reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
An insider provided internal Facebook documents revealing troubling practices. Danny Ben David, a software engineer, created a feature called "deboost," which suppresses content distribution by disabling shares and notifications. He observed this deboosting on several conservative pages, including Mike Cernovich's and Steven Crowder's. Crowder expressed disappointment but noted this isn't the first time Facebook has targeted him. Additionally, a document titled "coordinated trolling" aimed to address right-wing meme culture, authored by Seiji Yamamoto and Eduardo Arino de la Rubia. Yamamoto's presentation mentioned a classifier to identify trolls, using flagged terms associated with conservative language, indicating Facebook's strategy to suppress right-leaning content.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on shadow banning, referencing a Project Veritas video where a Twitter engineer claimed that machine learning algorithms target Republicans. One participant questions the validity of this statement, emphasizing that the engineer was not officially representing Twitter and was speaking in a casual setting. The other participant asserts that the claims made by the engineer are false, stating that Twitter does not use political ideology or party affiliation in its internal processes. They maintain that the practices described do not reflect Twitter's actual operations.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
When tech CEOs like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg discuss free speech, it often appears they prioritize their own views over the broader community's. Recent changes at Meta seem to cater to conservative users, potentially alienating liberals. This trend mirrors what's happening on Musk's platform, X, which has shifted towards a right-wing stance, promoting free speech that aligns with Musk and Trump. The implications of these changes at Meta, particularly regarding misinformation on platforms like Facebook and Instagram, will be important to monitor moving forward.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
They express that recognition by Microsoft or the UN means little in the face of ongoing genocide, emphasizing that “the genocide, that's when you will have our respect” and that words from politicians or organizations do not solve the problem. Shadow banning is described as a process where big tech restricts content reach for users, aligning with policy or regularity to support the propaganda they serve. Content labeling before model training could be biased (e.g., from IDEV), leading to content being flagged and pro-Palestinian users banned. Meta later calls such issues “bugs,” but they are viewed as deliberate actions to suppress certain content. They claim Larry Ellison, owner of Oracle, is the biggest contributor to the “Friends for Idea Yeah. Charity,” with last contribution around 16,000,000. They assert that if a person who is friends with Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel owns 80% of TikTok, and Netanyahu promotes using TikTok and X to spread their narrative, it demonstrates the danger of social media in shaping global views and the propaganda machine. They accuse these entities of trying to control social media to brainwash younger generations, potentially restricting pro-Palestinian speech. Lobbying is described as highly structured, with knowledge of where to go, who to speak with, and organizations that move money to actions aligned with those goals. They urge each person to contribute their own skills toward free Palestine, noting strengths in tech, music, journalism, etc., and to create alternatives and support one another to change the dynamic. They argue that Zionists became powerful by mutual support, while others are weaker due to lack of unity, asserting that unity would strengthen their movement. Hejazi introduces himself as the founder of Upscroll. He is Palestinian, born in Jordan, currently living in Australia, with seventeen years of experience in Big Tech. The genocide’s ongoing impact changed his life, leading him to feel complicit via his work at big tech and to witness shadow banning of friends, family, and others posting about Gaza. He mentions that 60 relatives were killed in Gaza. He quit his successful professional career to build an alternative social media platform and decided to devote himself to creating Upscroll, an independent platform to counter the influence of Meta, X, and TikTok. Upscroll launched a couple of months ago and is similar to Instagram, X, and soon TikTok, with tens of thousands joining monthly. On launch, the platform saw rapid uptake: hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands as users sought an alternative to shadow bans, seeking to have their content reach others. The platform is presented as a response to the pain of posting without reach and the desire to become independent from dominant platforms.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Zuckerberg pledged to be a free speech champion, but Meta worked with the Chinese Communist Party to build censorship tools. Facebook deleted the account of a Chinese dissident living in America at Beijing's request and then lied to Congress about it. Meta executives also decided to provide the Chinese Communist Party with access to Meta user data, including that of Americans.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Gates suggests AI should censor disfavored views of vaccines. Some members of Congress have brought up media literacy, which is described as an Orwellian code word for government propaganda. Kamala Harris and Tim Walz have called for government censorship of social media, including banning political rivals. Many governments, journalists, and societal elites view censorship of social media platforms as a must-have. Meta's Mark Zuckerberg confessed to bowing down to unethical and illegal government censorship demands on COVID. Gates and his partners use their clout to control the global COVID response with little oversight. TikTok banned ads by xxxy athletics, started by the former COO of Levi's, Jennifer Se, because her company recognizes the reality of biological sex. TikTok allows ads for minors to perform irreversible surgeries and is censoring the truth about trans-identified males participating in women's sports.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Zuckerberg claims to be an old-fashioned liberal who dislikes censorship, but why doesn't Facebook take a similar stand on free speech? It seems rooted in American political tradition. Speaker 1: Zuckerberg reportedly spent $400 million in the last election, primarily supporting Democrats. This raises questions about his impartiality.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Before the 2020 election, a group involving DHS, NATO, and DNC planned a mass censorship campaign on social media with 4 Pentagon-linked institutions. They aimed to prevent questioning of mail-in ballot legitimacy. The group coerced tech companies to censor content through threats and pressure, resulting in millions of posts being banned or limited. The campaign was set up months before the election to avoid a crisis if the election results were disputed. The group's actions were based on the belief that a Biden victory would rely on mail-in ballots.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Within a week of the Hamas attack, the algorithm was altered to be more aggressive towards comments from Palestinian users on Instagram. Leaked documents revealed an order to lower the precision threshold for Palestinian authors from 40% to 25%, meaning comments only need to be 25% likely to violate guidelines to be less visible. An engineer raised concerns about this significant change for just one country, questioning if it introduced bias against Palestinians. Meta acknowledged the adjustment, citing a rise in hateful content as the reason, though some staff expressed dissatisfaction. This bias could distort the narrative, leading users to believe they are seeing the full truth while actually being exposed to a limited perspective due to silencing of certain voices.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The algorithm manipulates views and followers to control narratives, promote movements, and sway votes. It pushes certain artists, products, and influencers to influence perceptions. If your content goes against the system, keep going - real support will come.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Zuckerberg allegedly stated he was ordered by the White House to suppress discussion of vaccine injuries on Facebook and Instagram. The speaker claims to have sued the Biden administration and obtained documents showing that 37 hours after taking office, a White House group was formed to suppress dissent regarding government policy, and the speaker was their first target. Facebook was allegedly told to remove the speaker from Instagram, which they did, despite the speaker's claim that all vaccine-related posts were cited and sourced to government databases or peer-reviewed publications. According to the speaker, Facebook told the White House that the information was not misinformation, but the White House called it "malinformation"—factually true information inconvenient for the government. The speaker asserts that numerous individuals, including O.J. Botticello, Marty Makary, Dr. Oz, and Vinay Prasad, were also censored.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Silicon Valley is trying to destroy evidence of their misdeeds related to election fraud. Tech billionaires are claiming there was no fraud, despite allegedly perpetuating it. Harmeet Dillon suggests big tech companies like Google have been using algorithms for years to treat different content differently, citing leaked evidence from YouTube programmers. For example, anti-Semitic videos are treated differently than anti-Muslim videos. These companies have allegedly allowed false information regarding the 2016 election to flourish for years.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Big tech companies like Twitter and Facebook are censoring a damaging story about Joe Biden and his family reported by the New York Post. According to the speaker, these companies are blocking the president's campaign, cabinet members, and Republicans in Congress from sharing the story. The speaker claims that Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg intend to decide the election's outcome by silencing anyone or any media outlet that threatens Joe Biden. The speaker notes that executives from Facebook and Twitter recently joined the Biden transition team, including Twitter's public policy director, Carlos Manier, and former Facebook executive, Jessica Hertz. The speaker presents a photo from 2011 of President Obama dining with Silicon Valley executives, including Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg, Reed Hastings, Dick Costello, and Larry Ellison, as evidence of big tech's relationship with the left.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A Google growth strategist, Dakota Liazer, stated Google is "reorienting" its search engine to favor Kamala Harris and that Facebook is promoting content favorable towards her. Liazer admitted Google is a "very progressive company" that believes favoring one side will increase profits. He said political headlines generate clicks and ad revenue, fueled by hate. Liazer said Google ads promote pro-Kamala rhetoric, linking to legitimate news sites, making it seem like a coordinated effort by big tech to help her win. He stated tech controls media and that billionaires want Kamala as the next "CEO" (president). Liazer said Google admitted to the controversy. He said Google is willing to cause election interference by featuring fear and Kamala Harris at the top of search engines. When asked if he felt bad about Google deceiving people, Liazer said no, stating that if they didn't do it, someone else would. He believes the most fearful demographic is the most profitable, and currently, the left is more fearful.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The top financial supporter of Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign was Alphabet, the parent company of Google. According to the witness, through deceptive search methods, they potentially influenced 2.6 million votes in her favor. This raises concerns about the power of a few Silicon Valley billionaires to manipulate election outcomes without detection. The witness clarifies that the 2.6 million figure is a minimum, and the actual range could be higher depending on the aggressiveness of the techniques used. These techniques include search engine manipulation and search suggestion effects, which give Google exclusive control over influencing public opinion.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Google's influence on the 2020 election is concerning. The speaker, who supported Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, believes that private companies like Google should not have the power to undermine democracy without any restrictions. They provide an example of how Google favored Democrats in Florida by sending go vote reminders to them on election day, while conservatives received fewer reminders on Facebook. The speaker suggests that if there was a monitoring system in place, this kind of bias could be captured. They also claim that if Google's influence was factored out, Trump would have won 11 out of the 13 swing states in the 2020 election.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Meta whistleblower Sarah Wynne Williams testified before a senate panel, alleging that Meta worked with the Chinese government to censor its platforms. Williams claimed Meta provided custom censorship tools for the CCP, allowed the CCP access to user data (including that of Americans), and removed a Chinese dissident's account. She also alleged Meta's AI model LAMA was used to help DeepSeek, a Chinese AI company. Senator Hawley presented documents suggesting Facebook was willing to make Chinese user data available to the Chinese government, potentially compromising American user data. Williams stated that Meta briefed members of the CCP on artificial intelligence. She also said that when Beijing demanded Facebook delete the account of a Chinese dissident living on American soil, they did it, and then lied to congress when asked about the incident in a senate hearing. A Meta spokesperson claimed Wynn Williams' testimony was divorced from reality and riddled with false claims. The speaker questions how many Americans knew their information would eventually be weaponized against them by the CCP in this manner. The speaker then promotes Above Phone as a solution to big tech surveillance.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Zuckerberg admitted the Biden-Harris administration pressured Facebook to censor COVID-19 content and information regarding the laptop. Speaker 1 states this confirms what many already knew and praises Zuckerberg for speaking out. They highlight Kamala Harris's focus on "freedom" in her campaign, including during debates and speeches at the Democratic convention. However, Speaker 1 argues Zuckerberg's admission exposes Harris and Biden for censoring free speech through Facebook. Speaker 1 concludes that Harris's words do not align with her actions and urges people to examine her record when considering her fitness for the presidency.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm definitely not buying Mark Zuckerberg's supposed MAGA conversion. After I posted a Twitter thread linking a group he donated to with organizations that are actively sabotaging Trump's agenda, Meta ran to the New York Times to smear me. Their defense was basically, "We gave money, but don't know what they did with it." Digging deeper, I found over a dozen organizations funded by Zuckerberg that are suing Trump and organizing protests against his policies. Zuckerberg hasn't publicly stated any intention to withdraw funds from these groups. He issued a letter apologizing for their impact on the 2020 election, but provided no evidence. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative website, which previously listed thousands of grants to left-wing organizations, now only shows grants from 2024 onward, conveniently erasing the record of election interference.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Facebook and other platforms have the power to manipulate content without explanation or transparency. They can secretly ban candidates or limit their reach while boosting other content. Elon Musk believes this is done in the name of free speech and to benefit people.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A Google growth strategist, Dakota Liazer, stated Google is reorienting its search engine to favor Kamala Harris. He said Google is a progressive company that will allow a belief that one side will allow them to make more money. Political headlines generate clicks and ad revenue, fueled by hate. Liazer said Google is coordinating with the Harris campaign, assisting and promoting pro-Harris ads. He described Google ads promoting pro-Kamala rhetoric, linking to legitimate news sites, making it seem like a coordinated effort by big tech to help her win. Liazer said a handful of billionaires in tech control media, and Google and Facebook are promoting content favorable to Harris. He said Google admitted to this controversy. Political headlines generate clicks and ad revenue, fueled by hate, but if Kamala wins, there will be less to write about, generating less revenue. Liazer said he doesn't feel bad that Google is deceiving people because if they don't, someone else will. He stated the demographic that is most fearful is going to be most profitable, and right now, the left is more fearful than the right.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Meta software engineer Matthew Fowler and data scientist Michael Zourab stated that Meta investigates and censors conservative posts. According to Zourab, fact checkers at Meta are liberal-coded, and most posts labeled as false are shared by conservatives, disproportionately affecting them. He cited the Hunter Biden laptop story as an example where Meta reduced the dissemination of the post on Facebook after the FBI warned them about Russian involvement. Engineer Clayman Jayapov revealed that right-wing people on Meta are either censored or flagged as disinformation. One individual stated that Meta has the right to suppress anything, while another said that they can censor anyone because it's a private company.

The Joe Rogan Experience

Joe Rogan Experience #2255 - Mark Zuckerberg
Guests: Mark Zuckerberg
reSee.it Podcast Summary
Mark Zuckerberg discusses his recent experiences and thoughts on content moderation, censorship, and the evolution of social media platforms during a conversation with Joe Rogan. He reflects on the journey of Facebook, emphasizing its original mission to give people a voice and the challenges faced in balancing free expression with the pressures of censorship, particularly during significant events like the 2016 U.S. presidential election and the COVID-19 pandemic. Zuckerberg notes that the push for ideological censorship began around 2016, influenced by the election of Donald Trump and the fragmentation of political discourse. He admits to having deferred too much to media narratives regarding misinformation, which led to a slippery slope of content moderation that eroded trust in social media platforms. He expresses concern about the role of government in pressuring companies to censor content, particularly during the pandemic, where he felt the Biden administration pushed for the removal of legitimate discussions about vaccine side effects. The conversation shifts to the scale of moderation on platforms like Facebook, where Zuckerberg reveals that 3.2 billion people use their services daily. He acknowledges the complexity of moderating content and the challenges of ensuring accuracy while maintaining free speech. He discusses the need for improved content policies and the introduction of community notes to enhance transparency and reduce bias in fact-checking. Zuckerberg also touches on the future of technology, including augmented and virtual reality, and the potential for AI to augment human creativity and productivity. He believes that while AI may change job landscapes, it will ultimately lead to more creative opportunities rather than obsolescence. He emphasizes the importance of open-source technology and the need for a diverse range of voices in the AI space to prevent monopolization. The discussion concludes with Zuckerberg reflecting on the relationship between technology companies and the government, advocating for a supportive environment that fosters innovation while protecting free expression. He expresses optimism about the future of social media and the role of technology in enhancing communication and creativity.

Breaking Points

CNN MELTDOWN On Zuckerberg Trump Bromance
reSee.it Podcast Summary
Mark Zuckerberg announced a significant shift in Meta's speech policies, moving away from third-party fact-checkers to a Community Notes system, similar to Elon Musk's X. This change aims to simplify policies and enhance free expression, reflecting a return to the platform's original ethos. Reactions vary, with some viewing it as a "MAGA makeover" that may attract conservative users while alienating liberals. Critics like Brian Stelter argue that tech CEOs favor their own speech preferences. Lena Khan raised concerns about the power of single executives over online speech, emphasizing the need for structural changes in the economy. The discussion highlights the implications of these changes on political discourse, with Zuckerberg's approach potentially reshaping user engagement on platforms like Facebook and Threads. The broader context involves fears of using free speech as a tool for political agendas, paralleling past interventions justified under democracy promotion.

This Past Weekend

Dave Smith | This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von #555
Guests: Dave Smith
reSee.it Podcast Summary
Theo Von opens with notes about a second Nashville show on May 3, 4:00 p.m. at Bridgestone Arena, thanking fans and listing tickets for East Lansing, Victoria, College Station, Gig ’Em Belt, Oxford, Tuscaloosa, Winnipeg, and Calgary, with tickets at theo.com. The guest is comedian, podcaster, and social commentator Dave Smith, known for Part of the Problem and Legion of Skanks. They discuss a wide range of topics, including the Israel and Palestine conflict; the conversation was recorded Monday, January 13, which is why there was no ceasefire discussion. The dialogue covers politics, media, censorship, war, and philosophy through a libertarian lens. Smith describes libertarianism as the belief in self ownership, non aggression, and private property, with government whose sole role is to protect liberty. He explains that liberty includes free speech, gun rights, and property rights, and that any government activity beyond protection is tyrannical because it takes from someone to give to someone else. They explore how this view translates into views on markets, peace, and intervention. A major portion of the talk turns to TikTok, its potential ban, and why platforms matter for information flow. They discuss TikTok as a source of news for young people, the shift away from traditional outlets, and the fear that a ban would suppress alternative viewpoints, especially material critical of Israeli actions in Gaza. They reference the Anti-Defamation League and its stance on Israel, and mention Osama bin Laden’s open letter to America and the grievances cited there, including presence of US military bases in Muslim lands, US support for Israel, and exploitation of regional resources. Smith notes the claim that Bin Laden listed the occupation of sacred lands and economic grievances as motivators, while also describing the complexity of the historical context and the reaction from various audiences to reading his words. The episode delves into censorship and power, including Zuckerberg’s Rogan interview and the claim that the FBI advised Facebook about a looming Russian information dump during the 2020 election. They contrast Facebook’s approach with Twitter’s, and critique the narrative of censorship as a new phenomenon, arguing that government pressure to shape speech has long existed, yet corporate and platform power now amplifies it. They discuss the Hunter Biden laptop episode, the role of third party fact checking, and the difference between a blanket ban and a signal reduction rather than a full removal. Beyond foreign policy, the conversation touches U.S. domestic policy and history. They discuss neoconservatives’ influence, Project for a New American Century, and the 1996 “A Clean Break” memo advocating regime change in the Middle East to advance Israel’s strategic aims. They recount Wesley Clark’s testimony about the plan to take out seven countries in five years, beginning with Iraq, and reflect on how the events unfolded after 9/11. They examine the moral costs of war, veterans’ experiences, and the sense that Americans were sold a false narrative about the purposes of intervention. On economics, they critique the Federal Reserve, the gold standard, and Bretton Woods, describing how fiat money and monetary policy enable endless borrowing and inflation. They explain how the Fed’s structure concentrates profits in banks and the government can pursue expansive policy by printing money, with consequences for ordinary people. They discuss healthcare markets, pricing transparency, and libertarian proposals to reduce regulatory friction and increase real competition. The chat also covers culture and media, the rise of podcasts, the evolution of standup, and Dave’s upcoming schedule, including Skankfest in New Orleans, a stop in Bozeman, Montana, and other dates at comicdavesmith.com. They close with reflections on truth, accountability, and the value of speaking honestly while recognizing uncertainty, emphasizing the importance of listening to diverse perspectives and maintaining a commitment to liberty. If you want more, follow Dave Smith at comicdavesmith.com for tour dates and updates, and catch his continued work on Part of the Problem and other projects. The conversation demonstrates a willingness to grapple with difficult issues in a forum that prizes openness and the exploration of ideas.
View Full Interactive Feed