reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow spoke on the phone on November 24, 1963. Rostow suggested that a presidential commission of distinguished, bipartisan citizens be appointed to investigate President Kennedy's murder, as world and American opinion distrust the Dallas police's handling of the situation. Rostow suggested members like Tom Dewey, Bill Story, or Nixon, excluding Supreme Court justices. Moyers suggested Rostow provide a memorandum for the president, emphasizing the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country. He said the president could use it in private talks with newsmen or for his joint session next Wednesday night. Moyers wanted the president to reassure the world that America is a land of public order, civility, and guaranteed public safety. Rostow agreed to send a memo right away. Moyers said he would pass on the commission suggestion to the president.

We, along with other senators, will press the Secret Service for answers. The American people deserve transparency. Past conspiracy theories have proven true, so we must uncover the truth of this situation.

Charlie Kirk addresses perspectives on political assassinations, including JFK’s. In the JFK files, Mossad is mentioned, but not tied to involvement; the best reading is “who wanted JFK dead the most,” with Israel frequently cited, yet Lyndon Baines Johnson, parts of the U.S. government, and the Cubans also implicated. There were “like, 15 or 20 things that happened that day that were inexcusable,” such as changing the parade route, JFK riding in an open-air convertible, LBJ not riding alongside him, the vehicle slowing down as it passed the Texas School Book Depository. The question emphasized is not only who did it, but that more than one person did it; acknowledging that could reveal government lies about JFK, leading to a broader skepticism about future government trust. Another participant comments that Charlie Kirk reminded viewers of common sense and not accepting force-fed narratives or “BS crap” from the government regarding a single gunman; the discussion notes “multiple people were involved” and “a lot of strange things occurred” that day. This aligns with a broader critique of government psychological operations: MK Ultra, Mockingbird, and Mockingbird II. The first government surveillance on the people after JFK’s assassination is described as Mockingbird I, designed to convince there was nothing to see despite much to see, with Mockingbird II deployed again to convince people that questions about Kirk’s narrative are crazy and to suggest there may be Turning Point USA employees engaged in an obvious cover-up. Frank Turek is cited as saying it’s crazy to imply betrayal by trusted individuals, though the historical note mentions Jesus Christ as a betrayal example; the discussion asserts JFK personally selected LBJ as vice president, and that LBJ was clearly implicated in JFK’s assassination. Charlie is said to be open to the idea that Mossad may have been involved, and he asserts that parts of the U.S. government and the Cubans were involved; he asks for more argument regarding Mossad. He suggests JFK’s assassination was plausible to involve multiple actors and notes that the question of “who wanted JFK dead the most” should be pursued further, including in examining who would want Charlie Kirk dead and why. The dialogue then moves to the political fast lane, with three motives for those who might want him dead: money, secrets, and power. He says he refused money, implying he knows his secrets; his youth political organization has gained influence. The discussion speculates on global implications, naming France, Israel, the U.S. government, and Egypt as mentioned in connection with the investigation. The McCrone couple are described as having paid for an assassination threat, and, notably, neither the Pentagon nor the White House or intelligence agencies nor the Elysee Palace dispute that narrative; the FBI is now listed as not denying that threat.

Speaker 0: I need your help to inform and alert the American people. Senator Kennedy has been shot. Speaker 1: On February 28th, the ATF learned that Koresh knew they were coming but proceeded anyway. Speaker 0: 911, there's been an explosion. We need to backtrack for a better view. Defending freedom in dangerous times is our responsibility. We welcome it. Our energy and devotion will light up our country and those who serve it.

The speaker discusses potential security failures in protecting the president at an event. They suggest the need for a thorough investigation to understand what went wrong and prevent future incidents. The speaker emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability in addressing security concerns. They stress the need for a comprehensive inquiry before making any accusations. The conversation highlights the significance of ensuring the safety of the president and the American people.

After President Kennedy was assassinated, our nation looked to Gerald Ford and a few others to understand the chaos. Conspiracy theorists can have their own opinions.

Bob: Madame Ambassador, he says that this is something that has been in the planning stages for months. I understand you have been saying that you think it was spontaneous. Are we not on the same page here? Madame Ambassador: Well, Bob, let me tell you what we understand to be the assessment at present. First of all, very importantly, as you discussed with the president, there is an investigation that the United States government will launch led by the FBI that has begun. Bob: But they are not there. Madame Ambassador: They are not on the ground yet, but they already begun looking at all sorts of evidence of various sorts already available to them and to us, and they will get on the ground and continue the investigation. So we'll want to see the results of that investigation to draw any definitive conclusions. But based on the best information we have to date, what our assessment is as of the present is, in fact, what began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what transpired some hours earlier in Cairo, where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy sparked by this hateful video. But soon after that spontaneous protest began outside of our consulate in Benghazi, we believe that it looks like extremist elements, individuals joined in that effort with heavy weapons of the sort that are unfortunately readily now available in Libya post revolution, and that it spun from there into something much, much more violent. Bob: But you do not agree with him that this was something that had been plotted out We several months do Madame Ambassador: not have information at present that leads us to conclude that this was premeditated or preplanned.

Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow spoke on the phone on November 24, 1963. Rostow suggested that a presidential commission of distinguished, bipartisan citizens be appointed to investigate President Kennedy's murder, as world and American opinion distrust the Dallas police's handling of the situation. Rostow suggested members like Tom Dewey, Bill Story, or Nixon, excluding Supreme Court justices. Moyers then asked Rostow for a memorandum for the president about the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country, evidenced by events like the "Impeach the Supreme Court" movement. Moyers wanted the president to emphasize America's tradition of public order and civility in upcoming talks with newsmen and in his joint session next Wednesday night. Rostow agreed to send the memo right away. Moyers said he would pass on the commission suggestion to the president.

Upon election, the speaker will establish an independent presidential commission on assassination attempts. This commission will release all remaining documents pertaining to the John F. Kennedy assassination. The commission will also conduct a rigorous review of the attack that occurred last month. The speaker states that many people have asked them to release the documents on the Kennedy assassination.

Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow discuss the assassination of President Kennedy. Rostow suggests a presidential commission be appointed, composed of distinguished, bipartisan citizens, excluding Supreme Court justices, to investigate the murder. He believes world and American opinion is shaken by the Dallas police's behavior, causing disbelief. Moyers relays his own idea: that President Johnson should address the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country, referencing the "impeach the supreme court" sentiment. He suggests the President emphasize America as a land of public order and civility in upcoming talks with newsmen and a joint session next Wednesday night. Rostow offers to send a memorandum to the president along these lines. Moyers says he will pass along Rostow's commission suggestion.

Speaker 0: He delivered a speech at Riverside Church on 04/04/1967, a year to the date before he was assassinated. And that was a powerful anti war speech that he delivered. Speaker 1: What would you say was the significance of that particular speech? Speaker 0: The real significance was that it put him, his footprints heavily into the anti war movement for the first time. And he termed The United States the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today. And so he was rising as a severe principal critic of the government in that speech. Another negative significance is that he was attacked from all sides. He was called a traitor by mainstream media. Millions of dollars were withdrawn from his organization, Southern Christian Leadership Conference. So he lost a great deal by taking that position. All of that is significant. Speaker 1: What do think was the primary motivation behind the killing? Speaker 0: I think assassinations, political assassinations are a last resort, as a rule. But I think in terms of The United States from what I've observed and throughout its history, and there have been assassinations other than those in the sixties, remember, I think it's a last resort. I think if they can, if a person is troublesome to them and potentially can develop a following, I think they have to stop him. Now they can do that by rendering him unemployable, by having him set up in some kind of a scandal or sexual activity that destroys his credit or her credibility. They can buy him off by giving him a job or position. There are a variety of techniques by blacking them out in terms of the media. And so if they can't control any other way, and the person is that critical in terms of potentially mobilizing people, that's when political assassinations take place. Assassination is the last resort. Martin King was assassinated not only because he was bringing enormous thought to the whole Vietnam War effort opposing it and the corporate militarists of the society, the weapons providers, energy providers, all of that were going to lose huge fortunes of money if that war ended. So it was not only that but it was the fact that he was going to bring half a million people to Washington in the Poor People's March. And the military believed that they would see their mission as a failure because they would go to the congress, try to get them to change the the priorities for public funding from from the military, take some money from the military, and bring it into social services programs, and they wouldn't be successful. And that would that would radicalize the group to such a point where they might have a revolution on the streets of Washington with masses they couldn't control. They didn't have the troops. Westmoreland wanted 200,000 more in Vietnam. They didn't have those. They certainly didn't have the troops to put down that kind of revolution on the streets. So they had to kill King, make sure he didn't bring that kind of dynamic into Washington.

The speaker urges stopping the use of the word "assassination," arguing that from a death investigator’s/forensics perspective, this is a murder investigation and a homicide. They state, "You politicize it when you say assassination."

Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow discuss the assassination of President Kennedy. Rostow suggests a presidential commission be appointed, composed of distinguished, bipartisan citizens, excluding Supreme Court justices, to investigate the murder. He believes world and American opinion is shaken by the Dallas police's behavior, causing disbelief. Moyers asks Rostow for a memorandum for the president regarding the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country. He suggests the president emphasize America as a land of public order and civility in upcoming talks and a joint session. Rostow agrees to send a memo immediately and Moyers says he will pass along the suggestion of a commission to the president. They briefly discuss Nick Katzenbach and his work.

Dean Eugene Rostow suggests to Bill Moyers that President Johnson appoint a bipartisan commission of distinguished citizens to investigate President Kennedy's assassination. Rostow believes world and American opinion is shaken by the Dallas police's behavior, causing disbelief. Rostow suggests members like Tom Dewey, Bill Story, or Nixon, excluding Supreme Court justices. Moyers asks Rostow for a memorandum for the president regarding the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country. Moyers suggests the president address this in private talks with newsmen or in his joint session, emphasizing America as a land of public order and civility. Rostow agrees to send a memo right away. Moyers says he will pass on the suggestion of a commission to the president.

Secrecy is not valued in a free society. We oppose secret societies and their oaths and proceedings. The dangers of hiding important facts outweigh any justifications for secrecy. We shouldn't imitate a closed society's restrictions. Our nation's survival is meaningless without preserving our traditions. Increased security shouldn't lead to censorship or concealment. I won't allow it. We face a ruthless conspiracy that expands through covert means like infiltration and subversion. This system is highly efficient, combining military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. It conceals preparations, buries mistakes, and silences dissenters. We need public scrutiny for understanding, support, and opposition. I welcome controversy and will admit our errors. The president has been shot and killed at the intersection of Elm and Houston streets, according to a doctor from Parkland Hospital.

Dark clouds of political crisis loomed over America after the assassination of President Kennedy. In the aftermath, the nation looked to Gerald Ford and a select few to make sense of the chaos. While conspiracy theories abound, the Warren Commission report remains the definitive account of this tragedy. This is largely due to Ford's involvement, as he was a respected figure in the nation.

The speaker discusses a series of alarming claims related to political violence and distrust in U.S. institutions. They reference online activity on social media and a book that appeared prior to what is described as the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The speaker states that the book “was put up, I believe, twenty four hours or within a certain period of time before he was assassinated,” and they recall seeing it but are unsure if there was any follow-up. Turning to broader issues of trust, the speaker asserts that skepticism toward the government, and specifically agencies like the FBI, does not arise from nowhere. They frame this distrust as grounded in “decades of the federal government and elected officials' failures and actually being transparent and honest with the American people.” In their view, there has been a history of corruption within the FBI, described as “corruptness that exists within the Department of the FBI previously,” which they juxtapose with references to “the deep state individuals in various branches of government that have engaged in coups against the American people.” The speaker then suggests a possible topic for discussion, stating, “We can talk about Kennedy if you want,” implying that discussions about government overreach or conspiratorial actions could include the Kennedy assassination as a point of reference. Overall, the points highlighted are: (1) a book about the assassination of Charlie Kirk appearing online shortly before the alleged event, with uncertainty about follow-up; (2) a claim that distrust in government institutions stems from long-standing failures and lack of transparency by federal authorities; (3) allegations of FBI corruption and deep-state actors across branches of government who have engaged in coups against the American people; and (4) an invitation to discuss related topics such as Kennedy.

Checklist for the summary approach: - Identify the core claim and the proposed link between the Demona project and JFK’s assassination. - Note the main actors and roles: Angleton, the Oswald file, the Kennedy White House, and the Israeli government. - Capture the central conflict: Kennedy’s push for on-site inspections versus Israeli resistance, and why inspections would reveal a bomb-making program. - Emphasize the claim that the juxtaposition of these facts should be part of the public record. - Preserve key terms and phrases from the transcript without adding new analysis or qualifiers. Summary: The speaker begins by asking why the Demona project, described as the Israeli nuclear program, which “has never officially been admitted by anybody but Israel,” could plausibly relate to the assassination of JFK. The reply asserts that the connection lies in what James Angleton was doing in 1963. It is stated that there were profound conflicts between Israel and the Kennedy White House over Israel’s nuclear program. Specifically, Kennedy pressed for on-site inspections, while the Israelis resisted these inspections because they would have revealed that Israel possessed a bomb-making program. The dialogue characterizes this disagreement as a real bone of contention between the Israeli government and the Kennedy administration in 1963, a period when Angleton controlled the Oswald file. The conclusion drawn is that the juxtaposition of these facts means that everything about the issue should be on the public record.

I asked colleagues to create a committee with subpoena power to investigate the lack of Secret Service protection for the president. The Secret Service director agreed to brief us, but it hasn't happened yet. I question why the president wasn't given more protection and who is responsible for that decision.

President Kennedy died today in Dallas from a gunshot wound to the head. This is confirmed by two priests who were with him. I don't have further details about the assassination. We're trying to reach WBAP TV. Right now, I'm overwhelmed; I don't know what to say or do. It feels like the United States lost its innocence today. A press room is being set up, and Malcolm Kellgren, assistant press secretary, is visibly upset.

Our first investigation will thoroughly examine the John F. Kennedy assassination. Preliminary findings suggest flaws in the single bullet theory presented in the initial congressional hearing. We believe there were two shooters. We're working to access secure information, hopefully before public release, to uncover more evidence. We'll announce our findings soon.

Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow discuss the aftermath of President Kennedy's assassination. Rostow suggests a presidential commission be appointed, composed of distinguished, bipartisan citizens, excluding Supreme Court justices, to investigate the murder. He believes world and American opinion is shaken by the Dallas police's behavior, causing disbelief. Moyers relays his own idea: that President Johnson should address the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country, referencing the "impeach the Supreme Court" sentiment. He suggests the President emphasize America's tradition of public order and civility in upcoming talks with newsmen and a joint session next Wednesday night. Rostow offers to send a memorandum to the President outlining these points. Moyers says he will pass along Rostow's commission suggestion.

Our first investigation will be announced soon and will cover a thorough investigation into the John F. Kennedy assassination. Based on what I've seen so far, the initial hearing held in Congress was faulty regarding the single bullet theory. I believe that there were two shooters, and we should find more information as we gain access to the SCIF, hopefully before the files are released to the public.

Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow discuss the aftermath of President Kennedy's assassination. Rostow suggests a presidential commission be appointed, composed of distinguished, bipartisan citizens, excluding Supreme Court justices, to investigate the murder. He believes world and American opinion is shaken by the Dallas police's behavior, causing disbelief. Moyers relays his own idea: that President Johnson should address the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country, referencing the "impeach the Supreme Court" sentiment. He suggests the President emphasize America's tradition of public order and civility in upcoming talks with newsmen and in his joint session next Wednesday night. Rostow offers to send a memorandum to the President along these lines. Moyers says he will pass along Rostow's commission suggestion.

Secrecy is repugnant in a free society. The assassination of President Kennedy occurred at 1 PM CST. We must overcome societal divisions – racial, economic, etc. – and work together. The assassinations of both Kennedy brothers are acknowledged. The dangers of excessive concealment outweigh the justifications for it. We must not let the need for security be used to expand censorship. The CIA’s purpose was creating constant wars for the military-industrial complex. Many Americans distrust the Warren Commission report. We must protect our freedoms; they are coming after us. No official should use my words as an excuse to censor, stifle dissent, or withhold facts. Some media push personal agendas, threatening our democracy. We seek a true peace, not one enforced by American weapons; we all share this planet and our children’s future.