TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A Winnipeg cafe owner and her family were believed to have been attacked, with the café trashed and anti-Semitic graffiti, sparking community shock and an outpouring of support. Police, however, say the incident was staged and have charged Oksana Behrendt, Maxim Behrendt, and Alexander Behrendt with public mischief. The family maintains their story, insisting they were victims of hate, and speaking on CBC Radio after the charges were filed. They described themselves as targets and said they did not stage anything, with statements like “In this moment, somebody grabbed me” and “They can find any evidence against anybody.” They also expressed that their business and home were under threat and emphasized their belief that the attack was real. Police maintained that the incident in Winnipeg was staged and that there was evidence of a crime, though not a hate crime. The cafe’s interior still bore signs of investigation as officers worked the scene. The backlash was swift: a Jewish LGBTQ advocacy group moved out of the building, and there was broad concern that the alleged stunt could undermine support for legitimate hate crimes. Community leaders and residents described feelings of betrayal and worry about future incidents, with comments such as “This is a betrayal of the community and a betrayal of also the police” and concerns that people might doubt genuine cases in the future. Court records show the Behrendts faced lawsuits over debts, and the family denied staging the incident for financial gain. They insisted they did not deserve judgment based on what they say is their truth, stating, “I don’t want people to judge us wrongly because we didn’t do it.” The charges were upheld by the court, and the broader community expressed disappointment and anger about the situation. Meanwhile, excerpts noted that hate-crime cases in Canada had risen to an all-time high in 2017, with nearly 2,100 incidents—a 47% increase from the previous year. Attacks on Jewish people accounted for 18% of all hate crimes, with attacks on Muslims a close second. Other items mentioned included international incidents: in Israel, police announced the arrest of an 18-year-old American-Israeli behind a series of bomb threats targeting Jewish communities worldwide; authorities said he used the Internet to mask his location, and the suspect faced a medical examination and legal scrutiny. In North York, a 67-year-old man, Avram Babrovsky, faced arson charges for allegedly setting a fire inside a synagogue, with a history of using his own access card to gain entry. In Schenectady, a man was accused of spray-painting swastikas on his own home, later charged with falsely reporting an incident and harassment. In West Bloomfield, Michigan, police credited technology for solving a case in which Sean Sammett allegedly fabricated an attack on leaving a synagogue; investigators found inconsistencies in his account, including elevated heart rate on an Apple Watch prior to the claimed assault, and evidence suggested he stabbed himself with a knife and used bloody tissues. Sammett was charged with filing a false police report, with authorities noting the impact on real victims and the community’s sense of safety. In Brooklyn and Manhattan, authorities reported 56-year-old David Haddad, who is Jewish, as the suspect in a string of antisemitic messages and swastika incidents, with additional phone threats to kill Jews. In Vancouver, a defamation suit was filed against HillelBC by UBC’s Social Justice Center over “iHeartHammas” stickers on campus; the stickers had circulated during a walkout for Palestine and a contractor who helped distribute them had been terminated. UBC stated it would not comment on the suit, and RCMP said no charges were laid after investigation. Additionally, Amsterdam’s mayor walked back the use of the term pogrom after violence following a match between Ajax and Maccabi Tel Aviv, amid political fallout from comments by a government official blaming Moroccans for the unrest. A separate report discussed viral video miscaptioning of footage from Amsterdam, showing Maccabi Tel Aviv fans fighting in a way that media outlets had miscaptioned as Jews being attacked; fact-checkers confirmed the video actually showed Maccabi fans chasing a Dutch man, and several outlets issued corrections.

Speaker 0 recounts being told at synagogue while offline that Candice is really going after him, and that heads-up sealed him a little. When he finally turned the phone on, he truly saw all the notifications. He was up until 3AM local time that night dealing with all the messages and emails. It’s not fun. He says, to an extent, it’s part of the nature of the business—when you put yourself out there, you’re going to get pushback. But this is not pushback. This is not someone responding to a legal theory of mine or making an intelligent point about the two-state solution or not two-state solution. No. This is literally just picking a Jewish person and calling him subhuman filth and sinking your band of millions and millions of neo Nazi zealots on a Jewish person who happens to be a husband and father to a young child. So, he says, it’s just awful, awful stuff. And he adds that he’s talking to lawyers. “Aaron, I think I’ve said this publicly already.” He’s a lawyer with his background, he clerked for a federal appeals judge, and he knows a thing or two about United States constitutional law. He thinks that there is a potentially serious case here for defamation, and he is very much speaking with lawyers, and we’ll see what happens.

There is a bomb on a plane. Lufthansa flight four four one. "I provided the bomb, and my team smuggled the bomb." "C four bomb." "We are told that this is called a, quote, viable threat, and canine units will sweep the plane, and all luggage and cargo will be checked." The pilot diverted the plane to JFK. "Two bomb threats called into two Jewish centers." "There was a bomb in the JCC that's going to go up to me in less than an hour." "Inside the JCC Building." "Tell them to hit the blue button because this is not okay." Katie with the FBI. "You've been in The United States. Do you speak English?" "You speak English very well." "We know what happened, we know how it happened, we know who did it, but we don't know why." "I didn't do it." "We have everything that we need in this case." "The anti Semitic threats targeting our Jewish community are horrible." "We are representatives of the United States government or the FBI."

In this video, Mr. Zundel, the speaker, presents a controversial perspective on World War II and the Holocaust. He questions the number of Jews killed in concentration camps and argues that Hitler did not have a plan to exterminate Jews. Zundel expresses admiration for Hitler and other Nazi figures, but denies being a Nazi himself. He criticizes immigration in Germany and holds negative views towards Jews. Zundel discusses his activities in spreading what he calls "truth material" about the Holocaust, acknowledging that his views are not accepted in Germany due to hate speech legislation. He also talks about the diversity within the Jewish community and refutes stereotypes. The speaker denies being a white supremacist and discusses his concerns about personal safety. He criticizes the justice system's handling of war criminals and expresses his belief that the Jewish community will face consequences for their actions. Overall, Zundel presents his views on German history, the Holocaust, and his own experiences.

The speaker claims the Israeli war room is trying to get the FBI after them. This follows the speaker's video arguing that Elias Rodriguez's elimination of two Zionist officials was an act of resistance, not an antisemitic terrorist attack. The speaker anticipates the FBI's involvement, recalling a previous incident in November when someone smeared them by sending false bomb threats to synagogues in their city, attributed to the speaker. The speaker expresses disdain for the FBI, federal authorities, the Israeli war room, and accuses them of being traitors to humanity.

Ernst Zundel is facing threats from the Jewish Defense League, with a recent explosion at his home believed to be caused by a pipe bomb. Zundel claims to have received threats of violence, while the JDL denies involvement. Zundel, known for controversial views on the Holocaust, remains defiant despite the attack. Security measures at his home include cameras, security guards, and barbed wire. The JDL expresses a desire to see Zundel's operation dismantled.

The speaker claims the Israeli war room is trying to get the FBI after them because they published a video arguing that Elias Rodriguez's elimination of two Zionist officials was an act of resistance, not an antisemitic terrorist attack. The speaker says this isn't the first time the FBI has come to their door; it also happened in November when a Zionist smeared them by sending synagogues in their city false bomb threats in the speaker's name. The speaker expresses anger towards the FBI, the feds, the Israeli war room, and accuses them of being traitors to humanity.

"Some of the Internet rumors that somehow Israel is behind the Charlie Kirk murder." "That's insane." "Israel also changes the orbit of the moon; Israel pushes the sun." "When you hate Jews, when you hate the Jewish state, you're willing to say anything and promote all these absurd, absurd rumors." "They're willing to kill us all the time." "We were poisoning the wells, we were drinking the blood of Christian children." "The Nazis said the same thing. You know, we're carrying vermin, we're spreading disease, and people believed it." "Well, since then, we've learned, when people spread these lies about us, prepare yourself for the assault." "Charlie Kirk said to me that he wrote me this detailed letter, you have to fight the slander. These untruths, these vilifications have consequences. And he was right." "He was going to win. That's why they shot him."

We found the thug who allegedly smoke bombed a Christian worship service and he appears to be linked to an antifossil operating within Canada's Department of National Defense.

The exchange centers on content posted online to the Department of State of Canada and the implications of that content. Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about what she posted and asks for a screenshot to verify the online statements. Speaker 1 asserts that she referred to someone as “a Zionist scumbag” and says “he's not my prime minister,” adding, “But really, you're gonna come to my door and you're worried that I'm going to do something.” Speaker 0 notes that there were “threats” and explains the purpose of the visit: to address such threats, which could lead to consequences if continued. Speaker 1 responds that the focus should be on “actual real crime” rather than harassing her over online remarks, and argues that the visit is a waste of tax dollars. Speaker 0 warns that if the behavior continues, there could be an arrest and charge, stating, “if you made some threats that are concerning… you could be arrested and charged.” Speaker 1 demands to see what she allegedly said, asking, “Show me what I said,” and accuses the interaction of harassment and harassment for expressing dissent about the prime minister. The dialogue touches on the nature of the statements. Speaker 1 repeats hostility toward the prime minister and labels the act as “harassing people for what they say online because I don't like our stupid prime minister, and he's a Zionist sunbag,” while Speaker 0 reiterates the right to express opinion but cautions against threats. The conversation escalates with Speaker 1 calling the environment “Communist Canada” and questioning the officers’ pride in their work, challenging, “How do you like working for that?… Do you go back home and look at your family in the mirror and say, this is what you do for a living?” Speaker 0 emphasizes the possibility of documenting the behavior and filing a report if the conduct continues, with a vague reference to “the Trump Blah blah blah blah blah.” Speaker 1 maintains, “I will say whatever the fuck I want about our prime minister. You can't stop my speech. Sorry. Opinion. Yeah. Exactly.” The dialogue ends with Speaker 1 stating, “Okay. Have a nice day. Goodbye now,” and Speaker 0 reiterating the threat assessment: “Be threatening. That's all I'm asking you.”

An explosion occurred early this morning at the home of Toronto publisher Ernst Zundel, believed to be caused by a pipe bomb. The blast, which happened around 4:30 AM behind a garage on Carlton Street, caused approximately $2,000 in damage to Zundel's property and nearby vehicles. The police are investigating, with several suspects in mind. Witnesses described the explosion as powerful, resulting in smoke and flames. Zundel, known for his controversial views on the Holocaust and a collector of Nazi memorabilia, has faced threats and has extensive security measures at his home. A caller claiming to represent the People's Liberation Movement for the Jewish Defense League stated their involvement in the bombing, though the group is unfamiliar to authorities. Zundel is currently facing a jury trial for publishing false news.

Ernst Zundel, a Toronto publisher, was charged with publishing false information about the Holocaust. The trial sparked a debate about freedom of speech and the validity of Holocaust denial. Zundel argued that the Germans did not kill 6 million Jews and that the Holocaust was a hoax. He faced protests and threats from Jewish organizations and was eventually found guilty of publishing anti-Jewish literature. Zundel was sentenced to 15 months in jail and there were calls for his deportation. The trial highlighted the sensitive nature of the Holocaust and the importance of historical accuracy.

Earlier this week, state police in Germany conducted raids, seizing electronics from individuals suspected of posting racist content online. Over 50 similar raids occurred across the country, targeting what prosecutors describe as coordinated online hate speech. It's absurd. They're modeling their laws after Europe's. Imagine armed agents raiding homes and seizing devices over internet posts? What if the content was Jewish, like menorahs? Suddenly, the anti-Nazi stance seems contradictory. The very principles they claim to uphold are being violated. It's nonsensical. Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Go to the AlexJonesstore.com. Infowars is recognized as the tip of the spear in the fight against the globalists. We are now reaching the most people of any of the shows out there. These new viewers aren't getting product and it is the hardcore viewers and listeners like you that are keeping us on the air. Check out the AlexJonesstore.com today, and I thank you for keeping us on the air.

Jeff states that Nazis are burning them down and then putting the firehouse. He calls them thugs, rental cops, and Nazis, and says "fuck you" to them.

The speaker is standing in the remains of a library in Toronto on Carlton Street, damaged by fire and water. They found a newspaper with the headline "Germany declares for peace. Adolf Hitler addressing the German nation on October 14, 1933." The speaker notes the irony, as Ed Sandall has spent 30 years advocating for peaceful solutions. The fire was started around 5:30 AM when gasoline was poured against the front of the house. Joergen, who was in the building, escaped with the surveillance tapes. The entire 3rd floor, including the library and private borders, is destroyed. What wasn't burned is soggy, and the roof is missing in portions. The rest of the building will be assessed to determine what can be salvaged.

The speaker claims the Israeli war room is trying to get the FBI after them because they published a video arguing that Elias Rodriguez's elimination of two Zionist officials was an act of resistance, not an antisemitic terrorist attack. The speaker says this isn't the first time the FBI has come to their door; it also happened in November when a Zionist smeared them by sending synagogues in their city false bomb threats in the speaker's name. The speaker expresses anger towards the FBI, the feds, the Israeli war room, and accuses them of being traitors to humanity.

An individual, identifying as Persian, threatens to destroy "you motherfuckers" and claims they are building an atomic bomb that will target Israel. The speaker expresses anger, alleging Israel "destroyed you guys, kissed your kicked your asses." The individual states, "Fuck Judaism." The speaker is filmed and labeled a "Persian coward." The individual repeats the threat to destroy "every fucking Jew" and challenges someone to "come here."

- Now some someone did tell me at synagogue while I was offline, you know, just a heads up. - Candice is really going after you. - I was up till 3AM local time that night just dealing with all the messages and emails and whatnot there. - It's not fun. - This is not pushback. Right? - This is literally just picking a Jewish person and calling him subhuman filth and sinking your band of millions of neo Nazi zealots on a Jewish person who happens to be a husband and father to a to a to a young child. - It's awful, awful stuff. - Aaron, I think I I'm pretty sure I've said this publicly already. - I'm talking to lawyers. - I think that we have a a potentially serious case here for defamation, and I'm very much speaking with lawyers, and we'll see what happens. - I clerk for a federal appeals judge. - I know I know a thing or two about United States constitutional law.

What you gotta do can include violence against anyone you call a Nazi. They call Ben Shapiro a Nazi. They're allowed to commit violence against anyone filming them. If you go down to like the military surplus store, navy surplus store, you can get like a k bar for like $30.40 bucks. Luring people to their cars with sawed off shotguns and handing out knives and shivs, this went far beyond a goof, and we needed to get Nachae Jered out of there. The media on the other hand, who you think would jump on a story like this, well, their response is what's most disturbing of all. Even being shown the footage in the presence of police officers to confirm authenticity, they walked away.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about his Jewish identity and references a "virulent anti-Semite" acquaintance who is supposedly friends with Holocaust denier David Irving. Speaker 0 brings up the Holocaust, referencing "smokestacks of Birkenau" and questioning the validity of the Holocaust. Speaker 0 claims this acquaintance denies the Holocaust by pointing to shadows in aerial photos of Dachau. Speaker 0 says this person questions how 6 million people could disappear. Speaker 1 denies being a Holocaust denier, stating he had a Bar Mitzvah. Speaker 0 says the acquaintance seemingly admitted people died, but questioned the number. Speaker 0 says everyone is entitled to their opinion, and that the number of deaths is somewhere between 600 and 6 million.

A Winnipeg cafe story dominates for a stretch, with Oksana Behrendt, her husband Alexander, and son Maxim reporting a violent attack on their Jewish-owned cafe, claiming they were assaulted, the cafe robbed and vandalized with anti-Semitic graffiti. Police later say the incident was staged and charge the family with public mischief. The family denies staging the event, insisting they were victims of hate. Community response swings from shock and sympathy to disbelief and anger, with some calling it a betrayal of the community and police. Court records show the family also faces lawsuits over debts. The case has led to cancellations of an interfaith vigil and the removal of a crowdfunding campaign, while police continue to present evidence to be revealed in court. Experts note hate-crime reports in Canada rose to nearly 2,100 incidents in 2017, up 47% from the prior year, with Jewish and Muslim communities among the top targets; the Winnipeg incident is cast as potentially damaging to genuine hate-crime victims if proven to be staged. In Israel and North America, authorities report a separate wave of antisemitic threats and attacks. Police in Israel say an eighteen-year-old American-Israeli is behind a string of bomb threats that terrorized Jewish communities globally, including numerous threats against Jewish centers, day schools, and synagogues, mainly in the United States, with some Canadian institutions evacuating. The suspect was identified through international security cooperation, and police seized computer equipment; the teen reportedly faced a medical condition. There is mention of a prior 2015 threat against Delta Airlines, and the suspect’s medical status is noted by a lawyer and officials. In Toronto area news, a 67-year-old man, Avram Babrovsky, is charged with arson in connection with a fire at a North York synagogue, allegedly after gaining access with his own card. Police continue the investigation and seek information from the public. In New York, a man in Schenectady, Andrew King, is charged with falsely reporting an incident after spray-painting swastikas on his own home and later harassing others; police say he claimed to be targeted due to wearing a yarmulke. In West Bloomfield, Michigan, a different case involves Sean Samet, accused of fabricating a stabbing at a synagogue. Investigators say Samet’s Apple Watch data showed a normal heartbeat during the alleged attack, contradicting his account; bloody tissues and a knife found later indicated self-inflicted harm. He faces charges for filing a false police report. Community leaders emphasize not tolerating exploitation of antisemitism, while acknowledging the impact on real victims seeking justice. In Brooklyn, New York, investigators report 56-year-old David Haddad, Jewish by background, arrested for harassment as a hate crime after a string of antisemitic messages and swastika incidents across Brooklyn and Manhattan, with connections to a local community member and potential ties to other incidents. In Vancouver, British Columbia, a defamation suit is filed by UBC Social Justice Center against HillelBC over iHeartHamas stickers associated with a campus Palestine walkout; HillelBC says an independent contractor distributed the stickers and that the organization terminated its relationship. The SJC asserts the stickers’ content was untrue and harmful, while UBC says it provided information to law enforcement and campus security. The RCMP concluded the investigation with no charges. Across Europe, Amsterdam’s mayor retracts the use of the term pogrom after violence surrounding a football match between Ajax and Maccabi Tel Aviv, with political fallout including the resignation of a Dutch finance minister amid right-wing rhetoric that linked Moroccan-origin residents to the violence. A separate segment fact-checks a viral video claiming Muslims are hunting Jews in Amsterdam, establishing that the footage actually shows Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters fighting a Dutch man, not a Muslim mob; miscaptioned coverage by multiple outlets is noted, with corrections and apologies pursued where possible. The piece closes by highlighting the broader context of antisemitic acts and the importance of accurate reporting.

Zundel claims the Holocaust is a hoax created by Zionists for money. He keeps a model of Auschwitz saying ovens were for typhus victims, not mass murder. He distrusts Jews due to their power in media. Charges were filed against him by a Holocaust survivor. Zundel believes Germans need rehabilitation, denying the 6 million death count.

Earlier this week, state police raided an apartment in Northwest Germany, seizing a suspect's laptop and cell phone for allegedly posting a racist cartoon online. This was one of over 50 similar raids across Germany, part of a coordinated effort to curb online hate speech. It's absurd how these anti-nazi principles are being violated. The authorities are going after people for posting Jewish propaganda, like pictures with the Star of David or menorahs, claiming they're illegal symbols. It's like, how is this any different from what the Nazis would do? Also, go to AlexJonesStore.com and get great supplements and gear. We're reaching over a million people a day, but these new viewers aren't necessarily supporting the show. It's the hardcore patriots who are keeping us on the air. Become a VIP member for $30 a month and get $40 to spend in the store.

He recounts being told, while offline at the synagogue, that Candice is really going after him, and he describes the effect of turning his phone on to see all the notifications and messages. He says he was up until 3AM local time dealing with the barrage of messages and emails. He distinguishes this experience from ordinary pushback, stating that this is not a response to a legal theory or a constructive debate about the two-state solution, but rather “picking a Jewish person and calling him subhuman filth and sinking your band of millions and millions of neo Nazi zealots on a Jewish person who happens to be a … husband and father to a young child.” He emphasizes the severity and ugliness of the harassment, characterizing it as “awful, awful stuff.” He then shifts to his own perspective, noting publicly (as far as he believes) that he is talking to lawyers about the matter. As a lawyer with a background that includes clerking for a federal appeals judge, he states that he “knows a thing or two about United States constitutional law.” He says there is “potentially serious case here for defamation” and that he is “very much speaking with lawyers,” with the outcome still to be determined—“we’ll see what happens.” He frames the situation as a confrontation that goes beyond typical professional disagreement, involving targeted hatred toward a Jewish individual who is described as a husband and father. Throughout, he underscores the personal toll of the online harassment, contrasting it with his professional experience and legal considerations. He communicates a sense of urgency and concern about the legal and reputational implications, while indicating he is actively seeking legal counsel to assess possible defamation avenues. The overall message centers on the severity of the targeted harassment, its anti-Jewish intensity, and the potential legal response he may pursue.

The speaker claims the Israeli war room is trying to get the FBI after them. This follows the speaker's video arguing that Elias Rodriguez's elimination of two Zionist officials was an act of resistance, not an antisemitic terrorist attack. The speaker anticipates the FBI's involvement, referencing a prior incident in November when someone smeared them by sending false bomb threats to synagogues in their city, attributed to the speaker. The speaker expresses disdain for the FBI, federal authorities, the Israeli war room, and accuses them of being traitors to humanity.