TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

My husband, a political prisoner, was taken by the FBI after our son reported him. He went to trial and received a seven-and-a-half-year sentence for being at the Capitol on January 6th. The government is weaponizing its power against American citizens, tearing families apart. I attend court hearings to witness the injustice and the precedents being set. They want to control us and criminalize our beliefs. We must resist and fight back. Our country is worth it. Our First Amendment rights are being taken away. My husband is serving time for exercising his right to protest. The government is using the January 6th events to target Trump and further their agenda. We stand outside the DC jail every night to support the patriots being held there.

My husband, a political prisoner, was taken in a pre-dawn raid and sentenced to seven and a half years in prison for his involvement in the events of January 6th, 2021. Our son, who had turned him in, was indoctrinated against us. The government has weaponized its power and is targeting American citizens. They are tearing families apart and labeling us as domestic terrorists. We must stay strong and vigilant. The government is criminalizing our forefathers' ideology and wants to weaken our nation. We must question their authority and obstruct their actions. Our country is worth fighting for. The mainstream media is not reporting on the trials, and the long-lasting consequences of these precedents will affect future generations. We must stand up and make our voices heard.

What has happened to Tina Peters in Colorado is outrageous, and a criminal violation of our civil rights laws. As Mesa County Clerk, Tina Peters tried to look at election irregularities in Colorado, which is her job under Colorado statute, and accessed tabulation codes in the voting machines. Instead of a warning, the Colorado Secretary of State went to the Mesa County Prosecutor, and put Tina Peters in prison for nine years with the help of a partisan hack judge. The judge admitted he imposed the severe penalty because she advanced false claims about Trump's defeat and became a celebrity among those who denied he lost the race. The acting US attorney in Colorado just filed a statement of interest in Tina Peters' habeas petition, pointing out that this is a 69 year old woman whose health is failing in state prison, and she's being punished for protected First Amendment thoughts.

Speaker 0 portrays Tina Peters as a 'gold star mother' whose son 'paid the ultimate price' in Iraq, noting she 'went and made a backup copy of the hard drive' in Colorado elections, which 'gave president Trump and his administration every shred of evidence they needed to put all these people away.' Peters, '80 years old,' was put on lunch/dish duty in a harsh Colorado prison. The speaker imagines Trump should have moved the White House to Colorado and pressed Jenna Griswold with a 'special counsel' for Colorado election fraud, arguing that 'the most powerful man in the world has zero ability because it's a state charge' and blaming 'his Jewish allies' for staging it. He says Peters will 'rot in jail' and proclaims, 'We are occupied by a foreign fucking government,' claiming Israel has 'free fucking health care' and 'free education' for settlers, while Americans suffer; 'We are an occupied nation.'

The speaker believes it is "shockingly unconstitutional" that Judge Mershant oversaw a trial given alleged illicit campaign money flowing through his family. The speaker is calling for subpoenas to be issued to Judge Mershant's daughter's company, which allegedly made over $15 million from information coming out of her father's courtroom. The speaker wants to see the company's bank records to determine where the money went, including how much went to the family before and after the "false conviction." The speaker also wants an investigation into FEC violations allegedly committed by the judge and his family. According to the speaker, America is calling for accountability in the judicial system, and Congress is the only entity that can provide it. The speaker hopes that members of Congress will issue subpoenas "ASAP."

I was part of the group arrested for the Whitmer kidnap plot, which was set up by the FBI. I was acquitted. I thought I was doing security work, but it turned out to be targeting Whitmer's cottage. I got charged for material support terrorism and felony firearm possession. The government lied about the situation. I urge people to take action to ensure real justice in the face of government overreach.

And how could it be right when she's in prison because of what she may say? You know, it just doesn't make sense that she's there. Provision five two: there's two contracts with Dominion—a state contract, and a contract each county holds with Dominion machines. The section five two talks about a project manager that should be appointed; Tina's case operated under that authority. They are the current project managers operating under precision five two of the county contract. Drinda Griswold, the attorney general's office came in and said, oh, you can't do that. They undermined Conan Hayes. That individual is not a surfer as the state portrayed him. Peter was there every step of the way; thank you again, Peter, for continuing to be in the fight.

Tina Peters wears an ankle monitor due to an alleged courtroom recording she says she didn't make, but was still found guilty. Peters' son, a Navy SEAL involved in anti-human trafficking, died in a parachuting accident, which she finds suspicious due to a double parachute failure. In 2016, Peters was diagnosed with lung cancer, which motivated her to make her life more meaningful. She attended a volunteer meeting for the GOP and realized the importance of citizen involvement in politics.

Speaker introduces Tina Peters, a gold star mother whose son died in Iraq. He says she went and got involved in our government and, upon seeing Davinian voting machines, declared it's my job to back up hard drive. She allegedly made a backup copy of the hard drive, giving President Trump and his administration every shred of evidence they needed to put all these people away. Peters spent the year on lunch duty in Colorado prisons, wearing yellow boots. The speaker blames Trump for inaction, suggesting he could move White House to Colorado and appoint a special counsel to investigate Colorado election fraud, but it's a state charge. He claims Jewish allies staged it and accuses a foreign government of buying a US social media platform to indoctrinate Americans, cites Israel's free healthcare and education, says settlers are paid to steal land, and says Tina Peters will rot in jail.

You think about Trump pardoning the January? Not so good. There were crimes that were committed. I did nine hundred days in solitary confinement, four years and six days without a trial in the DC Jail. I was never convicted. I was pardoned on 01/21/2025. I was arrested January 16. I never had a trial. Do you think that's wrong. No. That's wrong. So why was pardoning us wrong then? We had no chance in the DC Jail, in the DC court system. Is it a crime to stand up for your country against a stolen election? If you were an American, yes. Not would die. If the Democrats arrested you that you would get a fair jury trial in DC? I would certainly hope so. But but Republicans don't. Trump supporters don't. You're hoping it does not make it true. Bureaucrats, they couldn't care less about their constituency.

The Biden administration weaponized the Justice Department against me and my family for whistleblowing about gender-affirming care at Texas Children's Hospital. A Health and Human Services memo signaled that anyone interfering with such care would be targeted. I was indicted on patient privacy violations, but the DOJ was the one releasing patient initials. Facing years in prison and financial ruin, my family spent almost $2,000,000 defending me. The prosecutor even threatened my wife, who was onboarding as a federal prosecutor. I was willing to go to jail to expose the injustice. X was a lifeline, enabling me to share my story. The case was dismissed with prejudice, a victory after immense pain. Now, I seek accountability for those who abused their authority, hoping this never happens to anyone again.

We subpoenaed Mike Frontera, Dominion's lawyer, but they prevented us from accessing our witnesses. Since June, 670 bios passwords from 63 of Colorado's 64 counties have been publicly available, putting election security at risk. Jenna Griswold should be held accountable for this leak, which she knew about during my trial but failed to address. This negligence has compromised not just Colorado's elections but potentially others across the U.S. involving Dominion machines. There are serious concerns about election integrity in states like Arizona and Michigan. The situation ties back to international corruption, including connections to Venezuela and figures like Hugo Chavez.

Tina Pierce, a former clerk in Mesa County, Colorado, noticed irregularities during a municipal election. A representative for a liberal candidate knew the election results before they were finalized, and all conservative city council members were replaced by liberal candidates. Concerned, Tina requested a recount but was told by the Secretary of State to remove the QR code feature from the voting system. Suspicious of this request, Tina took a forensic image of the system. Upon examination, it was discovered that the system had been tampered with, with the hard drive reformatted and a new voting system image installed. It was also revealed that the voting system had vulnerabilities, allowing for the manipulation of election results.

The conversation centers on Tina Peters, her defense team, and alleged procedural and ethical problems surrounding her case. The speaker details his personal involvement, including paying a million dollars to Doug Richards to defend Peters. He recounts discovering misgivings about Richards’ defense plan a few days before trial and visiting Richards’ hotel room to hear his theory of the case. Richards allegedly arrived resentfully on a Zoom call with other criminal defense attorneys and proposed a strategy to put Peters on the stand, claiming that “colonelson” told her to image a hard drive. The speaker notes that colonelson was the president’s attorney, not Peters’ own attorney, and Richards supposedly argued Peters could claim it was legal advice from an attorney, although the speaker states California does not have a legal advice exception and Colorado law would render such a defense nugatory. The proposed strategy allegedly aimed to create jury sympathy for a 68-year-old grandmother rather than present substantive legal arguments or evidence of fraud. The speaker contends that Richards’ strategy would have resulted in Peters going on the stand with no other witnesses, effectively inviting jury nullification and failing to argue legitimate defenses or present critical motions. Peters reportedly fell ill during this period, and she fired Richards at the last moment, seeking proper counsel. The judge and Richards are described as part of a “railroad” process in Colorado, with Richards allegedly designing an ineffectual defense to push Peters to testify, thereby enabling possible indictments of Kurt Olson and 45. The speaker asserts that several local criminal defense attorneys on a Zoom call were horrified by Richards’ strategy and that the defense was deliberately weak. Stephanie Lambert, currently indicted in Michigan, who is in leg irons in Washington, DC, then took Peters’ case and filed motions that, in the speaker’s view, should have been filed earlier. These motions contend that Peters, as county recorder, had the right to make a backup of election data, and that the backup was a legitimate act; a friend with a cyber background and a surfer athlete allegedly participated with Peters’ permission, though the employee “Billy” later denied it. The speaker asserts Peters did nothing wrong and that the charges should have been dismissed. The speaker criticizes the legal profession more broadly, claiming mass coordination by state bar associations and “Project 65” to deprive people of Sixth Amendment rights, citing John Eastman as another example. He mentions a concerted effort to undermine the defense and hints at promises of federal judgeships in exchange for cooperation. He notes that Peters’ motions filed by Lambert should have been filed earlier and accuses Richards of crafting a strategy that would have allowed immediate indictments of Donald Trump’s legal team. The speaker references a Supreme Court filing and a constitutional crisis, stating that the Supreme Court already has “everything it needs” as of the prior night. He praises one DC judge as fair and straightforward, while his other cases are described as varied, though he intends to proceed even if it means jail time. He promises to upload a confidential brief and invites the audience to read the filing with SCOTUS, signaling ongoing legal action.

Tim Hazelow, a Republican ballot observer and Trump supporter in Island County, Washington, was convicted on trespassing and unlawful entry of an election center, a felony. The charges stem from Hazelow's refusal to wear a COVID mask while observing ballot counting in 2024, after which he was escorted out by law enforcement. The elected prosecutor, Greg Banks, known for his anti-Trump sentiments and wishing death on those not wearing masks, personally prosecuted the case after Hazelow refused to plead guilty to a misdemeanor. The speaker argues this is a political prosecution, highlighting that Banks compared Trump supporters to Nazis and wished death on people who don't wear masks. The defense was limited, as the judge deemed the prosecutor's bias and evidence of others not wearing masks irrelevant. Another Republican ballot observer, Tracy Abdul, faces similar felony charges. The speaker calls for a better defense team for Hazelow's appeal, as a felony conviction could impact his security clearance and lead to jail time.

Anne VanderSchel asserts that U.S. elections were not compromised by a glitch but were penetrated by global intelligence weapons, a system that did not begin in Colorado but in Serbia. She describes it as a CIA playground where foreign and domestic intelligence agencies perfected digital election manipulation long before Americans knew the name Smartmatic. She claims the system was handed off to Venezuelan military, weaponized through Smartmatic to flip elections, delete logs, and control entire nations, and that this foreign military infrastructure was quietly slipped into the United States, with her saying she witnessed it herself in Panama and the Darien Gap alongside Michael Young, noting the influx of Venezuelan and other foreign nationals. VanderSchel emphasizes that those responsible expected governors, secretaries of state, and corrupt supervisors of elections to cooperate, and they did—except for Mesa County, Colorado county clerk Tina Peters. She claims Peters imaged the Dominion machines before they were illegally wiped, thereby preserving the only untouched 2020 dataset in America. She notes there were 3,143 counties in the country, and Peters was the only county clerk who held that image, which VanderSchel says mirrors exactly what Serbian and Venezuelan insiders described. She asserts that once Peters exposed the election fraud and the foreign intelligence operation on American soil, those involved moved to destroy her, and that this is why she believes Peters is in a prison cell. VanderSchel characterizes Peters’ case as the single most important national security case in modern American history. She closes by stating she, Anne VanderSchel, will not back down and urges others to speak out as well. She calls for a strong public push to support President Trump’s executive order and the deployment of 500 National Guard pods in every state to reach election supervisors and precincts. She warns that if officials refuse to follow the executive order and hand-count ballots, arrests should begin.

The speaker identifies as a January 6th defendant who was held pretrial for four years. They claim the government wanted them to make a false statement about Roger Stone's involvement, and that they were offered no charges in exchange for the statement. The speaker alleges torture of pretrial American citizens and contrasts their situation with the handling of BLM and Antifa rioters, claiming those rioters received lighter sentences. They mention a $30,000,000 settlement in the Ashley Babbitt lawsuit. They state they have 5,000 pages of documentation available open source. As a result of their experience, the speaker says they lost their wife, child, house, job, and name, but anticipates being "stupid paid" by the government.

Tim Hazelow, a Republican ballot observer and Trump supporter in Island County, Washington, was convicted on trespassing and unlawful entry of an election center, a felony. The charges stem from Hazelow's refusal to wear a COVID mask while observing ballot counting in 2024, after which he was escorted out by law enforcement. The elected prosecutor, Greg Banks, known for his anti-Trump sentiments and wishing death on those not wearing masks, personally prosecuted the case after Hazelow refused to plead guilty to a misdemeanor. The speaker asserts Banks should have recused himself. During the trial, the judge disallowed key pieces of evidence, including Banks' political bias and the fact that others in the ballot counting area were unmasked but not charged. The speaker believes the felony charge is a political prosecution that could ruin Hazelow's life and is seeking a better defense team for his appeal, as well as for Tracy Abdul, another Republican ballot observer facing similar charges.

I was part of a group arrested for a plot to kidnap Governor Whitmer, but it was a setup by the FBI. I was acquitted. I thought I was doing security work, but it turned out to be about the governor's cottage. I got charged with material support terrorism for taking a video. The government lied about my involvement. I urge people to take action to ensure real justice prevails.

Forensic copy bit for bit of everything that was on the Mesa County computer. Just to clarify, there were two forensic images taken of the Mesa County Election server. One, before the software update. Another image taken after. Everything that had been on that drive before this update was gone. Looks like a cover up. Low risk of being caught. Low consequence if they are caught. The reason we know it was deliberate is because of Tina Peters. Are those files important to elections? Critical. The federal voting system standards are very clear that the election records that are required to audit a voting system include the digital records that are all the log files generated by that voting system, especially when it's a complex computer system.

I am a political prisoner of Nancy Pelosi, Merrick Garland, and Joe Biden. They lie about everything, including the president's health, the 2020 election, and COVID. We must fight back to stop their corruption and lies. If they try to send me to prison, we will continue the fight.

The speaker alleges a serious issue involving "auto pen pardons." They claim it was a "cash for clemency deal," where staffers exploited a "bogus legal system" to process pardon forms. The speaker believes these forms were then auto-penned, resulting in undeserving individuals being released, while someone profited from the scheme.

Speaker 0 accuses the Democrat Washington DC establishment and mainstream media of gaslighting Americans and lying to them. He says Christopher Wray appeared at congressional testimony claiming ignorance about undercover FBI agents, and alleges that people were left in solitary confinement in the DC Jail for eighteen months without family visits, shaves, or haircuts. He claims the FBI and others orchestrated events to paint Donald Trump as a domestic terrorist and to portray Trump supporters as wild extremists, while agents within the crowd agitated and destroyed a peaceful protest, turning it into chaos in which people felt they were fighting for their lives. Speaker 0 asserts that four unarmed Americans were killed that day: Ashley Babbitt, Roseanne Boylan, Kevin Greeson, and Benjamin Phillips, and says the FBI set up their murders with no accountability. He mentions that President Trump posted about the alleged lying to Congress and predicts an impending federal indictment for Wray, and he says “Read the messages I left you in the DC jail walls. You deserve it. Sleep well on that metal mattress.” Speaker 1 responds with “That’s right,” then asks about plans for legal action, noting a $25,000,000 lawsuit and asking whether it has been filed. Speaker 0 explains they filed a form 95, an official notice to the FBI and DOJ seeking recompense and reconciliation, stating they are coming for recompense and the American people deserve redress for families of January 6 detainees and others whose lives were affected, including people whose careers were destroyed. He says they will be filing an official federal court lawsuit that week. Speaker 0 contends the DOJ and FBI are complicit in a cover-up intended to overthrow the government and describes a plan from January 6 to create a false insurrection narrative to use a constitutional amendment to block Trump from running for president, labeling this a coup d'etat amounting to subversion of the will of the American people. He asserts due process violations by Christopher Wray, including Brady material violations (exculpatory evidence withheld), and claims such evidence was hidden from them. Speaker 1 asks how long Speaker 0 was held, and Speaker 0 states he was held for four years and one thousand four hundred sixty-seven days without a trial, noting he has no criminal record and repeatedly asking why federal agents, DHS agents, and confidential human sources were not disclosed, asserting these omissions violated the Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Amendments and amounted to cruel and unusual punishment without fair due process. He reiterates the duration: four years and 1,467 days in custody without trial.

The Biden administration weaponized the Justice Department against my family and me after I blew the whistle on gender affirming care for minors at Texas Children's Hospital. A Health and Human Services memo green-lit prosecutors to target anyone interfering with this care. The DOJ indicted me multiple times, even citing a non-existent law, for allegedly violating patient privacy, which I never did. They even threatened my wife. This ordeal cost us nearly $2 million. The charges were eventually dropped with prejudice, a huge relief, especially for our daughter. We're calling for accountability for those responsible for this abuse of power, hoping to prevent similar injustices. Without X, I never would have been able to blow the whistle. This isn't the America I recognize anymore.

A Wisconsin government employee was fired for allegedly rigging the 2020 election by printing 64,000 extra ballots in City Hall. She had ballots filled out by city employees, kicked out observers, and brought in more ballots in the middle of the night. An email from a coworker confirmed the suspicious activity. The speaker believes this fraud led to Biden winning the election unfairly. The woman's actions were deemed illegal and unconstitutional, and the speaker calls for prosecution. They express anger and frustration over the situation, calling Biden a fake president.