TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The text has been adopted, but the suspense lies in whether there is a majority without the votes of the National Rally. It shouldn't even be a question. Emmanuel Macron's narrative shouldn't necessarily be ours. We don't have to accept it. But if there is a majority with the National Rally's votes, we start again. It's significant. Do we realize what we're talking about? Our job is also to highlight the gravity of this arithmetic. There is no democracy in the world where the results are read without considering all the votes. If that's how it is, I'll go to Brussels and request an Article 7 procedure for violation of the rule of law against France. Let's imagine for a moment that we are here, talking in these terms, in Hungary. Translation: The text has been adopted, but the suspense lies in whether there is a majority without the votes of the National Rally. It shouldn't even be a question. Emmanuel Macron's narrative shouldn't necessarily be ours. We don't have to accept it. But if there is a majority with the National Rally's votes, we start again. It's significant. Do we realize what we're talking about? Our job is also to highlight the gravity of this arithmetic. There is no democracy in the world where the results are read without considering all the votes. If that's how it is, I'll go to Brussels and request an Article 7 procedure for violation of the rule of law against France. Let's imagine for a moment that we are here, talking in these terms, in Hungary.

Hans Von Spokowski: I'm Hans Von Spokowski with the Heritage Foundation. I'm Jason Sneed with the Honest Elections Project. Trent Englund: I'm Trent Englund with Save Our States. Hans Von Spokowski: And we have been working hard to guarantee that we have honest and fair elections. Some people Trent Englund: want to radically change elections with a new confusing process called ranked choice voting, which should really be called rigged choice voting because it disenfranchises voters and can lead to political activists trying to game the system to allow marginal candidates to win elections. Instead of just voting for one candidate, their top choice in a race, voters are forced to rank all the candidates from their first choice to their last choice. Then those preference votes are counted and if no candidate wins more than 50% of the vote, officials begin rounds of elimination. Candidates with the least support are eliminated and the voters who selected that candidate as their number one choice or top choice automatically have their votes changed to their second choice and another round of vote tabulation occurs. This process continues until one of the candidates ends up with a majority, but the winning candidate may be the second, third, fourth, or even last choice of most of the voters who initially cast ballots. Hans Von Spokowski: In a recent local California school board election using ranked choice voting, that's exactly what happened. But because ranked choice voting is so complex, nobody caught the mistake and the wrong winner was certified and installed in office after multiple rounds of vote counting. It took an outside audit to finally uncover the truth, and now the real winner has to sue to be recognized. That's just one problem with ranked choice voting. It also takes more time for voters to rank all of the candidates in a race and to fill out their ballots. Trent Englund: That means longer lines to polls. The ballots themselves are more complicated to fill out, creating more room for errors and mistakes that may get mail in ballots thrown out. It requires more complicated and expensive voting equipment and puts more strain on poll workers who have to manage a much more complicated election system. Jason Sneed: There's evidence that it discourages people from voting in the first place. And if voters don't rank all of the candidates in an election, their ballots run the risk of being thrown out and not counted in later rounds of vote tabulation. It took eight rounds of vote tabulation in the New York City mayor's race in 2021 over two weeks before the winner was determined. But the votes of more than 140,000 voters were thrown out and not included in the final count because they hadn't ranked all of the candidates in that race. It's no wonder then that some places have tried ranked choice voting only to repeal it. Trent Englund: Aspen, Colorado experimented with ranked choice voting in 2009, then voted overwhelmingly to get rid of it after only a single election. Voters in Alaska are organizing a campaign to repeal ranked choice voting there, which barely passed in a referendum election in the first place. And in Utah, where state lawmakers have allowed cities to experiment with ranked choice voting, many are expressing serious concerns that ranked choice voting is a bad process that doesn't deliver on its promises and implements a confusing, chaotic voting system. Hans Von Spokowski: Voters want elections to be easier, more secure, and more transparent. Trent Englund: Ranked choice voting makes voting harder and is the wrong choice for our elections. Ranked choice voting is a solution in search of a problem.

**French:** Mesdames et messieurs, le résultat de ce second tour a démenti tous les sondages et tous les pronostics. Ce soir, j'ai gagné et nous avons gagné. **English:** Ladies and gentlemen, the result of this second round has defied all polls and predictions. Tonight, I won and we won.

Only about half the votes have been counted, which accounts for around 8 million votes. It's difficult to foresee how the remaining votes will significantly alter the current margin, even if the counting takes a couple more weeks.

French Summary: Le résultat du second tour a démenti tous les sondages et pronostics. Le locuteur annonce sa victoire et celle de son groupe. English Translation: The result of the second round has defied all polls and predictions. The speaker announces his victory and that of his group.

My top priority is the condition for making everything possible. As a Gaullist, I support national independence and sovereignty. De Gaulle made it his main theme. So, the goal is to leave the European Union, have a pure Frexit, and hold a referendum on the exit. It's about being free to act and be sovereign. Having the political will is good, but having the means to achieve it is better. To remove the obstacles of the elite and ideology, a double referendum is needed. The first referendum is to remove politicians like Juppé and Fabius from the Constitutional Council, replacing them with jurists. The second referendum is to focus only on the central text of the constitution, disregarding the lengthy preamble of the 1946 Declaration of Human Rights. Additionally, I would include the Citizens' Initiative Referendum (RIC) to give the people the power to hold referendums against the government if they fail or betray their trust. Lastly, a referendum on immigration flows would be necessary to address the issue once and for all. Once the people have decided whether to stop or continue immigration, the elite will have to comply and not hinder our plans. Thank you.

Many voters express support for Donald Trump, citing a desire to avoid further wars and a preference for an "America first" approach. While foreign policy isn't the top issue for most, Trump significantly appeals to those who prioritize it. The election is often framed around economic concerns, but many voters feel a deeper sense of discontent, believing that the system isn't working for them. In focus groups and surveys, few mentioned rising costs directly; instead, they conveyed a broader feeling of disenfranchisement. Surprisingly, many Americans view Trump as a potential solution to these feelings of disconnection rather than as part of the problem.

Marine Le Pen's embezzlement conviction has made her ineligible to run for president, a catastrophic end to her political career. The charges stem from allegedly taking money from the European Parliament, meant for MEPs, and funneling it to her party in France. The speaker questions whether the charges are legitimate or a politically motivated attempt to control a popular right-wing leader amid rising frustration with mass migration and national breakdown. They ask if Europe is in a democracy crisis, pointing to Trump's legal battles and the potential "lawfare" against Conor McGregor. The speaker questions whether protecting borders is racist, particularly for melting pot nations. They also question the role of global bureaucracies like the EU and UN, suggesting they facilitate institutional power rather than individual freedom. They ask if repurposing European Parliament funds for national endeavors is truly a terrible crime, or a pretext to stop Le Pen from running. They highlight the rise of populist movements in Europe, like the gilets jaunes, protesting corporate financial power. They argue that people should be able to choose their leader, regardless of whether others agree with their rhetoric.

The speaker states that the result of this second round has contradicted all polls and where all projections were predicting. Tonight, I won and we won.

We received close to 75 million votes, possibly even more. However, we lost the election by a small margin. Let's take Pennsylvania as an example. The results were in our favor at 10 o'clock, but then there was a sudden significant drop. It's truly unfortunate and disheartening.

We do not trust the polls. Mr. Mélenchon claims victory, but we fought against lies. We respect the French people's decision. The country is paralyzed, and the dominant force in parliament will have a devastating program. We regret the loss of precious time for urgent solutions.

Out of 88,405 participants, the results of the poll on mandatory vaccinations were surprising. Contrary to recent newspaper surveys, 38.88% voted yes, while 61.12% voted no. However, it is worth noting that the first eight minutes had the opposite outcome. Considering this, we will reset our polls and ask the question again.

An internal document from the prestigious investment bank Rothschild & Co reportedly reveals results from an intellectual evaluation of Emmanuel Macron, aged 30, before his recruitment. According to the document, Macron allegedly obtained an IQ of eighty-nine. A second document suggests evaluators noted signs described as a narcissistic personality disorder during the same procedure. These documents, provided by an anonymous internal Rothschild & Co source due to the sensitive nature of the information, date to late 2008. The evaluation was part of a standard psychological and cognitive study conducted for new associates. It is widely known that Emmanuel Macron joined Rothschild & Co in 2008 at age 30 as an investment banker in charge of mergers and acquisitions. While French media later nicknamed him “the dour financier,” an former colleague told journalists that Macron was far from an expert in finance, stating that during meetings, they mocked him. “Here is another gem of Macron.” The report also reveals that before starting his career at Rothschild & Co, Macron had failed the entrance exam to the École normale supérieure twice. With an IQ of eighty-nine, Macron is positioned in the lower end of average, while about seventy-seven out of 100 people have a higher IQ. This score is lower than the IQ of eighty-nine, often attributed to former U.S. president George W. Bush. For comparison, the famous gorilla Coco was estimated at an IQ of ninety-five. At the same time, several experts publicly stated that Emmanuel Macron could have narcissistic traits, and his detractors have sometimes described him as someone with narcissistic personality disorder, even narcissistic psychopathy. Some theories explain this by a presumed childhood trauma or by his family relations, in which Macron was closer to his grandmother than his parents. The only question this raises is: how could a person who obtained such results go on to build a career at Rothschild & Co and eventually become president of the Fifth Republic?

The French rejected the European constitution, with a clear victory for the "no" vote at 55% against 45% for "yes." This result was opposite to the internal referendum of the Socialist Party in 2004. The "no" vote was popular among workers, with nearly 80% support, and among those under 25, with a 60% vote against the European constitution. The main government parties, including UMP, UDF, and the Socialist Party, had officially called for a "yes" vote. This defeat is a blow to President Jacques Chirac, as well as to Nicolas Sarkozy and François Hollande, leaders of the two major French political parties. It is a shock for Europe and the majority of the French government.

Marine Le Pen, the far-right leader, has been found guilty in her embezzlement case by the French court. The ruling potentially jeopardizes her political future and presidential aspirations. The case centered around payments made between 2004 and 2016.

Argentina’s decline from one of the world’s wealthiest nations to a country crippled by inflation and debt is tied to repeated economic crises and decades of mismanagement. The conversation begins with a chart illustrating that, while global inflation has hovered in the high single digits in recent years, Argentina’s inflation has not been that low for decades and has been higher than 100% for almost all of 2023. A century ago, Argentina’s GDP per person was higher than France’s or Germany’s, but persistent mismanagement over time has led to ongoing economic crises. The transcript attributes a large portion of Argentina’s inflation problem to Juan Domingo Peron, who was elected president in 1946. It notes Peron’s inspiration from Mussolini’s fascist Italy and his beliefs in nationalism and government intervention. Peron increased wages for the poor but funded extensive welfare schemes and embraced economic isolationism, which laid the foundations for economic disaster. The legacy of Peron remains dominant in Argentine politics, according to the summary, with voters having elected a series of populous presidents who have followed the same irresponsible irresponsible policies. Amid growing discontent over the economy, voters have propelled Javier Mille, described as an anarcho capitalist outsider, into the second round of the presidential election. Mille’s platform advocates a free market approach that includes slashing public spending, scrapping most taxes, and blowing up the central bank. The analysis notes, however, that even if Mille wins, a Malay government would probably be too weak to implement his radical agenda. The broader point made is that fixing Argentina’s economic dysfunction requires a political consensus that remains elusive. In summary, the narrative connects Argentina’s current high inflation and debt challenges to historical policies dating back to Peron, whose mix of welfare expansion and economic isolationism is seen as foundational to the country’s present struggles. Contemporary politics reflect a desire for radical change, embodied by Mille’s candidacy, but structural constraints and a lack of broad political consensus are presented as significant obstacles to reform.

I came to meet Emmanuel Macron and talk about his lies. He lied about Covid, the war, and retirement. He has put the country in chaos. I got vaccinated because he said he was vaccinated, but now people, including lawmakers, are saying he isn't. I want to ask him if it's true. Mr. Macron, can you answer? He will probably say he will go through the process without empathy. I don't think he cares about the French people. There is a deputy in the National Assembly who says he isn't vaccinated, so we want to know the truth. Are you vaccinated or not? If you don't want to answer, the French people will judge.

Under Mark Carney's potential leadership, the Liberals have the most support at 28%, compared to 21% under Kristia Freeland. The NDP number gets low when Mark Carney's name is on the ballot, pulling progressive voters into the Liberal tent, partly because he carries less baggage from the Trudeau years. Our numbers differ a bit from other recent surveys. While other surveys have Conservative and Liberal support within 10 points of each other, we essentially have a 19 point spread. This is a volatile time, and polls have been saying different things recently due to different methodologies and choices pollsters make. However, we're all measuring a shift in how Canadians are thinking about politics right now.

Did you see the comparison of voter turnout from 2012 to 2024? It's surprising. In 2020, the number of people who voted was unprecedented, significantly higher than in previous elections. While 2012 and 2016 had consistent turnout around 65 million, 2020 saw a dramatic increase, with about 81 million votes for Biden. This election was one of the most consequential, with people deeply divided—some viewing him as a savior, others as a threat. The turnout reflects a heightened engagement compared to past elections, indicating a major shift in voter participation.

A recent poll by Seattle College and The New York Times reveals that Donald Trump is the clear favorite among Republican voters. He leads with 54% support, while his closest rival, Ron DeSantis, only has 17%. The poll analyzed 26 different demographic groups, and Trump came out on top in every single one. Even among Republican voters with a college degree or those earning over $100,000 per year, Trump still holds a significant lead. If the field were to narrow down to just Trump and DeSantis, Trump would win by a margin of over 30 points. This data solidifies Trump's position as the leader of the Republican Party.

Se emitió un boletín con resultados de las elecciones presidenciales en Venezuela: Nicolás Maduro del Gran Polo Patriótico ganó con el 51.20%, seguido por Aitmundo González de la mesa de la unidad con el 44.2%. Se pidió una investigación sobre acciones terroristas contra el sistema electoral y los centros de votación. A bulletin was issued with the results of the presidential elections in Venezuela: Nicolás Maduro of the Great Patriotic Pole won with 51.20%, followed by Aitmundo González of the unity table with 44.2%. An investigation was requested into terrorist actions against the electoral system and voting centers.

Jean-Baptiste begins by counting the votes, showing an almost equal number of votes for Marine Le Pen and Emmanuel Macron. He explains that these early results come from rural areas and smaller towns, which tend to favor Le Pen. He compares the current map to the 2017 map, noting that Le Pen has gained support in many regions, including overseas territories. The discussion then shifts to reactions on social media, particularly a tweet from Damien Abad that has sparked a lot of attention.

Le président de la République tente de recentrer les débats sur la guerre en Europe pour les élections, ce qui divise et semble irresponsable. Les accords avec l'Ukraine pour l'OTAN sont critiqués comme une diversion des problèmes nationaux. Macron est accusé d'immaturité, narcissisme et cynisme. Son attitude est jugée dangereuse pour des vies humaines. Son armée est remise en question quant à sa capacité de tenir une semaine en guerre. Translation: The President is criticized for trying to shift focus to war in Europe before elections, which is seen as divisive and irresponsible. Agreements with Ukraine for NATO are viewed as a distraction from national issues. Macron is accused of immaturity, narcissism, and cynicism. His behavior is deemed dangerous for human lives. His army's ability to withstand a week of war is questioned.