TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

He claims to have a superior plan, but he hasn't shared it yet. Despite Canada experiencing wildfires, he continues to deny the existence of climate change.

The cost of maintaining Trudeau's proposed 100,000 new hires is significant. As of 2023, Canada’s federal public service employs nearly 360,000 individuals. Over the next 20 years, sustaining this workforce will cost taxpayers close to $1 trillion. This immense figure emphasizes the unsustainable nature of the federal bureaucracy and highlights the pressing need for reform.

Canadians may feel relief with Justin Trudeau's departure, but the Liberal MPs who supported his policies remain in power. They endorsed the inflationary carbon tax, excessive spending, and housing policies that doubled home costs, while also contributing to rising crime rates. Their sudden desire for change is not due to guilt over these issues, but rather a fear of losing their positions in the upcoming election. As the country faces a housing crisis, migrant challenges, and a significant deficit, the Liberals are preoccupied with internal power struggles. A carbon tax election is needed to choose between the costly NDP-Liberal coalition and common-sense conservatives who promise to cut taxes, control spending, and restore safety. The goal is to ensure every hardworking Canadian can afford a decent life in a united Canada.

The federal government is overspending, with deficits hitting record highs due to wars, welfare, and interest on debt. Tax revenue is not keeping up with spending, leading to a ballooning national debt. Interest payments on debt are consuming a large portion of tax revenue, making the situation unsustainable. The government shows no signs of cutting spending, leading to predictions of inflation, defaults, and debt crises in the future. This financial Ponzi scheme could end in disaster if not addressed soon.

Canada's debt stems from a collusion between the government and private banks. The government borrows money from these banks and repays it with compounded interest, leading to increased taxation on Canadians to cover the growing national debt. This cycle results in inflation, as the government allows banks to create money digitally without actual reserves. Currently, banks have only $4 billion on reserve while having loaned out over $1.5 trillion. This situation raises concerns about financial freedom and the need for change. Remember, a small group of people can indeed change the world, as history has shown.

People with TDS or EDS will slander anyone, and the truth doesn't matter to them. During Obama's second term, the deficit increased by $3.5 trillion. Under Trump, the deficit increased by $7.8 trillion due to the pandemic, which cost $3.6 trillion. $1.9 trillion of that deficit came from tax cuts, which put money back into the American people's pockets. At the rate our deficit is increasing, our government and our country is on pace for economic collapse. Trump and Elon are trying to fix this. If we don't change something, the only thing our government will eventually be able to commit money to is servicing debt, meaning no federal employees are getting paid, no SNAP benefits, no food stamps, no section eight, no Social Security. Do not listen to these fearmongers.

Politicians promise more "free stuff," leading to deficit spending, where the government spends more than it earns. To cover this, the Treasury borrows money by issuing bonds, which are essentially IOUs. These Treasury bonds constitute the national debt, requiring repayment by current and future taxpayers through taxation. Therefore, issuing bonds allows the government to spend today by stealing prosperity from the future. The Treasury then conducts a bond auction involving the world's largest banks.

These are tough times for Canadians with rising costs of living. Housing prices are soaring, with 2-bedroom apartments in big cities averaging $3,000 a month. Families are struggling with increased mortgage payments and grocery bills. Justin Trudeau has been neglecting these issues, favoring corporations over working people. Our efforts led to $1 billion for affordable housing and indigenous communities, as well as a framework for single-payer pharmacare. With just 25 NDP MPs, millions will benefit from free birth control, diabetes medication, and medical devices. Imagine the possibilities with a federal NDP government.

The Federal deficit is much larger than reported due to the way Biden's team hid student loan cancellations. The deficit for the previous fiscal year was $1.7 trillion, a 20% increase from the previous year. However, the actual increase was $600 billion, making the deficit $2 trillion. This puts the US on track to be $45 trillion in debt by 2033 and $144 trillion by 2053. Debt service, recessions, and wars further contribute to the deficit. Debt service costs are rising, recessions increase spending and decrease tax revenue, and wars add to the financial burden. With additional plans for global warming funds, corporate welfare, and welcoming illegal immigrants, the Treasury will continue to be looted until there are consequences.

Justin Trudeau is facing ethics questions after a charity asked him to return his speaking fee for an event that didn't make any money. The charity wanted to raise $300,000 for new beds for a nursing home but ended up losing money. Trudeau is asked if he feels obligated to give back the $20,000 fee. He responds by saying he will work with the charity to fix the situation. The interviewer questions Trudeau's decision to charge a fee for a charity event and suggests it goes against the image he is trying to portray to Canadians.

Justin Trudeau has significantly increased Canada's federal workforce to create an illusion of job growth amid economic challenges. This public sector hiring, which has added about 100,000 federal employees since he took office, allows the government to showcase employment gains. However, it imposes a substantial long-term financial burden on taxpayers, costing approximately $8.2 billion annually at an average salary of $82,000 per employee. This approach raises concerns about the sustainability of such growth and its impact on the economy.

The speaker is asked about their populist strategy and their use of strong ideological language. They deny talking about left or right but mention that many people believe in it. The interviewer suggests that the speaker is taking a page out of Donald Trump's book, but the speaker questions who would say that. The interviewer asks why Canadians should trust the speaker with their vote, and the speaker responds by emphasizing the need for common sense in the government. They criticize the current government's handling of the economy and promise to cap spending, cut waste, and balance the budget to bring down inflation and interest rates. They claim to have a common sense plan to improve the buying power of Canadians' paychecks.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about their populist strategy, which involves appealing to people's emotions and using strong ideological language. Speaker 1 denies talking about left or right and questions who would say they are like Donald Trump. Speaker 0 mentions that many Canadians might think so, but doesn't provide specific names. Speaker 1 asks for evidence and the conversation becomes unclear. Speaker 0 then asks why Canadians should trust Speaker 1 with their vote. Speaker 1 responds by promising to bring common sense to the country, criticizing the current government's handling of the economy, and pledging to cap spending, cut waste, balance the budget, and reduce inflation and interest rates. They claim to have the only common sense plan to improve people's buying power.

Scott and Mike Pence, both Republicans, voted to raise the debt, while Donald Trump added a staggering $8 trillion to our national debt. This is a burden our children will bear. Looking at the 2024 budget, Republicans requested $7.4 billion in earmarks, while Democrats asked for a mere $800 million. It's clear that the Republicans are the big spenders. We need an accountant in the White House to address this issue.

Some oppose our vision, refusing to support our budget and financial aid for small businesses. They neglect the vital role small businesses play in our economy and communities. They resist making Canada's tax system fairer for the wealthy. They advocate for minimal government involvement. Austerity would leave Canadians to fend for themselves, contrary to our values of mutual support. We pledge to empower younger generations and those who support them by using government resources to expand the middle class and uphold our country's promise. Thank you. Translation: Some people disagree with our plans and refuse to support our budget and financial aid for small businesses. They do not acknowledge the important role small businesses play in our economy and communities. They are against making Canada's tax system fairer for the wealthy. They believe in minimal government involvement. Austerity would mean individuals are left to fend for themselves, which goes against our values of mutual support. We promise to empower younger generations and those who support them by using government resources to expand the middle class and uphold our country's promise. Thank you.

The speaker is asked about their strategy and is accused of using populist tactics. They deny talking about left or right and being influenced by Donald Trump. The questioner asks why Canadians should trust them with their vote, but the speaker doesn't understand the question. They then explain their plan to bring common sense back to the country by capping spending, cutting waste, balancing the budget, and reducing inflation and interest rates. They claim to be the only one with a plan to improve the buying power of Canadians' paychecks.

Speaker 0 discusses public fatigue with politics and asks for simple answers, focusing on whether money will be printed or put on the line of credit, mentioning figures “11,000,000, 11.3.” Speaker 1 responds by asking how Speaker 0 would explain to constituents what they will vote on, and suggests Speaker 0 should help explain to Canadians. The exchange centers on whether the minister will print money or use the line of credit, with Speaker 0 pressing for a direct answer. Speaker 0 continues to press for a clear position, asking the minister to reveal what they will do and to share with Canadians. Speaker 1 repeats the question in a different form, asking what will be said to constituents if they vote in favor but are not willing to support Canadians, and asserts the need for help to explain. Speaker 0 insists on an answer, and Speaker 1 questions how not to explain to constituents what they will do, asking for clarity about the measure. The dialogue returns to the core inquiry: “Will you be printing money or the line of credit?” Speaker 0 asks if the government is running a deficit and asks for the deficit amount. Speaker 1 reiterates that the measure is intended to support Canadians at a time of need, and asks Speaker 0 to stand by their vote and say yes in favor, since it will support Canadians. Speaker 0 asks whether the program is a capital investment or an operating expense, noting difficulty in distinguishing with broad definitions. Speaker 1 responds that the definition is not as broad as suggested and directs attention to what the IMF says about Canada’s adopted definition. Speaker 0 presses for a determination on whether the program will be a capital investment or an operating expense, asking again for clear categorization. Speaker 1 states it will be a funding expense and an operating expense aimed at supporting Canadian health, but then interrupts to allow for clarification, indicating that there is also an aspect that could support capital investment. Speaker 0 clarifies the focus on Canada, and Speaker 1 explains the IMF reference as part of the discussion. A pause is requested by Speaker 1 with Miss Cobina on the floor, and Speaker 1 acknowledges the need to finish the clarification, allowing Miss Cobina to continue.

Justin Trudeau is not a liberal. He believes in government control over money, kids, the economy, speech, and more. This goes against the traditional liberal belief in liberty and limited government involvement in people's lives. A true liberal government should focus on doing a few things well and letting people live freely.

Canada needs a change in leadership, as the current situation is dire. The capital flight and decline in GDP per capita over the past eight and a half years are attributed to Trudeau's policies. His actions have severely harmed the country, and recovery will take decades. It's crucial for him to step down, as even his own party is urging him to leave. The focus now should be on fixing the country and moving forward.

Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, is criticized for his leftist policies. He and his brother were welcomed by Fidel Castro in Cuba. Rumors about Margaret Trudeau's behavior have circulated. People have noted a physical resemblance between Justin Trudeau and Fidel Castro. Trudeau may face backlash in the next election due to a cost of living crisis caused by his climate-focused policies.

Supporters of the bill admit it adds $270 billion to the debt next year, which is the only certainty. The bill also increases the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. This increase is an admission that they aren't controlling the deficit and anticipate adding trillions more in ensuing years. The authors of the bill are anticipating adding more than $2 trillion next year.

Justin Trudeau covered up a security breach at a Canadian lab where dangerous viruses are studied. Documents show collaboration with China's military on bioweapons. Trudeau refused to release documents, sued to keep them secret, and tried to buy vaccines from China. Despite knowing the risks, he called a snap election, and China interfered to help him win. Trudeau's actions show he cannot be trusted to protect Canada.

Look for a few minutes at the Liberal Hall Of Shame for 2015 to 02/2021. Liberal MP William Amos was caught twice on house Zoom proceedings in indecent positions. Liberal MP Yasmin Rathansi was wrongfully employing her sister with taxpayers' dollars and deliberately hiding this information from Canadians. Liberal MP Ramesh Sengha was removed from the Liberal Caucus in January 2021 after he accused multiple other Liberal MPs of supporting the calisthenia movement. Liberal MP Darshan Singh Kang had to leave the Liberal Caucus in 2015 over accusations of sexual harassment. Liberal MP Nikola Di Laurio didn't show up for work for a year after he announced his resignation in 02/2018. Then the public found out, oh, he actually didn't resign. He still collected his salary as an MP even if he was working full time in a law firm in Montreal. To this today to this day, this situation has never been clearly explained by Trudeau and the Liberals. Liberal MP Raj Greywall admitted he racked up millions of dollars in debts, paying casino blackjack, and ended up resigning from the Liberal caucus in 2018 after the news came to light. Following an RCMP investigation. But after suddenly announcing he had paid off his 7 figure debts, he stayed on as a member of parliament for the rest of the parliamentary session. You may recall that mister Graywald was already under investigation by the federal ethics commissioner at the time and was later found guilty of being in violation of conflict of interest. Then there was a liberal MP Marwin Tabarro. He was allowed to run against again for the liberal party in February even though detailed allegations of sexual harassment had been made against him. After being arrested in April 2020, he remained in caucus for almost two months because the prime minister's office claimed they knew nothing about it, took a newspaper article for the liberals to kick him out of caucus. Then former Liberal MP Frank Bayless signed one of those juicy sole source contracts with the Liberal government during the COVID epidemic. He received $237,000,000. Public health agency figures disclosed that more than 90% of the 10,000 Bayless Medical Company ventilators it bought were never used in any clinic or any hospital. Sadly, these ethical lapses were even worse amongst cabinet ministers. Let me give you a few examples. Anita Anad's husband was the recipient of one of those juicy COVID contracts. LifeLabs received tens of millions of dollars of COVID contracts. They sell test kits. Anita Anad's husband, John Knowlton, is a director of LifeLabs. The LifeLabs division has received multiple contracts worth millions since Anad was elected to the parliament in 2019. Navdeep Baines was industry minister and, as such, promised to crack down on big telcos who overcharge Canadians for Internet and cell phone service. Guess what? He found a job at Rogers after leaving the government. The lobbying commissioner said she was frustrated at this, but liberals will always find loopholes that means more money for them. Then there was Bill Blair, on several occasions, lied, meddled into the work of the RCMP regarding the worst mass killing in the history of Canada in Porta Peak, Nova Scotia. While he was the president of the Treasury Board, Scott Bryson tried to block approval for the contract of a navy supply ship being built at the navy shipyard in Quebec because he was lobbied to do so by New Brunswick's powerful Irving family, owners of the rival Halifax shipyard. Minister Bryson also tried to argue there was no need for him to set up a conflict of interest screen to prevent him from participating in government decisions involving two of Atlantic Canada's wealthiest families, even though he used to chair one of their investment firms and that his spouse continued to sit on the company's board of directors. Francois Philippe Champagne owned two apartments in London, England worth millions of dollars. His mortgages were with a Chinese bank. Strange indeed for a Canadian in The UK, Canadian MP in The UK to have to go to a Chinese bank for a mortgage. Judy Foote got involved in the Frank Norman affair. I will talk about that in a bit. But what is interesting here is that she resigned for health reasons. But suddenly, her health improved, and she was rewarded with the job of lieutenant governor in Lupinland and Labrador. Steven Gebel forgot to pay his taxes, but he never forgot to travel, especially to China. This minister is running around the globe, busy lecturing Canadians, but patting Chinese or Gulf Emirates officials on the back. Catherine McKenna and John Wilkinson, his predecessors, and environment were of the same ilk, jetting around the world to lecture the common folks that they should bicycle to work. Foreign affairs minister Melanie Jolie's office staff didn't read an email that said her department was sending a representative to a Russian embassy party. So we had a representative at a party drinking vodka with the Russian officials just after Putin invaded Ukraine. Not reading their emails is a hallmark of Trudeau ministers and their staff. It was the excuse given by Bill Blair and Marco Mendocino and, of course, Justin Trudeau. When David LaMetti was turfed from cabinet, a lot of people wondered why. He had actually, after all, done much of Trudeau's bidding, we thought. Well, in the last few weeks, we learned that LaMetti canceled a verdict of first degree murder against Jacques Delisle, a former judge, even if all the experts were against this decision. Lemetti and the government refused to come clean on why he did that, even though Delisle later pleaded guilty to manslaughter. You all heard senators' nonanswers to our questions on this issue. What about Dominique Leblanc, who, despite despite connection to the powerful Irving family, was appointed to be minister of fisheries, oceans, and the Canadian Coast Guard. He had to consult with the Essex commissioner for weeks in order to figure out how to stick handle around this very obvious conflict of interest. Then there was a time when minister LeBlanc flew from Moncton to Montreal and back aboard a jet owned by JD Irving Limited. Nothing to see here, folks. But when the ethics commissioner, Mario Dion, found minister LeBlanc guilty of breaking a conflict of interest act because he awarded a lucrative Arctic surf clam license to a company linked to his wife's cousin. He couldn't wiggle out of that. Speaking of Dominique Leblanc and Scott Bryson, we still don't know what their exact role was in the vice admiral Norman affair. The Liberals tried to renege on a contract for a supply ship in order to give it back to the Irvings. When they got caught, they decided they would get the height ahead of vice admiral Norman. The prime minister even sent him to trial before the police had investigated its investigation. Scott Bryson and Judy Foote left their positions, and taxpayers ended up being invoiced for an undisclosed sum of money paid out to vice admiral Norman. That is a first class cover up. Marco Mendocino's case was hopeless. Conflicts of interest, emails not read, bold lies in public, pure incompetence. When you are so bad that even Justin Trudeau thinks you're bad, you've hit the bottom. Someday, I will have a speech just on Marco Mendocino's scandals. I may need my unlimited time for that. It happens that ministers organize fundraisers outside their writings, but when you represent a downtown Montreal riding, this is strange. It is even stranger if this fundraiser happens to be in New York. New York, USA. To my knowledge, that is the first, and this honor belongs to Mark Miller. Mary Anne Monsoff had to admit that she was actually not born in Afghanistan, as she had told people and led people to believe for years. Bill Morneau is another minister who was scandal prone. He started his political career with violating the Elections Act, for which he was fined. This is, after all, the same finance minister who forgot that he had and forgot to declare his villa in France in his ethics reporting. This is the same finance minister who sponsored Bill C27, which happened to increase the value of pensions sold by the minister's own company, Morneau Shepell. When the bill was tabled in the House of Commons, the value of Morneau Shepell shares joked, and minister Morneau just happened to still be holding $21,000,000 worth of shares. And as I already mentioned, his role in the We Charity scandal, when he quit, he pretended he was going to the OECD top position. No one knows for sure if this was true. One thing is true, and it's real. Taxpayers footed the bill for his failed campaign. I still have an order paper question on the true cost. Still unanswered after twenty five months, it was reported in the media that this phony campaign cost at least $11,000,000. Mary Ang was found guilty by the ethics commissioner for giving contracts to her best friend. In a Trudeau government, that means you pretend to be sorry, and that has no consequences. How about Seamus O'Regan? The government spent $180,000 defending him in a defamation suit. And do you remember Hunter Tootoo? He had to leave cabinet to deal with, sadly, addiction issues. But what was strange was when he said that Justin Trudeau had hugged him after he revealed that he had an inappropriate relationship with a staff member. Harjit Sajid was found to have lied about his role in Afghanistan. But this happy bunch knows how to organize a party sorry, a cabinet retreat. The three affordability retreats held in Charlottetown, Vancouver, and Hamilton between 2022 and August 2023 cost 1,325,000. Hey, life is better with lobster and white wine, especially when you are discussing affordability. It's not surprising to see all those ethical lapses. After all, this is the leader of an organization who sets the tone. Justin Trudeau does not believe the rules of ethics apply to him. So how could he insist that his officials, his MPs, and his ministers be any better? In 02/2015, we learned that Justin Trudeau was billing charities for speaking engagements, even as an MP. This was a First Colleagues, a sitting politician who charges people to hear him speak. When he got caught, he said he was sorry and wrote a check. A few weeks later, he was caught again. He had charged the House of Commons for expenses that had also been reimbursed by the organizations to which he spoke. Again, we had the, I'm sorry, here's a check routine. This was a preview of things to come. Who can forget the thank you for your donation comment and incident where the PM's elitist and condescending attitude was on full display when he jeered at an indigenous protester before that? Before that, we had Elbowgate when Justin Trudeau pushed aside fellow MP Ruth Ellen Brasso Brasso because he was in a hurry to vote. His time was more precious than others, and pushing aside women who get in the way is something our fake feminist prime minister does without hesitation. That was in line with Justin Trudeau's behavior in the Kokanee grope incident where he groped a female journalist. Then he said, oh my, I would not have done this had I known that the woman was a national reporter. I guess in his mind, it's more acceptable to grope a person that is not a national reporter than one that is. Now we all remember, of course, that our prime minister decided that this was indeed a lesson, not just for him, but for all of us. We all know that some people experience things differently, he said. Now let's not forget the three, four, five, maybe more incidents where Justin Trudeau wore blackface because he thought it was funny to pretend that he was black. We don't know how many times he did that because he can't re