reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Digital certificates are needed for people working in nursing homes, hospitals, and schools to authenticate their vaccination status. Travel may also require such authentication. Pfizer broke every record in developing the vaccine.

I also think this this issue to do with the technology and the digital infrastructure, I just want to emphasize how important I think that is. Because in the end, you you you you need the data. You need to know who's been vaccinated and who hasn't. Some of the vaccines that will come on down the line will be multiple there'll be multiple shots. So you've got to have the the reasons to do with the health care more generally, but certainly for a pandemic or for vaccines, for you've got to have a proper digital infrastructure, and many countries don't have that. In fact, most countries don't have that.

Speaker 0 emphasizes the importance of technology and the digital infrastructure. "This issue to do with the technology and the digital infrastructure, I just want to emphasize how important I think that is." Because in the end, "you you you you need the data. You need to know who's been vaccinated and who hasn't." "Some of the vaccines that will come on down the line will be multiple there'll be multiple shots." So you've got to have the the reasons to do with the health care more generally, but certainly for a a pandemic or for vaccines, you've got to have a proper digital infrastructure," He says. "and many countries don't have that." "In fact, most countries don't have that."

We will implement a biometric tracking system that covers land, sea, and air. In Africa, a partnership between Gavi, Mastercard, and Trust Stamps will introduce a biometric digital identity platform in low-income remote communities. Trust Stamps' technology is already used in various sectors like commerce, government, travel, and medical records. It enables identification for government services, ensuring a safe and seamless process for recipients.

The speaker discusses the lack of knowledge regarding what happens to our digital identities when creating new accounts or logging in through large platforms. To address this issue, the speaker mentions that the commission will soon propose a secure European digital identity. This identity can be trusted and used by citizens across Europe for various activities, such as paying taxes or renting bicycles. The speaker emphasizes the importance of a technology that allows individuals to control the data exchanged and its usage.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of technology and digital infrastructure in managing vaccinations. They highlight the need for data on who has been vaccinated and who hasn't, especially considering future vaccines may require multiple shots. A proper digital infrastructure is crucial for healthcare in general and particularly during a pandemic. However, the speaker notes that most countries lack this infrastructure.

The speaker discusses the central bankers' goal of introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and the need for digital IDs to achieve this. They suggest that the pandemic provided a convenient excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the lack of strong justification. The ultimate aim is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs.

The transcript argues that the entities behind “Digital ID” can be mapped into four main players: the United Nations (UN), the World Economic Forum (WEF), the World Bank, and ID2020. The UN is presented as a starting point. The UN has Sustainable Development Goals, and the transcript cites SDG 16.9, which says that by 2030 it wants to provide legal identity for all, including birth registration. The transcript claims UN agencies frame digital ID as necessary to participate in the digital economy in order to access services, describing this as a way to “lock you in.” The UN is described as working closely with the World Bank. The World Bank’s “Identification for Development” program (ID4D) is said to promote biometric digital ID systems for low and middle income countries, beginning there because it is “easier” to get compliance and roll out, and then gradually moving toward first world countries. The transcript lists top donors as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the UK government, the French government, Norway, and the “Amadhyar Network,” described as created by the eBay founder. ID4D is also described as having partnerships with UN and other groups. The transcript says ID4D has a partnership with the WEF, the European Commission, and the GSMA. The GSMA is identified as a nonprofit association representing mobile network providers’ interests, described as enabling a digital ID for a phone that could eventually progress to “a microchip… implanted in you,” with step one being adoption on mobile phones. The WEF is described as the main thought leader for digital ID and as setting the global agenda for frameworks rolled out. The transcript notes that Larry Fink is a board member of the WEF and CEO of BlackRock, and adds he is part of Trump’s inner circle, stating that Trump will not stop rolling out digital ID. The final entity is ID2020, described as a US-based NGO alliance formed in 2014. It is characterized as promoting “privacy protecting digital ID” aligned with UN strategic development goals, operating as a public-private partnership with major corporations, including Microsoft, Accenture, Gavi Vaccine Alliance, and Mastercard. The transcript highlights ID2020 partnerships: Gavi and Mastercard created a “digital vaccine record” to track children in underdeveloped countries using Mastercard’s technology, with Gavi described as the vaccine passport component. It also states that Gavi says digital ID innovation is central to its mission, and lists Gavi’s alliance with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, WHO, UNICEF, World Bank, and others. Another partnership mentioned is Microsoft and Accenture as “founding alliance partners” of ID2020, building a blockchain-based identity prototype using biometrics and blockchain for undocumented people, with the transcript concluding by describing future steps connecting digital infrastructure to everything people do.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of technology and digital infrastructure for managing vaccines and future pandemics. They highlight the need for data on vaccinations and the necessity of a proper digital infrastructure, which many countries lack. The speaker suggests that the G20 should focus on creating partnerships and mechanisms for handling future pandemics effectively. They mention the role of formal institutions like the WTO and organizations without bureaucracy and politics. The speaker concludes by stating that politicians will prioritize a plan if they see its relevance in the near future.

A speaker discusses India's nationwide digital ID system, Aadhaar, and chip away at the assurances given by officials who praised its rollout. The speaker notes that about a week or so earlier, Kirstjarma met with Prime Minister Modi and top officials in India to extol the benefits of digital ID, highlighting Aadhaar and claiming a fabulous nationwide rollout. The speaker then presents a troubling counterpoint: cybercriminals are claiming they have stolen the entire Aadhaar database—describing it as the database of 815,000,000 people with details such as names, addresses, identity confirmations, bank details, and more. According to these claims, the criminals are currently selling the entire database for $80,000 at a time. The speaker acknowledges uncertainty about verification but states that this story is circulating and raises questions about security. The core concern is about how secure the system will be when every facet of a person’s life could be held in one place: passport, driving license, NHS records, criminal records, bank details, every transaction, gas and electricity bills, travel records, flight records, car tax, council tax, and any arrest or hospital appointment information. The speaker asks whether we can trust the people running these systems to keep data secure, given the frequency of data breaches and data thefts, including several large incidents in the past year in the country. The concern is framed as a general warning about the viability of a centralized digital ID system that aggregates extensive personal information, and how well it would function in practice if it were compromised. A specific anecdotal point is raised: India’s example is cited as a real-world instance of the system’s security challenges, with the speaker encouraging listeners to look up the incident. The speaker notes that Star Lord was out in India holding up India as an example of how well the system could work, referencing a perceived contrast between the praise and the security breach claim. The segment closes with a skeptical modulo—“Right, Kia. We believe you.”—casting doubt on official assurances. In summary, the speaker highlights a purported massive data breach claim against India’s Aadhaar system, questions the security of a centralized digital identity that consolidates extensive personal data, and contrasts official praise with concerns about data vulnerability and trust in those who manage such systems.

In this video, the speakers discuss the importance of certificates for recovered and vaccinated individuals to prevent the spread of infectious diseases. They also mention the global population, which is expected to reach 9 billion, and how advancements in vaccines and healthcare can help lower it by 10-15%. The speakers emphasize the need for government and foundation collaboration to address epidemic risks and prepare for future outbreaks. They briefly touch upon the importance of safety testing for medicines, particularly vaccines. Lastly, they highlight the urgency of distributing vaccines worldwide to end the current pandemic and prepare for future ones.

A discussion centers on a new proposed law, HR 8250, which would require operating system providers to verify the age of any user of an operating system and for other purposes, covering Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android, with open-source Linux considered in the debate. The claim is that this could serve as a Trojan horse to control people through a digital ID system, rather than being merely safety-focused. Speaker 1 references Catherine Austin Fitz, who says that if global elites deploy digital ID systems, they will control all aspects, including health freedoms and financial transactions. She argues that once financial transaction control is in place, all protections in health and food freedoms could be negated, and a 100% digital system with a digital ID and programmable money would allow authorities to dictate health decisions, vaccine status, gender-transition decisions for children, and other policies by turning off funds. Speaker 0 notes that Fitz is not hyperbolic and mentions Austin Steinbart, founder of the Quantum Party of America, who is joined by Speaker 0 to discuss the issue further. Speaker 2 (Austin Steinbart) asserts that the HR 8250 proposal is a disaster and goes beyond a digital ID concept by embedding age verification into the core of every device. He says the bill is six pages long and delegates enforcement to the FTC, creating ambiguity about whether biometrics, ID cards, or face scans would be used, leaving the mechanism up to the executive branch. He points out that the proposal could coordinate with companies like Apple (potentially via Face ID) and Microsoft to embed verification, while raising questions about how open-source Linux distributions would be forced to comply. He notes that Linux is open-source and typically users have root access, enabling workarounds or removal of such core files, and questions how a retrospective integration would work on devices like POS systems or hotel front-desk computers. Speaker 0 asks how the implementation would occur and whether the digital ID is the core objective beyond age verification. Speaker 2 confirms that the core goal is a universal digital ID across platforms, tying to privacy and cybersecurity concerns by requiring every service to interact with core OS files to verify age, with California already moving toward age verification that apps and websites would rely on. Speaker 0 links this to a broader move toward a central bank digital currency (CBDC) and a digital ID, quoting a sound bite from Catherine Austin Fitz about health identifiers affecting travel and other activities. Speaker 3 (a figure from the World Economic Forum) is cited, emphasizing tokenization of financial assets and the rapid rollout of a digital wallet and digitized currencies globally, with a critique that many countries are unprepared for such changes. Speaker 2 clarifies that blockchain or tokenization per se isn’t inherently bad, but concerns arise when centralized actors with anti-freedom aims design and control the system, shaping speech and policy. They discuss the potential benefits of tokenized assets in theory, while warning that centralized control could enable censorship and restricted financial activity. Speaker 0 ends by urging viewers to contact members of Congress to oppose HR 8250, urging them to “burn this thing down,” and thanks Speaker 2 for the analysis.

In this video, the speaker discusses the potential implications of a global digital ID system. They explain that this digital ID would be a single format, containing personal data such as health, financial, and driving history. The speaker expresses concerns about the erosion of cash and the increasing use of digital currencies. They also suggest that the government and pharmaceutical companies may use the digital ID system to enforce mandatory vaccinations. The speaker believes that this system could be used to control and manipulate populations. They urge viewers to resist the implementation of digital IDs.

The speaker explains that understanding the digital control grid requires grasping three parts: programmable money, digital IDs, and a supporting hardware infrastructure. First, programmable money is presented as the most important element. The speaker argues that guardrails are needed to prevent programmable money from interfering with “financial freedom.” Second, programmable money is said to depend on a digital ID. The speaker claims they fought against digital IDs and lists excuses used to justify them, including online safety, vaccinations, election fraud, and immigration. The speaker says tight borders existed before digital technology and asserts there is no need for digital IDs. According to the speaker, proponents want a high-quality, globally interoperable digital ID in order to implement a “third lock,” and that digital IDs are required for that third lock. Third, the speaker says the final requirement is hardware infrastructure. They describe this as increasingly visible in America, citing FLAC cameras, drones overhead, and large data centers. The speaker references an approval of a data center in Utah described as 63 miles wide or long, with an estimate that full capacity would use three times more energy than the entire state of Utah currently uses. They add that the United States has approximately 4,500 data centers, while China has about 368, claiming the U.S. has more than ten times as many despite having a much smaller population. The speaker connects these data centers to collecting data and implementing the “third lock,” not only on American citizens but also on people worldwide who have stable coins or trade digital tokens. The speaker concludes that as hardware becomes more present and visible, more people—especially young people—start objecting and pushing back, saying they do not want to be part of it.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the UK government’s rollout of a national digital ID, presenting it as imminent and not merely a future possibility. Speaker 0 states that the government is rolling out a national digital ID in the UK and asserts it is happening now, not something to consider for someday. Speaker 1 reinforces the opposition to digital ID, urging a rejection of it. Speaker 0 reports that they are outside BBC Broadcasting House for a digital ID protest, framing the event as a mobilization against the rollout. Speaker 1 warns that saying yes to digital ID could lead to an inability to say no to the government ever again, not just to the current government but to future ones unknown. Speaker 0 recalls assurances that national ID cards were dead and not representative of Britain, noting that the modern version is not a plastic card but a “live connection.” Speaker 1 calls on people to raise their heads out of complacency, asserting that humans are not data and emphasizing that the issue concerns everyone’s freedom. Speaker 0 contends that what is happening is an attempt to funnel humanity into being a number, implying a loss of individuality. Speaker 1 describes a future where the ability to earn, move, buy, or speak is not a right but a permission, and permissions can be switched off, framing this as a consequence of Digital ID. Speaker 0 summarizes the topic as Digital ID: how it started, how it is being sold, and what life looks like behind a biometric paper.

The speaker discusses the central bankers' goal of introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and the need for digital IDs to achieve this. They suggest that the pandemic provided a convenient excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. The ultimate aim is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs.

The speakers discuss the European Union's vision for digital identity and the use of vaccine passports. They mention the ID 2020 initiative and how it has become relevant during the pandemic. The speakers believe that digital identity, combined with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), will lead to increased control and monitoring of individuals. They give an example of how CBDCs could be used to track carbon emissions and limit people's freedom based on their consumption habits. They warn that society may become even more controlled and monitored, similar to the COVID-19 situation. They encourage listeners to visit the World Economic Forum (WEF) website to find information about personal carbon allowances and the monitoring tied to the climate agenda.

A proper digital infrastructure is critical for managing vaccinations, especially with multiple-shot vaccines. It's essential to track who has been vaccinated. This is important not only for healthcare in general, but specifically for managing pandemics and vaccine distribution. However, most countries currently lack this necessary digital infrastructure.

In the video, the speaker discusses the need for certificates to identify recovered and vaccinated individuals in order to prevent the spread of COVID-19. They explain that this is important because some countries may not have the virus under control, and it would be impractical to completely restrict travel for these individuals. The speaker also mentions Bill Gates' foundation and its potential involvement in this matter.

We need to track who has been vaccinated and who hasn't, especially with upcoming vaccines that may require multiple shots. A robust digital infrastructure is crucial for healthcare in general and particularly during a pandemic. Unfortunately, many countries lack this infrastructure.

The speaker discusses the central bankers' goal of introducing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and the need for digital IDs to achieve this. They suggest that the pandemic provided an excuse to push for digital IDs through vaccine passports, despite the weak justification. The ultimate aim is to establish a totalitarian control system with CBDCs connected to digital IDs.

Having a strong digital infrastructure is crucial for effective healthcare, especially during a pandemic or vaccination efforts. It is important to have accurate data on who has been vaccinated and who hasn't, as future vaccines may require multiple shots. Unfortunately, most countries lack the necessary digital infrastructure for this purpose.

The speaker discusses the European Union's vision for digital identity and the use of vaccine passports as a precursor. They suggest that digital identity combined with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) could lead to increased control and monitoring of individuals. For example, if someone uses CBDCs to make a purchase, their carbon emissions could be deducted from their account. The speaker believes this could result in a society with limited freedom. They encourage viewers to visit the World Economic Forum (WEF) website to find information about personal carbon allowances, which they claim supports their argument.