reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker states that they are not saying the organization lost 85,000 children, but that contact was lost with them and their whereabouts are unknown. The speaker asks if that is a fair statement. The speaker asks if, after making three calls on average to check on 85,000 children placed by the organization, there was no response. The speaker then asks if it is fair to say that contact was lost with over 85,000 kids. The speaker asks for a yes or no answer. The speaker states that the organization does not know where 85,000 of the children are. The speaker then says they will move on after receiving no answer.

The speaker discusses their experience in solitary confinement, where they have been for two weeks. They mention that they were placed there by Deputy Wharton Landrigan, who had expressed a desire to punish them as political prisoners. They describe the harsh conditions in solitary, including being confined to a small cell and being treated like a dog during outdoor time. The speaker believes that they are being singled out for punishment and criticizes the use of solitary confinement as a violation of human rights. They also discuss the indictment of former President Trump and express their belief that he will be indicted again for his involvement in the events of January 6th. They mention the potential use of the 14th Amendment to prevent Trump from running for office.

Speaker 0 informs the individual they are being detained for violating conditions they did not break. The individual questions the reason for their detention. Speaker 0 asks if the individual understands the seriousness of the situation, to which they respond negatively. The individual requests identification from the officers, expressing confusion about where they are being taken. They question the officers' actions and ask for identification again. The individual seeks reassurance that they will not be harmed. The situation revolves around alleged violation of suspension conditions despite the individual's absence from social media platforms.

The speaker expresses concern about the treatment of their father in a care home. They received a picture showing their father with injuries and were shocked to learn that he didn't receive a brain scan for those injuries. The speaker also mentions a phone call informing them that their father was failing and that end-of-life medication would be introduced. They were allowed to visit their father but only from the door. The speaker questions the reasons behind these restrictions.

The speaker confronts law enforcement, demanding their name and badge number. They mention FirstNet and whistleblowers inside the facility. They express their intention to obtain and publish body cam footage. They point out a bus filled with illegal immigrants and question the officer's knowledge. The officer responds that they are unsure. The speaker accuses the officer of lying and insists they know about the bus. The officer ends the conversation, stating they will leave it at that. The speaker expresses disbelief at the situation.

In this video, the speaker and his team visit a Ramada Hotel in San Diego that has been converted into a facility for illegal immigrants. They try to gather information about what is happening inside the facility and speak to security officials. The speaker confronts the guards about the conditions inside and questions their actions. They also encounter Chinese migrants who crossed the border illegally and interview them. The video ends with the speaker discussing their mission and the importance of transparency.

My drone captures a massive camp with numerous houses and quarantine camps for children. The facility appears to be expanding, possibly funded by tax dollars. The speaker questions the legitimacy of the operation and notes the presence of surveillance and private property signs. They express concern over the scale of the camp and the unknown activities occurring there.

Speaker 0 claims that someone was put in solitary confinement for more than a hundred days for speaking about what was happening inside his country. He says he knows why this is happening: purely for votes and to keep people in power. Speaker 0 adds that after visiting Europe and making videos about what was happening, he anticipated similar moves in the United States. He recounts a sit-down interview with Tommy Robinson, who explains that the Labour Party in the UK, and the Democrat Party in the US, stay in power because they “tell these Muslims they can go ahead, do whatever they want.” He says a Muslim “should be more conservative than they would be a liberal” because they don’t stand for much of that progressive stuff, and that “they have Sharia law” above everything. According to him, if someone goes to a mosque with a thousand people, the mosque leader is told, “we’re gonna let you guys do whatever you want, just make sure you vote for us.” He asserts that, as a result, the leader of the mosque will lead everyone in the mosque to voting centers to vote for that candidate. He claims this is why in London the mayor is Muslim and many surrounding towns are Muslim, and that they actually have courts practicing Sharia law. He says he anticipated this would happen in America as well, and mentions Mundami as an example. Speaker 0 then notes Mundami advocated for making childcare more affordable when running for office. He questions what is known about childcare now, describing daycare centers as “complete frauds.” He says he anticipated the current development and that people are now starting to see it in America. Speaker 0 explains that after he was pressed to give his opinion, people began loving it, even though he had not intended to speak out. He says he was originally just going to ask people questions, but they turned his journalism into activism, which he says forced his hand. He says he feels compelled to continue. Speaker 1 cautions, advising not to let them force him into something he thinks they don’t want him to do, referencing what he is currently doing. He concludes that they would rather have an activist than a competitor.

The speaker questions why media outlets like Virgin Media and RTE do not report on missing migrant children, suggesting potential sex trafficking. RTE journalists labeled the speaker as extreme and implied there is no issue with missing children. The speaker denies suggesting a state conspiracy but wants more attention on the welfare of migrant children. The truth of the matter is left for the audience to decide. Translation: The speaker questions why the media does not report on missing migrant children, suggesting potential sex trafficking. RTE journalists labeled the speaker as extreme and implied there is no issue with missing children. The speaker denies suggesting a state conspiracy but wants more attention on the welfare of migrant children. The truth of the matter is left for the audience to decide.

We have every obligation to defend our people, community, and families by any means necessary. While not wanting to be violent, we are not nonviolent; we believe in self-defense. If someone comes at me or my family, I will do everything in my power, legal or not, to defend them. There are over 200 people detained in a dungeon in the basement, with no bathrooms, showers, enough food or water, and children are also being held there. This is a human rights violation. We have to liberate those people and fight for them. They are being held around the corner, and we are going to move down there so they can hear and see us and know they are not alone.

I can't tell if it's just a blanket or something else. The guard shoots the lock off the cell door, and we go in for a closer look. It moved. Is someone there? The person inside tells us he’s from Homs and has been in the cell for three months. You're okay. He grips my arm tightly. Does anyone have water? There's some light. It's water. You're okay.

I'm locked in an assisted living facility in New York, and it feels like a prison. I'm isolated here with much older people. I eat alone because it's depressing to eat with the others. All I have is a bathroom, a closet, and a TV that I had to get myself. I'm not allowed to go out or have visitors. I can call out, but no one can call me. I've been asking for an iPad for what feels like years, and I want my phone back so I can talk to my family and friends. In the last month, I've only been outside twice, for dental appointments. The system has completely failed me. The guardian is supposed to permit me as much independence as practical, but this is the opposite of independence. I want my freedom back.

There is a highly fortified military camp where single young adult males are being brought. It is difficult to access and resembles a checkpoint. As a journalist, I have been threatened for trying to expose these operations, as they don't want the American people to know. Thankfully, some brave men and women in uniform have shared these locations with us off the record. They believe it is important for the truth to be known. I have been threatened two days in a row for sharing this information. Please share this message to spread awareness.

Gaza Strip is currently experiencing continuous violence, a complete siege, and severe war. The speaker questions the absence of human rights, international support, and global awareness regarding the situation. They plea for help to ensure their survival.

People were not receiving the necessary medical help, including a cancer patient who was denied treatment. The situation was outrageous, with reports of prisoners being beaten or abused, although this is not the norm and is illegal. Unfortunately, society tends to ignore the voices of those who have been incarcerated.

Speaker 0 states that there is no credible information. None. If there were, I would bring the case yesterday that he trafficked to other individuals. And the information we have, again, is limited. So the answer is no one? For the information that we have. In the files? In the case file. Okay.

The speaker asked the vice president for a meeting with Mr. Abrego Garcia, but was told to visit Sikhat instead, which the speaker declined. The vice president couldn't promise a meeting the following week. The speaker then requested a phone or video call with Mr. Abrego Garcia to report back to his family, but this was also denied, though the vice president suggested the American embassy might have more success. The speaker inquired about Mr. Abrego Garcia communicating with his wife, as requested by the family, but the vice president was unsure if that could be arranged. The speaker concludes that there is an unjust situation and accuses the Trump administration of lying about Abrego Garcia. The speaker claims that American courts have reviewed the facts and that the Trump administration's lawyer admitted in court that Mr. Abrego Garcia had been taken in.

The speaker visited an unspecified facility and found the conditions inside to be acceptable, noting people are safe, clean, and being fed. However, the speaker doesn't know if everyone inside belongs there. The speaker believes ICE is out of control and attempting to intimidate people. The speaker asserts that the people will ensure the current administration adheres to rules that prevent the country from becoming a dictatorship or third-world country. The speaker then yields the floor to Lamonica.

In this video, the speaker is at a Ramada Hotel in San Diego that has been converted into an illegal immigrant compound. They attempt to infiltrate the facility and speak to security officials to find out what is happening inside. They encounter resistance from the security guards, who refuse to provide information and even threaten them. The speaker also speaks to Chinese migrants who crossed the border illegally and stayed at the hotel. They mention that the facility is funded by NGOs, including Catholic and Jewish services. The video ends with the speaker expressing their determination to expose the corruption and fraud happening at the facility.

Detainees allegedly drink, brush their teeth, and defecate in the same unit. Authorities claimed to have exceeded standards by providing a three-foot privacy wall inside the 32-detainee cage, running the length of the toilet area.

The transcript is a tense telephone exchange between two people discussing a suspected incident at an asylum intake center. - Speaker 1 identifies themselves as the wijkagent (district police officer) of the aanmeldcentrum in Ter Apel and says they are calling to address an incident. They express that how Speaker 0 is speaking to them is “a bit disrespectful.” - The core dispute revolves around whether Speaker 0 tried to enter the premises of the aanmeldcentrum. Speaker 1 states that Speaker 0 came onto the terrein (the site) of the aanmeldcentrum, and also mentions the Drapenerveene as belonging to the aanmeldcentrum and not being public. - Speaker 0 counters that they did not enter the site, only walked around on the public road. They emphasize that they were not inside and argue that they did not commit any rule violation, asserting that they “have not done any violation” and that Speaker 1 is recording or documenting the event. - Speaker 1 insists that Speaker 0 was on the Drapenerveene, which, according to Speaker 1, is part of the aanmeldcentrum and therefore not public. They claim that there were signs missing and question what Speaker 0 was seeking there. - The dialogue touches on what is permissible around the area: Speaker 1 asserts that Speaker 0 was on or around a restricted area (Drapenerveene) linked to the intake center, while Speaker 0 maintains they merely walked on the public road around the premises. - The conversation also covers the manner of the communication itself: Speaker 0 asks for a proper introduction and the reason for the call; Speaker 1 responds with the need to clearly state who they are and what is happening, stating they intend to proceed with documenting the situation. - By the end, Speaker 0 asks for Speaker 1’s name, indicating a desire to establish identity and purpose for the call. Key points emphasized by Speaker 1: - The call is about an alleged entry attempt or presence on the premises. - The Drapenerveene is described as part of the aanmeldcentrum and not public. - There is a focus on signs and access control, with a claim that this is not public space. Key points from Speaker 0: - They assert they never entered the site, only walked around on the public road. - They challenge the behavior and tone of the caller, seeking a straightforward explanation of who is calling and why. No judgments are offered in the transcript; the speakers are focused on identifying who is on the premises, what areas were accessed, and the appropriate grounds for the call.

The speaker visited an unspecified facility and found the conditions inside to be acceptable, noting people are safe, clean, and being fed. However, the speaker doesn't know if everyone inside belongs there. The speaker believes ICE is out of control and attempting to intimidate people, but asserts that they will not succeed. The speaker declares that "we, the people" will ensure the current administration adheres to the rules that separate the U.S. from dictatorships. The speaker then yields the floor to Lamonica.

In this video, the speaker describes a disturbing discovery in a prison cell hidden in the trees. The cell was designed for children, with a small hole for them to crawl in and out of. Inside, they found a child's vanity, a hospital toilet, a car seat, strollers, toys, clothing, and food packets, indicating that children had been kept there. The speaker also mentions arm restraints on trees, which investigators believe are used for a disturbing practice known as a "rape tree." The speaker emphasizes that this situation is inhumane and deeply upsetting.

The speakers are questioning where a group of kids is being moved to, but the person in charge refuses to provide any information. The first speaker expresses concern about the kids going missing, and the third speaker confirms that it happens frequently. Another speaker mentions that the kids are being taken to the airport. The first speaker criticizes the secrecy and tries to film the situation. They ask why the group is hiding their faces and instructing the kids not to talk. The conversation continues with the speakers discussing the questionable nature of the situation.

The speaker asserts the primary concern is everyone's welfare and safety, but believes the individuals in question are illegal migrants, not refugees. The speaker claims it's telling that no one specifies what these people are fleeing from, what wars, countries, or persecution they are escaping. Because of this lack of information, the speaker believes they are by definition illegal immigrants and technically criminals. The speaker states they shouldn't be housed in five-star hotels but in cells. The speaker believes they should not be allowed to leave until they pay for their ticket back. The speaker's question is not where they will be moved to in a year, but how they will be removed from the country.