reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The globalist neo-con elite wants BlackRock to take over Ukraine to strip its resources and subjugate it, and they want to destroy Russia. Russia has legitimate concerns about actions in Eastern Ukraine, including the building of an army to attack them and the installation of a hostile government in 2014. Trump tried to listen to Russia's concerns, but was subverted. A major Russian offensive is expected in June, which will sweep away most of Ukraine and its government in Kyiv, which only represents globalist interests. The war has become financial, and the globalists are losing. BRICS will expand with 81 new members and move to a gold-backed currency. Intervention in Western Ukraine by US and Polish forces could trigger a full-fledged war, despite Putin's restraint and desire to avoid conflict with the West. Putin repeatedly warned against advancing NATO's border and turning Ukraine into a hostile actor. Russia wanted equal rights for Russians in Eastern Ukraine and would not surrender Crimea, fearing it would become a US naval base. The US goal is regime change in Russia and its division into constituent parts for exploitation. Russia has a plan for a 31-month war if the US insists on fighting, but the US is not prepared for war and is struggling to recruit soldiers.

Last weekend, I was at a very expensive ski resort in the Alps, filled with wealthy Ukrainians spending lavishly. This is happening all over Europe. This money, I believe, should be ours—American taxpayer money. Furthermore, I know that a significant portion, up to half, of the arms we send to the Ukrainian military is being sold off, a lot of it ending up in the hands of drug cartels at our border. This is criminal. Our intelligence agencies are aware of this, and I believe they are profiting from it. Billions of dollars in aid are being stolen and sold to our enemies. This is unacceptable, and no one in America seems to know about it.

Zelensky was an actor and comedian. He was never involved in politics, never involved in governance, government, nothing. Not one of those things. In 2014, when Ukraine's government was overthrown in a coup, Zelenskyy was placed there, his only experience being playing the role on TV and in movies. Ukraine has always been known to be one of the top 10 most corrupt countries in our entire world. This war started in 2014, and although Russia made the first move, the question you guys need to start asking yourselves is, was Russia actually the aggressor? Zelenskyy has banned all opposing media. Zelenskyy has single handedly banned any oppositional party. There have been documented cases of Zelensky's military showing neo Nazi strategy called the Azov battalion. Liberals, who was laundering money with Russia and Ukraine? Hunter Biden.

The focus is on the exploitation of Ukraine's fertile land, with foreign corporations eyeing agricultural opportunities. Despite promises of a referendum on land sales, the moratorium was lifted in 2021, allowing foreign-controlled companies to buy land through loopholes. The U.S. has heavily invested in Ukraine, providing over $46 billion in military aid since early 2022. Concerns arise that once peace is established, Ukraine will face immense debt repayment demands, with current debts exceeding its GDP. The country is experiencing severe inflation and rising poverty, while many citizens are sent to the front lines, leading to significant casualties. Zelensky's actions appear to align with foreign interests, raising questions about the future of Ukrainian sovereignty and the well-being of its people.

This war should never have happened. Russia sought terms favorable to Ukraine, primarily to keep NATO out. Military contractors benefit from NATO expansion, ensuring a market for their weapons. Since March 2022, the U.S. has committed over $113 billion to Ukraine, with more requested, while the real beneficiaries are American defense manufacturers. Mitch McConnell suggested this funding is a money laundering scheme, with BlackRock owning many of these companies. Loans to Ukraine come with harsh conditions, including austerity and the sale of government assets, particularly valuable agricultural land. Despite the sacrifices of Ukrainians, 30% of this land has already been sold to companies like DuPont and Cargill, also linked to BlackRock. The rebuilding contracts for Ukraine have gone to BlackRock, revealing a strategy to maintain divisions among us while profiting from the conflict.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the Ukraine conflict as part of a broader geopolitical strategy attributed to a globalist elite. Speaker 1 contends that globalists in the White House, in Congress, and in European capitals want BlackRock to take over Ukraine to strip its resources and subjugate it to a globalist agenda, and they also aim to destroy Russia. The claim is that the war has never been about Ukraine itself, but about destroying Russia. According to Speaker 1, the people in charge failed to perform strategic analysis, underestimating Russia by treating it as if it were the post-Soviet state of 1992—weak and prostrate. The reference to John McCain’s description of Russia as “Spain with a gas station” is invoked to illustrate this hubris. The argument continues that Russians warned against NATO on their border and about the dangers of Western actions in Eastern Ukraine, but these concerns were ignored. Speaker 1 asserts that the outcome is a dangerous, ongoing war that could become regional or global, with a consequence that the White House is not fully grasping. He predicts a massive Russian offensive when ground conditions permit, foreseeing that much of what is currently identified as Ukraine—especially the Kyiv government—will be swept away. He claims the Kyiv government represents the interests of the globalist elite seeking resources to exploit, not the Ukrainian people. The discussion shifts to broader economic implications, including the potential loss of the petrodollar as Putin engages with Saudi Arabia and China. Speaker 1 frames the war as both military and financial, suggesting that BRICS could expand dramatically and move to a gold-backed currency, whether a single currency or a basket. He asserts that this shift threatens the current global financial system and that the globalists are desperate as a result. The speaker fears that once Ukraine’s fate becomes clear, there will be pressure to deploy US forces into Western Ukraine, with Polish and possibly Romanian troops, which would escalate into a full-scale war with Russia. According to Speaker 1, Putin has shown restraint and does not want a war with the West, but intervention in Western Ukraine could end in open conflict. Speaker 1 also argues that Putin has repeatedly warned against advancing the border toward Russia and transforming Ukraine into a hostile actor, framing what happens in Ukraine as an existential strategic interest to the United States. He contrasts this with a claim that Biden’s stance has prioritized regime change in Russia and the division of Russia to exploit it, while alleging that oligarchs like Kolomovsky, Soros, and others are part of this globalist project. The discussion concludes with criticisms of U.S. military recruitment practices, suggesting the Army and Marines are not prepared for such a conflict, including comments about recruitment of illegals encouraged by the administration.

The speaker discusses the war in Ukraine, claiming it benefits American defense contractors like Northrop Grumman and Lockheed through NATO expansion. They criticize the large sums of money being allocated to Ukraine, suggesting it is a money laundering scheme benefiting companies like BlackRock. The speaker highlights loan conditions imposed on Ukraine, leading to the sale of government assets to multinational corporations. They express concern over the exploitation of Ukraine's valuable agricultural land by companies like DuPont and Monsanto, ultimately controlled by BlackRock. The speaker concludes by emphasizing a strategy to keep the population divided and distracted by internal conflicts.

Corruption and big business are entwined in Ukraine's ongoing war. Russia sought terms favorable to Ukraine, primarily keeping NATO out. As Kyiv engages with BlackRock and JPMorgan for reconstruction funding, concerns arise about U.S. companies profiting from the conflict. Significant U.S. financial commitments have been made, but much of this money may benefit American defense contractors rather than Ukraine directly. The collaboration with BlackRock began amid economic isolation, attracting global businesses eager to invest. However, conditions tied to loans may impose austerity and force Ukraine to sell its assets, including valuable agricultural land. Critics argue this reflects a broader pattern of foreign domination, with the war creating profit opportunities at the expense of Ukraine's sovereignty and future.

The transcript claims Russia and Ukraine are preparing for the “end game” after what it describes as a major escalation, saying Russia has stopped negotiating while European and Western leaders are “playing with fire.” It provides context about an attack on the Sterbolesk College in which Ukraine is said to have launched multiple drone strikes that killed 21 college girls and wounded 42 people. The transcript asserts that, according to the speaker’s sources, there were “no military assets” at the college. It says Ukraine stated a drone went off course, and then argues that the targeting was intentional. It adds that Ukrainian drone operators are described as being awarded points and incentives for civilian deaths, with an “extra equipment” and “medals” system after monthly data handovers. The transcript further claims remaining Russian college professors who survived are “added to Ukraine’s kill list,” referencing the Myravaetz website. It also alleges coordination of drone targeting using satellite coordinates and says the CIA and the UK are involved in targeting and telemetry data for attacks on civilian infrastructure. On the Russian side, the transcript describes an overnight response on Kyiv, featuring, for the first time, “Orichin” missiles, and includes reactions to missiles striking nearby locations. It claims Russia warned foreign citizens to leave, calling it the “last straw,” and said it would conduct “systematic strikes” on targets across Kyiv. It quotes a Russian Ministry of Defense statement that foreign nationals and diplomatic missions should leave as soon as possible, and says the EU responded that it would not leave. The transcript includes remarks attributed to Dmitry Medvedev criticizing the EU’s decision to maintain diplomatic presence. It then claims that a larger buildup is underway and says forces and special forces from Germany, France, the UK, and the United States—including the CIA—have been building up inside Ukraine. It argues Russia might take Odessa and claims this would cut off Ukraine from the ocean, asserting that taking Odessa would effectively prevent Ukraine from remaining viable. It claims Putin has been patient and aims to prevent civilian casualties, and states that civilian casualty numbers on the Ukrainian side were “incredibly low” compared with attacks on Russian civilians. It also describes alleged pressure within Russia for a more aggressive approach, framed as coming from anger over civilian deaths. The transcript then shifts to alleged threats involving the Saint Petersburg Economic Forum (June 3–6), stating Russia is treating them seriously and expects possible attacks during the event. It asserts Russia plans to “bring pain to everyday infrastructure across Ukraine,” and, if that does not produce surrender, to encircle Kyiv again. It includes an RT-referenced claim that “annihilation” of terrorist infrastructure will begin, including in Europe. Later, it quotes an NBC interview with President Zelensky claiming soldiers are rationing ammunition and lacking weapons to advance, with territorial losses if American aid does not arrive. It then claims President Trump posted a meme about alleged waste and corruption involving Ukrainian steel shipped to Poland for export to the U.S. to avoid “Section 232” tariffs and anti-dumping duties. The transcript ends by arguing Russia was not “pushed back” at Kyiv, stating Russia “left” as part of a pullback and aims for a settlement.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify core claims, end-state, and strategic stakes across the dialogue. - Preserve unique or surprising assertions, including direct phrases where pivotal. - Exclude repetition, filler, and off-topic asides; focus on moving arguments. - Translate nothing (content is already in English); present claims as stated, with minimal interpretation. - Do not insert opinions or adjudicate truth; report claims exactly as presented. - Target a concise, coherent 388–486 word summary. Speaker 1 asserts that the globalists—described as a "globalist neocon elite" on both the Hill and in the White House, plus elites in Europe—want to see BlackRock "take over Ukraine" to strip its resources and turn it into a subjugated state for the broader agenda. They also want to see Russia destroyed, arguing the war has never been about Ukraine but about what can be done to destroy Russia. Russia is depicted as weak, with references to earlier contemptuous assessments like "Russia is Spain with a gas station." The speakers contend Moscow had legitimate concerns about Western actions in Eastern Ukraine and NATO on its border; they claim Washington ignored those concerns and installed a hostile government in Kyiv in 2014. They say President Trump attempted to listen but was surrounded by loyalists who "took an oath of obedience" but who ignored his orders. The outcome foreseen is a serious war that could become regional or global, with the claim that the globalists are losing. When the ground dries in June, a "massive Russian offensive" is anticipated, and much of what is called Ukraine would be swept away, especially the Kyiv government, which the speaker claims serves elite interests rather than the Ukrainian people. Speaker 0 pivots to the petrodollar, noting Putin’s outreach to Saudis and Xi, suggesting that moving away from the petrodollar would undermine U.S. borrowing and living beyond means. Speaker 1 reframes the war as now financial as well as military. The BRICS alliance is described as expanding—"81 additional members"—and moving to a currency backed by gold, whether a single currency or a basket. This, they argue, would undermine the dollar and signal grave trouble for global finance, driving the globalists to desperate measures. They warn that once Western Ukraine falls, there would be pressure to deploy U.S. forces into Poland and Romania, with possible Romanian participation, leading to a full-fledged war if intervention occurs. Putin is described as having exercised tremendous restraint and patience, avoiding a war with the West; he supposedly does not want conflict with the West, but if Western forces involved themselves near the Polish border or beyond, “the gloves will come off.” The dialogue also asserts Russia’s strategic calculus: Putin warned against advancing the border to Russia, sought equal rights for Russians in Eastern Ukraine, and refused to surrender Crimea, which was seen as a bulwark against a U.S. naval base. Biden’s goal is framed as regime change and dividing Russia, with oligarchs such as Koloboyski and Soros alleged to be part of this globalist project. The plan is described as a strategic defense with an economy-of-force approach pushing toward the Polish border, setting up the threat of a protracted, multi-year conflict. The United States’ military recruitment is depicted as underprepared, including Marines being encouraged to recruit illegals.

Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, is described as a “cokehead” and a manufactured political figure. He is said to have been manufactured by Igor Kolomoyski, described as a Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch who owns OnePlusOne Media in Ukraine. OnePlusOne Media is claimed to have financed and produced the TV show Servant of the People, which hired Zelensky, a well known actor with zero political experience or even political interest, to play the role of President in the show. The show ran from 2015 to 2018 and achieved huge ratings, with claims that there was disproportionate propaganda and PR for the show, some saying it was completely astroturf. Viewers who know Ukrainian and watched the show described it as mildly enjoyable but not a big deal. It is asserted that Kolomoisky created a political party called Servant of the People, mirroring the TV show, and their candidate was Zelensky. The claim is that Kolomoisky financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire. The speaker notes that not many actors are billionaires, implying Zelensky’s wealth is unusually high for an actor, and contends that Zelensky is the “finger puppet” of Kolomoisky. The narrative continues that Kolomoyski also financed Hunter Biden, to the tune of $50,000 a month plus additional benefits, in 2014, when Burisma, the Ukrainian oil and gas company, hired Hunter Biden to be on its Board of Directors at $50,000 a month. It questions who controls Burisma, asserting Kolomovsky is the same person who manufactured Zelensky as President of Ukraine. The speaker asserts that Zelensky and Hunter Biden are “spiritual cousins,” both bankrolled by the same man, Kolomovsky. It is claimed that both have serious drug addictions and both are intimately involved in Ukraine, with a contrast that Zelensky does not have a father who is President of the United States. There is a claim that the White House is freaking out over Ukraine, and that in Ukraine there are many secrets. The assertion is that “the more unsavory people in the Washington establishment” have used Ukraine as their private piggy bank, financially exploiting it and stripping it of monies and assets needed by the Ukrainian people. This is linked to Ukraine being one of the poorest countries in Europe due to corruption and Western exploitation. Hunter Biden’s $50,000 a month is highlighted, with a remark that $50,000 a year would solve the problems of four or five families in Ukraine, illustrating the disparity given Ukraine’s poverty. The laptop is invoked to mention a possible 10% kickback to the old man, Joe Biden. The speaker asserts that Kolomovsky financed Zelensky and Joe Biden, and suggests there are many others who financed Ukraine’s leaders to carry out “evil deeds,” asserting that the West is terrified the truth will come out in Ukraine.

Larry: Lavrov claimed Ukraine attempted to attack Putin’s official residence in Novgorod with around 91 long-range drones in December; allegedly all intercepted, no proof provided, no reported injuries or damage. Lavrov said retaliation is coming, targets for retaliatory strikes and timing had been set. Putin supposedly mentioned this on a call to Trump two days before the Zelensky meeting in Florida; Yuri, a Kremlin aide, said Putin was shocked and outraged, and that it would influence Washington’s approach to working with Zelensky. Russians claim Trump was relieved that no Tomahawk missiles were provided to Ukraine. No US confirmation; Trump described the meeting with Putin as very productive, and discussions included the temporary ceasefire not being an option. Budanov had suggested it wouldn’t be the first assassination attempt on Putin, but the most consequential due to timing. The question posed: who is the target—Ukraine, Zelensky, Budanov—or a Russian false flag to justify attacks and derail negotiations. Speaker 1: Timelines. The attack allegedly began the night of the 28th and continued into the 29th. The Russians say it was an attack on one of Putin’s residences, described as terrorism. Putin hasn’t lived at his residences for three years, using the Kremlin instead, but this is not the first Ukrainian attempt to target Putin; there was a proposed attack when he flew into Kursk by helicopter. Russians are upset that this attack had no military objective, only potential assassination, and they know Putin wasn’t there. The Russians view it as real and plan to respond; Lavrov indicated that negotiations would be reexamined. Budanov claims Ukrainian intelligence has targeted Putin multiple times; the attack timing coincides with Zelensky in Florida, suggesting possible rifts or risk of undermining negotiations. The possibility of Western (American or British) intelligence involvement is raised, with speculation about CIA influence or European intelligence, particularly Britain’s MI6, given its Ukrainian roots. The question remains whether the attack was staged to derail negotiations or a genuine strike. Larry: If Ukraine did this, why would they? Ukraine might want to eliminate an obstacle to peace, though that could backfire; some argue Putin is more restrained than any immediate successor. If 91 drones were launched, Western intelligence would likely be involved, possibly undermining Trump’s approach. There is a sense of mixed messages from U.S. intelligence, with individuals like Susan Miller pushing claims of Russian interference that contradict other narratives. Zelensky stated no territory would be ceded as part of negotiations; Russia’s position is that Crimea, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, Donetsk, and Luhansk must be permanently part of the Russian Federation, elections must occur in Ukraine before negotiations, NATO must be out of Ukraine, and demilitarization is non-negotiable. Russia suggests there will be no 800,000-man army; these conditions are not open for negotiation. Russia may be willing to discuss numbers of troops for Ukraine, but not to concede core territorial goals. Speaker 0: If CIA or other elements were behind this, could it be to undermine Trump or push for a peace deal by pressuring Putin? Putin showed up in uniform with the military leadership, signaling a hard stance on land/territory, stating that negotiations should proceed without ceasing. Some argue this would trigger a stronger Russian push, while others see this as undermining Trump’s efforts. Trump and Zelensky had discussed a peace plan with 90-95% agreement, with a few thorny issues, possibly territorial. Trump characterized their call as productive; Russia reportedly agreed to support Ukraine postwar with discounted energy and resources. Lavrov’s rapid response to the attack and the potential retaliation would affect ongoing negotiations, which some view as already derailed due to Ukraine’s intransigence on concessions. Speaker 1: Could European intelligence be involved? Britain’s MI6 is seen as critical; there is a suggestion that British intelligence could have acted without American consultation. This would strain relations with Trump, especially after new security strategy. The transcript also notes a broader shift in Western posture: some European leaders are pushing for stronger defense and a more independent European stance, which might influence the dynamic around negotiations and intelligence actions. Speaker 0: Zelensky’s Christmas remark, “may he perish,” followed by an attack on Putin’s residence, prompts questions about who’s pulling Zelensky’s strings. Zelensky is described as the “highest paid actor in the world” with large sums allegedly pilfered from Ukraine’s aid; Zelensky could be expendable to those steering Ukraine’s direction. The meeting in Mar-a-Lago between Zelensky, Trump, and others occurred while the Putin residence attack was underway, suggesting an attempt to undermine negotiations. Budanov’s connection to the CIA and potential independent actions by Ukrainian intelligence raise further concerns about internal Ukrainian divisions. Speaker 1: Russia’s potential retaliation could target Ukrainian intelligence assets like the SBU headquarters in Kyiv, or European assets inside Ukraine if evidence points to Western involvement. Russia’s current military actions include continuing strikes on power infrastructure, with movements in Zaporizhzhia and around Kherson, indicating an axis of attack. Independently, Russia claims significant ground progress; Ukraine counters with claims of selective advances by Russia and a favorable propaganda edge for Ukraine. The battlefield metrics show Russia increasing manpower and maintaining multiple axes of attack, with eight or more fronts, while Ukrainian recoveries of bodies show a ratio suggesting heavy Ukrainian losses. Speaker 0: The conversation ends with expectations for retaliation, possible new European involvement, and the enduring fear that negotiations remain unsettled. The next days could reveal more about who is behind the attack, how Russia responds, and whether a path to peace remains possible, given the conflicting narratives and competing strategic interests.

They believe that large sums of money are being stolen, particularly in Ukraine. The money is not being used for its intended purpose of fighting a legitimate war. There are suspicions of kickbacks and corruption. The goal seems to be to depopulate Ukraine for other purposes. Estimates suggest that hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian men have been killed or displaced, leading to a significant decrease in the population of Ukraine.

The speaker discusses the war in Ukraine and claims that Russia tried to settle on favorable terms. They argue that the expansion of NATO benefits military contractors like Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, General Dynamics Boeing, and Lockheed, who gain a captive market. The speaker criticizes the large amounts of money committed to Ukraine and suggests it is a money laundering scheme benefiting BlackRock, the owner of the military contractors. They also mention loan conditions imposed on Ukraine, including extreme austerity measures and the sale of government-owned assets to multinational corporations. The speaker highlights the sale of Ukrainian agricultural land to companies like DuPont, Cargill, and Monsanto, all owned by BlackRock. They conclude by stating that the strategy of keeping people divided allows those in power to continue their actions without consequence.

This war should never have happened. Russia sought terms favorable to Ukraine, primarily keeping NATO out. Military contractors benefit from NATO expansion, ensuring a market for their weapons. Since March 2022, the U.S. has committed over $113 billion to Ukraine, with more requested. Mitch McConnell suggested that this funding primarily supports American defense manufacturers, hinting at a money laundering scheme. Loans to Ukraine come with harsh conditions, including austerity measures and selling government assets, particularly fertile agricultural land. Major corporations, including those owned by BlackRock, are purchasing this land. Biden awarded contracts for Ukraine's reconstruction to companies like Accra. This strategy aims to keep society divided, fostering conflict among various groups while obscuring the true motives behind these actions.

One name to watch is Victoria Nuland, who has a lot at stake regarding Ukraine, which I believe is one big money laundering operation. What Elon Musk has revealed is only the outflow of dollars. The full cycle of funding—where the money goes in Europe and how it flows back into the pockets of people in the United States—has yet to be demonstrated, but I am aware of it. I believe Trump and Elon will discover that people like Victoria Nuland will feel the pain as they are at the center of this. Zelensky is an actor with a great relationship with Putin. In the coming weeks or months, we will discover things about Zelensky that will upset the American people regarding money flowing back into the US and into the pockets of people in Washington DC. It will be ugly and involve the entire establishment.

The globalists aim to have BlackRock take over Ukraine for resources, while also targeting Russia. The war is financial and military, with potential for a global conflict. Putin seeks to protect Russian interests in Ukraine, warning against hostile actions. If the US intervenes in Western Ukraine, a full-fledged war may erupt. Putin has shown restraint but has a plan for a 31-month war if needed. The US military is not prepared for conflict.

This war never should have happened. Russia tried to settle with terms beneficial to Ukraine and us, mainly keeping NATO out. Military contractors want new NATO countries because it forces them to buy weapons from specific companies like Northrop Grumman and Lockheed, creating a trapped market. We've committed billions to Ukraine, money that could have housed every homeless person in the US. Mitch McConnell admitted this money largely goes to American defense manufacturers, essentially a money laundering scheme. BlackRock owns these companies. The "loan" to Ukraine will never be repaid. The conditions include extreme austerity and the sale of government-owned assets, including its valuable agricultural land, to multinational corporations like DuPont, Cargill, and Monsanto, which are also owned by BlackRock. BlackRock even got the contract to rebuild Ukraine. They're doing this openly because they keep us divided and fighting each other.

The focus is on Ukraine's fertile land and the interests of foreign corporations. Despite a moratorium on land sales, pressure from the IMF led to its lifting in July 2021, allowing foreign-controlled companies to purchase land through local proxies. Ukrainian agricultural land is significantly cheaper than in Western Europe, attracting foreign investment. The U.S. sees Ukraine as a strategic project, controlling food security in Europe. In 2022, BlackRock proposed to assist in Ukraine's reconstruction, with costs initially estimated at $350 billion, later rising to $1 trillion. This has raised concerns about Ukraine being privatized and sold to investment funds, as BlackRock's influence grows in politics and the economy.

The transcript outlines a string of alleged connections between Jeffrey Epstein, Ukraine, and Zelensky, tied to broader themes of modeling, trafficking, and political upheaval. It states that Epstein’s newly released files reference two Kyiv-based modeling agencies described as the best in Kyiv and as providers of cheap escorts, with one contact suggesting access to around 400 girls. The files also document travel routes from New York to Kyiv, arranged apartments, extended stays, and logistics, along with real estate dealings including a 2017 discussion of a mansion purchase in Lviv and large money transfers tied to the deal. A key claim is that Epstein was prepared to take advantage of Ukraine’s upheaval. An email from 2013, before Ukraine’s CIA-facilitated government change, purportedly shows Epstein writing to the head of the Rothschild banking group that “Ukraine upheaval should provide many opportunities. Many.” The transcript claims the emails indicate Epstein worked directly with the Rothschilds on capitalizing on the chaos in Ukraine, and asserts that Rothschild-linked interests moved into Ukraine after the 2014 upheaval to acquire assets in land, energy, and infrastructure. It also mentions the transfer of major financial assets during Petro Poroshenko’s presidency, with an assertion that oligarchs “simply changed hands.” The narrative then moves to 2019, noting Poroshenko’s ouster and Zelensky’s rise. Epstein allegedly wrote to a Ukrainian-born woman urging her to study Ukrainian politics, Zelensky, corruption, and parliament, adding, “it is funny, but sophisticated corruption. Huge amounts of money will be made. I’d like to see you as a female oligarch.” The transcript claims Epstein and Zelensky had lunch together multiple times. It also asserts Zelensky was accused of being complicit in human trafficking in Ukraine, citing a redacted email that reportedly states Zelensky “allowed modeling agent Jean Luc Brunel to traffic girls out of the country.” Jean Luc Brunel is described as someone Epstein used to traffic girls; he was found dead in a prison cell in 2022 while under investigation for rape of minors, sexual exploitation, and trafficking. A further twist claims Zelensky invited performance artist Marina Abramovic, a central figure in the original Pizzagate narrative, to serve as Ukraine’s ambassador in September 2023, to help rebuild schools and support children affected by the war. Abramovic is described as Serbian, not Ukrainian, and her art is noted for themes involving ritual blood and cannibalistic imagery. The transcript suggests Abramovic’s involvement as ambassador raises questions given her association with Pizzagate figures from the Podesta emails. Overall, the content asserts that several names linked to Epstein and Pizzagate appear in connection with Zelensky and Ukraine, including claims Zelensky’s regime and associates are involved in trafficking and corruption, while noting Abramovic’s ambassadorial role and historical links to the Pizzagate narrative.

The transcript alleges that there are preparations to fly Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and much of his inner circle to Israel, where they would have immunity against extradition for criminal proceedings, and that this is what they would need after completing duties in Ukraine. The speaker asserts that Zelensky and his circle are “on … one foot right now in Ukraine and the other foot really in the door of the aircraft to fly them out.” The claim is made that people do not realize how weak and fragile the Ukrainian government is. Additionally, the speaker reports receiving information from Eastern Europe about people coming out of basements and homes in Prokhorst (Prokhorovka? Prokhorst is presented as a location), telling the Russians, “thank god. Let’s get this over with,” and expressing a wish for the war to end. The transcript notes that, according to the speaker, those in Eastern Ukraine and much of the population in the West desperately want an end to the war, and they realize it will only end with one outcome: “the elimination of Zelenskyy and his regime.” The statements imply a belief that increasing numbers of people are regretting the continuation of the conflict and favor a conclusion that involves removing Zelenskyy and his government.

BlackRock has made a deal with Zelensky to rebuild Ukraine after the war. However, it's worth noting that BlackRock is a major shareholder in arms manufacturers profiting from the war. So, while they sell weapons, they also get to rebuild the country. Hillary Clinton also mentioned economic opportunities in Iraq after the devastating war, referring to the large customer base there. It's a rather cynical perspective, considering the loss of innocent lives. The United States should view Iraq as a business opportunity, according to Clinton.

- "This is a war that should have never happened." - "The major thing they wanted was for us to keep NATO out of the Ukraine." - "March 2022, we committed a 113,000,000,000." - "it's not really going to Ukraine. It is going to American defense manufacturers. So he just admitted it's a money laundering scheme." - "And who do you think owns every one of those companies? Blackrock." - "Ukraine has to put all of its government owned assets up for sale to multinational corporations, including all of its agricultural land, the biggest single asset in Europe." - "500,000 kids almost. Ukrainian kids have died to keep that land as part of Ukraine." - "And then in December, president Biden gave out the contract to rebuild Ukraine. And who do you think got that contract? Lakhra."

Mitch McConnell was questioned about sending $113 billion to Ukraine, claiming it's really for American defense, implying a money laundering scheme. Tim Scott referred to it as a loan, but it's unlikely to be repaid. This "loan" allows for conditions that enforce austerity in Ukraine and require the sale of government assets, particularly agricultural land, to multinational corporations. Notably, 30% of this land has already been sold to companies like DuPont, Cargill, and Monsanto, all linked to BlackRock. Additionally, BlackRock received the contract to rebuild Ukraine. This strategy of division keeps the public distracted and fighting among themselves, preventing them from recognizing what's happening.

The speaker argues that the Ukraine war is a distraction from a major event four days earlier, on 02/20/2022, involving a huge financial scandal in Switzerland connected to Putin’s circle and Swiss banks. The scandal is described as Swiss secrets (Suisse Secret in French), the largest leak from a major Swiss bank, Credit Suisse, revealing details on more than 30,000 clients and over $100,000,000,000. The Suddeutsche Zeitung reported that secret data had been obtained over a year via a secure digital mailbox. The speaker notes the timing as four days before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on 02/24/2022 and claims this scandal was the trigger for the war. The speaker alleges that “every war gets organized and decided out of Switzerland,” and cites prior videos about the “beast of the Alps” and the Knights Templars. He links Putin, the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, and Zelensky to Switzerland, asserting that important decisions are made there. He claims that on 02/24/2020 there was supposed to be a live broadcast about Credit Suisse and Swiss secrets by the Germans and their Zupeitsche Zeitung and the OCCRP, but the Ukraine war started and the discussion disappeared. The transcript lists a wide array of figures connected to the Swiss secrets list: dictators, aristocrats, drug lords, mafia bosses, and Putin pals. Notable named individuals include Alyaksay Aleksin (Belarusian businessman associated with Lukashenko, sanctioned in 2021), Alexander Lukashenko, Haji Saifula Khan Bangash, a minister of finance, and numerous others described as aristocrats, oligarchs, or corrupt. The list comprises 30,000 people, with names spanning Abdelaziz Bouteflika, King Abdullah of Jordan, Queen Rania, Abdul Khalim Khadom (Syrian official and Assad loyalist), Luis Carlos de Leon (aristocrat), former Ukrainian prime minister Lazarenko, various generals and intelligence officials from Egypt, Pakistan, Armenia, and other regions, as well as figures from South Africa and Rhodesia. The speaker emphasizes that these individuals allegedly channel money through Credit Suisse, and that many are connected to Putin, Lukashenko, and allied regimes. He asserts that many of these people, and their networks, are linked to the Wagner private military company (PMC) and that the list aligns with countries where Wagner has been active. The speaker claims that the Swiss secrets scandal is tied to global money flows and sanctions evasion, noting connections to the Paradise Papers (2017), Pandora Papers, and the Panama Papers, and argues that Swiss markets help pay for Russia’s war via oil, gas, and commodity trading. He asserts that commodities like oil, gas, and wheat are central to the instability and potential financial crisis. The narrator asserts that the money moved to Switzerland by wealthy Russians, to avoid sanctions, enabled the private banking industry and that the war in Ukraine was staged to distract from the scandal and to facilitate wealth transfers to safer locations. The closing stance asserts that Switzerland is the base of all evil, the cross of the Swiss flag symbolizes a door to wealth, and that the media, global elite, and oligarchs use distraction to cover the Swiss secrets scandal and the transfer of wealth while innocent Europeans suffer from the war. The speaker concludes that the war is a distraction and thanks Switzerland for making it possible, implying a broad conspiracy about finance, war, and power.