reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the corrupt media and mentions Operation Mockingbird, a CIA program. They also mention Obama repealing the Smith Munt Act, allowing propaganda in broadcasting without the need for credibility. The speaker believes that when Obama mentioned "fake news," he was warning about the establishment, media, and globalists coming after him. They mention Congress wanting to create a law to prevent Trump from running and the Republicans investigating Hunter Biden. The Department of Justice launched an investigation, and Trump's Mar-a-Lago was seized. The speaker mentions Trump's use of the Presidential Emergency Act and Biden's continuation of Trump's executive orders. They hint at upcoming revelations.

The speaker discusses the Smith-Mundt Act, initially designed to prevent the US government's foreign propaganda from being used on American citizens. The act, created in 1948, acknowledged the potential dangers of a "covert permanent department of dirty tricks" influencing foreign universities, media, and politics to promote US interests. Frank Wisner, a CIA figure, created a media network to influence international narratives. The Smith-Mundt Act originally prohibited the use of these propaganda efforts domestically, aiming to protect Americans from manipulation while securing economic advantages through foreign influence. However, the speaker claims this protection has eroded, leading to a deeper problem where the foreign policy establishment funds groups that operate both abroad and domestically, influencing media and promoting censorship. The speaker advocates for a strict firewall and severe penalties to prevent the misuse of propaganda and protect domestic interests.

In the 1930s, a law was passed in the United States to prevent the government from engaging in misinformation propaganda campaigns targeting its citizens. However, in 2012, the Obama administration and its sister agency, the FBI, intentionally spread misinformation and propaganda to American citizens.

Message to President Trump: A supporter who voted for you three times asks you to revisit what Barack Obama and Joe Biden got rid of in 2013—the Smith Mundt Act—that held news corporations accountable for lying to the American people and spreading propaganda instead of truth. They propose reintroducing it as law (Smith Mundt Act or Charlie Kirk Act) to make it damn near impossible for these people to lie to the American public. They say lies have brought chaos, hatred, division, and anarchy; a man lost his life over it due to hateful rhetoric of calling him a fascist and a Nazi and a white supremacist and a bigot, the same thing they called you, this man is dead. They urge Congress to pass a law to hold journalists and content creators accountable for lies and half truths, and hold news corporations—right, left, or center—accountable for their behavior.

There are Americans involved in propaganda that could warrant civil or even criminal charges. Addressing this could serve as a stronger deterrent.

The defining characteristic of the United States is freedom of speech, guaranteed by the First Amendment. However, this fundamental right is rapidly eroding due to censorship disguised as combating disinformation and malinformation. This censorship, directed by the US government, is not limited to the private sector. Mike Benz, an expert on this issue, explains how the foreign policy establishment and defense contractors manipulate this. Internet freedom, initially used for supporting dissident groups globally, has become a tool for censorship since 2014. NATO now views controlling media as crucial for political influence, targeting even domestic groups. This shift accelerated after the 2016 election, with Russiagate providing cover for domestic censorship. The 2020 election and the COVID-19 pandemic saw massive censorship, with government agencies and private entities working together to suppress dissenting voices. This system uses AI-powered tools to identify and remove content deemed harmful to "democratic institutions," effectively creating military rule disguised as democracy. The fight to preserve free speech is now centered on platforms like X (formerly Twitter), which are facing immense pressure from both governmental and international entities.

Project Mockingbird aimed to control the public via media, but was less effective with the rise of alternative media like podcasts. To beat the "deep state," one must challenge it in unfamiliar territory. The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, passed in 2012 and enacted in 2013, legalized propaganda for US citizens, repealing the 1948 Smith-Mundt Act which had prohibited domestic release. Obama essentially reopened the door for Operation Mockingbird, allowing the CIA to propagandize Americans. High-level intelligence officials or people associated with the intelligence industry are running journals. The CIA is the biggest funder of journalism in the world through USAID. Intelligence agencies manipulated information on platforms like Twitter and Facebook. Before 1975, the CIA compromised journalists from major publications, including The New York Times and The Washington Post. Politicians are repeating the same talking points from a script like actors.

Let's discuss the recent propaganda tactics associated with Trump. This approach isn't new; it mirrors strategies used by autocrats like Hitler. Trump has effectively convinced a significant portion of the population that the system is rigged, fostering distrust in public institutions and the media. This tactic, which involves repeating a big lie, has historically led to disastrous societal outcomes. Despite legal consequences for figures like Rudy Giuliani, many still believe the false narratives. The overarching goal has been to undermine trust in our institutions, and Trump has succeeded in this regard, particularly through his promotion of "fake news."

In the 1980s, a law was passed prohibiting the U.S. government from engaging in misinformation propaganda campaigns aimed at its own citizens. However, in 2012, the Obama administration and Congress repealed this law. Now, it is legal for agencies like the FBI to intentionally disseminate misinformation propaganda to American citizens.

The discussion centers on the Smith-Mont Act (referred to as the Smithmont Act) and its modernization, arguing it enabled U.S. influence operations abroad while constraining them at home. The claim is that, after World War II, winning elections and shaping law in foreign countries required an apparatus to influence hearts and minds, which shifted warfare from military occupation to political subversion. In this view, the 1948 act authorized a covert, permanent department of “dirty tricks” to infiltrate and co-opt universities, unions, media, politicians, judges, and the broader “swarm army” of influence, effectively creating a global propaganda machinery controlled by the State Department, CIA, and later USAID. A key figure cited is Frank Wisner, associated with the so-called Wissner’s Wurlitzer, described as a “church organ” that could play the international media like a symphony to cause any media narrative to go viral worldwide. The assertion is that the United States and United Kingdom dominated early robust radio, film, TV, and print, enabling foreign propaganda operations. The Smith-Mont framework supposedly allowed the U.S. to plant fake news abroad—“propaganda abroad”—but prohibited such activities from affecting domestic audiences, shielding Americans from comparable interference. The speaker argues the rationale for this separation was economic: if foreign governments resisted resource access, military basing, or U.S. multinational operations, Americans would bear economic costs (lower living standards, fewer imports, higher prices). Thus, foreign influence operations were designed to be accessible abroad and barred from coming home. This protection lasted about seventy years but is claimed to have eroded in the last decade, with reference to a broader “Smithmont problem” now affecting funding and operations. The claimed evolution is that the foreign policy establishment can fund groups that operate domestically in a dual-use fashion—providing foreign grants for media propaganda abroad while also operating within the U.S.—and can influence social media censorship to coerce foreign governments into enacting censorship laws that affect U.S. peer-to-peer speech. The speaker warns that, to preserve the foreign influence function, there must be a hard firewall and severe penalties for any violations, implying the importance of maintaining a clear boundary between foreign propaganda activities and domestic communications. Overall, the transcript asserts that the Smith-Mont framework created a permanent, cloaked apparatus for influencing foreign audiences, with a historical showcase of Wisner’s organization and its reach, while stressing the need to reinstate stringent firewalls and penalties to prevent domestic misuse of such operations.

America's exceptionalism stems from its free speech, enshrined in the First Amendment. However, this fundamental right is rapidly eroding due to censorship disguised as combating disinformation and malinformation. This censorship, directed by the US government, isn't about truth but about silencing inconvenient voices. Mike Benz, an expert on this, reveals how the military-industrial complex and foreign policy establishment weaponized internet freedom, initially using it for regime change, then turning it inward to control narratives and elections. This involved using social media companies and government-funded organizations to censor dissent, framing it as a national security threat. This has fundamentally altered American governance, potentially leading to military rule. The future of free platforms like X is precarious, facing pressure from the US government and the EU's Digital Services Act.

The speaker describes “true fifth generation warfare” as a scenario where you do not know who your opponent is. As an example, they ask who is responsible for the puppet master behind the COVID crisis, suggesting potential names like Klaus Schwab, Joe Biden, and Tony Fauci, but stating that “these are surrogates” and that you don’t really know who is managing the message being propagated—the essence of fifth generation warfare. They claim that over the last three years, governments, nongovernmental organizations, transnational organizations, pharmaceutical industry corporations, media, and financial corporations have cooperated via public private partnerships, which the speaker asserts is a euphemism for fascism, to deploy the most massive, globally harmonized psychological and propaganda operation in history. The speaker asserts that, during this period, people have been subjected to the most massive, harmonized, globally coordinated propaganda campaign in the history of the Western world. They state that governments of many Western nation states have turned military grade psychological operations strategies, tactics, technologies, and capabilities—developed for modern military combat—against their own citizens. They conclude by labeling these as inconvenient facts and claim that the world many people believed in no longer exists, if it ever did.

The speaker discusses the Smith-Mundt Act, initially designed to prevent the US government's foreign propaganda from being used on American citizens. The act was created in response to concerns about the "Frankensteinian monster" of a permanent department conducting "dirty tricks" to influence foreign governments through media, universities, and other institutions. Frank Wisner, a CIA figure, created "Wisner's Wurlitzer," a media network to spread narratives globally. The Smith-Mundt Act originally allowed such activities abroad to secure resources and economic benefits for the US, but prohibited its use domestically. The speaker claims that the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act under Obama effectively repealed this firewall. They express concern that the foreign policy establishment can now fund groups that influence domestic prosecutors and media, and promote social media censorship abroad that impacts US companies and speech. The speaker advocates for a strict firewall and severe penalties for violations.

In the 1970s, Carl Bernstein exposed Operation Mockingbird, revealing how the CIA influenced over 400 journalists to spread propaganda. The CIA manipulated major news outlets like The New York Times and CBS. The 2013 NDAA legalized domestic propaganda, allowing misinformation campaigns against Americans. Media ownership has consolidated to just 6 conglomerates like Comcast, Disney, and 21st Century Fox, controlling film, TV, and news. These conglomerates have significant influence over what the public sees and hears.

Intel agencies have a significant influence on television broadcasts, Facebook, and Google. Many anchors, including a national security reporter, act as mouthpieces for the Pentagon and the CIA, knowingly spreading lies. This is a common practice, even at CNN. These reporters read government propaganda from intel agencies, and it's frustrating and offensive, regardless of whether one agrees with the lies or not. For instance, when the CIA and Pentagon claimed that Bashar al Assad used poison gas, there was no evidence to support it. Despite this, many people were killed in response.

One-sided news stories and the sharing of biased and false news on social media are plaguing our country. Some media outlets publish these fake stories without fact-checking. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.

The speaker discusses the Smith-Mundt Act, initially designed to prevent the US government's foreign propaganda from being used on American citizens. The act was created in response to concerns about the "Frankensteinian monster" of a permanent covert operation influencing foreign governments through media and other institutions. Frank Wisner, a CIA figure, created "Wisner's Wurlitzer," a media network to spread narratives globally. The Smith-Mundt Act originally allowed such activities abroad to secure economic advantages for the US, but prohibited them domestically. The speaker claims this protection was lost a decade ago and that the US faces a deeper problem with USAID, the Pentagon, and the State Department funding groups that operate both domestically and abroad. These groups allegedly engage in media propaganda and social media censorship, influencing foreign countries to pass laws that target US social media companies and speech. The speaker advocates for a strict firewall and severe penalties for violations.

One-sided news stories and the sharing of biased and false news on social media are plaguing our country. Some media outlets publish these fake stories without fact-checking. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.

Propaganda through film and mainstream media has been occurring for decades. A bill that died in the senate was brought up again as an amendment in the 02/2012 NDAA on pages 326-328. According to maxkaiser.com, it is the same bill, but one word was removed. Section b expressly allows the use of propaganda domestically if there is a possibility that at least one non-US citizen will eventually receive the communication. This is reminiscent of the movie Wag the Dog.

Project Mockingbird was a Deep State project to control people through the media, which was more effective when there were only three broadcast networks. The narrative broke because the Deep State focused on controlling mainstream media and didn't think it needed to worry about podcasts or "pirate radio." People realized they were being lied to and that these lies were harmful, so they stopped watching mainstream media and started looking for information elsewhere. To beat the Deep State, one must drag it into territory it doesn't understand.

A major piece of legislation was quietly signed into law that allows the US government to combat foreign propaganda by creating its own. The Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act of 2016, sponsored by Senator Rob Portman, is designed to combat foreign propaganda from organizations such as RT, China's CCTV, or Iran's Press TV. There is currently no single US governmental agency charged with synchronizing strategies to counter foreign propaganda. This bipartisan bill will establish an interagency center at the State Department to coordinate counterpropaganda efforts. It also creates a grant program for NGOs, think tanks, and other experts engaged in counterpropaganda work. This law essentially funds U.S. propaganda. Three years ago, an amendment removed the ban on the US government creating propaganda and showing it to US citizens, a ban that had been in place since 1948.

The speakers discuss the events in Boston and express their belief that it resembled martial law. They mention the use of propaganda by intelligence agencies and the passing of a law that allows the government to propagandize American citizens. They question the authenticity of news events and highlight examples of spectacles and events that may have been subsidized. They also discuss the Smith-Mundt Act of 2012, which allows the government to produce and disseminate media for both foreign and domestic audiences. They suggest that this law enables the production of staged events and propaganda.

In 2013, the United States legalized the propagandizing of its own citizens. The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, buried within the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act, repealed the 1948 Smith-Mundt Act. The original act allowed the State Department and mainstream media to engage in propaganda in foreign countries, but prohibited its release for public consumption in America. Obama signed the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act into law, lifting this prohibition. Since July 2, 2013, scripted and orchestrated propaganda can be presented to the American public as factual news.

In 2013, propaganda was legalized in the United States. The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, buried within the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act, repealed the 1948 Smith-Mundt Act. The original act authorized the State Department and mainstream media to engage in propagandizing foreign countries, but prohibited releasing that same propaganda in America for public consumption. Obama's signing of the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act lifted this prohibition. Now, any propaganda, even if outrageous, is legal, making it easier to perpetrate false narratives on the American people.

What if you've been lied to your whole life? What if the mainstream media all read from the same script? What if President Obama passed a bill allowing the media to propagandize citizens? What if propaganda techniques from Nazi Germany are still used today? What if there's a conspiracy to brainwash people with official stories? What if cancer treatments and vaccine risks are being censored? What if the US government performed medical experiments without consent? The pandemic may be about control, not a virus. Journalism is dead, we're being programmed. But censorship has awakened the masses. We must stand up for health and freedom before it's too late. It's time for noncompliance. This is our moment to expose the lies and reveal the truth. Coming soon: "Propaganda Exposed, Uncensored, The Truth About Health Freedom and Big Pharma."