reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I checked Danielle's bedroom for radiation levels due to new street lights outside. Phone on airplane mode showed low levels. But outside, the street lights emitted constant high levels, which can cause cold-like symptoms, fatigue, headaches, and nausea. These lights are common now, even near my cottage. This constant exposure is harmful to health.

Speaker 0: Kevin Matas, with the California Brain Tumor Association, collaborates with emfscientist.org and other groups—two hundred doctors and scientists from 39 countries—who have looked at health effects from wireless radiation. From their work and others, we can clearly say that wireless radiation can cause cancer, neurological problems, immune system disorders, and reproductive harm. Our scientists, along with other groups, include people developing wireless health effects from various sources—brain tumors from cell phone radiation, neurological symptoms from Wi-Fi in schools, neurological and cancerous health effects from simple smart meters. Smart meters are wireless meters on homes to avoid manual readings. Regardless of the source, the health effects can be the same. Cell towers are the most powerful source of wireless radiation emissions. What brings me here today is the rollout of five Gs technology, which is very different from 2G, 3G, and 4G. This is because the wireless radiation uses a higher frequency. Our current wireless technology uses about 1 gigahertz to 4 gigahertz; this new five G technology is ultra high frequency, ultra high intensity, at 24 gigahertz to 90 gigahertz. To put this in perspective, 90 gigahertz is 90,000,000,000 electromagnetic waves per second hitting your body. We know people are already getting sick from the lower frequencies and we expect, our scientists expect, that these higher ultra high frequency microwaves are going to bring people to disease quicker and in a more intense form. The other problem with five G technology is these microwaves are very short. Old microwaves were about two and a half to three feet long; these are now about an inch to a half an inch long, and they don't travel very well. So they're going to have to put a little cell tower transmitter in front of about every two to 10 homes. This is a big problem because cancer rates around regular cell towers are about three or four times what they are normally, so we’re seeing a lot of things. It’s going to be continuous exposure as with other cell towers, but it will be emitting a much more higher frequency, high intensity wireless radiation. Speaker 1: Ladies and gentlemen, not only are these five G death towers going to double cancer rates in our country, they are going to be used to target individuals in a way never seen before. Since most people keep their smartphones on them like a tracking device, and since their political profiles are linked to their phones, it only makes sense that this is going to be an easy way to target people silently and without a trace. As you can see with these new five G death towers, they are going to be focusing beams of high frequency energy at a user's location. These five G death towers are in fact particle beam weapons that can be aimed at people. These particle beams move at the speed of light and track you wherever you go, and in most cases you'll be hit with particle beams coming from multiple directions. This truly is a national emergency considering who controls this technology. You saw how the IRS targeted conservatives. You saw how the FBI covered up the Las Vegas and Hillary investigations. Well, what do you think this beast system is going to do with Christians and conservatives on their networks? Zap, zap, and double zap. That's what admit it. That's what you would do if you were doctor evil. You'd poison the food, the air, the water, and you'd use these death towers to slowly induce cancer. Have no doubt about it. These five G death towers are bad news any way you look at it. So go to your city council meetings. Protest these bad boys from coming up in your neighborhood before it's too late. If you're listening to this, you are the resistance.

In 1971, the US Navy studied the dangers of non-ionizing radiation from cell phones, Wi-Fi, smart devices, and wireless air pods. The study found that non-ionizing radiation can cause central nervous system issues like headaches, insomnia, restlessness, memory loss, seizures, and convulsions. Additional symptoms include anxiety, lack of concentration, dizziness, sleepiness, chest pain, tremors, hallucinations, and changes to DNA and blood sugar. The endocrine system can also be affected, specifically the thyroid. Further symptoms include DNA mutations, sparking of dental fillings, hair loss, brittle hair, and ringing or buzzing in the ears. Companies producing these devices cannot be sued.

Speaker 0 asserts that microwave radiation around people is severely limited by practical constraints, yet cites a report from the Army on millimeter waves that references three hundred fifty studies showing clear biological effects even below thermal thresholds and below established safety guidelines. The claim emphasizes that the subjects in these studies were aware of what was happening in a substantial portion of cases, ranging from thirty percent to eighty percent, because skin and eyes are disproportionately affected by wireless radiation. The argument is that such exposure would impact the skin and nerves, thereby affecting the entire nervous system, and would also expose eyes to military-grade wireless radiation. The speaker further contends that this exposure would involve placing directed radiation in front of people’s homes and forcing it into their rooms, describing the situation as absolutely absurd. A video is mentioned from FCC proceedings in which one of the five G engineers reportedly states that directed beams are being aimed into people’s windows at levels not permitted in their own safety laboratories or safety guidelines. The speaker reiterates that the FCC did not treat this as a pressing issue, describing the stance as shrugging it off and indicating that it isn’t something to be discussed at that time. Key points highlighted include: - The Army report on millimeter waves referencing three hundred fifty studies showing biological effects below thermal and safety guideline levels. - A significant portion of study subjects purportedly aware of the exposure, due to the skin and eyes absorbing a disproportionate share of wireless radiation. - The assertion that exposure could affect the skin and nervous system, with particular emphasis on neurological impacts and ocular exposure. - The claim that directed beams could be placed in front of residential windows and forced into people’s rooms, described as absurd. - A video excerpt from FCC proceedings where a five-G engineer supposedly admits to directing beams into people’s windows at levels not allowed in safety labs. - The speaker’s claim that the FCC dismissed the issue as not needing discussion at that moment. Overall, the speaker builds a narrative that there are documented biological effects at non-thermal exposure levels, that individuals could be knowingly exposed in everyday environments, and that regulatory bodies have not treated the issue with the urgency or seriousness implied by the presented evidence.

Speaker 0 describes smart meters in the context of a book, showing a plant and a smart meter, and notes that “that side's all cooked.” They claim that this illustrates what “they don’t tell people.” The speaker asserts that a smart meter catches fire and that a utility company denies homeowner damage claims, with insurance not covering fires. They reference “all these fires” and say there have been fires across the country linked to smart meters. They question how safety is tested, claiming that “this is a plastic dummy” and “that’s a phone” used to demonstrate safety, followed by the statement “And then what about plants exposed to Wi Fi? Look at this. No Wi Fi.” The speaker contrasts the apparent demonstration with alleged real-world risk to plants from wireless technology. The speaker adds a claim about the Navy, stating that it “knew 5,000 studies on the dangers of wireless technology.” They offer an example as “one good one” and connect Wi-Fi to thyroid issues, asserting “Thyroid issues, Wi Fi.”

The speaker explains that they want to keep the meter in the green band. They turn the meter on and note that in their own home, they have control of all wireless and can bounce the reading into the green area. They demonstrate what happens when they open up an earbud case, describing that the reading immediately shifts into the screaming red, which they say is as bad as it gets. They report that at home, their typical baseline is about two to three microwatts. Just by opening the earbud case, the reading jumps to 130,000 microwatts, then 152,000 microwatts, and it continues to climb. The speaker emphasizes that the goal is to be at 10 microwatts or less. They reiterate that it is not 10,000, but 10. Next, they simulate removing the earphones as if they were going to use them, noting that they don’t use them at all. They mention that they “just topped off my meter” by exposing the earbud, and they acknowledge some camera-related awkwardness. They report that with the earbud in the case, the reading was just shy of 200,000 microwatts. However, when they take the single earbud out and bring it up to the meter or “right up to the brain,” the reading reaches 3,180,000 microwatts. They reiterate the target of being under 10 microwatts and contrast it with the readings shown, indicating that a single earbud can produce a reading in the millions of microwatts. They state that this is a concern related to exposure levels. Finally, they remark that now there is a whole generation putting these ear pods up to their brains. They suggest that some people are likely sleeping with them at night, even though their bodies would be doing cell repair and regeneration during sleep, implying a potential clash between usage and natural biological processes.

Trevor Coppola and Deborah Tavares discuss a NASA “war document” found on NASA’s website, emphasizing its significance and urging wide public awareness due to its content. Speaker 1 (Deborah Tavares) explains the document appeared on NASA’s site as a PowerPoint by Dennis Bushnell, the chief NASA scientist at Langley, presented July 2001, just months before 9/11. The title is future strategic issues, future warfare circa 2025. She notes the document claims, on page four, that the presentation is based on existing data, trends, analysis, technologies, with no “pixie dust,” and that the entire premise centers on robots, cyborgs, and humans—creating a conflict between stated “future” and reality at the time. She emphasizes she found shocking material on page 93. Speaker 0 (Trevor Coppola) asks about authorship and whether the public was intended to see it. Speaker 1 asserts that elites often telegraph their plans and that the NASA document was public but likely unseen by most, implying it was not widely noticed or absorbed. He/She highlights explicit statements on page 93: “capture torture Americans in living color on prime time,” followed by “terror attacks within the Continental United States using binary biologicals,” the use of an EMP, radiation frequencies against brains, and “conduct serious sigh war and collateral damage and exploitation.” The document also mentions “exploit CNN syndrome.” They reference a CIA-linked network and suggest the document involves global corporations and agencies (US Air Force, DARPA, CIA, FBI, Southern Command, Atlantic Command, Australian DoD) and that the planet is treated as a corporate realm (“USA Inc.”). They claim the document discusses beam weapons (page 45) and asserts humans are to be superseded by machines, noting fears that “humans have taken over and vastly shortened evolution” and that the bankers/global elites seek immortality and transhumanism. Speaker 1 describes other alarming concepts: microdust/microns as a weapon, a completely new legal warfare approach, and the use of frequencies (low and microwave) in warfare; reference to U.S. Army reports on smart meters and frequency targeting (site smartmetersmurder.com). They assert that frequencies will affect 100% of the population, with “canaries in the coal mine” experiencing health issues such as tinnitus, heart palpitations, skin rashes, sleep disturbances. They discuss how the elites shield themselves (cancer cures, chip mechanisms) and mention chemtrails/nanofibers as a phase in their plan, connecting this to broader depopulation and mind control aims. Speaker 1 questions how to shield the elites from their own weapons and connects the document to broader global manipulation, including social engineering, mass media control, and surveillance via metering and wireless infrastructure. They claim that the document reveals the intention to manage education, communications, and even the economy through telecommunication and metering. Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a multi-faceted strategy: to awaken the public through education of key source documents, not revolution but revelation, and to organize grassroots awareness. They reference the “Quiet Weapons Silent Wars” document (1954) and “Iron Mountain” as foundational texts, arguing they outline a strategy to control humanity and shape political systems, education, and culture. Speaker 1 promotes accessibility of sources: stopthecrime.net, linking to smartmetersmurder.com, and YouTube content by Barry Trower on weaponization of frequencies, highlighting disguised cell towers and new deployment tactics (church steeples, yucca shapes, etc.). They stress the necessity of recognizing the NASA document, moving beyond illusion to a reality defined by these texts, and propose that public education can drive solutions without violence. They warn of a reality in which technologies (drones, micro dust, beam weapons, and surveillance) could be used to take down the U.S. with minimal confirmation of fingerprints. The discussion ends with acknowledgments and a plan to direct listeners to stopthecrime.net for more information and related resources.

In the video, Speaker 0 explains that LED lights are being pushed aggressively, even given away for free, because they will connect everything in the Internet of Things. These LED lights can be connected to a cellphone, a tablet, all home appliances, the thermostat, cars, the garage, and more, allowing monitoring and data collection from these devices. They can also be used to turn off devices based on climate reasons and other factors, meaning you are connected up to the Internet of Things. What’s interesting, according to the speaker, is that these LED lights “ping a lot of microwave radiation,” which will be demonstrated in the next video. The speaker describes using a TriField EMF tester to check the radiation coming off the LED lights and shows results labeled as “off the charts.” The claim is that by bringing these lights into the home, microwave radiation is being pinged into the house. The speaker asserts that this microwave radiation can impact health, listing effects on the heart, brain, eyes, skin, and other organs. The LED lights’ capability to connect to the Internet of Things is highlighted again as part of this scenario. The video then notes a claim about a 2016 announcement from the AMA, stating that LED lights can increase the risk of cataracts and eye degeneration, implying long-term harm to eyesight while allegedly promoting environmental aims. In summary, the narrator claims: - LED lights are being pushed and given away because they enable the Internet of Things, connecting to smartphones, tablets, home appliances, thermostats, cars, and garages for monitoring and control. - These LEDs allegedly “ping a lot of microwave radiation,” detectable with an EMF tester, described as “off the charts.” - The radiation entering the home is claimed to impact health, including the heart, brain, eyes, skin, and other organs, in addition to enabling IoT connectivity. - The speaker cites a 2016 AMA statement asserting that LED lights can increase the risk of cataracts and eye degeneration.

In 2020, 5G was introduced in Sweden, intended to provide faster transmission speeds using higher frequencies and emitting higher levels of microwave radiation. Its deployment occurred without prior studies on health impacts. An oncologist researching environmental agents and cancer, including radiofrequency radiation, found increased risks of brain tumors and acoustic neuroma linked to mobile phone use. A journalist investigated 5G's introduction, accompanying a person measuring radiation in homes. In one instance, a woman reported her daughter experiencing nosebleeds near 5G antennas. The journalist experienced physical symptoms in the woman's apartment. Scientists called for safety studies before 5G deployment, concerned about potential health consequences due to increased radiation exposure. People reported symptoms like sleeping problems, headaches, and heart issues after 5G base stations were deployed. Case studies have investigated health impacts on people exposed to 5G in real life, revealing symptoms consistent with microwave syndrome, such as headaches, fatigue, and sleep difficulties, which often disappear when people leave the area. One individual reported heart palpitations after 5G antennas were installed near their apartment, directed toward their home.

Speaker 0: So many people ask how to get rid of Wi Fi. So what you're gonna do, you're gonna get an Ethernet cord and a USB adapter like that. Next, what you're gonna do is you're gonna log in to your router. So you're gonna go to the back of the box. You're gonna find an IP on there. You're gonna log in to your router on whatever device you have, and then you're gonna find all these wireless settings. So you have guest WiFi, which you're gonna turn off 2.4, five gigahertz. You're also gonna turn off all your regular wireless. Make sure all this is turned off. Now you're gonna take that Ethernet cord that you bought, and you're gonna stick it into the back of your router. And then next, what you're gonna do is you're gonna take the other side of the Ethernet cord with the adapter, stick it right into your computer, and you're gonna wait for it. And then in about a second, you got the Internet without Wi Fi. Now someone's gonna ask, well, why did you get rid of Wi Fi? Well, microwave sickness, headaches, dizziness, sleep issues, insomnia, fatigue, nausea, heart palpitations, memory loss, ringing of the ears, skin rashes, muscle and joint pain, leg and root pain, tingling, irritability, numbness, nosebleeds, depression, and anxiety. Doesn't sound too safe. And just for the record, my phone's on airplane mode right now and see how everything's off with an Ethernet cord. You can do it for your phones too. And if you got five g, turn it to four g or airplane mode. And there'll always be those Muppets who just say it's all safe, but the US Navy did 2,000 studies in 1971 on the dangers of wireless technology. So it's been known. And here's what they found, depression, impotence, anxiety, lack of concentration, dizziness, sleepiness, insomnia, irritability, chest pain, and tremors. Probably a good idea to have wires. And last but not least, here's a $13 book that's 600 pages long on the topic. Things to look into.

A retired mechanical engineer has secured his analog meter with a lock and chain and a notice reading, "Attention. Do not install smart meter," because he believes smart meters are dangerous. He claims smart meters emit high-frequency radio waves that penetrate the body and can cause health problems. He says these radio waves go through concrete walls. Because his bedroom is next to the meter, he is worried about his and his children's health. He also claims that smart meters catch fire due to very high voltage inside.

Speaker 0, Speaker 1, and Speaker 2 discuss headphones and potential thyroid health concerns. They note they no longer wear Bluetooth and now prefer wired headphones; Speaker 0 says they use wired headphones plugged into the phone, and they are “just Amazon products. Nothing’s fancy, and they work just as well.” Speaker 1 expresses relief that Speaker 0 moved away from wireless, mentioning that they had shared information for years and kept sending content until Speaker 0 switched. Speaker 2 introduces a shift in how people view wireless headphones. They acknowledge that wireless is convenient, but say it’s moving from outside the Overton window toward inside it. They reference a recent analysis (epidemiology) showing a strong or significant association between Bluetooth headphone use (AirPods, Beats, wireless) and an increased incidence of thyroid nodules, noting this applies to both men and women. They describe the thyroid as a master gland and explain that thyroid nodules can be precancerous. They emphasize proximity to a hormonally sensitive gland and RF EMF exposure from a device worn near the neck, asserting they can measure RF with a meter and that earbuds emit RF energy. They compare the RF exposure to that of microwaves, stating the measurement units are microwatts per meter squared and that the RF band of Bluetooth is essentially the same as that of a microwave. They describe the headphones as “a small microwave in your head” for hours a day and note that readings can be obtained by placing the RF meter near a microwave. Speaker 1 agrees with caution, saying they won’t put a cell phone to their ear and questions why anyone would wear earbuds all day, feeling “spidery” about it. Speaker 0 reports returning to wired setups (Apple 1/1Point0) and values conversation without wireless interference, calling it nostalgic and safer long term. Speaker 1 discusses reasons for pushback: tradition, fashion, or fear of changing habits. They mention they once bought olive-colored Apple headphones as a fashion statement and acknowledge that appearance can distract from the health discussion. Speaker 0 clarifies they aren’t “tin hat” about everything but notes that people who sounded alarms often get vindicated later. They prefer alternatives if there’s even a slight chance of risk. Speaker 1 shares a light parenting anecdote: their five-year-old confessed briefly wearing wired headphones for five minutes, illustrating the challenge of managing kids’ exposure. They reflect on broader concerns about kids, screen time, and technology exposure, referencing a recent guest’s emphasis on limiting screen time. Speaker 0 ends with a Casino-like caution: if there’s a better alternative that works as well, why take the chance?

Speaker 0 argues that tin foil hats actually work and demonstrates how a small amount of aluminum foil can reduce RF electromagnetic fields (RFEMF) from a WiFi router. He shows a RFEMF meter reading standing a few feet away from the router, noting measurements between 100 and 200 microwatts per square meter. As he moves right up to the WiFi router, the reading climbs to over a million, sometimes 2,000,000 microwatts per square meter. He states that generally you want to be working and living in an environment that's less than a 100 or 200 microwatts per square meter. He shares that when he is sitting ten to fifteen feet away, the reading is 18,000 to 20,000 microwatts per square meter. He asserts that this is not an environment he wants to be working in all day. Mentioning that there is a lot of debate about RFEMF and its harm to humans, he says there are a significant number of studies suggesting that RFEMF from a WiFi router or your phone can affect human biology negatively. The proposed solution is to wrap the router with aluminum foil. He states, “Literally just wrap this around the WiFi router, and now you're officially a conspiracy theorist. It's modern art,” yet demonstrates the result. After wrapping around the router, the reading between 500 and 1,000 microwatts per square meter is observed, representing a 10- to 20-fold reduction. He notes that right before wrapping, the reading was 100,000 microwatts per square meter, and after wrapping it, the reading is five to 7,000 microwatts per square meter just in front of the router. He emphasizes that the router remains still very high right at the device, but that the levels are significantly lower throughout the rest of the house. He concludes by stating, “Tinfoil hats work. 5¢ of tinfoil on your WiFi router, something that's in every home, can significantly decrease your exposure throughout the day while you're working.” He ends by encouraging viewers to send this to somebody they know who works very close to a WiFi router.

The speaker expresses strong concern about five Gs towers, suggesting their worry is high (even implying a scale up to nine or ten). They state that calling it “five Gs” is a misnomer because it doesn’t tell you what’s wrong with EMFs. EMFs are bad depending on the pulse rates and the wavelengths, and some of them are very bad. They note that in Europe, regulations are an order of magnitude lower than what is allowed here. There are literally over 10,000 studies that document a number of ill effects, including cancer and tumor growth.

They literally went into the rooms. They went into these babies' rooms, in over 50 households. They literally measured the physical EMF radiation that was in the babies' rooms. That accounts for smart TVs, baby monitors, cellular tower distance, and Wi-Fi. All this stuff combined contributes to this total EMF load here. And those babies who were in the high EMF rooms, high EMF households suffered triple increased risks of neurodevelopmental disorders, and they accounted for below birth rate. So this wasn't because they were born too early. They accounted for income. It wasn't because, you know, they had a lot of money and a lot of, you know, going to the doctors often and getting screened. It appeared because it was due to these little babies that are just developing, getting bombarded with artificial electromagnetic radiation, which appears to be influencing their development process.

Speaker 0 describes higher frequencies as potentially impacting bees and insects because the wave size can resonate with insect size, leading to greater absorption. He shows a study with heat-map images of higher frequencies on the honeybee, noting five insects were examined and bees at different life stages were tested; higher frequencies resonated with the bees and were more highly absorbed, potentially causing biochemical changes that can affect bee behavior. He notes other studies on their website showing impacts to honey production and bee reproduction, including cases where bees did not return to a hive when wireless radiation was near it. Speaker 1 states, “For decades, there has been irrefutable evidence that electromagnetic waves have an influence both thermally and non thermally on living beings, including people.” Speaker 2 adds that five g has triggered irrational fears, but experts are concerned, and Daniel Favre is among hundreds of scientists who think precautionary steps should be taken. Favre signed appeals to the United Nations and European Union asking for the health effects of it to be reassessed. Danielle has been looking into the impact of electromagnetic fields on honeybees for years. Speaker 1 elaborates: in a practical setup, a cell phone emits the waves while another phone receives the waves, and a device records the sound of the colony in the beehive via a microphone under the hive. The waveform thickening indicates greater colony sound intensity; when phones are active, the colony is disturbed, and once the phone is off, the colony returns to normal noise. Speaker 2 emphasizes that implementing five g safely for people and the environment requires more time for independent research and for digesting information from thousands of published papers, citing Enrico Stura, an electronic engineer specializing in molecular biophysics. Speaker 1 adds that “The electromagnetic waves produced by personal telecommunication systems during reasonable periods of time lead to demonstrable and proven DNA damages.” Speaker 0 references a study on radio frequency radiation injuries around mobile phone base stations, conducted as a field study for years, observing trees in line of sight of cell antennas showing damage that led to felled trees over time. He notes photographs showing the antenna and the crown fitting, and mentions studies on impacts to plants, stressing the broader concern about widespread antennas in Montgomery County, the United States, and the world.

So when I travel, I bring my EMF reader with me. Notice that zero point zero. And I'm in a building, and there's people above me. But when you unplug everything, that's what happens. When I had this on, and it was pinging like crazy, and I couldn't figure out where the router was. What I noticed was that phone was plugged in. That's a wireless phone. And look at this. The router was below the bed. So this was going off the charts because they hid the router underneath the bed. So while people are sleeping and they're like, oh, I can't figure out why I didn't get a good night sleep. We got Wi Fi pinging in your place. When you put this closer to here, you see how that's starting to increase? Because the RFs that are toxic can run off of the wires. So it's important

"When I first started looking at how electromagnetic fields cause disease, I was actually trying to prove that it didn't because I couldn't believe that we would be exposed to EMF all around us, literally all around us." "It actually made me more aware of where the EMF is in my own house." "Like for example, my office, right on the other side of my office outside was our smart meter." "We had a large amount of EMF in my office that I didn't even know about." "What it does is there's something called a voltage gated calcium channel inside every single cell." "When you are exposed to EMF, these calcium channels stay open longer and more calcium goes into the cell." "When we have an increase in intra cellular calcium, this creates a situation inside of the cell that increases significantly free radicals and reactive oxygen species."

- "We have our own government." - "The US National Toxicology Program completed a $30,000,000 study that concluded cell phones cause cancer and DNA damage." - "Italy's Ramazzini Institute completed another study that shows from cell towers cancers, DNA damage, and more." - "So it doesn't matter where these signals are emanating from." - "The World Health Organization in 2011 said it doesn't matter where it comes from." - "All of this man made radiofrequency back in 2011 was classified as a group two b possible human carcinogen." - "What was missing back in 2011 were these animal studies that the National Toxicology Program and the Ramazzini Institute and others have completed that show clear evidence of cancer." - "Now clear evidence is the top of five categories that can be assigned." - "That should have triggered public policy to inform all the parents and to protect us, but it didn't."

Lou shows an image of a guy running with ear pods and checking a device like an Apple Watch, asking how much that is doing inside his body and noting many people are likely using them. Speaker 1 says we’ve all been sold sexy products that are fun, but the risks aren’t being shared. They offer a free public education webinar every month, two hours, to walk through the science, and for cliff notes they provide the following immediate observations people may notice: - Headaches - Nosebleeds - Anxiety - Depression - Insomnia They describe this as a neurotoxin that pulsates our biological system many, many times per second, more than the Earth’s natural electromagnetic field. The brain perceives this invisible light energy as the lights are on, which disrupts the circadian rhythm in the wee hours of darkness. Melatonin suppression is singled out as a major consequence, affecting sleep and the nighttime cell repair and regeneration processes. The blood-brain barrier is a membrane surrounding the brain that helps keep toxins out of sensitive brain areas. The speaker claims that constant pulsing with man-made microwave radiofrequency opens up or permeates the blood-brain barrier, allowing toxins to accompany blood into the brain and contributing to increased neurotoxicity today. The speaker also mentions something called rouleaux formation. When radiating devices like a phone are held, the pinky finger tingles. Citing Dr. Magda Havas and Dr. Rob Brown, they say this exposure leads to rouleaux formation. The speaker explains rouleaux as red blood cells that are normally free-floating and deliver oxygen throughout the body being affected by microwave radiation, causing red blood cells to become magnetized and stick together, forming chains like a stack of coins that cannot efficiently reach tissues and organs to deliver oxygen. Rouleaux formation is described as a very serious concern.

My Wi-Fi router emits harmful radiation, with levels reaching 2,500,000 microwatts per meter squared when turned on. This can cause cancer and neurological issues. To reduce exposure, stay at least 10 feet away from the router. At 20 feet away, levels drop to 1,000 microwatts per meter squared. The safe zone is below 10 microwatts per meter squared.

The speaker introduces antennasearch.com to find cell phone towers near homes and suggests switching cell phones to LTE instead of 5G to boycott a system that is allegedly poisoning people. The speaker claims safety tests are inadequate and that the rapid rollout of 5G since 2020 is causing radio wave sickness, which was allegedly removed from medical books in the 1920s. Symptoms of radio wave sickness purportedly include fevers, chills, shortness of breath, fatigue, headaches, loss of smell, insomnia, pain in the chest, dizziness, muscle pain, hypertension, strokes, and thyroid issues. The speaker states that cell phone tower companies are immune to lawsuits and references a 1971 US Navy document that supposedly acknowledged the damages of this technology. The speaker eliminated WiFi, Bluetooth, and smart meters and now uses a wired internet connection.

An electromagnetic meter reading is off the charts at 18,000, then 19,000. The speaker states they have never seen a reading that high before. The speaker says "that is getting microwaved" and "fried." The grinders have dropped out on peak. The reading then hits 20,000, which the speaker claims is 20 times the legal amount of EMS reading.

Wow, the EMF levels are off the charts! I can't believe I'm seeing readings this high, it's unbelievable. The meter is going crazy, way past 18,000. I've never seen anything like 16,190 in my life! The equipment is getting fried, practically microwaved. The grinders have even dropped out, peaking at 20,000. That's like 20 times the legal limit.

There have been numerous studies since the 1930s on the dangers of microwave radiation, with 5G testing conducted in the 1970s. The speaker believes that microwave radiation is extremely dangerous and that we should eliminate it. They suggest using fiber optics instead, which is safer and provides the same benefits. Another concern is that microwave radiation disrupts our frequencies, which should be in sync with those of the Earth and the universe. The second speaker advises against using lead paint and recommends setting up optic lines to avoid Wi-Fi. They claim that Wi-Fi is a weapon and that various electrical devices, such as smart meters, stoves, microwaves, smartphones, and computers, can negatively impact sleep and cause headaches.