reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says this is the second update and refers to a “five million dollar challenge” being overturned last summer, adding that “they said Mike was right,” framing the focus as “voting machine evidence.”
They state that, according to an article from Law and Crime “yesterday,” Dominion dropped the lawsuit against Mike Lindell and My Pillow. The speaker says this does not mean they will stop fighting voting machine companies, and that they are “all in to get ’em get rid of ’em, get to paper ballots, hand counted.” They announce that within the next half hour they will post an “eight hundred page historical drop of the voting machine evidence” on Lyndale TV, describing it as previously unseen material compiled over the last five years. They claim it will be accompanied by a press release and call it “a historical library” with “five hundred and some” articles, stating it contains “hundred percent evidence to back each thing up.” They also say it was “part of this given to the president” and that it was “re-uh, he re-truthed it.”
The speaker characterizes Dominion dropping the lawsuit as relief, saying My Pillow “never did anything,” but that when Dominion sued My Pillow for “one point three billion dollars” with employees concerned due to the CEO’s “free speech,” the situation was stressful.
They say they are appealing, noting an appeal “just went out” that will be filed “today,” referring to a Colorado case where My Pillow “won a year ago,” and describing this appeal as “the last piece of that.” They claim voting machine companies are “falling like dominoes.”
They reference Smartmatic in Minneapolis, described as “like a parked car,” and say a judge made a ruling before trial that the speaker defamed the judge. They then say that a week later, it “came out that Smartmatic is in fact committing crimes” with its voting machines against other countries, and they say more will “be coming out too.” They use an analogy comparing the situation to a case being dismissed in light of new evidence, but they say that, according to their lawyers, it does not work that way, and that judges can “sit on it” indefinitely or throw it out without a trial.
The speaker concludes by saying it is not a conspiracy that judges are corrupt, asserting instead that judges may be in fear of going against voting machines.