to return the next day to find everything burnt down. The speaker's neighbor also lost their house, and they both expressed sadness and a desire to start anew. Despite the devastation, they still love the area and find it hard to leave.

The speaker witnessed a building collapse that resembled a controlled demolition. This was the third collapse of the day, similar to what we have seen on television when buildings are intentionally destroyed. The fire in the building had been burning since early morning, making it difficult to fight due to the unstable structure. Dana Tyler is also present.