reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Megyn Kelly discusses Donald Trump's upcoming arraignment in D.C. and expresses frustration over media coverage, suggesting that the narrative is biased against Trump. She highlights other significant news, such as Devin Archer's testimony regarding Hunter Biden's alleged corruption, which she feels is being overlooked. Andrew Klavan joins the conversation, emphasizing that Trump is leading the GOP nomination process while Biden's administration faces scrutiny over corruption allegations. Klavan argues that the Department of Justice (DOJ) appears politically motivated in its actions against Trump, particularly in timing indictments to coincide with revelations about Biden's corruption. The discussion shifts to the upcoming debate between Ron DeSantis and Gavin Newsom, seen as potential successors to Trump and Biden. Klavan notes that DeSantis has improved his campaign performance and is appealing to Republican voters, while also addressing cultural issues. He criticizes the current political leadership's age and lack of fresh ideas, suggesting a need for younger leaders who can connect with the electorate. The conversation also touches on the cultural war, with Klavan asserting that the right has been losing ground but is beginning to fight back. He mentions the importance of addressing issues affecting families and children, particularly in education. The discussion highlights the need for a cultural shift and the role of women in advocating for traditional values. Later, Kelly and Klavan discuss Archer's testimony, which implicates Biden in efforts to protect his son's business interests in Ukraine. They argue that the evidence suggests a pattern of corruption that warrants further investigation. Klavan expresses concern over the implications of ongoing legal battles for Trump and the Republican Party's electoral prospects. Alan Dershowitz joins the show to provide legal insights on Trump's indictments, arguing that the cases lack solid evidence and may be politically motivated. He emphasizes the importance of a fair trial and the potential consequences of a conviction in a politically charged environment. Dershowitz suggests that the ultimate judgment should come from voters rather than the courts. The episode concludes with a discussion on crime in Oakland, featuring Bishop Bob Jackson and Seneca Scott, who criticize the city's leadership for failing to address rising crime rates. They express concern over the impact of soft-on-crime policies and the need for effective law enforcement. The conversation highlights the disconnect between political leaders and the safety concerns of residents, calling for urgent action to restore public safety.

Tucker Carlson and Chris Moritz discuss the decline of California, highlighting the state's transformation from a prosperous region to one plagued by crime and dysfunction. Moritz attributes this decline to several factors, including the influence of criminal justice reform movements and specific legislative changes, such as the Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. Plata, which mandated prison population reductions. This led to laws like AB 109, which transferred nonviolent offenders to county jails, ultimately resulting in increased crime rates and recidivism. Moritz points to the rise of juvenile crime, with gangs recruiting children as young as ten for violent crimes, and discusses the impact of Proposition 47, which reclassified thefts under $950 as misdemeanors and decriminalized drug possession. He argues that these laws, supported by figures like Kamala Harris, have contributed to a culture of impunity for criminals and have eroded public safety. The conversation also touches on the role of the Mexican drug cartels in California's criminal landscape, with Moritz asserting that they exert significant influence over the state's criminal economy. He describes how the cartels have taken control of drug distribution and violence, leading to a situation where local gangs are forced to adapt to survive. Moritz expresses concern over the political landscape, noting that California has become a one-party state characterized by corruption and inefficiency. He criticizes the lack of accountability for politicians who enact harmful policies and suggests that the current system is unsustainable. The discussion concludes with Moritz emphasizing the need for a return to effective governance and the importance of civic responsibility in preserving civilization.

Dave Rubin announces a shift of the Friday Roundtable to Thursdays, welcoming guests John Cardillo and Spencer Claven. They discuss President Biden's apparent cognitive decline, suggesting that his inability to read a teleprompter reflects broader concerns about his leadership. Cardillo notes the Democrats' dilemma regarding Biden's replacement, while Claven emphasizes the seriousness of the situation, likening it to elder abuse. The conversation shifts to college campuses, where protests have erupted in support of Hamas, with Rubin criticizing the media's handling of anti-Semitism. They highlight the role of outside agitators and the failure of university administrations to maintain order. Cardillo expresses frustration with the NYPD's limitations under current leadership, while Claven argues that the far-left's tactics are destructive and rooted in a hatred of America and Israel. They also touch on the implications of progressive policies in cities like Los Angeles, where crime is rising amid calls to reduce prison populations. The hosts conclude that the consequences of such policies are dire, with cities like San Francisco serving as cautionary tales for the future.

Megyn Kelly discusses two significant elections in California that could signal a shift in public sentiment against rising crime and homelessness. The primary race for Los Angeles Mayor features Democratic Congresswoman Karen Bass and billionaire developer Rick Caruso, who recently switched parties. The other critical election is the recall of San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin, a progressive known for his lenient policies towards crime, which have led to increased lawlessness in the city. Guests David Sacks and Jason Calacanis, both influential figures in Silicon Valley, have been active in the effort to recall Boudin. They highlight that Boudin's election in 2019 was facilitated by low voter turnout and ranked-choice voting, and since then, his policies have resulted in chaos, with many residents feeling unsafe. Sacks notes that recent polling indicates a strong likelihood of Boudin's recall, as many San Franciscans express dissatisfaction with his approach to crime. Calacanis addresses criticisms that the recall effort is driven by wealthy Silicon Valley elites, asserting that the movement is fundamentally about local voters wanting to reclaim safety in their communities. He emphasizes that the majority of San Francisco is Democratic, and the recall is a grassroots response to Boudin's failure to enforce laws effectively. Both guests recount specific incidents that have outraged the public, particularly within the Asian American community, where violent crimes against elderly individuals have gone unpunished under Boudin's administration. They argue that the progressive agenda of decarceration, which Boudin embodies, has led to a dangerous environment, with criminals not facing appropriate consequences for their actions. The discussion also touches on broader implications for California politics, suggesting that a successful recall could indicate a shift away from extreme progressive policies towards more moderate approaches. They express hope that this could lead to a more balanced political landscape in the state. As the conversation shifts to the national context, they discuss the influence of George Soros in funding progressive district attorneys across the country, which has contributed to a nationwide trend of leniency towards crime. The guests argue that this trend has disproportionately affected marginalized communities, contradicting the intended goals of social justice. The episode concludes with a focus on the economic implications of these political shifts, particularly in light of rising crime rates and public safety concerns, which could impact voter behavior in upcoming elections.

In this episode of the All In podcast, hosts Chamath Palihapitiya, Jason Calacanis, David Sacks, and David Friedberg discuss their recent controversial episode featuring Vlad Tenev from Robinhood. Chamath expresses his dissatisfaction with the content, feeling it lacked substance and was more of a PR stunt. The group debates the role of guests on the podcast, agreeing that they should focus on discussions rather than interviews, as they are not journalists but commentators. The conversation shifts to the political climate in San Francisco, particularly focusing on District Attorney Chesa Boudin. The hosts criticize Boudin's approach to criminal justice, arguing that his policies of decarceration have led to increased crime rates and repeat offenders being released without prosecution. They highlight specific cases, including recent violent incidents involving repeat offenders, attributing these issues to Boudin's failure to hold criminals accountable. The hosts also discuss the broader implications of Boudin's policies and the rise of similar approaches in other cities, such as Los Angeles. They express concern about the growing number of authoritarian regimes globally and the decline of democracies, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to criminal justice reform that includes accountability. The episode concludes with a discussion on the future of vaccinations in the U.S., with Friedberg noting that supply is not the issue but rather the distribution and policy surrounding vaccinations. The hosts express optimism about the potential for life to return to normal as vaccination efforts ramp up, while also addressing the psychological impact of the pandemic on people's willingness to return to pre-COVID activities. They end with a light-hearted discussion about future podcast plans and the importance of maintaining their unique voice.

Bold warnings set the tone: in Washington, Tim Dylan and Saga describe a rising sense that the government has militarized the streets, with National Guard on standby and a system that claims to decide what crosses the line. They say a surveillance state is taking shape—tech monitoring, social media screening for anti‑Semitism, and a bureaucratic posture that would jail people for their thoughts. The conversation links these moves to long‑timed conspiracy theories, arguing this is the 'wet dream' Alex Jones warned about, now unfolding before the public eye. They shift to Washington, DC, crime, and policing. They recount incidents like a federal occupation of the city after January 6, discuss juvenile offenders and prosecutions, and cite Judge Janine’s decision to scale back firearm charges. They critique the Trump administration's approach as showmanship rather than execution, noting poll results showing DC residents largely oppose federal police takeover. They contrast perceived incompetence with the seriousness of crime, arguing residents want more lawful enforcement in poorer neighborhoods, even as city leaders push back against tougher policing. On drugs, homelessness, and policy, they link national trends to local conditions, arguing fentanyl, addiction, and a perceived lack of social safety nets drive crime and degrade quality of life. They advocate a shift from 'toxic empathy' to paternalism, supporting mandatory rehab or accountability measures, while acknowledging civil liberties concerns. They compare different cities, praising New York’s tougher stance and criticizing places like San Francisco. The dialogue ends by acknowledging the political backlash to these hardline tactics and the broader question of how to balance safety with rights.

On March 9, 2021, Dave Rubin discusses several pressing issues, starting with Joe Biden's apparent cognitive difficulties, highlighting his inability to remember names and locations, which he argues poses a national security risk. He criticizes mainstream media for not addressing these concerns, suggesting a reality disconnect for those only consuming traditional news sources. Rubin then critiques Don Lemon's commentary on racism within the British royal family, expressing concern over the dangerous implications of unchallenged accusations of racism. He also targets a New York Times piece on Senator Josh Hawley, arguing it unfairly relies on opinions from his past acquaintances rather than substantive evidence. Lastly, he addresses the closure of Walgreens in San Francisco due to rampant shoplifting, attributing it to lenient laws that treat theft under $950 as a misdemeanor, which he believes exacerbates crime and societal decay in progressive cities.

Megyn Kelly welcomes David Sacks, a venture capitalist and co-host of the "All In" podcast, known for his criticism of California Governor Gavin Newsom and San Francisco's District Attorney Chesa Boudin. Sacks shares his background, including his connection to Peter Thiel at Stanford and his role as CEO of PayPal. He discusses the cultural shifts at Stanford during the late 80s and early 90s, highlighting the rise of political correctness and the challenges faced by conservatives on campus. In the tech industry, Sacks notes a liberal monoculture, where expressing conservative views is rare. He recounts experiences at a party hosted by Cheryl Sandberg, where many attendees expressed their disdain for Trump, while others quietly supported him. Sacks emphasizes that Silicon Valley has become less supportive of free speech since Trump's election, with a shift towards content moderation and censorship. Sacks critiques Boudin's policies in San Francisco, which he believes have exacerbated crime and drug issues. He argues that Boudin's approach to de-prosecution and decarceration has led to a rise in crime, including fentanyl overdoses, and he expresses disbelief that Boudin was elected given his radical background. Sacks highlights the dangers of releasing repeat offenders and the lack of accountability for criminals, attributing the city's crime wave to Boudin's policies. The conversation shifts to broader issues of censorship, particularly regarding COVID-19 and vaccine discussions. Sacks argues that the suppression of dissenting voices has backfired, leading to distrust in public health messaging. He discusses the need for legislative changes to Section 230 to prevent viewpoint discrimination by tech companies. Sacks also touches on the situation in Canada, where truckers are protesting against COVID mandates, and the backlash against them from the government and media. He criticizes the hypocrisy of politicians who impose strict rules while failing to follow them themselves. The discussion concludes with Sacks addressing the importance of free speech and the need for alternative platforms to challenge the dominant narratives in mainstream media.

The Megyn Kelly Show features a discussion with Kyle Warner, a professional mountain bike racer who shares his experience with adverse side effects following his second dose of the COVID vaccine. Warner describes how he initially felt fine after his first dose but began experiencing heart palpitations and other health issues after the second dose. He ended up in the emergency room multiple times, where he was diagnosed with pericarditis and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). Warner emphasizes the lack of open discourse regarding vaccine side effects and expresses frustration with the medical community's dismissive attitude towards his symptoms. The conversation shifts to Andrew Branca, an attorney discussing the trial of former police officer Kim Potter, who fatally shot Dante Wright during a traffic stop. Branca notes that the prosecution has struggled to present a compelling case, as Potter's actions appear to be a tragic mistake rather than criminal recklessness. He highlights the testimony of other officers who supported Potter's intentions and the challenges the prosecution faces in proving criminal intent. Allie Beth Stuckey joins the show to discuss the crime wave in San Francisco, particularly in light of Mayor London Breed's recent shift in stance on law enforcement. Stuckey critiques the policies that led to increased crime rates and expresses skepticism about whether Breed's new approach will result in meaningful change. The discussion touches on broader themes of social justice and the consequences of progressive policies on public safety. The episode also addresses the controversy surrounding transgender athletes in women's sports, specifically focusing on Leah Thomas, a trans swimmer at the University of Pennsylvania. Stuckey and Kelly discuss the unfair advantages that trans women may have in competitive sports and the implications for female athletes. The show concludes with a focus on the societal impacts of pornography, as highlighted by Billie Eilish's candid remarks about her experiences with it. Eilish's comments resonate with concerns about the normalization of harmful sexual behaviors among young people. Overall, the episode covers a range of topics, including vaccine side effects, legal issues in high-profile trials, crime and law enforcement policies, gender identity in sports, and the influence of pornography on youth.