reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
You misunderstood my point. When I said marriage is irrelevant where procreation is impossible, I meant that in principle, not in specific cases. The definition of marriage is tied to the potential for procreation, which is why it exists. Even if individuals are infertile, the definition remains intact because the possibility of procreation exists between a man and a woman. In contrast, same-sex unions cannot procreate in principle, which alters the definition of marriage. If we redefine marriage to exclude procreation, we undermine its foundational purpose, which is to regulate the responsibilities associated with procreation. This approach risks making the institution arbitrary and devoid of its original significance.