reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Bill Gates has filed a patent for nanotechnology that can track people and deliver vaccines. Despite initial denials, Gates recently confirmed the launch of this technology. He also mentioned plans to put vaccines in food to ensure compliance. The EU has announced a new initiative called Fast Track, which aims to roll out hundreds of new shots per year, including through stickers and food. Taking these shots will earn individuals social credits. The speaker expresses concerns about these developments, likening them to bodily violation and invasion of privacy. They also mention a controversial statement made by Dr. Fauci. The conversation touches on the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, including the polio vaccine.

They are now pushing wearables on the population. And starting with external wearables and then going into internal wearables in the future, we do know as well Gates Foundation funded what's called microneedle patch implants that install quantum dots in skin for about five years to for use as vaccine passports. Again, this is on the National Library of Medicine website. So, yeah, the plan appears to be going from external wearables, get them to wear that, and then you go into the internal wearables, these implants.

I confronted Lisa McGee from Vaxx Choice about the bio cyber interface for e-health being taught at Cambridge and other universities. I asked her to clarify its definition, location in the body, and functionality. She claimed there was no misrepresentation of Professor Akhiles' work, but I disagreed, emphasizing that it involves an injectable bio cyber interface under the skin, not a wearable device. There are honest representations of this work and misleading ones. Doctor Edward Group has shared Acuity's latest keynote and a definition of the bio cyber interface, which includes internal biosensors and wireless biomedical telemetry for e-health, enabling wireless intrabody nanocommunication. More details will follow in part 2.

We can determine if someone has been injected with something by analyzing just one drop of blood. Microchips have been found in vials, which are communicative. These microchips can be seen under a microscope, and a team that specializes in this area confirmed their presence. They were surprised by the advanced technology. Microtechnology is used in industries but not in the medical field without explicit consent. However, there is suspicion that certain elements of microtechnology have been deployed. This suggests a well-organized operation with limited knowledge among individuals. The secrecy surrounding micro technology, MAC addresses, and graphene may be explained by this organization.

Central banks are considering the introduction of central bank digital currency (CBDC), but there is little information on what it actually looks like. Some central banks have reportedly developed the final stage of CBDC, which is the size of a grain of rice and serves as a digital ID and wallet. This aligns with the trend of contactless payments using RFID technology. However, the idea of implanting microchips under the skin raises concerns about privacy and human dignity. The concept of universal basic income has gained support from billionaire elites since the technology for microchip implants became available. The COVID-19 pandemic has further facilitated the agenda for digital ID implementation.

Way back in 1778, the Continental Congress unanimously passed America's first whistleblower law, recognizing the duty to give the earliest information to congress of any misconduct by government employees. Two hundred forty six years later, whistleblowers have an incredible record of changing the course of history. The discussion centers on alleged biometric surveillance and control: “Microchips and tracking devices are embedded in the vaccine. Is this accurate?” “We have six MAC addresses that are pulsing Bluetooth signals, and all we are is surrounded by tombstones.” “These are not vaccines. These are not biological. As you go through the patent in section two one nine, it explains how they are self assembled nanoparticles, and they're fully programmable.” “From a technical perspective, if I can retrieve data, I can send data.” “DARPA calls it transhumanism.” Documents cited include FOIA-released “New World Vistas” (1994), which says: “utilizing radio frequencies in order to manipulate and control biological process on a human person” and “the ability to imprint memory sets and erase memory sets, along with causing various physiological responses.” Earlier reports allege “remotely read thoughts” and “biometric telemetry” in Vacaville Prison, and a reference to “the future is not human” by the World Economic Forum.

The mRNA vaccine genetically modifies by replacing a piece of DNA with a synthetic one, making individuals patentable. Vaccinations are being administered through nasal swabs that can target the brain. The swabs reach the cribriform plate, allowing nanoparticles to enter the brain and potentially connect to the cloud. Testing is essentially a form of vaccination and nanoparticle implantation.

Speaker 0 says it is “a literal QR code” that will be used to create a “biological vaccine passport system” in which people “won’t use your phone” to enter stores or travel. Instead, the system would use a wrist-based implant: material embedded in the body. Speaker 0 describes the technology as a “very dangerous vaccine platform” meant for wide-scale rollout. They say it was first developed and funded by Gates in 2019 through a study of “quantum dot implants,” described as “a micro needle patch array.” The patch is said to be “like a bandaid,” applied to the wrist; it “dissolves” and “installs these quantum dot materials that last for at least five years.” Speaker 0 then claims that in 2025 Gates funded another study showing how advanced the technology has become. They say the micro-needle patches can install “literal quantum dot qr codes” that can be “read with ai” using specialized cameras. They add that the decoded information could include “store batch information [and] lot number,” as well as “how many doses you receive.” Speaker 0 concludes that this system is planned for “manual wide scale deployment for another pandemic,” and that the QR-code-related system “lasts… for years, perhaps permanently.”

Speaker 0 discusses what central bank digital currency (CBDC) might look like, noting that many people won’t like its appearance. He claims several central banks have already fully developed the final stage of CBDC, which would come in stages—initially through a mobile phone, but the final stage being small, the size of a grain of rice. He says this grain of rice is the entire wallet and digital ID, serving as your wallet, passport, and key. Speaker 1 asks if that grain of rice is the entire wallet. Speaker 0 confirms: yes, it’s your digital ID and wallet. He observes that debit and credit cards have moved to RFID chips for contactless payments, conditioning people to wave instead of swiping. He suggests the next rationale is that waving is faster, but raises concerns about losing or having cards stolen, implying a broader move toward implanting a microchip under the skin. He argues this would be a step too far for many due to human dignity concerns, requiring persuasion. Speaker 0 then connects universal basic income (UBI) to this technology, noting UBI has been discussed for a century, but billionaires and the World Economic Forum only supported it in recent years. He states that since February 2015, big billionaires and the World Economic Forum have endorsed UBI. He claims Bill Gates stated in February 2017 that UBI is a good idea but too early to introduce it, and he asserts the missing element then was a digital ID. He attributes the timing to the COVID agenda, arguing the sequence was to develop the technology first, then the ID. Speaker 0 explains a supposed usual game plan: central banks create boom-bust cycles and economic crises, then present a new idea as the solution. He contends that resistance to an implant would be high, so they sought another approach. He claims there is a World Economic Forum insight that once people accept electronic implants, there is a legal angle under which those with implants could be encouraged to be viewed as enhanced and not necessarily human, while the transhumanist movement entertains the idea of humanoid robots. Speaker 1 asks about a potential consequence, and Speaker 0 reiterates the idea that once someone has a microchip implant, the next question is whether they will still have human rights. He claims the World Economic Forum has conducted surveys asking whether humanoid robots should have human rights, and that most people say yes once the implant is accepted. In summary, the speakers discuss CBDC progression to a grain-sized digital ID wallet, RFID conditioning, the push for implantable chips, UBI advocacy by elites, a COVID-era trigger, a crisis-based rollout tactic, transhumanist legal considerations, and potential human-rights implications for humanoid robots.

Speaker 0 describes a theory they’re exploring: every vaccine examined, and the patents and testimony from the Department of Energy, point to a 500,000-strong collection of bioweapons categories, including plague, HIV, anthrax. They claim all these bacteria and yeasts have been mutated and converted into a “hybrid gamma irradiated” form, advanced and radioactive, and that these are entering humanity. They say, regarding a nuclear stockpile, humanity itself becomes the host of these radioactive materials, since they are digital and can be activated to detonate a mass casualty event. Speaker 1 clarifies by restating the concern: they can create a pandemic at any moment by activating materials that have infiltrated our bodies. Speaker 0 adds that they have become involved in helping families legally; their law firm supports families because some school districts have become worse than during COVID, even though childhood vaccines are still largely recommended federally. They claim school districts and scientists are desperate to get these materials into children, with Catholic schools allegedly no longer honoring religious or medical exemptions. They describe children with severe reactions and contraindications being denied entry to schools, faced with truancy threats or expulsion. They insist there is nothing healing about these vaccines and call it an infiltration system necessary for AI to function properly. Speaker 1 mentions the U.S. allegedly cutting ties with the WHO, but says research by John Fleetwood shows the U.S. maintains relationships relating to vaccines and influenza, with substantial taxpayer funding. They assert that with a digital ID, one’s bank account can be cut off if they don’t get certain vaccines or comply to maintain the digital ID, arguing the agenda has continued and accelerated with AI. Speaker 0 adds that the WHO remains a standing organization but has been rebranded, and emphasizes that the United States is front and center in partnerships with the WHO. Speaker 1 introduces Biomems (biomedical microelectromechanical systems) as a subset of MEMS used in biomedical research and medical devices, noting that this has existed for years. They describe sensors under the skin that transmit data to pharmaceuticals or governments, not just pacemakers. They reference Albert Bourla, who stated that a pill has been designed to track compliance. Speaker 0 confirms: “They tell us what they're doing.”

The microneedles inject DNA or RNA vaccines and luciferase into the skin, allowing for bioluminescence visible with a smartphone app. This technology will create a digital ID or barcode to show vaccination status. Additionally, a hydrogel containing nanotechnology will be implanted under the skin, potentially altering the genome. This raises concerns about being branded like a product and the implications of such technology.

In 2016, Klaus Schwab mentioned that by 2026, everyone would have a digital identifier. A U.S. patent exists for technology in vaccines that can measure biometric data and transmit it to third parties. Additionally, a Microsoft patent from 2020 links biometric data transmission to cryptocurrency. The question arises: how to convince 7 billion people to accept technology that tracks their biometric data? One theory suggests creating a bioweapon to instill fear, leading to isolation and a desperate need for a vaccine that contains this technology. This raises concerns about why children, with a 99.998% chance of recovery from COVID, would receive these injections if not for reasons beyond health.

Doctors and nurses missed the chance to inform the public about computer networking in the body without consent. Medical body area networks and nano sensors are used for health monitoring. A nano cyber interface sets up networks for communication, data transfer, and surveillance in humans without consent. Sabrina Wallace shared this info in a 30-page PDF. This is biodigital enslavement and technocratic totalitarianism. Download and share the PDF.

The program presents Havana syndrome as real, linking it to a broader set of experiences that emerge after the COVID-19 vaccine rollout. It highlights alleged increases in complaints identical to Havana syndrome and presents a documentary claim that vaccines act as transmitters of signals, including a striking trailer scene where signals are shown coming from six feet underground in graves of vaccinated individuals. The narrative ties these claims to a wider fear of biometric surveillance, total control, and the potential weaponization of new technologies. Jesse Beltran, a TSCM-certified investigator and expert in anomalous frequency analysis and Havana syndrome–related phenomena for over two decades, discusses how his work has expanded from Havana syndrome to the post–COVID era. He explains that his team, using highly sensitive equipment, detects anomalous RF signals and nonlinear junction semiconductor materials in specific focal areas around the body of those who have been jabbed, including individuals who are not symptomatic. He describes two devices: an RF general frequency detector with extreme accuracy and a nonlinear junction detector, originally designed to locate airplane rust but repurposed to find circuitry or semiconductor material at minute scales. The team’s observations include positive results for semiconductor materials in those affected, sometimes leading to surgical removal of biosensors. The narrative recounts cases such as Bonnie Kellerbee, whose implants were surgically removed after examination by Beltran’s team. Kellerbee’s husband recounts years of distress, misdiagnosis as schizophrenia, and the eventual discovery of implanted biosensors. Kellerbee’s case is used to illustrate nonconsensual implantation and to raise legal questions about medical ethics and consent in the United States. The discussion cites the 2016 21st Century Cures Act, particularly section 3,024, which the speakers claim makes it legal to experiment on U.S. citizens without their consent as long as the risk remains minimal; they argue that minimal risk is defined as anything that does not occur in normal life. They note protections exist if a person is in an IRB and say data can be shielded under national security protocols, with 2024 updates extending these protections to private entities and universities. The conversation then covers the evolution of patterns observed before and after COVID. Before COVID, scanning sometimes yielded no detectable signals; after COVID, the speakers report that virtually all tested individuals show positive signals at highly specific locations, and patterns observed in prisoners and soldiers could be superimposed across the general population. They describe instances where even children tested under parental consent showed identical patterns to adults, and they discuss the possibility that signals can be present in environments outside urban centers, implying alternate exposure routes such as water or air. Beltran and his team discuss “biometric routers” and the concept that anyone vaccinated becomes a transmitter and receiver of signals. They reference a broader surveillance and control framework, including a central command platform that could monitor and direct people through AI-enabled interfaces, potentially enabling operations like locating suspects, drafting warrants, and coordinating deployments from a dashboard. They describe a system in which total surveillance and control could extend to restricting access to food, money, and services if individuals do not conform. The participants also discuss potential remedies. They mention Zeolite Z (Masterpiece) as a natural mineral product claimed to reduce symptoms by binding graphene oxide and toxic metals, with anecdotal reports of 50–70% symptom reduction among some users. They note ongoing testing to determine protocols for neutralizing or rendering inert the nanotech, acknowledging that countermeasures must adapt as technology evolves. Towards the end, the host invites viewers to share experiences and questions, and to consider the broader implications for future generations, free thought, and human rights in a world where information, memory, and even biology might be programmable. The discussion closes with an invitation to consult further research and contact the presenters for evidence-based discussions or coaching, while emphasizing the urgency of public awareness and inquiry.

Clayton (Speaker 0) introduces a claim that intelligence agencies are using nanoparticles found in vaccines as a mechanism for telepathy among themselves, tying it to Havana syndrome and COVID shot technology, and says this has been confirmed by MI6 whistleblowers. He welcomes Jesse Beltran (TSCM investigator) and Edward Zahl (producer behind Died Suddenly) who have uncovered new details. Jesse Beltran describes that worldwide he has been contacted by people with pedigree, including an MI6 asset who reached out to disclose this topic. The asset is Oxford-educated with a chemistry background, who says he was head of operations on assignments in the Middle East and Somalia. He disclosed that Havana syndrome involves a communication system used by MI6 assets and agents as a form of synthetic telepathy. This method is said to be preferred because it is discreet and plausible deniability when surveilled. If agents do not follow orders, the system allegedly becomes a torture device. The asset is currently involved in a lawsuit in the UK against MI6 to seek damages and removal from the program. Edward Zahl confirms the lawsuit and adds that the story is not limited to MI6 but involves Five Eyes nations in using this technology to influence political outcomes and individual beliefs, including the possibility of guiding people to accept particular ideologies or tasks by an external voice. Clayton frames this as a contemporary evolution of ideas from Project Artichoke, noting that the mind is the “last frontier” and that manipulation could erase memories or imprint new ones. Jesse emphasizes that the technology is not just about communication but about remotely torturing or controlling individuals, with potential to affect broad democratic processes. Edward adds context by noting that while some Havana syndrome victims report negative impacts, a UK-based asset suggested there could be some beneficial uses in certain scenarios, though most victims experience invasive and traumatic effects. The discussion broadens to a global scale across governments and private actors, with references to attempts to create unknowing assets and the ethical and security implications of mind control. They discuss mechanisms: graphene oxide and silicon-based materials in nanoparticles serve as amplifiers or miniature antennas, enabling radio-frequency and terahertz-range signaling to implanted or in-body devices. Beltran cites Dr. Robert Young’s studies showing graphene oxide and silicon derivatives in vaccines and their role as amplifiers; he mentions a related scientific article about terahertz graphene on a patch antenna for future 6G communications, illustrating how such systems could communicate with small implants. He asserts that during the pandemic, this technology allegedly disseminated widely, including into ecosystems, grasses, trees, and food, making everyone a potential node in an integrated Internet of Things and synthetic biology in human form. He notes that in tests in the UK they observed reproducible signaling in silicone indicators and that some locations’ signals could disappear when reduced, suggesting a measurable effect. They discuss how the system could be controlled from afar via satellites and cell towers, with low-power Wi-Fi signals and 6G technologies enabling deeper skin penetration. They claim that the president’s comments about 6G penetrating the skin illustrate the practical implications. Edward argues that this raises national security concerns about foreign powers or tech magnates having remote access to a person’s thoughts. Jesse recounts a personal connection to individuals experiencing these symptoms, including Aaron Alexis, who reportedly contacted him about help before the Navy Yard shooting, with the shooter having engraved “ELF” (extremely low frequency) on his rifle. The discussion returns to the risk that thoughts and inner voices could be simulated or injected, turning private cognition into observable signals. Edward concludes with a call to action on safeguarding brain sovereignty and soul, stressing that the issue surpasses borders and conflicts and demands urgent public discussion. He points listeners to DiedSuddenly.info for more information and notes that a future release will address these topics further.

We can determine if someone has been injected with something by analyzing just one drop of blood. We have found communicative microchips in these vials, with the help of CNRS. These microchips can be seen under a microscope, and a more powerful team confirmed their presence. However, officially, micro technology cannot be used in the medical field without explicit consent. We suspect that there has been a deployment of micro technology, indicating a well-organized organization with limited knowledge. This could explain why no one wants to discuss micro technology, Mac addresses, and graphene.

Hydrogels, found in COVID vaccines and the blood of both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, can be programmed, encrypted, and decrypted, acting as a brain-computer interface. According to Dr. Ana Maria Mihelcia, these hydrogels facilitate the fusion of humans and machines. Mihelcia and Clifford Karnakam found hydrogel plastics, nanotechnology signatures, silicone, and sulfur in the blood of the unvaccinated exposed to shedding. This technology hijacks methyl groups needed for detoxification. Hydrogels, including polyvinyl alcohol and polycaprolactone, are listed as stealth nanoparticles in the Moderna patent. The hydrogel encryption technology can store memories and visual information, allowing for secure financial transactions and digital IDs. MIT researchers are using this technology to fuse humans with machines. Professor Sokrat Khizroev discussed using magnetic nanoparticles for brain-machine interfaces. Mihelcia's research indicates COVID shots alter torsion fields and produce magnetism. Karen Kingston discusses self-assembly nanotechnology, spike proteins triggered by electromagnetic frequency, and quantum dots as gene-editing technology. This nanotechnology is distributed via chemtrails, food, water, medications, and vaccines. Protocols to reverse COVID shot effects are ineffective against these hydrogels, infecting billions.

Speaker 0 and others discuss a perspective that humanity is at a stage similar to the time of Noah, with Nephilim changing humanity. They claim: the only pure humans left on Earth are the unvaccinated, defined as having original God-made DNA unaltered by science. Speaker 2 describes reviewing slides and asserts that every person now has certain anomalies in the blood, which appear in everyone, including themselves, and notes that these anomalies appear when the body decomposes. They state red blood cells are affected and that the anomalies morph into other forms; the changes may occur during the discussion. Speaker 3 describes blood changes post-injection: after vaccination, there is a drastic chain of white nanoparticles entering and causing cells to lose normal round shape, becoming non-smooth and asymmetrical with lumps and protrusions. They label this as an intentional world war on human blood, citing doctors Sherry Timpany and Luke Montagner, and refer to the Nobel Supreme Court of the United States. Speaker 5 asserts that the US Supreme Court has ruled that vaccinated people worldwide are products, patented goods due to a modified DNA or RNA vaccination, making the vaccinated person transhuman and not human under human rights. They claim that there is no rights, freedoms, or religious exemptions for those vaccinated, since they are regarded as property or chattel. They state this applies worldwide and that patents are subject to US law since 2013. Speaker 6 clarifies that chimeras and humanized mice exist in labs, and that genomes are not necessarily differentiated in such models. They discuss the court ruling and explain that a synthetic genome created via mRNA can be patentable, establishing that creating a synthetic genome through genetic modification could confer intellectual property rights. Speaker 7 notes the vaccine discussion connects to the courts and asks what the ruling says; they agree that the holding is that a synthetic genome created with mRNA can be patented, and that vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) involve this concept, questioning how to separate the synthetic genome or DNA in the body from natural genome. Speaker 3 references the Fifth Column’s findings about self-assembling nanotech in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines, claiming nanotech networks in vaccines can control nanomachines, with graphene oxide as a key component. They describe graphene oxide as a power converter that can be activated by frequencies (26 GHz, aligning with 5G), powering nanotech machinery to self-assemble within the body. Speaker 8 argues vaccines are not about a virus but about inserting nanosensors and a wireless body area network (WBAN) into people, with nanosensors embedded in cartilage; claims the testing and nanosensors operate at up to 60 GHz. Speaker 9 discusses a predicted second wave not from the virus but from vaccine-induced injury, compounded by fear and new technology (5G) that could affect voltage-gated calcium channels, potentially making pathogens more permeable. Speaker 10 presents an internal Pfizer document alleging manipulation of mRNA to include a dangerous toxin identified as graphene oxide, claiming billions of nanoparticles per 30-kilogram shot, and contending that COVID-19 vaccines are a bioweapon based on deleted Wuhan databases. Speaker 11 reports aluminum levels in rain and snow samples, claiming high concentrations (13,100 micrograms per liter in rain, 61,000 in snow) and asserting that aluminum is pervasive in the environment. Speaker 12 emphasizes geoengineering as a greater immediate threat, noting heavy metal aerosols in breath and air. Overall, they converge on the central claim that the unvaccinated are the only pure humans remaining, and that vaccination alters DNA, introduces nanotech and graphene oxide, and subjects vaccinated individuals to transhuman status with restricted rights.

The speaker believes injections are attempts to install operating systems in people's bodies, referencing a statement by Moderna's chief scientist officer. This relates to the Internet of Bodies, where materials are placed in bodies to facilitate interaction with telecommunications and digital technology. The speaker compares this to tagging livestock, suggesting nanoparticles create an organic barcode within the human body. They cite a symposium called Omni War: The Battle for the Brain, which delves into the Internet of Bodies. They believe there are intentional, mysterious ingredients in food, sprays, and injections aimed at installing an operating system in the body.

All animals and humans have been implanted with Graphene Biochips for control and contact tracing. This includes connection to the Internet of humans and animals. The goal is to have complete control over the body and spirit. Despite the heavy topic, there is still hope to be found.

When Elias Brotberger goes to work, he uses a microchip in his hand for keys, ID, and wallet. The chip, like a grain of rice, allows him to access the building and buy snacks. In Sweden, microchip implants are common, similar to credit card technology. Despite concerns about loss of privacy and humanity, many see the value in having a smart device under their skin. The process is quick and painless, with estimates of 510,000 people already chipped. Human microchipping is a reality in Sweden, with potential for widespread adoption in the future.

In 2018, the CEO of Pfizer spoke at the World Economic Forum about the potential of ingestible computer chips in tablet form. These chips would signal when a drug has been digested, allowing authorities and insurance companies to monitor medication compliance. The CEO acknowledged the initial cost and emphasized the benefits of this technology. Looking back now, considering the COVID-19 pandemic and associated mandates, his remarks may not seem far-fetched.

Speaker 0: I think what a lot of people aren't really familiar with is the bioengineering aspect of this, and we only need to look to this recently published headline from the Daily Mail, which was resurfaced, declassified CIA files that revealed a chilling blueprint to manipulate Americans' minds through covert drugging with vaccines. And it's not just vaccines that was in that blueprint. It's also the food, the water supply, pretty much altering our state of mind and our biology through all of these methods. And this is going back all the way to the fifties. One can only imagine how far they've come now, but you've been digging into this, and you have a bit of an idea as to how far they've come. To us about your latest research. Speaker 1: So you're absolutely right. And this has been, you know, a slow progression. Nothing is just being, you know, introduced new. I mean, it the technology has advanced, but it's been going on for decades decades, hundreds of years. And when you think about pharmaceuticals, the the apparatus of pharmaceuticals, they are all they it is medicinal chemistry, which is synthetic materials, synthetic biology, engineered bacteria, yeasts, molds, and all of those things like you just said. We have we are being assaulted with these these materials, which are now considered devices, you know, with the manipulated EMF and frequencies. And all of those are to exactly what you just said, weaken the system. And really this pro this slow progression of a we're in the midst of a forced evolution to become providers of a synthetic material, hybrid synthetic material. So we'll continue to produce as we do because the humanity's biological systems are by design meant to thrive and recycle and and repurpose themselves, but to survive. And so we accept these synthetic materials, and we and our body slowly begin to make accommodations to those mutations, natural mutations, but also so much of these so much of the synthetic material is coded to go in and trigger a mutation or to forcibly cause a mutation. So we literally are walking around. I mean, all of us, and it goes from the tiny little mushroom that's growing in the woods to, you know, aquatic life to every single biological electrical system, the nervous system, you know, is based on frequency. It's based on electricity. And so that is that's what's being attacked is the nervous system and the immune systems of every living being. Speaker 0: Now you're talking about some very important things here, Lisa. You've sent me this article from Medium titled the synthetic nervous system, a blueprint for physical AI. And in this article, it talks about how for the past decade, AI has lived primarily in a box, but now, our, you know, our interaction with AI has been linguistic and digital. We've cracked the code apparently, completely on generative AI, unlocking the ability to, listen to this, manipulate symbols, pixels, and code at scale, but we're now entering a far more complex epoch, the era of physical AI. And they are talking about the transition from AI that thinks to AI that acts. So they're saying the intelligence behind humanoid robots. They also give, you know, autonomous systems and things of this nature. My concern is that their plan stated goal is that they want humans to integrate with AI. This is something that even Elon Musk itself has said we need to do in order to stay relevant. And your research shows that they're already in the process of doing that. Talk to us a little bit about that. Speaker 1: Yes. And probably have. We and and, you know, I think that life as we know it will fairly stay the same because what the integration is through, and you've heard of this, is the digital twin. You know, assigning each of us a representative in the AI ecosystem, ecosystem, which which is is a a digital twin. But that digital twin is able to function and, perform because it is it is based off of your data, your biological data, your, that they are going in and removing and stealing through the infiltrators and facilitators that is vaccines, bioengineered foods, bioengineered bacteria. The, you know, the pharmaceutical industry is the perfect setup, and it's only one of one setup that goes in, and now these are all synthetic material devices. They work off of Wi Fi. They're software platforms, and they are all digital. And they are being monitored by the Department of Energy, HHS, MITRE now, these private companies and private oligarch, you know, tech companies that all have access to our free our our inner, you know, biological data DNA and and everything. And so that the AI platform, in order for it to succeed and for its longevity, there has to be a cohesive connection between humanity because we are the fuel that is going to feed that AI ecosystem. And it cannot it it's not gonna be one or the other. It has to work cohesively, and and they have to be joined. And how the the joining of those literally is through an infiltration system, which is primarily vaccines and engineered pathogens.

The speaker suggests that the agenda to implement CBDCs has been delayed, but the technology has been ready since 2015. They mention that CBDCs could initially be phone-based apps, but the ultimate goal is to implant a small chip under people's skin. The speaker believes this violates human dignity. They explain that to convince people to accept this, there will be a push for universal basic income due to unemployment and crises. However, to efficiently run this system, the speaker suggests the need for a CBDC chip implant. They acknowledge that a surprising proportion of people may agree to this.

The speaker claims the biggest issue is the transhumanism agenda, naming Bill Gates, World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, and Ray Kurzweil, who 'started this in 2000 roughly '16 going public with what they wanna do.' They say 'we are going to convert God's carbon based life form humans into a silica based cyborg system' and 'they've been doing that,' urging people to take responsibility for health to become superhuman. They claim 'Right now, everybody is about 10% human and 10% machine.' They say they can show, for any person, whether 'vaxxed or unvaxxed,' 'synthetic red blood cells,' 'hydrogels,' and 'nanotechnology,' and insist 'it's everywhere'—in toothpaste, toilet paper, cereal—and that 'they're spraying nanotech and nanodust, smart dust everywhere in the sky with the chemtrails' and 'it's in the water supply.' They mention a transhumanism research team with an electron microscope, ending with 'What we have to focus on right now.'