reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asks, “Can we stop here? Can we stop here? We’ll stop right here for one second. Please join us in a quick prayer.” The quick prayer: “Heavenly father, thank you, lord, for this woman, this young woman, lord. My sister, I love her so much, lord.”

The speaker expresses gratitude and acknowledges their wife. They interact with someone in the audience and then proceed to talk about their mother. There is a brief interruption to adjust the camera. The speaker mentions a lollipop and continues speaking to someone off-camera. They ask a child their age and mention the challenges they face. The speaker shares a preference for children over adults and asks if anyone knows what their father used to say.

The speaker believes Vladimir Putin wants peace. Despite raining missiles, Putin's dream was to take over the whole country, but the speaker believes that because of them, Putin won't achieve this. The speaker states they don't trust many people, including the interviewer, accusing them of dishonesty and asking "fake questions." The speaker believes Putin respects them, and that is why Putin won't take over all of Ukraine, even though that was his original intention. The speaker concludes that the war should never have happened.

Speaker 0: Let's pray for the poor so they don't turn into thieves. Thank you very much, thank you very much, very kind. Speaker 1: I'm not sure if we're on air. Yes, yes, someone is listening. Sorry for the messiness.

The speaker asked for an explanation about the children's role in their beliefs. The person they were talking to explained that the children have a different perspective. They see themselves as fighting against God and view children as the closest thing to God because they are innocent and haven't been corrupted. The more a baby or young child suffers, the more they believe they are defeating God. This is their main focus and nothing else matters to them.

It was a true privilege to meet His Holiness, Pope Leo the fourteenth today. The speaker reflects on the significance of this encounter, underscoring how meaningful the conversation felt in the current moment when a large number of lives continue to be lost across various perilous environments. The dialogue focused on shared values and responsibilities, highlighting a commitment to solidarity and the duty to welcome those in need, as well as an urgent obligation to save lives and protect people who are on the move. The discussion explicitly centers on the grave human impact of displacement and risky journeys, noting that losses occur at sea, in the desert, and along migration routes. The speakers stress that addressing these crises requires a collective approach rooted in compassion and courage, with an emphasis on actionable steps to respond to those in need. This emphasis on humanitarian duty is presented as a guiding principle for policy and practice, encouraging a posture of care and protection for vulnerable individuals who traverse dangerous paths. A key portion of the conversation is devoted to the concept of safe and regular pathways as a means to reduce dangerous journeys. The speakers articulate how establishing predictable, lawful routes can help diminish the risks associated with irregular migration, while also preserving the dignity of migrants. These pathways are described as tools to open up opportunities that support sustainable development, linking the protection of human life to broader social and economic benefits for communities involved in migration flows. Throughout the exchange, there is a continuous reaffirmation that every life lost serves as a powerful reminder to act with both compassion and courage. The tone conveys gravity and determination, urging responsible actors to translate moral imperatives into concrete measures that protect people on the move. By foregrounding solidarity, humane reception, and safe transit options, the conversation with Pope Leo the fourteenth is framed as a call to collective action that aligns humanitarian values with practical strategies for saving lives and promoting dignity and development.

Speaker 0: Get on your feet. Speaker 1: War is raging in Iran. Speaker 2: We're praying Speaker 3: we're praying for Speaker 1: all the soldiers and troops. That's great that you're praying, but Speaker 4: How about all the kids that died when The USA hit the the towns? Speaker 2: It broke my heart. That is the oh. In Speaker 0: what ways have you grown closer to Jesus? Speaker 5: I serve a righteous God, Speaker 6: And that is why we say our prayers. Speaker 3: We are all his children. Speaker 1: But when I say children, mean like the holy blessed Trinity, which is why I hold the Bible. Speaker 0: Sweet cream foam chai ice matcha. Okay. Speaker 7: And Bella will have all organic pup cup. Speaker 4: Organic? Yes. Everything organic. Speaker 2: We have to protect all men in America, especially all white men in America. Those are the boys that we care about in this country. America is built on their backs. Yes. Because they are the Speaker 8: ones who mattered most.

Please pray for the poor so that they don't turn into thieves. Thank you very much, thank you very much, very kind. I don't know if we're live. Yes, yes, you're on the air, someone is listening. Sorry for the messiness.

The speaker expresses gratitude to Cardinal Perlin, Vatican Secretary of State, for his humility, dignity, and friendship towards the Jewish community. The speaker conveys that Jewish people worldwide are praying for the Holy Father's recovery and have deep love and affection for him. Appreciation is expressed for the Church's efforts in combating antisemitism and standing up for the Jewish people. The speaker thanks the Cardinal for graciously greeting them.

I don't want to be an emperor. I want to help everyone. We should live by each other's happiness, not misery. Greed has poisoned us, barricading the world with hate. We have lost our way. We need humanity, kindness, and gentleness. The airplane and radio bring us closer together, calling for universal brotherhood. Don't despair, the misery will pass. Power will return to the people. Soldiers, don't give yourselves to brutes. Fight for liberty. The power lies within all of us. Let's unite and fight for a new world, free from greed and intolerance. Let science and progress lead to happiness for all.

During war, everyone faces problems, even those with beautiful oceans. While you may not feel it now, you will feel the effects in the future. God bless you, you will not have war. I am not in a position to dictate what you're going to feel, but you will feel influence. We are going to feel very good and very strong. You are not with us, you start having cars. You don't see where you are going. You're gambling with World War Three. Someday, I'm going to find this piece of shit in the trunk.

The speaker discusses a conversation they had with someone about the mindset of those who harm children. The person explains that these individuals view the world differently and have a singular purpose: to defeat God. They believe that children are the closest thing to God because they are created in His image and have not yet been corrupted. The more pain they can inflict on a child, the greater their victory over God. This is their sole consideration.

I want to talk about peace, not imposed by force, but real peace that allows nations to thrive and build a better future. Peace for all, not just for Americans. Peace that brings hope and prosperity for everyone. Peace that is essential for a meaningful life.

The speaker questions the benefits of a government that seems to have bad luck. They discuss the importance of maintaining inner peace within the population and rebuilding the state on moral principles. They emphasize the need for religious and positive Christian values. The speaker also mentions the significance of separating two different paths, one leading to heaven and the other to the mountains.

The speaker questions the actions of the Catholic Church, accusing them of only raping kids and enjoying tax exemptions. They express disgust and repulsion, suggesting it is time to shut down the church.

Speaker 0 asks a question to Speaker 1, who is the Holy Father. Speaker 1 responds by saying that there are no inappropriate questions between them because they respect each other. Speaker 0 then asks about Speaker 1's experience with a girl in California. Speaker 1 mentions that he remembers her eyes, initially filled with love but later filled with disappointment. This taught him the importance of wanting Catholics to be in love and not wanting to see disappointment in their eyes. Speaker 1 admits that there are times when he doesn't believe in himself or his abilities. He mentions someone named Boilev who knows how to do things and still believes in God. Speaker 0 clarifies that Boilev is a politician, not the Holy Father.

Nancy Pelosi reflects on Pope Francis's death, recalling their four meetings and his consistent request for her prayers, despite her belief that he should be praying for them. She describes him as a saintly man who valued faith, hope, charity, and peace. Pelosi emphasizes Pope Francis's humility and confidence, noting he was the first non-European pope in 1,300 years and the first Jesuit. She highlights his focus on climate change and care for the poor, referencing his encyclical on God's creation. Pelosi recounts receiving communion at a mass in Saint Peter's Basilica in 2022, despite the Archbishop of San Francisco's opposition due to her support for abortion rights. She details a private visit with Pope Francis before the mass, during which he stood up from his wheelchair to greet her and her husband. She received communion in the front row, in the presence of the Pope.

A person asks why the speaker is called the "black pope," and the speaker says the term started in the nineteenth century and is related to power. The speaker clarifies that he does not have power. The person then references the Jesuit high oath, which they claim includes a promise to seek war against heretics, protestants, and liberals, and to spare no one while hanging, wasting, boiling, and flaying enemies alive. The speaker states they have never seen this oath before. The person says the oath is in the congressional record.

Speaker calls for a respectful conversation despite differences: "You guys for a respectful conversation even though we see things very differently." They say, "I think God has a better plan for you." They add, "maybe you have an encounter with God and Jesus loves all of you. And he'll he can transform your life. He transformed my life." They describe life as "And every day is a new day, and it's a hopeful, beautiful life ahead of you." They state, "God loves every single one of us. We're all sinners, and Jesus died I mean, you've definitely been the most respectful one that I've seen." They credit the Holy Spirit: "it's not me. If it was me, I'd be yelling and screaming. It's the holy spirit." They close with, "Jesus has gone to work on my life." "And so god bless you guys. Thank you for a great Charlie, thank you for coming."

Speaker 0 apologizes for painting black on someone's window and talks about a president killing a wounded child and crashing a sister's plane. They mention praying to God to bring the troops home and clean up the mess in Iraq. Speaker 1 mentions a civil interaction with Hillary before discussing other matters. The transcript ends abruptly.

Speaker 0 expresses concern over the high number of children's deaths in Palestine and questions the lack of action for peace and democracy. They emphasize the unacceptable loss of over 7,000 children's lives and ask how many more have to die. The speaker also mentions the death toll of 20,000 people and appeals for humanity. They request not to be touched and clarify that they are not causing any trouble while on the train.

Speaker 1 describes a decision to follow conscience after twenty years in the military, mostly deployed to the Middle East. He explains that after multiple deployments he realized “we weren't there for the reasons that our government told us” and that there was no vital national interest in the current fight. He made a promise to himself about twenty years ago not to send young Americans off to die on foreign battlefields if he ever had a position of responsibility. When given that opportunity, he decided to resign, stating he did not want to send others to die in wars he believed were not in the nation’s interest. Speaker 0 notes their Catholic faith and mentions recent comments by the Holy Father highlighting concerns for innocent civilians harmed by conflict, including the killing of Father Pierre in Lebanon. The question is asked whether faith community or religious leaders’ support has helped. Speaker 1 responds that the support has been huge and that the resignation gained more traction than he expected. He emphasizes that although the decision was not made lightly, faith helped him hear “God's voice” and guided him to take action, which made the act feel easy and liberating. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 has hope for America. Speaker 1 affirms having a great deal of hope, calling this an exciting moment. He highlights the power of technology to connect like‑minded people and give them a voice, despite potential downsides. He notes the significant presence and enthusiasm of young people in the room, expressing optimism about the next generation. Speaker 1 outlines what he believes must happen moving forward: during the midterm season and as the war progresses, people should be on their knees in prayer, then take action once upright. He argues that leaders must hear the public’s stance against this war and the lack of a vital national security interest, calling for the troops to come home and for efforts toward peace in the region. He asserts a desire to avoid “twenty plus more years of bloodletting” and urges people from all political parties to pressure representatives to oppose continued overseas wars. Speaker 1 clarifies that he is not advocating pacifism; if the country is attacked or there is an imminent threat, actions will be taken. The core message is that the nation must not continue down the current path, and making this stance clear to leaders is essential to preserving hope.

I acknowledge that the truth can be difficult to accept, but it should be acknowledged. There are suspicions of wrongdoing that have been ignored. We are bombarded with news that we passively accept without questioning. It is expected of us to conform and follow their perspective without questioning their motives. However, I have many unanswered questions. How is it that children are being abused, yet no one has been held accountable? I have read about it in religious texts, and it seems like these children are being protected. I am determined to fight against both foreign and domestic terrorists. I refuse to be controlled like a sheep. I will only kneel to my own beliefs, even if it means standing up for them until the end. Our voices are silenced, but there is violence in the streets. I have endured many hardships, but I cannot continue to tolerate them. I choose to see the glass as half full and remain optimistic. People can be cruel and malicious, and I pray for help to overcome our current situation. If necessary, I will resist and then seek forgiveness.

Before the audience, a circus troupe performs for the Pope.

The speaker mentions receiving a death threat from Chief Red Cloud and expresses their disapproval of his actions. They discuss the idea of sitting back and praying versus taking action in a spiritual war. They also mention knowing where Chief Red Cloud lives and planning to contact the FBI. The speaker emphasizes the need to recognize the spiritual war they believe is happening. Another speaker shares their experiences of being threatened when preaching about God. The conversation ends with a question about whether the American church is falsely promoting peace.