TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

This type of violence is not okay and is becoming too common. It doesn't matter which side, party, or person it's directed at; it has to stop. We have a responsibility to be better.

I wish Trump had better security. The Secret Service won't talk about the threat on his life or why they ignored it. We will get answers.

Bro, what's happening? Domestic violence is out of control. Let's all be kind to each other. What's happening?

We are witnessing modern-day lynchings that are unjustly accepted as justice. If we truly believe in equality, it shouldn't be permissible for someone to be killed simply for being black, brown, or anything other than a white male. This troubling trend resembles the racial injustices of the 1950s, where perpetrators often escape accountability for their actions against marginalized communities. We face serious issues in this country related to race, and if we don't address them, they will continue to grow and cause harm.

This situation is absurd. Why has it come to this? I shared something that he posted, yet I'm the one being arrested. It doesn't make sense that I'm in cuffs while he isn't. There seems to be anxiety caused by social media posts, but I don’t understand why I'm being targeted.

Why are we cheering for someone getting shot? He's dead. Like, no matter what political beliefs are, should not be cheering that someone got shot. He has a family. We do. We I value everyone's beliefs, but we should not be cheering as a class that someone got shot. He has a family. Yes. And who shot them? A transgender person. Oh. Oh. Oh. So that's what it is. Yes. Five males. It doesn't matter. You should not be cheering that someone got shot. Yes. You should not be cheering that someone got shot. Yeah. He's still, like, attacking you guys don't care what other people got.

"Talk to me about the environment in which a shooting like this happens." "we don't know any of full details of this. We don't know if this was the supporter shooting their gun off in celebration or so. We have no idea about this." "He's been one of the most divisive, especially divisive, figures in this who is constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups." "I always go back to hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which then lead to hateful actions." "And I think that's the environment we're in, that people just you can't stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and not expect awful actions to take place." "And that's the unfortunate environment we're in."

I just found out about this recent event. Someone attempted to shoot, but missed by a hair. The shooter was likely a white man. We were so close to solving half of the issue.

Speaker 0: Listen to this clip, Hannah, of what I said that was so dangerous and controversial. K. Keen Jeffries, a progressive congressman, literally tweeted, while the trial was going on, lock up Kyle Rittenhouse and throw away the key. And he's the same guy that rails against mass incarceration, and I agree with him on some of it. But now, before the trial's even over, they're calling for this guy to be locked up and throw away the key. Like, they've already reached their conclusion. Speaker 1: No. Didn't give him a fair shake. Speaker 0: It's a very ... And they lied about it being a white supremacy thing when it's a white dude that shot three other white people. It's the entire thing is bizarre and it's Out of self defense. Speaker 1: Right. Yes. Speaker 0: In my opinion. Speaker 1: That's most important. Speaker 0: The truth is he defended himself; he wasn't some mass shooter white supremacist, and he should be acquitted. Do you feel bullied? Speaker 1: I I don't. And honestly, I think that was the most milquetoast explanation of everything that went down.

This was not a race thing or a political thing. It was a human being thing. This person made a bad choice and affected both his family and my family forever. His brother was there who tried to save him, and he died in his arms. If you weren't there, please don't spread rumors.

It would be unfortunate if people reported Mike Harlow for his recent comments perceived as transphobic on Twitter. While not everyone who speaks against trans individuals is necessarily transphobic, Harlow's recent behavior has raised concerns. Just suggesting that reporting him could be a consequence of his actions.

Which tweet are we discussing? The one referring to it as a modern-day lynching? The facts of the case are still unfolding, and I have significant concerns about it.

My sympathy to Charlie Kirk's family and to Charlie Kirk who obviously is, you know, become a target for somebody. I don't know whether it's political violence because I don't know who did it. I know they seem to have somebody in custody. But I will say that political violence unfortunately has been ratcheting up in this country. We saw the shootings, the killings in Minnesota. We've seen other political violence occur in other states, and I I would just say it's gotta stop. And I think there are people who are fomenting it in this country. I think the president's rhetoric often foments it. We've seen the January 6 rioters who clearly, you know, have tripped a new era of political violence.

Participants discuss the news that Charlie Kirk was shot, with uncertainty about whether he is dead: "Murder for having a different opinion from somebody else." They note, "I haven't seen anything that said confirmed." Rumors about who shot him spur debate: "a supporter shooting their gun off in celebration"—"That's a crazy take." They stress we "We don't know any of full details of this yet" and that "it's not a tweet. It's not on their Twitter account" or anything, with clips shared by "Dave Portnoy reposted this." The mood is horror and condemnation: "Nobody deserves that." They condemn the culture of division, call out "paid propagandists masquerading as the news," and warn this event could either spur meaningful dialogue or fuel violence and fear. The speakers fear the impact on political courage and discourse.

I'm glad Trump is safe and condemn political violence. People believed media's extreme claims about Trump, leading to violence. Media should reflect on their role in spreading fear and misinformation.

"Most murders in The US never become national news." "This one's garnered attention for a couple of reasons." "First and foremost, the recent release of that gruesome video." "Second, the energy from pro Trump activists." "They picked up on this video from local news and ran with it." "In this case, it is Trump aligned influencers who are posting up a storm about this case on social media." "Over the weekend, Elon Musk, Charlie Kirk, other Trump figures succeeded in making this senseless death a symbol of big city crime." "We heard president Trump asked about it yesterday when he was heading home from New York City." "He didn't seem to know much about it." "He said he would get briefed." "And then today, Trump did know all about it." "That's exactly what has happened here."

"As a nurse, I am disgusted by the amount of health care professionals that I see making light of mocking and justifying yesterday's tragedy." "As a medical professional, I treat everyone, every with the most respect regardless of your beliefs, regardless of your background. You are a human life first and that is how I treat all of my patients and that is how we should treat everyone." "It is appalling. It is an outrage." "I am disgusted and I just cannot believe that we are here now in this state, in this country, that we are justifying hate crimes on people because of their beliefs." "But the fact that I see medical professionals making fun of and justifying an innocent man being taken out in front of thousands of people watching livestream of the event in front of his children and his wife is unforgivable and disgusting."

I am shocked by the inhumanity of an influencer with over 2,000,000 followers who wished for a better aim to harm the president. This behavior is vile and unacceptable. Anyone supporting this influencer should be called out. We would never wish harm on any leader, and I, along with many others, condemn this sick individual and urge them to seek help.

Terry, a gentle man, was handcuffed today. It's unbelievable to see him in a perp walk on Blaze TV.

Did he just call for the genocide of everyone who supports the Palestinian people?

This event has been labeled as the first live stream genocide in history. The implications of this are significant, and it is likely that prosecutors will be eager to pursue legal action related to it.

Mister Musk's recent Twitter activity sparked a discussion on freedom of speech. While we also value this freedom, we acknowledge the need to address illegal content online.

Smith onto the space. Harrison, thanks for joining. We’ve got questions about your tweet. How are you? Harrison: I’m pretty good. I just got home, trying to do Advent with my kids, so I have about ten minutes. I heard Matt Baker defending me, so I came to settle objections. What’s up? Smith: First of all, I appreciate you coming on. We’ve had disagreements on X. The first question is about your original tweet about someone telling you Charlie Kirk was going to be assassinated. Explain that, because I’ve got a question about your second tweet. Harrison: That’s it. There’s no further explanation. Somebody with knowledge of the situation told me that, and I tweeted it in response to something Ian Carroll had said, a month before. I told the story again on Moonbase Live when I talked to Jake Shields, a week before the shooting. I won’t tell you who told me because they asked me not to, but it’s basically corroborated. The person I talked to was not the same as those who talked to people like Max Blumenthal. So apparently, multiple people are telling the same story. Only I published it before the event. Did the FBI or TC or something ask you any questions about it? Smith: Nope. Harrison: And that’s the problem, Soleiman. That’s the problem right there. Smith: We’ll move on. He’s got ten minutes. The tweet today said: “the assassination of Charlie Kirk has been a resounding success for the left, they got to kill one of our shining lights, divide the right and normalise political violence and the only backlash they received was Jimmy Kimmel show got suspended for two days.” That seems to contradict your first statement, since the first tweet was before the assassination. How does that message come across? Harrison: The first tweet was before the assassination, so it couldn’t have anything to do with who I thought did it. It was before the assassination, a month earlier, and I had heard the rumor that Charlie Kirk feared for his life. The second tweet reflects the world view that most left people have: “we killed Charlie Kirk. We got away with.” It’s about the left believing they did it and got away with it, and it’s about the weakness of the right to treat threats against us with seriousness. Whether or not it was a leftist is still up in the air; I have unanswered questions about the patsy they have now. Still, the left has benefited. The left acts like they did it. The official story is the left did it, personally. I have questions about that story, but what matters is the widespread perception that the left did it and got away with it, and that informs their behavior. Smith: Do you think the widespread opinion matters? Harrison: I can’t hear you both at once. Matt? Smith: How do you feel about the genocide in Gaza? Harrison: I’m strongly against the genocide in Gaza. Vocally. Since before October 7. I’m against it as an Israeli shill? Smith: No one said that. The argument was that you’ve spoken out against genocide in Gaza before October 7, but Infowars promotes Zionist agendas and Zionist talking points, attacking Muslims in the United States and the UK. Zionist billionaires like Robert Shillman, etc. Harrison: I get it. Zionist interests overlap with mine, but it has nothing to do with Zionism in our calculus. I am for Western culture, America, heritage Americans of all backgrounds, and I’m fighting for Christianity. I’m against Muslims infiltrating Western countries, and I’m against Zionists controlling Western countries. These are not contradictory. There’s nothing Zionist about not wanting Muslims to take over your country, just like there’s nothing Muslim about not wanting Zionists to control your country. Infowars is anti-Zionist recently, and Alex condemns what Israel and Netanyahu are doing. But there’s a deliberate message of unity of all Americans who aren’t trying to dominate or subvert others. Unless they’re Christians, of course. Smith: So you’re saying you’re not arguing for a single team; it’s two enemies, rock, paper, scissors? Harrison: It’s two enemies, not one. I’m against both. I’m against Muslims taking over and against Zionists dominating. It’s not contradictory. It’s not about a single team. Smith: The point isn’t that you must pick sides; the issue is you’ve pushed claims that there is a Muslim takeover, which isn’t supported by numbers or power. People argue this is propaganda. Harrison: Okay. I don’t care whether the takeover has progressed. If I said it’s fake, I’d say that. I’ve got to go, but I appreciate the clarification. Smith: Posted on the day Jake Lang went; you were clearly talking about him. Harrison: I was talking about why Dearborn was the location of the march and why it was appropriate. Jake Lang is Jewish and Zionist; he’s not a Christian. He’s ethnically Jewish. He says he’s Christian, and in Christianity you can convert. I’ll call him a Christian man if that’s how he defines himself. Thanks.

It's been an hour, and there's been no mention of Gaza. Why discuss past genocides without addressing the current situation? It's baffling that no one is willing to talk about an ongoing genocide. What has happened to everyone? Do you lack compassion? Over the past year, 200,000 people have died.

It's unfortunate another child's bad choice will affect him for life. The speaker has compassion for every human being. This is not a race issue, nor a black and white issue. The speaker does not want the situation politicized. The speaker does not appreciate online remarks from people who weren't present during the event.