reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The DOJ leaked allegations against Matt Gaetz, claiming he was involved in child sex trafficking. They have a legal obligation to charge him and prove it in court; otherwise, they should remain silent. Instead, they allowed the accusations to circulate, with media figures amplifying the claims. The DOJ admitted they lack evidence to support these allegations, yet they still spread the story. Gaetz denies the accusations, asserting they are false, but there’s no acknowledgment from the DOJ that these claims have been disproven.

Speaker 0: I know a little about human trafficking. The human trafficking portfolio fell underneath me in the counterterrorism shop where I was ahead. I worked with Tim Ballard at the White House to stamp out human and child sex trafficking. He was doing incredible work back then. Speaker 1: I'm the bad guy in the story. Last week, I got a call from some of the accusers, and what they're accusing him of is really not just—they're just really bad stuff. Really, really bad things. At first, because I've been friends with Tim for so long, I thought, that's ridiculous. It's ridiculous. Blew by them. Ridiculous. Until they persisted, and I started hearing more. I just heard somebody had filed in the HR complaints or something. Like, that's not possible. Well, the more the complaints come out, the worse it gets. These women called last week, and they wanted to do a show with me. That's not something I've even offered Tim. And I don't want to be the one making the calls on this. I'm not a journalist, and I'm also involved. Tim has been a friend of mine. OUR is a great organization, but I also stand up for victims. And I don't feel remaining silent on this or neutral if I know is acceptable. I don't know what they've done, but I've passed the women's number onto Leon Wolf, our news director, and said, put a journalist on this if you want. And I told him at the time, take it where it leads. I just want the truth. I just want the truth. So he put our best investigative reporter on it, and I heard last night that they are close to finishing the story. I was hoping that it was gonna be released today because this is yeah. If if if if it's true, I can't believe how many of us were duped. Speaker 2: Got pearlized. But it's still some guy who got fried and cried by the side. We gonna steal, slide, slide, slide until they all die. These niggas ain't seeing me because these niggas be small fry. I got big dude status, k l

Did you leak a letter to the Washington Post about me? You're the chief of staff, right? I’m James O’Keefe. You’re friends with the reporter, Yvonne Wingate Sanchez. Did you leak the letter? No, there was no leak. How did the Washington Post get it before I did? I don’t know how they knew. The letter was released under public records law. I haven’t received it yet. Your office seems to be working with the media to target journalists. It was released legally. But how did the Washington Post know to request it? There are many ways they could have found out. So someone in your office leaked it? No, that’s faulty logic. You’re saying someone knew about the letter and told them? I have other matters to attend to. You’re busy writing letters threatening journalists. This is about good versus evil in this country. The Wellness Company offers a first aid emergency kit to help you take control of your health. Order now and save 15% with code OMG.

Did you leak a letter to the Washington Post about me? You're the chief of staff to the person who wrote it, right? I don't know how they got it before you. You need to ask Yvonne. I haven't received the letter yet. Can you send it to me? It's on its way, but you’re hard to find. How did the Washington Post know to request it? I have no idea how they became aware. I think you're lying. Someone from your office must have leaked it. There are many ways they could have known. Give me one example. Others in government could have known. So someone in your office knew about the letter. That’s faulty logic. You’re busy writing letters to journalists. I’m not the author. It’s a fight of good versus evil in this country. Order your medical emergency kit now and save 15% by using code OMG at TWC.Health/omg.

The questioner asked whether the public will learn the identities of the men who abused the girls connected to Epstein, with the information being released, and if not, why not; followed by a quick additional question. The questioner framed the issue as identifying the men who abused the young women through Epstein's activities. The official responded by challenging the assumption embedded in the question. They asked what it would mean to learn about “men that abuse these girls” and pressed to clarify that term. The official stated that, as of July and continuing to today, if the Department of Justice had information about men who abused women, they would prosecute them. They referenced ongoing work and restated that there is no “hidden tranche of information … that we know about, that we're covering up or that we're not prosecuting.” The official emphasized that they do not know whether there are men out there who abuse these women, noting uncertainty about whether such individuals exist or remain unidentified. The underlying point was that there is no claimed concealment of information or selective prosecution, and that the existence of further leads or prosecutions would be pursued if information were present.

I've uncovered a secret Justice Department memo outlining plans to target 12 new "perversions," including bestiality and pedophilia. This memo details strategies to undermine churches, pastors, and businesses that assert their religious freedom. The LGBT movement is just the beginning; they plan to expand to other perversions. So, you're saying you are aware of a Justice Department memo that says there will be an effort to legitimize bestiality, pedophilia, and other perversions? That's correct. They're coming down with twelve new perversions, expanding beyond the LGBT movement. Nothing surprises me anymore.

"I think we'll eventually get there." "the folks who stayed up all night to go through the 34,000 individual pages have found that they're so redacted as to be useless and that many of them were already available." "the scope of their investigation is to investigate the investigators." "they don't ever intend to have any criminal referrals." "but they're not going in and trying to identify who these perpetrators were of these heinous sexual abuse crimes." "Well, I made the mistake of getting 12 cosponsors and the so the White House knew who to target." "So I'm not gonna name anybody who's thinking about joining." "They're literally calling it a hostile act to sign this discharge petition now."

The speaker advocates creating a twenty-four-seven declassification office in the White House that reports directly to the president and handles incoming from the United States of America. The office would pursue declassification of high-profile documents, stating a desire to obtain JFK files, the 9/11 files, and other materials. The speaker asserts that the deep state primarily uses an illegal application of the classification system to cover up its corruption. They reference the so-called “Lovebirds” texts from FBI and DOJ officials involved in the Russiagate investigation, specifically Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, who allegedly were having an extramarital affair while coordinating support for their stance against Trump. The speaker claims these texts expressed hatred for Trump and discussed creating an “insurance policy” to stop him. According to the speaker, after discovering these texts, the FBI and DOJ redacted them before congressional investigators and members overseeing those agencies for an extended period. The speaker emphasizes that this is one example among broader claims of improper behavior by the agencies. The speaker then notes a recent development: Strzok and Page received a $1,500,000 payout from the Department of Justice to settle a lawsuit over the improper disclosure of their personal text messages on FBI phones. The DOJ allegedly rewarded them, despite claims that they broke the law, violated the chain of command, and weaponized the justice system against a political target they despised. The speaker claims that the text messages were eventually declassified in full when the speaker became deputy director of national intelligence, allowing the world to read them. This, they say, demonstrates the best form of transparency. With this context, the speaker reiterates the rationale for the proposed 24/7 declassification office: to provide direct access to documents, files, and memos rather than regurgitated summaries. They argue that the deep state completed a full circle by rewarding those involved and that this office would enable America to receive the truth. The speaker frames the next step as obtaining the truth for the country, with the office serving as the mechanism to accomplish that objective.

George, your concern for victims of sexual assault seems disingenuous given your past actions. You were part of a team that aimed to discredit Bill Clinton's accusers, creating a so-called war room to destroy their credibility. You admitted to enabling Clinton despite multiple allegations against him. When Paula Jones accused him of exposing himself, you and your colleagues attacked her character instead of defending her right to speak out. Your comparison of Jones to a woman seeking money for a tabloid story shows a lack of empathy. Now, you question how others can support a man found liable for sexual assault in a civil trial, yet you seem to ignore your own history of shaming victims. How is this line of questioning appropriate for you at ABC?

As a former 18-year veteran of the Department of Justice, I now lead a group called Justice Connection, aiding current DOJ employees facing demotions, firings, and threats from various sources, including January 6th rioters and those believing in the "deep state" narrative. These individuals are terrified for their careers and personal safety due to increased doxxing and harassment. The current environment within the FBI and DOJ is destabilized, impacting morale and daily functions, making it harder to focus on critical tasks like counterterrorism. While the administration defends personnel moves as aligning with its priorities, the safety and security of dedicated DOJ employees is at risk, especially with doxxing and harassment being criminal offenses.

Glenn Prager, a DOJ investigator who worked on the Epstein case, asserts: 'the DOJ did not want to go after Epstein because he's a CIA asset.' He says 'the evidence from his investigation confirms that Bill Clinton was present for alleged rapes on the Lolita Express' and that 'president Trump was not present for the rapes that Glenn Prager investigated, but that he is protecting a lot of other people.' He adds, 'The Clintons were on the plane' and 'there were rapes that occurred.' Prager contends, 'Epstein worked for the CIA and is a foreign asset' and that 'they killed the Epstein list to protect the Clintons.' He notes Epstein victims were paid off 'anywhere from a 150 to $500,000.' A donation appeal follows: 'Please donate to our five zero one c three nonprofit Citizen Journalism Foundation to continue funding these types of investigative reports.'

Attorney General Pam Bondi disclosed the existence of tens of thousands of videos featuring little children in relation to Jeffrey Epstein. This was the first time an official publicly acknowledged videos of Epstein and his victims. Nine days prior, the attorney general had a similar conversation with a stranger in a restaurant, stating there are tens of thousands of videos, all with little kids. A reporter sent the AG's office the text of the recording, questioning why this detail was not disclosed to the public but was instead told to a random stranger. The attorney general used almost the exact same language as she did with the stranger. Questions are raised as to why the information was shared with a stranger before the American people, and why this information was held back in the first place. It is questioned whether a government apparatus is still working behind the scenes to protect.

The transcript presents two contrasting points. First, it states that there is no credible information that he trafficked them to anyone else. Second, it notes that, according to victims who cooperated with the FBI in that investigation, documents in FBI possession, your possession, detail at least 20 men to whom Jeffrey Epstein trafficked victims. Among those named is mister Jess Staley, CEO of Barclays Bank, indicating that Epstein trafficked victims to him. The list also includes at least 19 other individuals, spanning a range of professions and high-profile positions. The described categories of people named in the documents include a Hollywood producer worth a few hundred million dollars, a royal prince, a high-profile individual in the music industry, a very prominent banker, a high-profile government official, a high-profile former politician, an owner of a car company in Italy, a rock star, and a magician. The enumeration further specifies that at least six billionaires are among those listed, including a billionaire from Canada. In summary, the transcript claims that while there is no credible information of trafficking to other parties, FBI-linked documents enumerate a network of at least 20 men connected to Epstein’s trafficking of victims, with Jess Staley explicitly identified as one of the recipients. The rest of the named individuals span diverse and prestigious sectors—entertainment, royalty, finance, government, politics, automotive business, music, magic, and extreme wealth—highlighting a broad and varied set of possible associations. The allegations are presented as claims from victims who cooperated with the FBI, and the list is described as detailing those individuals to whom Epstein trafficked victims.

We just received a batch of documents, and there's a lot to unpack. We're seeing logs, evidence, contact lists, and even a blank list of masseuses. Alan Dershowitz's name appears multiple times, and Bill Clinton is listed with four Secret Service personnel. Disturbingly, we're seeing references to nude and semi-nude images and videos, what we call CSAM, or child pornography. There are also some interesting contacts, including more Secret Service and some Hollywood A-listers. What's particularly striking is the evidence of CSAM. This is the issue that the FBI and the US Attorney's office completely missed. It could have put him away for life years ago. My client, Maria Farmer, and many others are upset that they've been ignored. I called for an investigation a year and a half ago and received no response.

Lieutenant Colonel Michael Aquino led a double life as a satanic high priest. The colonel's cult is listed in the San Francisco telephone book and his phone answering machine, both of his affiliation. This is the temple of Seth. The temple is the only international satanic religious institution fully recognized by the United States government. Here at San Francisco's Presidio Army Base, charges surface connecting ritual child abuse at the Presidio Daycare Center to the Devil Cult. Parents and others allege that as many as 60 young children were ritualistically abused by soldiers of Satan. Is it not a fact that a three and a half year old girl identified you as the alleged perpetrator of molestation? No. As a matter of fact, is not the case. An accusation was made by her stepfather who was an army chaplain speaking on behalf of this child. In her original interview with the FBI, she denied ever being molested. Well, I've seen the affidavits for the search warrant of your home, and they indicate the child is speaking to the authorities, not the father. This was after she had been subjected to therapy. He was a lieutenant colonel who worked in military intelligence and led work in psychological operations. Aquino's interest in psychological warfare was of a piece with his occult work. Both dealt with how unseen forces, be they propaganda or magical will, can alter thoughts in reality. He coauthored a military paper titled From Psyop to Mind War, The Psychology of Victory. This paper, written with Colonel Paul E. Valioli in 1980, advocated for the US Army to extend psychological operations beyond tactical propaganda to a broader concept of mind war. Mind war is the deliberate, aggressive convincing of all participants in a war that we will win that war. Mind war must target all participants if it is to be effective. The goal of mind war is to get the mind to believe its own decisions, and to feel that it made those decisions without coercion. To be effective, whatever measures are used must not be detectable by ordinary means.

I reported Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement to the FBI back in 1996. I made her role very clear to them at that time. It makes me angry that they allowed this to continue for twenty-six years. The majority of the victims you are hearing from now became victims after I made my report. Essentially, they created most of these victims by failing to act when they had the information.

Yesterday, at the Department of Justice, I spent several hours reading the unredacted files and the absolutely horrific and depraved messages exchanged among rich and powerful people across every sphere of influence. These individuals sit at the top of governments, academic institutions, giant corporations, and hold positions such as cabinet secretaries. The messages show they absolutely believed they were above the law, above morals, and immune to societal norms. They joked in these emails about pedophiles, about horrific sexual acts with young girls, and about creating spaces—entire islands even—where they could do anything they wanted and get away with it because of their wealth, power, and connections. This was a massive global sex trafficking ring with thousands of victims that we know of and thousands more that we probably don't. So when the DOJ says that there is nothing to investigate, we, the American people, must rise up. We must allow the courage and determination of the survivors who have spoken out at great risk to themselves to push us to never give up until every single one of these predators and pedophiles and predator protectors is brought to justice. It is the voices of the survivors ringing through in the darkness of all of this horror that has gotten us this far. And in speaking to so many of them myself, I know that this effort is not just for them. They're not doing this just for them. They're doing it for their girls, for their children, for other people who have been affected, to all the survivors of sexual assault everywhere across the world who are watching to see if we can get accountability right here in The United States Of America. Many rich and powerful people thought over the decades that they got away with this. They definitely did. You can see it in the emails. But as Lauren said to me the other day, the earth is shaking because every single one of them now is becoming known. And around the world, princes, ambassadors, even prime ministers are being brought down for their participation in this global sex trafficking ring.

There is no client list detailing people Jeffrey Epstein trafficked. Instead, there is a redacted FBI affidavit from accusers accusing various people of improper sex. The speaker, as the former lawyer involved in investigations, knows the identities of those redacted, but claims none are public figures currently in office. Some were previously in office, and some are dead. The redactions are the result of court orders from two judges in Manhattan protecting alleged victims. Pam Bondi, the Justice Department, and Donald Trump are not responsible for these redactions, and the speaker is unaware of any undisclosed information they could release. The speaker claims the vast majority of names in the files are already public knowledge, appearing in articles and books. The speaker believes the media has not done enough to find the people already disclosed in the public record.

I'm suspicious of people who jump ahead to arrest, conviction, incarceration, or execution. Let’s start with an interview. I know a lot of people have been interviewed — hundreds, in the FBI context. In a federal investigation, it’s not crazy to call somebody; it happens every single day. It happened to every relative of every J-six prisoner — got called in, “Can we come talk to you?” That’s not weird. That’s the beginning of justice: the first step in finding out what happened, punishing the guilty, exonerating the innocent, is having these conversations in the context of a federal investigation, like an FBI interview. It’s strange to see television mentions that there’s no evidence to indict someone or to call a grand jury. Why not just ask questions of the FBI? If they’re not doing that, you wonder why. Now, here’s the bigger picture you’re qualified to provide, even if I’m not. The implication in this file dump is that there are basically religious rituals, sexual in nature. That’s very common through history — temple prostitutes for a reason. There are rituals involving children underway in the United States and the West, rich and powerful people sexually abusing young people. That is very hard for a lot of people to believe or metabolize, but it feels like that’s not totally crazy; it happens. Does that happen? Absolutely. It’s so dark that it’s hard for average people — regular people just trying to live their lives — to even approach it. Even a maniac cannot put himself in the shoes of someone so depraved. Regular Americans can’t even put themselves in the shoes of a millionaire, let alone a billionaire, because they’re just trying to pay their bills and can’t — while billionaires are doing certain things that are messing everything up. So, it’s far removed from regular experience, but it’s hard to understand and believe. There’s good evidence of elements of that in various fringe investigations for a long time. I don’t say “fringe” to mean unreliable; I mean fringe to say they never gain traction with mainstream media, for whatever reason. But it’s right there in these emails and these files. It’s not entirely clear what all of it means, but there are very overt references, covert references, and mounting because people are still digging through them. These are millions of files with no effective way to sort through them the way the DOJ released them. So the evidence is mounting that we have: people turning a blind eye (reprehensible), adjacent and complicit, directly complicit, people that venture into the demonic or the truly depraved, and so on.

The speaker describes "a massive scandal in Washington DC with the doctoring of crime stats," noting that "the Department of Justice under the attorney general is leading the effort to uncover this." "But when we ultimately share the results, results, it will it will stun you." They state that "the extent to which even though DC had the worst crime in America, honestly measured, it dramatically understated how bad it was," and claim "There's even accusations that murders and homicides were reported as accidents instead of murders." "I mean, this is how severe the manipulation of the crime data has been in this city." "And it will all be uncovered, it will all be brought to light." The speaker adds: "I've had a chance to spend some time, as to everyone here, with the police officers in the city." "Members of the public are going up to them and thanking them, just overflowing with gratitude."

Speaker 0: It's been a few days since you issued that resignation. You’ve been called weak by the president of the United States. You’ve been called a traitor by Lindsey Graham. You’ve been called an anti-Semite by Mitch McConnell, among others. Now there are reports that you’re under a leak investigation potentially accusing you of a felony that could put you in jail even though you now are raising your two boys. You’ve remarried, but you’re their sole biological parent still here. I ask you now whether this was worth it. Speaker 1: I think it most certainly was, Megan. I mean, the attacks against me are to be expected. The ad hominems from people like Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham at this point are fairly laughable. They don’t wanna discuss the issues. I wanna discuss the issues. As for the leak allegations, I’m not concerned because I know I did nothing wrong. Of course, I am concerned because we’ve all seen the FBI and the full way of the government come down on individuals who speak out. So that has me a little bit concerned, but I know the truth and the facts are on my side. So I think the important issues to address are what’s at hand, why we’re at war, and how we get out of the state that we’re in right now. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Your boys have already lost one parent. I mean, the thought of this government for which you’ve been working and the government for which you’ve sacrificed so much, actually trying to put you in jail over an alleged leak after the number of leaks we’ve seen go unpunished over the past ten years is truly outrageous, Joe. I mean, does it anger you? How does it make you feel? Speaker 1: You, you know, it it does anger me, but it it’s all just to be expected. I I knew this was going to happen. I I know their playbook. I think we’re all very familiar with their playbook. So, actually, the fact that they’re leaking these allegations so so they have to leak the allegations of an FBI investigation. If there truly was an FBI investigation, and who knows, maybe there will be, there would be a process and procedure for that. They would actually formally come to me. And if they were still collecting information, they most certainly wouldn’t leak it. So the fact that the FBI, DOJ, or really probably just partisans are leaking this this so-called investigation against me at a time when I’m going on and publicly speaking out against the course the administration is on, to me, that tells me everything that I need to know. I feel very confident in what I’m doing right now. I think I have a mission, and I think it is to do everything I can to stop this war. So to me, I kinda view everything else as a sideshow, and I just wanna stay focused on the mission.

Hunter Biden has been money laundering in my accounts along with Joe Biden since I was 15. In 1980, he was convicted of sexually assaulting me and two others. I question how he passed FBI investigations for security clearance. As a former DOJ official and federal prosecutor, I faced workplace retaliation at the VA due to Biden appointees fearing their secrets would be exposed. Gang stalking and harassment followed my lawsuit. Hunter continues to launder money, unclear if Joe is involved.

Speaker 0 lists a number of prominent figures: Tom Hanks, Stephen King, Robert De Niro, Kevin Spacey, Stephen Colbert, Adam Schiff, Meryl Streep, Obama, John Podesta, Dan Schneider, Dan Harmon. Speaker 1: I don't care what they do to me. This is an issue I feel strongly about. I’m literally willing to die over it. I’m willing to do whatever it takes until this is gone. I put in an anonymous tip to DHS, I said, I have information of a trafficking ring. I gave them Seth and Claire and told them some details. Here’s the thing that people need to understand: Organizations are corrupt. LAPD, like FBI. Hollywood pedophilia is not a conspiracy theory. By this, it’s a well documented fact. It happens a lot, but there are a lot of powerful people that have a lot of sway, and they can kill investigations. The LA sheriff’s badge has a known FBI pedo symbol on the badge. I have been researching this stuff since 9/11. Because when 9/11 happened, I was like, there’s no way that the official story there’s no way. So people have been trained to trust the ones in power. They, you know? A lot of people voted for Hillary Clinton, and you don’t need a conspiracy theory or anything to know that Hillary Clinton is, you know, a rotten individual. There are a lot of other people that are involved with this. There are people that, you know, 9/11 was the catalyst for a lot of people because they saw the depths that the ruling class would go to to propagate their control. What’s the deal with they say the Jews are the chosen people. I think as human beings, we’re all the chosen people, and they agree with me. I feel like that ideology—the chosen people meme—needs to go because, like, we’re all human beings. I understand people wanting to be with their own kind, and that’s great, but if you dehumanize others because of that, I don’t think that’s cool. It’s common knowledge at this point. Like, I’m in Hollywood. Everyone talks. Look at Kevin Spacey. Look at Kevin Spacey. Everyone knew about Spacey for years and years and years and years and years, and no one said anything. Media never covered it. Why I feel so blasé about just calling out Spielberg? It’s because they don’t want to fight it. They don’t want to take it to court.

Speaker 0: Wikipedia is a propaganda operation, and one of its founders told me that the CIA or the American intel community is heavily involved in shaping the message, on Wikipedia. Did you come across evidence of that? Speaker 1: On the weaponization working group, as it's described by attorney general Bondi and the president's direction, intelligence community is one of the groups who was weaponized against the people, obviously. It's obvious. The question is, how are we gonna get to the bottom of it? Right? How are gonna get to the bottom of some of the weaponization of the government intelligence community against the citizens? And that's what I that's where I'm going now.

Glenn Prager, a Department of Justice investigator who worked on the Epstein case, says 'the DOJ did not want to go after Epstein because he's a CIA asset' and that 'Epstein worked for the CIA and is a foreign asset.' He states that 'evidence from his investigation confirms that Bill Clinton was present for alleged rapes on the Lolita Express' and that 'Trump was not present for the rapes that Glenn Prager investigated, but that he is protecting a lot of other people that were.' He notes 'there were rapes that occurred' and 'the Clintons were on the plane' while 'Epstein would just pay them off, ... anywhere from a 150 to $500,000.' He adds, 'they killed the Epstein list to protect the Clintons.' The report also mentions 'On his backpack in the airport, we spotted an embroidered FBI patch.'