reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: Vaccines date back to 1626 poisoning the people. Okay? Poisoning the people since 1626. This is not new. They're not like, oh, we got some new stuff, and it's not the snake venom or anything else. It's just poison is what it is. They've been poisoning the people since 1626 with vaccines. So no child, no adult, no grandma, no grandpa, no mother, no nothing needs any shots, whether it be tetanus, whether it be rabies, whether it be anything. You do not need to put any shots into your animal, your grandma, your father, your mother, your children. That's it. It's straight poison. And there's a great picture from 1885, and it says, vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate. There is money in the side effects. That's it. That is all vaccines. Money in the side effects for the pharmaceutical companies to poison the people and just keep making money off of them. You go back into the nineteen hundreds and doctors used to claim there were no cases of cancer in an unvaccinated person. How about the Amish? The Amish don't put a single vaccine into their body, And you notice that the Amish look pretty darn healthy. Well, altogether. Why? They're not injecting themselves with poison. It makes no sense. So there's all these cultures who didn't use this garbage. And then as they now become like modernized and they start putting this garbage into them their body, then all of a sudden, people start coming down with all the same illnesses. I got autoimmune, lupus. I got allergies. I got this. I got that. Right? Right? All those things. Where do you think they're all stemming from? They get you as you're young because you don't have the ability to consent. Right? Tell that tell the doctor to take the needle and stick it in themselves. Give themselves their own boosters and vaccines. You don't need to do that. And I think people need to stand the ground with that because there has never been a single vaccine that has ever helped helped anybody.

"But, what I'm most excited about is is announcement that we're going to make that we're making now, which is that the Florida Department of Health, in partnership with the governor, is going to be working to end all vaccine mandates in Florida law." "All of them. All of them. All of them." "Every last one of them. Yeah. Every last one" "Every last one of them, every last one of them is wrong and drips with disdain and and slavery. K? Who am I as a government or anyone else or who am I as a man standing here now to tell you what you should put in your body? Who" "am I to tell you what your child should put in your body? I don't have that right. Your body your body is a gift from God. What you put into your body what you put into your body is because of your relationship with your body and your God. I don't have that right." "Government does not have that right. They want you to believe they" "have that right. And, unfortunately, you know," " they've been successful. They've been successful."

We will have to explain to our kids what being a parent was like when they were kids. It's pretty crazy. The government was out of control, poisoning everything and sending our money to other countries. We couldn't pay our bills. We had to buy food from local farmers because the government poisoned everything. The medical industry was the number one killer, but we couldn't say anything because they were in control. We did things to preserve your fertility. That's why we're farmers. Any questions?

The speakers frame a broad concern about control over resources and exposure to external interventions. Speaker 0 emphasizes individual agency in food-related choices: “I put into my mouth. I can control what I feed,” and notes that while people can decide how to grow their food and whether to spray pesticides, they cannot control “the experiments over my head.” They describe a sense of invasion and threat, stating, “Within an hour, it spreads out. It creates a blanket. We're in a war. This is a war against me, you, our children, our grandchildren, and generations to come. This is war raised upon us.” They claim the programs involve “spraying tons of patented aerosol balloons into our skies without public consent,” naming substances such as aluminum and barium, and assert these actions are “targeting your food, your water, and it's coming in multiple different ways.” When asked how to verify these claims, Speaker 1 mentions that “states have bills to ban it,” suggesting a political dimension to the issue. Speaker 0 expands on the political and legal landscape, stating that “I think there are now 32 states that have taken an attempt at this,” and that the issue has “become a huge issue.” They argue that if ordinary citizens knew “the truth of what's going on and what they're being exposed to without their consent,” they would be outraged and would take action. They call for accountability, declaring, “I don't want some creep ramming chemicals down my throat without my permission. We need to prosecute those people that are doing it.” The exchange also touches on strategy and momentum. Speaker 0 asks whether they should “stand in one spot and say enough is enough” and whether, if others don’t listen, they should “take it to the next step.” They reflect that they have been pursuing this issue “for a while,” indicating ongoing effort and persistence. Overall, the dialogue centers on perceived loss of individual control over exposure to environmental interventions, the belief in large-scale, covert aerosol programs, legislative responses at the state level, a call for accountability and prosecution, and the contemplation of continued collective action in response to what is described as an ongoing, war-like threat.

The speaker argues that peptide companies are funded by Big Pharma, the government, and organizations and companies including Bill and Melinda Gates, Pfizer, and “Barta,” and claims that boosters are part of this system. They say “Barta” is the U.S. federal agency paired with pharmaceutical companies to develop vaccines for use in people. The speaker contrasts vaccines with “peptide vaccines,” citing “J&J and Barta,” and says they found a document titled “New Peptides as COVID-19 Vaccine Candidates” and another item on “Peptide vaccine research.” The speaker claims that peptides are “peptides as drugs into cells” and highlights “cell penetrating peptides,” describing this as the purpose of peptides when put into the body. They address the claim that the government would never poison someone by saying peptides are meant to be introduced into cells. They also claim that insulin is a peptide, stating that insulin was created by pharmaceutical companies after “vaccinating people causing diabetes,” and they specifically assert that Pfizer both makes insulin and “gave diabetes” with the COVID vaccine. The speaker further claims that HRT and TRT are also created by pharmaceutical companies, presenting these as connecting dots. They then ask what the difference is between “health influencers” telling people to take peptides and the government telling people to take vaccines, asserting that “both of them” lead to the same outcome (“a free donut at the end”) and urging people to “think about that when you’re putting this experimental stuff into your body.” The speaker’s proposed solution is to eat real food instead of injecting “mysterious substances,” linking injections to “all types of other diseases” and to “making a business down the road.” They recommend raw eggs, raw milk, raw butter, and raw meat, and conclude by saying not to “fund big pharma or the government” and asserting that the government is trying to “depopulate us.”

Borax is claimed to “pull fluoride out of the body,” with the speaker saying that taking “a little bit of a pinch of borax” can remove fluoride from the system. The speaker identifies borax as sodium tetraborate and references “the borax conspiracy,” describing a man who traveled with “a little pinch of Borax” and claimed he was helping people with arthritis, osteoporosis, pain, inflammation, and fluoride-related issues. The speaker asserts that this man was “shut down in the nineteen eighties.” The speaker says the topic is “something to look into,” and adds that there is a “document from 1893” describing a fellow who supposedly did “5,000 studies on the benefits of Borax.” The speaker claims that “nobody wants to talk about that” and states that “PubMed pulled all of that off.” The speaker further claims that PubMed involvement relates to “salt and the salt beds,” encouraging the audience to think about “sitting in a salt bed” or “sitting in a salt lake” and describing these as healing, stating that “that’s what borax connects you back to.” The speaker then describes an event where “poison control came after” them after they first talked about borax. The speaker says the Florida poison control responded by saying that borax is toxic, and frames it as an issue of selective enforcement: instead of going after vaccines, “they said that borax is toxic.” The speaker repeats the idea that “we won’t go after the vaccines,” claiming that “that cold off ten percent of the population linking to blood clots, died suddenly,” is part of what the speaker believes poison-control messaging overlooks. The speaker states, “Borax is dangerous. That’s what they tell you.” The speaker advises viewers to “go to earthclinic.org” and “look into Borax,” saying they “highly recommend” checking it out and positioning the message as “solutions.” The speaker also expresses strong opposition to medical interventions, saying they are “so over the system” and describing it as “murder by injection,” stating that injections are “poisoning the people” and “culling the population.” The speaker concludes by saying they hope the information brings “truth” and encourages sharing with others to help “enlighten somebody else,” so people can “be aware” and “know about murder by injection.”

"What greater fight for freedom is there than to have control over your own body? And up until the point where your children are 18, you get to make that decision for them too. If not, if that is not the case, then you don't have freedom. If you don't decide what's going into your child, then your child is property of the US government. If they can inject your children beyond your will and there's nothing you can do about it, they can't get the education your taxes are paying for, then we have been reduced to nothing more than farm animals being lined up by Farmer Joe and vaccinated at will with any crazy technology they can come up with like mRNA technology which we know has been disastrous and skipped its safety trials. We are fighting to put all that to an end."

Speaker announces that the Florida Department of Health, in partnership with the governor, is going to be working to end all vaccine mandates in Florida, Washington. All of them. Every last one of them. Every last one of them is wrong and drips with disdain and and slavery. K? Who am I as a government or anyone else? Or who am I as a man standing here now to tell you what you should put in your body? Who am I to tell you what your child should put in your body? I don't have that right. Your body your body is a gift from God. What you put into your body what you put into your body is because of your relationship with your body and your God. I don't have that right. Government does not have that right. They want you to believe they have that right. And, unfortunately, you know, they've been successful.

The transcript presents a call to deflate what is described as a parasitic system consisting of big government and large corporations. The speaker, identified as Speaker 0, advocates growing, preparing, fermenting, storing, foraging, hunting one’s own food and medicine, living off grid, and swapping with local communities as a strategy to reduce dependence on centralized state and corporate power. The overarching goal is to destroy inflation, corruption, and power abuse attributed to rich elites by shrinking the influence of parasitic big government and corporations. Key justification offered for deflating the system includes the belief that people must become independent locally and stop feeding large-scale states and companies, otherwise decay will reoccur. The speaker frames the relationship between host and parasite as a healthy, non-destructive dynamic only when the parasite remains subordinate to the host; in contrast, large-scale states and corporations are characterized as parasitic and destructive due to their excessive scale, which purportedly allows wealth to be siphoned from grassroots to higher levels, creating an increasingly extreme parasitic sociopathic elite. The speaker contends that large-scale political and economic structures rise above and destroy their many hosts, culminating in system-wide collapse. The elites and their parasitic system are described as a “overarching multiple host cancer” that drains life from common people. The National or NJAM (as referenced by the speaker) is described as either a more gradual return to local living or a collapse accompanied by significant suffering. Because the stated reason for parasitism is the opportunity created by excessive scale to concentrate wealth upward, the remedy is to reduce scale and power. Regarding justice and governance, the speaker asserts that seeking justice from the courts of the parasitic monster (big government and corporations) is futile, comparing it to asking justice from parasites that feed on you. The proposed response is to starve the parasitic monster and instead feed oneself, one’s household, and the local community. A regional emphasis is placed on Belgium, with a call to brace for this approach there. A set of quantitative claims is provided to illustrate the deflationary argument: Belgium’s national debt for 2024 is discussed in billions of euros, with a breakdown of debt across federal and sub-government levels, producing an extrapolated 2024 figure that reaches 125% of GDP. The speaker uses these figures to support the call to deflate the parasitic system further. The source is credited to Source2mia.org, and the speaker ends with a request to like and follow.

The speaker discusses the claim that the FDA receives 47% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry, noting that the agency released this figure only after a rumor that 50% of their funding came from pharma. They point out a perceived conflict of interest, suggesting that the people writing rules and regulations are funded by the same entities being regulated. The speaker shares personal health concerns and notes difficulty finding valid information not paid for by big pharma. They state that 85 to 90 percent of women with similar issues experience changes or relief in symptoms simply by changing their diet, specifically by going gluten-free, though the speaker personally is not inclined to go gluten-free. Instead, they mention cutting out refined carbs and sugars and report feeling a ton different after only two days on this diet. They express excitement about sharing the journey with viewers. The speaker mentions reassembling a squat rack for a home gym and acquiring egg-laying birds, describing these actions as part of a broader stance against big pharma. They reiterate disbelief that 47% of FDA funding comes from the pharmaceutical industry and declare “a big to big pharma.” The speaker invites audience thoughts and feedback on the topics discussed.

Speaker 0 argues for “deflating the parasitic system,” claiming that growing, preparing, fermenting, storing, foraging, hunting your own food and medicine, living off grid, swapping with your local community, and avoiding big government and big corp creates deflation and destroys inflation, corruption and power abuse with which the rich elites steal money and power. The goal is to “deflate the parasitic big government and corp” more and more. Why deflate the parasitic system? The message states that people must start living independently locally and no longer feed and support large scale states and companies; otherwise decay “just always starts over again.” It asserts that large states and companies are parasitic destructive due to their excessive scale, and that in a healthy parasite–host relationship the parasite must remain subordinate and non-destructive toward its host. The speaker describes large scale states and corporations as rising above and destroying their many hosts until the entire system collapses, characterizing the elites and their parasitic system as an overarching multiple-host cancer, sucking the life out of common people driven by parasitic sociopathic elites and by people enabling large scale systems. The NJAM is described as either a more gradual return to people living independently and locally or a collapse with a lot of suffering. The reason given for their parasitic destructive nature is the scale: excessive scale offers the opportunity to suck wealth away from the grassroots and concentrate it higher up in the system, creating an increasingly extreme parasitic sociopathic elite. The speaker claims that seeking justice from the courts of the parasitic monster, “biggolfpluscorp,” will always fail, likening it to asking justice from the parasites that feed on you. Therefore, the advised course is to “starve the parasitic monster” and instead “feed yourself, your household and your local community.” A note to “Brace yourselves in Belgium” is included. Specific economic data are cited: “Belgian national debt 2024 in billions of euros.” It lists federal Janapr (likely January) plus 29.6 to 534.89, sub-governments plus 22%, 652.57 equals 113% of bbp. Extrapolation 2024, plus 108.3 to 724.79, equals 125% of bbp. The speaker concludes, “Therefore, let's deflate the parasitic system even more.” The source is given as Source2mia.org, with a request to like and follow.

The speakers discuss the potential effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Speaker 1 explains that the idea of DNA fragments and reverse transcription in vaccines is a distinct possibility proven in vitro (in the laboratory) but not as solidly established in real-life humans. He says the machinery exists to reverse transcribe the synthetic mRNA in “these gene products” but notes skepticism about certain public figures and officials who allegedly ignored earlier communications. He cites Denis Rancourt’s data, claiming the vaccine has killed 17 million people and that the injury-to-kill ratio is 34.4. He translates this to global totals of 602 million injured or killed, with approximately 700,000 Americans killed and 2.5 million injured in the United States, describing this as an unprecedented injury-to-kill ratio in medicine and military contexts. He asserts that deadly gene products should have been removed from the market and from Florida two years ago. Speaker 0 asks whether Latipo was alerted two years ago and whether he ignored the warnings. Speaker 1 confirms that Latipo, Ashley Moody, and DeSantis did not respond to communications over the past two years, but notes that Latipo is now taking some action. The conversation shifts to how people can respond health-wise. Speaker 1 contends that health care systems and governments are corrupt, claiming the government has spent trillions of dollars to capture healthcare systems and push dangerous narratives. He urges listeners to leave the conventional healthcare system, describing it as corrupt and implying that healthcare professionals are silenced or fired for speaking out. He promotes an alternative health approach through a parallel system and mentions an emergency medical kit intended to address multiple dangerous diseases and scenarios, asserting that timely access to certain drugs is limited through ordinary medical channels. Throughout, Speaker 1 emphasizes drastic distrust of mainstream medical and governmental institutions, urging viewers to seek alternative health solutions and to prepare for potential health crises. He repeats that the traditional healthcare system is compromised and advocates a shift toward a different healthcare approach and emergency preparedness, including access to medications outside standard channels.

I have to become a farmer and herbal medicine doctor because our food and doctors are poisoning us. I now use apple cider vinegar for bathing and baking soda and vinegar for laundry, as traditional products are toxic. Bottled water is also not trustworthy, although it may be slightly better than tap water, which is contaminated. I don't trust doctors, politicians, or the news, and I have to do extensive research to uncover the truth.

Speaker 0 argues that “health cannot come through a needle,” stating that injecting “a virus, a particle of a bacteria, and a bunch of chemicals” cannot be a basis for staying healthy. They compare this to claiming that taking “seven different types of prescription medications” makes a person healthy, adding that “health in the presence of pharmaceuticals is an oxymoron.” They describe encountering patients who report coming in for knee pain while saying they are otherwise “perfectly healthy,” yet they are taking multiple medications, including treatments for high blood pressure, cholesterol, reflux/GERD, headaches, and a diuretic. Speaker 0 says “symptom-free in the presence of drugs is not health,” emphasizing that health “absolutely cannot go through a needle” and calling it “an inside-out phenomenon.” Speaker 0 then outlines what they believe produces health: taking care of the “terrain,” keeping the gut healthy, getting adequate nutrition, getting plenty of sleep, getting a lot of sunshine for vitamin D, and getting children “outside” for exercise. They claim, “You don’t need to be vaccinated.” They also express criticism of entrusting a child’s health to someone else, saying they do not understand “the abdication” of a “precious little package” to “another human who happens to wear a white coat and have a title of pediatrician,” describing it as misplaced trust “that they know best.”

Friendship is based on shared values, and the group shares a lifelong vision to make the country healthy with evidence-based, replicable science. This will challenge the current system, which is destroying our health due to misaligned economic incentives and public health. The speaker met with heads of pharmaceutical companies, stating the desire to live in a place where companies profit by making people healthy, rather than the current alignment against each other. The healthcare system has perverse incentives that force people to do the wrong thing. The country has become a sick care system instead of a health care system, and the people in the group will change that.

Speaker 0 said he is most excited about an announcement that the Florida Department of Health, in partnership with the governor, will work to end all vaccine mandates in Florida, “all of them,” including “every last one of them.” He added that the mandates are wrong and described them as “rips with disdain and slavery,” and asked who he, as a government or as a man standing there, would be to tell anyone what they should put in their body. Speaker 1 said he does not have the right to tell people what their child should put in their body, stating, “Your body… Your body is a gift from God.” He said what people put into their bodies is because of their relationship with their body and their God, and that he and government do not have that right. He said government wants people to believe it has that right and that “unfortunately, they’ve been successful.”

We became farmers because mainstream food and tap water are unsafe. We take responsibility for our health, as doctors often prescribe harmful treatments instead of addressing root causes. For laundry, we use baking soda and vinegar instead of toxic detergents. Our family size is intentional, and our children don’t attend school to avoid negative influences. We also choose not to vaccinate due to concerns about vaccine safety and effectiveness. Dining out is off the table because restaurant food is often cooked with unhealthy oils. We are actively seeking ways to avoid environmental toxins. If you’re interested in escaping society and starting a community farm, comment yes and check out my book for guidance.

Speaker 0 reflects on how they would explain to their kids what being a parent was like when they were kids. They suggest that, if spoken aloud, the situation seems crazy: the government was out of control, they claim the government had “literally poisoned everything” and were sending all of their money to other countries. They describe a contrast: they could not pay bills while other countries needed their money. They claim food and water were poisoned, leading them to start buying food from local farmers, and they note they didn’t eat a lot of fruits and vegetables because the quality was so bad due to the government’s poisoning. They assert that the medical industry was “basically the mafia,” claiming it was the number one killer of people in America, and they state that you couldn’t say anything about it because, as they put it, it was “literally the mafia.” They then recount that they did many things to ensure their children could keep their fertility as they aged. The speaker concludes by saying that these efforts are why they are farmers now, and they invite questions from their kids.

Health cannot come through a needle or pharmaceuticals; symptom-free with drugs is not health. Health is an inside-out phenomenon requiring a healthy gut, adequate nutrition, sleep, and sunshine. Children need exercise and do not need to be vaccinated. The speaker questions trusting pediatricians with one's child, wondering how people reached that point.

One speaker argues that mold should not be feared because mold consists of spores, and spores are everywhere; spores are equated to pollen, suggesting that fear of mold is unfounded since they are the same thing. The other speaker adds that there are studies indicating that “those ones all heal all the diseases,” highlighting a notion that fear campaigns around mold are misleading. They claim that if a person has mold, candida, or similar issues in their body, it signifies “too many toxins” and that the body is signaling this excess as a remedy to keep the person alive. The dialogue includes a specific recollection about Ajana, who purportedly said that certain things are in the body so that toxins, metals, or similar substances may not actually take you out; otherwise they would seep into the organs and end you quickly. This is presented as evidence of the body’s miraculous nature. A central theme repeatedly asserted is that “the human body is absolutely miraculous” and that “everything is reversible.” The speakers list various conditions—autism, autoimmune diseases, lupus, and even eyesight—claiming they have witnessed people reverse these conditions. It is stated that people can regenerate their eyes and no longer need an eye professional, and that reversing all conditions is possible if one takes initiative. The speakers critique the medical establishment, implying that “every single professional will tell you the opposite because they want you to be their patient for life.” This sentiment is tied to a broader call for personal action: if people do not make changes—such as removing WiFi or taking other unspecified steps—they will continue to complain rather than find solutions. Overall, the message emphasizes that fear about molds and toxins is misguided, that the body possesses remarkable self-healing capabilities, and that proactive efforts can reverse a wide range of health issues. The speakers express a strong desire to provide solutions and to move people forward, rather than remain mired in complaint.

I have to become a farmer and herbal medicine doctor because our food and doctors are poisoned. I now use apple cider vinegar for bathing and baking soda and vinegar for laundry because detergents are toxic. Bottled water isn't much better than tap water, which is also contaminated. I don't trust doctors, politicians, or the news. I have to do extensive research to uncover the truth.

The discussion centers on pets being used as self-amplifying mRNA vectors. The USDA quietly approved Merck's self-amplifying RNA shots called Novavac NXT for cats and dogs with no real safety testing. It says it gives a small dose of RNA particles delivered in the Novavac NXT vaccine. RNA copies exponentially in the cells, and the copies are transcripted into large amounts of the desired antigen. The antigen stimulates a more robust humular and cellular immune response. All sounds good in theory. However, these injections may shed messenger RNA and synthetic antigens to human owners through breath, saliva, or fluids may cause long term genetic damage similar to that seen in humans may recombine with wild viruses creating dangerous new pathogens. This rollout puts both pets and their owners into an uncontrolled genetic experiment without consent. “So says Nicholas Holcher, Miles per hour. So masters in public health. We don't know. Nobody tested it. Nobody did any studies. We don't have long term studies. We don't have short term studies. We just don't know. I'm a little scared. I really don't want to be a part of this.” And by the way, they're actually talking about spraying messenger RNA on our crops. How are we affecting our I feel like this is the everybody remember the book Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. I think I had to read it in high school. Was one of those required readings. Or what was the other book? 1984? Like, I feel like we're living in this dystopian universe where we just experiment with all these genetic things and we just throw it into the environment and throw it into our pets and throw it into people, and we don't know what the outcome is until we see. Are we all gonna go the way the dinosaurs? I don't know. Now I really sound like a conspiracy theorist. Are we all gonna like, is somebody gonna come along in a few thousand years and find fossil remains and try to figure out why we all died? I don't know. It's fine. It's fine. It's just a little nervous.” One speaker says they homestead: they raise their own chickens. They’re not treated with chemicals. Their dogs and cats don't get vaccinated with things that might shed into the environment, and they’re growing all their own organic fruits and vegetables. “Yep, I'm I'm I'm going that way. Y'all y'all do what you need to do. It's a little scary. I don't recommend that particular vaccine for your dogs. I I guess that's the bottom line. I don't know. Be careful what you eat.”

Speaker 0 argues that type 1 diabetes is linked to factors such as raw meat, raw milk, bee pollen, removing WiFi, barefoot grounding, and dragon's blood. They claim the pancreas is “pretty much just getting zapped by WiFi, electricity” and that these elements “mess with your blood sugar.” They assert that consuming raw meats, raw milk, and raw honey causes the pancreas to work harder due to “too much electricity, too many radio frequencies,” combined with too much processed foods, and that everything in the gut turns to sugar, leaving the pancreas overloaded. They propose that diabetes type 1 is reversible, and that type 2 diabetes requires only activity and dietary changes. They state that “all illnesses are reversible,” and expand on a broader view that illness exists because of systemic incentives: they claim the Rockefeller system benefits from people being sick and detoxing, implying that if people healed themselves through a raw diet, eliminating WiFi, and reconnecting with the sun, they would not be patients and hospitals would shut down. They suggest doctors, nurses, and hospitals rely on keeping people sick and dependent to earn money. The speaker reflects on a personal journey that led to these realizations, concluding that many people are lying and that others want you to remain a patient. They present a worldview in which sickness serves financial interests, and imply that true healing comes from lifestyle choices such as dietary changes, removing exposure to WiFi, and increasing sun exposure.

In the future, we'll have to explain to our kids what it was like being parents. It was pretty crazy. The government was out of control, poisoning everything and sending our money to other countries. We struggled to pay our bills and had to buy food from local farmers because the quality was so bad. The medical industry was like the mafia, killing people but we couldn't speak out. We did a lot to preserve your fertility. That's why we became farmers.

Story: they say 'organic food was just food,' 'grass fed beef was just beef,' and 'raw milk was just milk.' Farmers seeking real healthy food were 'forced to use government issued pesticides and chemicals.' They describe schemes where farmers were 'paid to not grow food,' told to plant wildflowers and scatter bird seed, raising prices as fertilizer costs rose. '£500,000,000' was taken away from farmers and handed to farmers abroad. They blame a 'climate crisis' and say 'cow's farts' are the problem. They claim 'world's largest landowners' push for us to eat bugs and lab grown foods, 'to wipe out the farming industry piece by piece.' 'No farmers means no real food.' Support local farmers: buy from farm shops, grass-fed meats, unhomogenized milk, and real free range eggs.