reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker expresses extreme shock and distress, exclaiming "Oh my god. What the fuck?" multiple times. The speaker demands someone be killed, repeating "Kill him" several times. The speaker also says "Allah" and "Delay."

Speaker 0 expresses shock and disbelief, exclaiming about "big bonuses" and questioning who was asked about something. Speaker 0 then states, "He's out there, ma'am," followed by further expressions of confusion and disbelief. Speaker 1 echoes the shock. Speaker 0 then states that "they've just killed he should killed a few people, you know."

The speaker expresses surprise and shock at something that happened. They use strong language to convey their emotions.

Following news of her death, Speaker 1 posted "Lies catch up with you. There's no way out," but claims she didn't delete it; it was a story that expired after 24 hours. She says the post was an instant reaction and she was in shock when she heard the news. She feels bad for the children, but believes suicide doesn't excuse lying. Speaker 1 feels strongly about the story. Speaker 2 says the deceased was a victim, used, abused, and destroyed by men, and couldn't survive what she lived through. Speaker 2 believes her truth about Prince Andrew is true. Speaker 2 says she had to go through it again and again. Speaker 0 adds that she had been abused when she was very young.

The speaker expresses surprise and emotion, exclaiming "Oh, wow" and "Oh my god." They question why they are feeling emotional and then remark that something doesn't look real.

The speaker expresses intense shock and anger, repeatedly asking, “The fuck is wrong with you,” and “What the fuck did you just do?” They urge, “Somebody call the ambulance,” and insist, “Somebody needs to call 911.” They state, “I can’t believe they just did that” and exclaim, “Holy shit,” wondering, “Why would you do that?” They react with disbelief, “I can’t believe I’m seeing it,” and direct someone named Jamaica to come over: “Come on, Jamaica. Come here.” The speaker describes the scene as “so fucked up,” repeating that it is “fucked up,” and concludes with the claim, “He was only helping.”

The speaker describes her husband's attempted murder as a horrible experience, and expresses distress over the silence surrounding the event. She questions why law enforcement didn't arrest the shooter before the speech. The speaker believes there is more to the story and emphasizes the need to uncover the truth.

The speakers express shock and concern as they witness a violent incident. They repeatedly mention that someone is dead and express disbelief. They mention getting "cow po" and "cow poleys" to help the injured person. The conversation ends abruptly.

The speaker expresses extreme surprise and disbelief at an unspecified event. They use strong language to convey their shock and question what is happening.

The discussion centers on serious allegations involving a programmer who accused OpenAI of stealing people’s work and not paying them. The group notes that this programmer was murdered, with several participants presenting conflicting views on his death. Speaker 1 states that it was a great tragedy and that the programmer committed suicide, expressing a strong belief that it was suicide. In contrast, Speaker 0 describes the situation as clearly a murder, citing multiple troubling details and offering their personal conclusion that the programmer was killed. There is also any emphasis on the programmer’s public exposure. Speaker 2 notes that the programmer had been named four days earlier in the New York Times lawsuit and had just done an expose for the New York Times on how copyright issues with OpenAI were involved, specifically on the twenty-sixth, highlighting timing as very odd. The conversation touches on surveillance and investigative details. Speaker 3 claims there were multiple investigations and two police reports, but asserts that only one police report has been seen, alleging that in the first report the writer changed it, and that this is the second report; they claim the only one seen is the second report. The narrative then returns to the stated belief that the programmer was murdered. Speaker 0 lists signs of foul play: a struggle, surveillance camera footage, and wires cut. They detail that the programmer had just ordered takeout, had returned from a vacation with friends on Catalina Island, and that there was no indication of suicide. They note there was no note and no observed behavior suggesting suicide, and that the programmer was found dead with blood in multiple rooms, arguing that these factors make murder seem obvious. The question of whether authorities have been consulted is raised, with Speaker 0 asking if the authorities have been talked to about it. Throughout, Speaker 1 reiterates their belief in suicide by asking, “Do you think he committed suicide? I really do,” maintaining that position even after the murder narrative is presented. Speaker 1 confirms they have not discussed the matter with the authorities.

Speaker 0 says, “They doing too much, man, and they keep pushing people. You know?” Speaker 1 erupts, “Oh, shit. What the fuck? They killed my did they fucking kill that guy? Are you fucking kidding me, dude? Not again. Are you fucking kidding me? That guy's dead. Yo. We need people on”

Speaker 0 describes a shocking event that triggered widespread crying and a feeling that lingered even 30 years later. Speaker 1 recalls a pre-event anxiety followed by a sudden calmness, then frenzy after a shot. Speaker 0 didn't hear the shot but rushed to the scene after being informed. Speaker 1 was awakened by her husband, who had been getting cereal and delivered the news with a grave expression. Speaker 0 simply stated, "it."

Speaker 1 reacted to the news by crying and expressing disbelief. They stated that it was impossible to believe and that they are still crying. They claimed that the reported cause of death, suicide, was not possible and asserted that "somebody got to" the deceased.

Two speakers discuss a report about Charlie's death. They relay the claim: They're reporting that Charlie has died, that he's dead at the age of 31, which he would have to be if that video was real. They consider implications of the video, suggesting that the age would align with the video if it were authentic. They then exchange skepticism about survival: There's no way he survived that. The only good thing is it had to have happened quickly. The first speaker concurs with uncertainty, concluding with: Right. Right. The brief exchange emphasizes belief in the reported death tied to the video's alleged authenticity and an assumption about rapid events.

The speaker is in extreme distress, alternating between shock and urgency. They immediately exclaim, “What the fuck is wrong with you? Oh my god. My Oh my god,” expressing disbelief and anger. They repeat with: “What the fuck did you just do? The fuck did you just do?” signaling they believe an action was taken by someone that is unacceptable or shocking. The speaker then directs another person named Liz to take action, saying, “Liz, somebody call the ambulance.” They repeat the urgent instruction, adding, “Somebody call the ambulance. Somebody needs to call 911,” emphasizing the need for emergency assistance. Continuing to express disbelief, the speaker says, “I can't believe they just did that. Holy shit.” They struggle with their emotions, saying, “Just can't get come on. Come on. Oh my god. Oh my god.” There is a moment of heightened attention to the scene as the speaker states, “I can't believe I'm seeing it. Can't believe I'm seeing it. Oh my god. Come on. Come on, Samantha.” They direct Samantha to come closer, insisting, “Come here. Come on. Come here. It is.” The final fragment, “It is,” remains incomplete but underscores the sense of something unfolded or observed that the speaker wants to highlight. Overall, the transcript captures a rapid sequence of shock, blame, and urgent calls for medical help, with the speaker addressing Liz and Samantha and repeatedly expressing disbelief at what they are witnessing.

"We got action. And then you done shot your own people. That's crazy. She done shot her own people." The speaker expresses disbelief and frustration that someone shot their own people. They repeat, "How you shoot your own people? That is crazy." The speaker recalls telling the person, referred to as a "dumbass girl" and "dumbass bitch," not to shoot. The speaker then observes, "Blushy leaking. That is slow. That is slow. That is slow."

The speaker expresses extreme shock and distress. They repeatedly exclaim "Oh my god" and "What the fuck?" The speaker then demands someone be killed, chanting "Kill him" multiple times.

Speaker 0 expresses extreme shock and states they have lost everything, including the moon, and now have nothing left.

Speaker 0 expresses the difficulty faced by their family of six siblings. Speaker 1 offers condolences for their loss. Speaker 0 then emphasizes the importance of their message, stating that they do not want their brother's death to be used as an excuse to harm innocent people. They criticize the government for using this situation to justify violence, claiming that it does not bring security or peace but rather more terror and death. Speaker 0 calls on the government to stop killing innocent people and find a different path towards peace and security. Speaker 1 thanks Speaker 0 and offers condolences again.

The speaker describes her husband's attempted murder as a horrible experience, and expresses distress over the silence surrounding the event. She questions why law enforcement didn't arrest the shooter before the speech. The speaker believes there is more to the story and emphasizes the need to uncover the truth.

A bystander recounts a fatal shooting and describes chaotic scene and personal distress. They report that “they just killed that lady right there in that car” and urge others to check on the people connected to the car, asking if anyone knows who the car belongs to. The speaker notes the victim was in a car with her wife, who is later described as being covered in blood and distressed. The speaker repeatedly implores others to contact the victim’s family or friends, asking if any of her Facebook contacts or relatives can be reached. The speaker emphasizes the horror of witnessing the event and mentions that “this lady got blood” and that the wife was in the car. They express fear and shock, saying they don’t want to show the incident on Facebook and describing the cold weather as a factor contributing to their trembling. The scene is described as a crime scene, with the speaker insisting that those responsible “just killed her” and noting that the body was moved away toward the end of the street. Throughout, the speaker alternates between anxiety and disbelief, stating that “they just smoked this lady” and that her wife was sitting nearby with blood on her face. They reference being in a residential area and hearing shots, then coming outside to find the aftermath. A second speaker, identified as Speaker 2, urges people to move out of the way and confirms the seriousness of the situation, repeating that the woman was killed and that brain matter or blood was present on her wife’s face. The account includes: the victim’s wife present at the scene, the shooting witnessed from within a home, gunfire and immediate aftereffects, and the body reportedly transported toward the far end of the corner. Overall, the transcript centers on a live, graphic account of a woman’s killing in a car, the impact on her wife, the immediate response (movement of the body, presence of blood), and the speaker’s attempts to notify others and cope with the shock, describing the incident as a serious crime scene and noting that it occurred in a cold, tense environment.

The speaker describes the situation as pretty traumatizing, with reacting to whatever is happening and not being able to think straight. She mentions that the other person was crying during the event, and the speaker could not help because they were pretty helpless themselves. They note that, now, the person is getting better. The experience is affecting sleep, with both of them not sleeping well, and they say they’re very trumpetized from that.

The speaker expresses shock and dismay, repeating the phrase "Oh my gosh" and "Oh my goodness." The speaker then accuses someone of doing something to a female, repeating the phrase "Look what you did to her" multiple times with increasing intensity and adding "What's the hell?"

Speaker 0 expresses shock and disbelief at something they just witnessed. Speaker 1 argues that what they saw was not a plane, but Speaker 0 disagrees. They discuss the explosion and the confusion surrounding it. Speaker 1 mentions people jumping off the building, and Speaker 0 reacts with disbelief. Speaker 1 mentions filming the incident and witnessing the second building explode. Speaker 0 reacts with shock, mentioning that the prime minister is gone.

The transcript captures a moment of intense shock and confusion. The speaker repeatedly exclaims with strong profanity, asking, “What the fuck is wrong with you? Did just do? The fuck did you just do? What the fuck? What the fuck?” and follows with multiple cries of “Oh my god” and “Holy shit,” conveying disbelief at what just happened. The speaker asks for someone to call for help, saying, “Liz, somebody call the ambulance. Somebody call the ambulance. Somebody needs to call 911.” The urgency is clear as they insist, “I can't believe they just did that. Holy shit. Holy shit.” The speaker continues to express incredulity, saying, “Just can't get come on. Come on.” There is a directive or plea directed at “Jamaica,” with the speaker saying, “Come here. Come on, Jamaica. Come here. It is.” The tone throughout emphasizes immediate distress and the need for assistance.