TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Synthetic DNA and RNA injections are genetic therapies, not vaccines. The speaker questions the mislabeling of these therapies and criticizes the CDC for redefining vaccines. They argue that the shots are not effective and are being given for non-existent variants. The speaker raises concerns about the safety of these injections, including the potential for cancer and other health risks. They highlight the contamination of the vaccines with DNA and other harmful substances. The speaker calls for the cessation of these shots, the opening of cancer databases, and the return of informed consent in medicine. They emphasize the importance of trust, integrity, and community in navigating these issues.

The speaker expresses concern about the presence of SD40 sequences in gene therapies, suggesting that it was not accidental and could lead to cancer. They argue that gene therapies were unnecessary as there were effective treatments available, such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, which they claim are safe. The speaker questions the transparency of the FDA, as they redacted data on endotoxin levels for 75 years.

The speaker questions the presence of SB40 sequences in vaccines, suggesting they could lead to cancer through insertional mutagenesis. They advocate for alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, claiming they are safe and effective. The speaker criticizes the FDA for redacting data on vaccine contamination, questioning their transparency.

The speaker claims SV40 in literature turns on cancer genes. They further claim the spike protein impairs tumor suppressor systems P53 and BRCA, promoting cancer and inhibiting the ability to fight it. The speaker suggests cancer rates are up, and the question is how much is due to vaccines. They state that repeated shots every six months increase the chances of getting loaded with synthetic genetic material that will cause harm, including heart disease, neurologic disease, blood clotting, immunologic problems, and cancer.

When COVID-19 vaccines were sequenced, commercial annotation software highlighted functional parts of the plasmids, including antibiotic resistance genes and SV40 components. The speaker claims that Pfizer had to manually remove these annotations before submitting the plasmid map to regulators. According to the speaker, regulators received the DNA sequence, but the sponsor is obligated to annotate every open reading frame and promoter, even if their function is unknown. The speaker alleges that Pfizer intentionally removed annotations, hiding them from the FDA, which the speaker believes is a violation of guidelines. The speaker suggests the reason for hiding SV40 components is due to SV40 virus contamination in polio vaccines and its debated link to cancer. The speaker asserts that while epidemiological data is confounded by vaccine shedding, laboratory studies show SV40 is a potent oncogenic virus. The speaker claims that the vaccines contain some of the more carcinogenic components of that virus, and that these sequences are functional and have consequences.

A biochemist and toxicologist discusses concerns about the Pfizer vaccine. They claim that the vaccine contains plasma DNA, including SV40 sequences, which were not disclosed to regulators. They believe this is intentional and could lead to DNA integration and potential cancer risks. The speaker argues that the DNA in the vaccine is different from RNA and can be permanent. They suggest that safer alternatives like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin exist and question the transparency of the FDA. They urge states to protect their citizens and reconsider the use of the vaccine, especially for pregnant women and children.

The speaker discusses the issue of DNA contamination in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and questions the FDA's handling of the situation. They explain that normally rigorous tests are required to ensure safety, but in this case, the FDA ignored those tests. The speaker also mentions that Moderna's own patent acknowledges concerns about DNA and insertional immunogenesis. They reveal that DNA fragments, including an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40, were found in the vaccines. The speaker expresses shock at the FDA's lack of transparency and highlights the potential risks associated with DNA damage, such as cancer and birth defects.

The speaker discusses DNA contamination found in Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines, highlighting regulatory agencies' failure to address the issue. They mention potential risks of DNA integration and cancer development, urging for a review of regulatory practices. Concerns are raised about DNA levels exceeding limits, potential cell integration, and long-term presence in the body. The speaker emphasizes the need for better monitoring tools and the unique nature of DNA contamination in these vaccines.

The speaker claims messenger RNA vaccines with the spike protein can induce cancer in multiple ways. They allege the presence of oncogene stimulants, specifically SV40 in the Pfizer vaccine, confirmed by multiple researchers. A paper from Wurzburg purportedly confirms this and shows the vaccines convert cells to cancer. The speaker asserts the spike protein and mRNA vaccines bind to major suppressor genes like P53, BRCA, and MSH, which normally suppress cancer. Mutations in these genes can lead to earlier onset of cancer. The speaker suggests these vaccines could cause the equivalent of mutations in these genes, leading to an explosion of colorectal cancers. They advocate for an immediate ban on these vaccines and accountability for those who oppose it.

The speaker expresses concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding the presence of DNA and contamination in the shots. They argue that the vaccines have caused more deaths in a few months than all other vaccines combined in the past 30 years. The speaker also discusses the potential risks of gene therapy and the presence of SV40 sequences and antibiotic-resistant genes in the shots. They believe that the contamination and intentional inclusion of certain sequences raise concerns about the vaccines' safety. The speaker calls for the recall of the vaccines, especially for children, and questions the transparency of the FDA and CDC in handling the data. They suggest using alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

The speaker expresses concern about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding the presence of DNA and contamination in the shots. They argue that the number of deaths reported after the vaccine rollout is higher than in the past 30 years combined for all other vaccines. The speaker also discusses the risk of gene therapy and the potential for cancer and autoimmune reactions. They mention the presence of SV40 sequences and antibiotic-resistant genes in the shots, which they believe is intentional. The speaker highlights the increase in miscarriages and stillbirths reported after vaccination and questions the transparency of the FDA and CDC. They urge for the recall of the vaccines and express frustration with the lack of action taken.

The s v 40 sequences, they should not be there. They could have chosen another plasmid that did not have the s v 40 sequences. If these sequences sit above an oncogene and they're promiscuous, that means they are likely to integrate in places more likely than other genetic inserts. Insertional mutagenesis anyway causes cancer, and that's the risk. That's why gene therapies were not brought to market for so many years because there was a risk of causing cancer from insertional mutagenesis. We never needed these vaccines. Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, I can tell you as a toxicologist, they are not toxic. They're some of the safest drugs you can use. Endotoxin levels: they've got them all redacted. Why would you redact them if you were trying to be transparent? Why would you hold the data for seventy five years?

The speaker alleges that after receiving FDA Emergency Use Authorization for a vaccine produced via "process one," manufacturers switched to "process two." This new process allegedly introduced contaminants, including foreign DNA and SV40, a cancer-causing substance. The speaker connects this alleged change to a reported increase in aggressive cancers, particularly among young people. Referencing an NIH paper, the speaker claims SV40 is a known oncogenic DNA virus that induces cancers in laboratory animals. The speaker asserts Pfizer knew they were putting a carcinogen in process two. They speculate that this is the reason Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, citing trade secrets.

The speaker explains that there is contamination in the messenger RNA, including fragments of DNA called cDNA, with one of them being s v 40, a known cancer-promoting segment. The other speaker mentions that mainstream news reports estimate that millions of Americans had cancer due to SV 40 contamination in the past. The first speaker confirms that SV 40 turns on cancer genes and that the spike protein in the shots impairs tumor suppressor systems. They conclude that the shots promote cancer through SV 40 and suppress our ability to fight cancer. The speaker acknowledges that cancer rates are increasing, but the extent to which vaccines contribute to this is still uncertain.

The speaker raises concerns about the contamination of current vaccines with DNA and the unknown consequences of this contamination. They argue that efforts should be made to eliminate DNA contamination, even if it increases production costs. The speaker mentions a researcher from MIT who accidentally discovered that mRNA vaccines were contaminated with DNA. They criticize Pfizer for testing vaccines from one process and then vaccinating billions of people with vaccines from another process, which were contaminated with DNA. The presence of DNA in the vaccines raises risks, including potential cancer development. The speaker believes it is misleading to claim that the vaccines have undergone clinical trials when they have not been properly studied. They call for more rigorous research before commercializing vaccines.

The speaker discusses government censorship and coercion in response to vaccine safety concerns. They recommend banning mRNA vaccines and boosters due to potential cancer risks. They also mention DNA contamination in vaccines and its impact on cancer rates. The conversation highlights concerns about accelerated aging and tumor growth linked to vaccine boosters. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency and quality control in vaccine production.

The speaker raises concerns about the contamination of current vaccines with DNA and the unknown consequences of this contamination. They argue that efforts should be made to eliminate DNA contamination, even if it means higher production costs. The speaker mentions a researcher from MIT who discovered that mRNA vaccines were contaminated with DNA, despite DNA not being listed as a component. They criticize the authorities for testing vaccines without DNA contamination on a small group of people, but then vaccinating billions of people with contaminated vaccines. The speaker highlights the potential risks of DNA contamination, including the possibility of cancer. They conclude by stating that vaccines from the second process should undergo more rigorous studies before being commercialized.

The speaker discusses the presence of contamination in vaccines, specifically cDNA fragments and s p 40, which is a cancer-promoting segment of DNA. They mention that s v 40, a related virus, caused cancer in millions of Americans in the past. The speaker explains that s p 40 turns on cancer genes and that the spike protein in the vaccines impairs tumor suppressor systems. They conclude that the vaccines promote cancer and hinder our ability to fight it. The speaker acknowledges that cancer rates are increasing but questions how much of it is due to the vaccines.

The speaker discusses the issue of DNA contamination in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and questions the FDA's handling of the situation. They explain that normally rigorous tests are required for genotoxicity and immunogenesis, but the FDA seemed to ignore these requirements. The speaker also mentions that Moderna's own patent acknowledges the concerns related to DNA and insertional immunogenesis. They reveal that DNA fragments, including an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40, were found in the vaccines. The speaker expresses concern about the potential risks associated with DNA damage, such as cancer and birth defects. They criticize the FDA for downplaying the issue and emphasize the importance of transparency.

The speaker expresses concern about the presence of s p 40 sequences in vaccines, suggesting that their inclusion was intentional and could lead to cancer. They argue that gene therapies were not brought to market for years due to the risk of insertional mutagenesis causing cancer. The speaker advocates for the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin as safe alternatives to vaccines. They question the transparency of withholding data and urge the protection of citizens by standing up against experimental products. The speaker concludes by pleading for one state to take action and set an example for others. No questions are asked.

The speaker discusses the presence of DNA in the Pfizer vaccine and expresses concern about its potential consequences. They explain that they sequenced the DNA in the vaccine and found it surprising that any DNA was present. The speaker suggests that this DNA could be causing rare but serious side effects, such as death from cardiac arrest. They also mention that the DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, potentially leading to genome modification, autoimmune attacks, or even future cancer. The speaker acknowledges that these concerns are theoretical but believes they warrant further investigation.

The video discusses the presence of SV40 (simian virus 40) in COVID genetic vaccines and its potential link to cancer. The speaker clarifies that while the vaccines do not contain the entire virus, they do contain the promoter and enhancer from SV40, which could increase the risk of DNA integration and potential oncogenesis. The speaker also mentions the role of lipid nanoparticles in vaccine delivery and the need for further research on their toxicity. Additionally, concerns are raised about the biodistribution of the vaccines and their potential impact on the germline. The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding these risks and considering alternative approaches to respiratory virus vaccination.

Speaker 1 expresses concern about the presence of SV40 sequences in vaccines, suggesting it is not accidental and could lead to cancer due to insertional mutagenesis. They argue that gene therapies were delayed due to the risk of cancer from insertional mutagenesis. The speaker believes that alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are safe and questions why the FDA redacted data on endotoxin levels for 75 years. They emphasize the unusual nature of the current situation and urge the protection of citizens by not administering experimental products to pregnant women and babies. The speaker pleads for one state to take a stand and set an example for others. No questions are asked.

The speaker expresses frustration that COVID vaccines are still recommended for those most likely to be injured by them. They claim Vinay Prasad, now at the FDA, attacked them on ivermectin, stating it doesn't work and that "turbo cancer" is not a thing. The speaker believes there is denial regarding the mRNA technology and its potential link to aggressive cancers, as well as ivermectin's potential as a solution. They suggest that admitting the mRNA vaccines may be causing cancer and that ivermectin may be a solution could force the shutdown of the mRNA technology. The speaker claims there are numerous publications suggesting the vaccines may be causing aggressive "turbo cancers." They state the new Trump administration doesn't want to abandon the mRNA technology, complicating the use of ivermectin, fenbendazole, and benzoyl in cancer treatment due to a lack of support.

The speaker explains that the messenger RNA in the shots is contaminated with cDNA, including a cancer-promoting segment called s v 40. They mention that s v 40 turns on cancer genes in the human body and that the spike protein in the shots impairs tumor suppressor systems. The speaker suggests that the shots promote cancer through s v 40 and inhibit our ability to fight cancer. They also mention that cancer rates are increasing. The speaker raises the question of how much of this is due to the vaccines.