reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In 1986, the Challenger explosion killed 7 astronauts. Years later, people claim to have found them alive with the same names and faces. Some are now in different professions. The internet makes it easy to verify identities now, but back then, disappearing was simpler. NASA denies these claims, but the similarities are hard to ignore. An investigation is needed to understand this anomaly.

Speaker 0 discusses claims related to two major historical events and the alleged suppression of information surrounding them. First, regarding the assassination of John F. Kennedy, Speaker 0 asserts that the assassination was carried out “by the Tiny Hats,” and that 18 witnesses were found dead afterward. This assertion is presented as a central point in the book, which Speaker 0 says has been banned because it “admits that after JFK was taken out by the Tiny Hats, 18 of the witnesses also ended up no longer alive.” The speaker emphasizes that the pattern is that “they always try to eliminate anybody who can expose the truth.” Second, Speaker 0 connects the JFK event to the Apollo moon-landing narrative. The claim is that after the alleged people went to the moon, the astronauts who supposedly went to the moon “also ended up no longer being here.” The implication is that those who could have spoken out against the moon-landing story were removed. The speaker then elaborates that “they took out the people who could have said something, who could have told people that they just landed in Nevada instead of actually going to the moon.” Throughout, the text frames these statements as part of a broader pattern of silencing witnesses who might reveal the “truth.” The speaker presents the sequence as follows: after JFK’s assassination, witnesses who could reveal the reality were killed; similarly, after the moon-landing story, astronauts or others connected to the event who could provide alternative information were also eliminated. The underlying claim is that both events are accompanied by deliberate actions to prevent disclosure of a hidden truth, with the book cited as a vehicle that documents or supports this view, contributing to its ban. No additional context, verification, or evaluation of these claims is provided in the excerpt. The focus remains on the asserted linkage between high-profile events, the deaths of witnesses or involved individuals, and the notion of intentional suppression of alternate explanations. The overall narrative centers on alleged conspiratorial patterns of eliminating people who could reveal the supposed truth behind JFK’s assassination and the moon landing.

The discussion centers on Charlie Kirk and the handling of his death. The speakers are uncertain about the official account and call for a truly rigorous and honest federal investigation. Specific points raised include: - A claim that Canada said Egyptian-registered aircraft followed Charlie Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, around for years in various places; the speaker asserts this is factually true and notes it is a very strange data point, though its meaning is unclear. - A claim that Erika Kirk’s event had a disproportionately large number of foreign-registered cell phones, which is also stated as true. - The speakers emphasize that the FBI has a moral and legal obligation to investigate openly and to consider all possibilities, applying the same process as in science, journalism, and law enforcement. They express a lack of confidence in the FBI and the officials who run it, and argue that honesty and a coherent narrative are needed to restore public trust. - Foreknowledge of the incident is discussed: posts on X allegedly predicted that Charlie Kirk would be killed on the date of the college event in Utah. The question is raised about whether those posts were just guessing and whether those involved have been interviewed by the FBI to determine how they knew what they knew. - The speakers compare the investigation to other events, suggesting that if they investigated, they would examine who publicly posted foreknowledge and seek detailed explanations: who they spoke to, what they know, and how to verify it. - There is a request for an explanation of how the killer transformed into a radical, violent actor, with a note that the speaker does not automatically endorse trans ideologies but wants to understand the radicalization process. - The speakers discuss Candace Owens’ role: the controversy and turmoil surrounding her claims, and the idea that those in authority are responsible for the investigation, not individuals like Candace or podcasters. - A concluding sentiment expresses greater trust in Candace Owens’ intent than in the average DOJ official, framing Candace’s presence as filling a vacuum left by authorities, while insisting that the people in charge must restore confidence through honest reporting and a plausible narrative.

The story focuses on a number of US scientists connected to sensitive research who have died or disappeared, with a look at possible connections. Carl Grilmar is an astrophysicist at Caltech who worked on a NASA-supported space telescope project and infrared systems. He was shot and killed at his home just two months ago. Frank Maywald was a senior scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab, focused on advanced satellite systems. He died nearly two years ago, but his cause of death has never been made public. Monica Reza is reportedly connected to a NASA Jet Propulsion Lab project. She went missing last summer while hiking in California, with no trace. William McCaslin is a retired Air Force general and former head of the Air Force Research Lab, which oversaw advanced space and surveillance programs. He has been missing since February. Reports say he once oversaw funding connected to a project that also included Monica Reza. In New Mexico, Melissa Casais has been missing since last summer. She worked at Los Alamos National Lab in an administrative role but reportedly also had security clearances. Anthony Chavez, also connected to Los Alamos, is an engineer who disappeared during a walk a few months earlier. No signs. No answers. Nuno Larrero was an MIT researcher focused on nuclear fusion and was shot and killed in his Massachusetts home last December. It was the case of the Brown Shooter. It’s a separate case with no confirmed links to the others. The key point: authorities have not connected these cases, but there is overlap in institutions involved—NASA, Air Force Research, Los Alamos Laboratory. The question remains: could they be connected, or is this something else entirely?

- Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the possibility that a friend was murdered and suggest that both victims died suddenly from fast-moving cancer, a method they say the agency uses overseas to eliminate people. Speaker 1 admits he cannot prove this but notes the sudden deaths. - The conversation asserts that the US government has technology to infect people with fast-moving cancer and to perform cognitive and directed-energy warfare. Speaker 0 states the government has the technology to infect with fast-moving cancer and to do so absolutely. - In 1997, Speaker 1 describes a hearing on asymmetric threats where he chaired the research committee and focused on four threats: drones, cyberattacks, electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and cognitive warfare. He asserts that cognitive warfare is now being labeled by some as Havana syndrome and that directed-energy weapons are the underlying technology. - Speaker 2 recounts a recent homeland security hearing about foreign adversaries using direct weapons against US citizens, enabling incapacitation. He emphasizes the chilling nature of the briefing and criticizes current domestic leadership as foolish, corrupt, incompetent, and wicked. - Speaker 3 notes that up to 40% of the Air Force equipment budget in the 1990s was classified, making much of it “black.” He emphasizes that military and security research often precedes civilian medical science, and that servicemen were used in experiments without fully informed consent, referencing NK Ultra-era disclosures of thousands of service members used as subjects. - Speaker 4 discusses MKUltra, describing a Canadian experiment involving psychic driving with massive LSD doses, eye-tracking, and memory loss, funded by MKUltra and affecting civilians. He mentions Project Midnight Climax, where Johns were observed in brothels while subjected to LSD, and notes similar experiments by the British Royal Air Force and Army. The results of Midnight Climax are unknown, with no published after-action reports. - Speaker 3 adds that Secretary of Energy O’Leary stated under Clinton that over a half a million Americans had been used in human experiments over four decades without informed consent, including mind control, with no accountability. He argues that mind-control technology has advanced, and questions who should govern its use, given the lack of legal frameworks. - The discussion covers mind-effects research and the lack of treaties governing such technologies. They reference a European Parliament security and disarmament resolution (1999) addressing mind-effects and mind-control technology, and Russian Duma resolutions (2002) seeking similar safeguards. Zabigniew Brzezinski’s Between Two Ages is cited regarding electronically stroking the ionosphere to influence behavior over geographic areas, connecting it to HARP and other electromagnetic carriers capable of mass or individual influence. - Speaker 6 explains historical demonstrations of electronic mind control, starting with Jose Delgado’s remote manipulation of a charging bull using radio energy and electrodes, and notes later work showing noninvasive techniques to influence behavior using low-power magnetic fields. Speaker 7 reiterates Delgado’s animal studies and the potential for noninvasive methods to affect emotions and memory, with broader implications for humans. - Speaker 3 discusses the progression of research funded by DARPA and others toward higher-resolution control of brain activity, enabling controlled effects that override senses and create synthetic memories, raising questions about future justice and evidence. They describe European Parliament and NATO/US military interest in mind-control technologies and the absence of robust legal protections. - Speaker 9 presents advances in AI-enabled brain-reading and memory-altering devices, including mind-reading and emotion decoding, while Speaker 10 and Speaker 12 discuss privacy concerns, brain-data privacy laws (Colorado’s law adding brain data to privacy protections), and the availability of consumer devices that decode brainwaves. They warn that brain data can be misused by insurers, law enforcement, advertisers, and governments, with private companies often sharing data without clear disclosure. - The segment concludes with a note that devices can infer attention and thoughts, and that DARPA’s N3D program aims for noninvasive neuromodulation with implantable electrodes read/write capabilities. It references 1980s–1990s discussions of RF energy as a potential nonlethal mind-control technology, and a 1993 Johns Hopkins conference listing low-frequency weapons as attractive options.

The discussion centers on six American scientists working on advanced materials and plasma technology who have suddenly disappeared, with a parallel pattern of missing Chinese scientists. The speakers debate where the technology originated (with sources suggesting it came from downed UAPs/UFOs) and why these individuals are vanishing, including both U.S. and Chinese scientists who worked on similar high-end military applications. Brandon Weichert outlines a sequence of events and connections: - In mid-March 2026, three Chinese defense scientists — Zhao Jingkang (nuclear weapons expert), Wu Manching (radar and metamaterials expert), and Wei Yiyan (missile systems expert) — were quietly erased from the Chinese Academy of Engineering’s website, signaling they are no longer among the living. - A few days later, hypersonics expert Yan Hong (a key figure in plasma aerodynamics) died suddenly at 56. - Weichert pairs these five Chinese scientists with the six American scientists who were working on related technologies, noting massive overlap in their work and suggesting that the Americans’ and Chinese’ programs mirror each other in advanced plasma and weapon systems. - He concludes that there is shadowboxing between the United States and China, describing it as a shaping operation in the run-up to a potential major conflict, with both sides attempting to eliminate the other’s brainpower—the human capital essential to sustaining high-end warfare. - He recalls historical precedents where nations targeted each other’s scientists (the Americans reportedly killing Soviet scientists and vice versa; Israelis targeting Iranian scientists) and argues this is not unprecedented. - Weichert cautions that the topic is not necessarily about aliens; he suggests that the systems discussed may be advanced technologies developed in the U.S., Russia, and China for years, potentially including non-alien sources and even Nazi-era technologies that were inherited, while acknowledging that alien explanations exist in public discourse. - He notes that there is a broader geopolitical dynamic at play, including the possibility that the timing of alien-related talk may be designed to distract from conventional advances in technology and the fact that China may have caught up to or surpassed the U.S. in some conventional technologies. The conversation also addresses satellites and space warfare: - There are reports on meteors or fireballs in the sky, but the speakers believe some debris could be from satellites shot down in low Earth orbit. - SpaceX Starlinks have suffered “an explosive fragmentary event,” potentially from being hit by anti-satellite weapons; Starlinks have previously been used for protests (in Iran) and supplied to Ukraine, and the Russians have developed systems like Klinka and TOBAL to knock down Starlinks. - There is a longstanding concern that electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapons on satellites could disrupt or destroy the U.S. electric grid, with a claim that one EMP detonated 50 miles above the continental United States could knock out 90–95% of the grid and take at least two years to restore, especially given reliance on Chinese-made restoring equipment. - The discussion returns to the importance of human capital and education, with a provocative claim that the Department of Education may be the single greatest national security threat due to its impact on human capital, alongside the national debt. The speakers acknowledge disagreement about whether the origin of the advanced plasma technology is extraterrestrial or terrestrial, emphasizing instead the strategic implications of missing scientists on both sides and the ongoing modernization and counterspace dimensions of the conflict.

Where is the body of Thomas Matthew Crooks? A report reveals that the FBI quickly cleaned up biological evidence from the crime scene after the assassination attempt on Donald Trump on July 13, 2024. Congressman Clay Higgins, who investigated the scene, found alarming actions by the FBI that raise questions about the investigation's integrity. Notably, the FBI released Crooks' body for cremation just ten days after the incident, without informing local authorities, hindering the verification of autopsy reports. Higgins expressed concerns that without examining the body, the accuracy of the reports cannot be confirmed. This situation, along with the rapid cleanup of evidence, suggests possible obstruction of justice in the investigation.

The discussion centers on the government's lack of transparency regarding drone incursions over military bases and civilian areas. Michael Shellenberger points out inconsistencies in official statements, where authorities claim to be investigating while simultaneously asserting there’s nothing to worry about. He highlights numerous instances of unidentified drones over sensitive locations, questioning the military's control over U.S. airspace. Both Republican and Democratic representatives agree on the need for clearer authority and funding for detection systems to address these incursions. Shellenberger emphasizes that while there’s no evidence of foreign control over the drones, the government's failure to communicate effectively leads to misinformation and public concern.

Speaker 0: There have been briefings to Congress that lead us to believe there is definitely an advanced technology out there that's not created by mankind. Speaker 1: About a decade ago I revealed on Joe Rogan that from my research in the Global Sun Admissions, aliens don’t come from distant star systems—they come interdimensionally. We have limited sight across our normal light spectrum and into other dimensions. I’ve spoken to high-level Pentagon people, CIA, scientists, physicists, who’ve said it’s an interdimensional invasion. The Bible and other ancient religions reference an unseen presence entering our universe, our domain, our dimension. There’s a clip of her on Fox News Friday night saying it’s interdimensional, but classified. A craft will show up 100 miles away instantly or fly Mach 20 and make a perfect turn—things that would crush solid stainless steel due to gravity. So we know they’re interdimensionally jumping. Now Trump talks about a big reveal; Obama says aliens are real. This isn’t just about UFOs—it's part of a broader awakening. It’s a distraction from Epstein, perhaps, but Trump said after reelection he’d disclose, and there’s a report due. Disclosure is happening on many fronts. We’re focused on UFOs and extraterrestrials, not taking away from exposing Epstein. There’s a lot of disclosure and crazy stuff happening on every front. Speaker 2: He (the other speaker) gave classified information and wasn’t supposed to. Speaker 1: Aliens are real? He gave classified information, whether they’re real or not. Speaker 3: Hours later, the president posted on Truth Social directing the release of government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life and UFOs. We bring in Florida Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, chair of the Oversight Committee Task Force on declassification of federal secrets. She has said there is evidence of interdimensional beings that can operate through the time spaces we have. You told Joe Rogan you’ve viewed evidence of interdimensional beings on Earth that operate through time spaces—can you explain? Speaker 0: Yes. In classified briefings we’ve seen evidence suggesting advanced technology not created by mankind. There are videos, including one where a UAP deflects a Hellfire missile, taken from ISR footage off the coast of Yemen. Some physics defy explanation; not the only government to examine this. I view it through national security: are these technologies adversarial weapons or not? The federal government denying access to Congress is alarming in a free society. We expect the American people to decide after reviewing the evidence. Gates has said that if you’ve seen what we’ve seen, you’ll believe it too. Speaker 3: So you’re saying the Air Force has covered up UAP sightings? Is it because we or others have advanced technology, or because a foreign actor has abilities beyond our understanding? Speaker 0: Based on our interviews and testimony, we have reason to believe this tech is not created by mankind. It’s possible there are advanced US weapons denied access to the public. Unelected bureaucrats denying access to Congress is problematic, and there have been whistleblower threats and even deaths discussed in testimony. There’s bipartisan momentum toward disclosure, and we’ll continue to explore with the American people. President Obama’s remarks and Trump’s anticipated declassification are fueling this process. Speaker 1: The elite seek transcendence and to know the secrets of the universe; some are good, some bad, some mixed. Einstein and Planck suggest multiple dimensions; top scientists and billionaires are now speaking of a false hologram, artificial constraints, and gravity bleeding into this universe, with dark matter as a sign of something deeper. Some say we’re in a computer-generated projection, a thought or dream in a programmer’s mind. There’s talk of a sub-transmission zone below the third dimension fighting to ascend. Some believe humanity is at a fifth or sixth dimension intellectually, while a war rages to determine whether humanity will advance or be controlled by a breakaway civilization merging with machines. Google and others allegedly contemplated building a giant artificial system—a hive-mind AI connected to billions of people—that could predict and influence the future, potentially erasing individual free will. A counterstrike is underway to block such systems and promote genuine debate about humanity’s path, including addressing alleged pedophiles and “psychic vampires” in control of AI before humanity is harmed. The interdimensional force behind these developments is said to grant advanced knowledge to certain groups, sometimes described in religious terms as Satan. There’s more to come as disclosures unfold, including anticipated declassification next week when Trump allegedly releases UFO files. Speaker 3: We’ll be watching and covering it next week as disclosure unfolds.

There is footage and records of unidentified objects in the sky that we can't explain. It is believed that the Pentagon has been hiding a program from Congress and the executive branch. This program, run by unelected officials, avoids oversight and goes against American democracy. There is a disinformation campaign targeting the US populace, which is unethical. A bill called the UAP Closure Act aims to force the Pentagon to reveal the truth to Congress and the American people. However, there are efforts to kill this bill by Speaker Mike Johnson, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Congressman Mike Turner, and Mike Rogers. It is important to call lawmakers and demand the passage of the UAP Disclosure Act.

A series of inventors working on free energy technologies mysteriously died before sharing their discoveries. From arsenic poisoning to boating accidents, each death was surrounded by suspicious circumstances. The suppression of these inventions by powerful entities like the Department of Energy and JPMorgan raises questions about the true reasons behind these deaths and the lack of progress in making free energy accessible to all. The world is full of strange coincidences.

UFO sightings are predominantly reported in the United States, leading to skepticism about their credibility. There's speculation that some phenomena might be linked to altered states of consciousness, possibly during psychedelic experiences. Additionally, the conversation shifts to a Chinese scientist, Dr. Ning Li, who worked on anti-gravity technology and vanished, likely returning to China. Her groundbreaking research attracted attention and funding, but after starting her own company, she stopped publishing results. An obituary later surfaced, raising questions about her fate. It’s suggested that if she made significant advancements, the government may have isolated her to prevent information leaks, especially given her background. Concerns about espionage and the potential military implications of her work are discussed, highlighting the delicate balance between innovation and national security.

Pictured here was an astrophysicist at Caltech. He worked on a NASA supported space telescope project and infrared systems. Now he was shot and killed at his home just two months ago. Then there's Frank Maywald. He was a senior scientist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab focused on advanced satellite systems, and he died nearly two years ago, but his cause of death has never been made public. Meanwhile, Monica Reza. Monica Reza also reportedly connected to NASA's jet propulsion lab project. She went missing last summer while hiking in California. No trace. It keeps going. There's William McCaslin, a retired air force general. He too is missing. He's a former head of air force research lab and oversaw advanced space and surveillance programs. He's been missing since February. Reports say he once oversaw funding connected to a project that also included Monica Reza. Now there's more to New Mexico. Melissa Cassis Cassis. She is been missing since last summer. She worked at Los Alamos National Lab. She had administrative role but reportedly also had security clearances. Just months earlier that she went missing, so too did Anthony Chavez, also connected to Los Alamos, an engineer. He disappeared during a walk. No signs, no answers. And then finally, there's Nuno Larrero. You remember Nuno Larrero? He was the MIT researcher focused on nuclear fusion and was shot and killed in his Massachusetts home last December. It was

Multiple top microbiologists died under suspicious circumstances over a decade before the 2020 pandemic. Professor Wiley, an expert in human immune response and viruses like HIV and Ebola, was found dead in the Mississippi River after investigating dangerous viruses. Other renowned researchers specializing in infectious diseases and biological agents also died. Some were stabbed in car trunks, while others crashed their cars due to missing brake fluid. These scientists were connected to government projects related to bioterrorism, flu pandemics, or anthrax. A total of forty microbiologists were lost in less than four years, revealing connections to weapons research.

There's significant chaos behind the scenes regarding UAP disclosure. Two individuals connected to former Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines revealed a slow drip disclosure agenda originating from her office. The aim was to create the impression that the U.S. government had not seriously investigated UAPs for the past 15 to 20 years, particularly following the Nimitz incident. This plan, spanning 15 to 20 years, consists of several phases. The first phase involves using the James Webb Telescope to release images of artificial structures on distant celestial bodies. Subsequent phases include identifying artificial structures on the Moon and Mars, linking these to archaeological sites on Earth, and ultimately excavating humanoid remains believed to be connected to these anomalies.

Incidents involving the killing, death, and missing status of scientists connected through national security, black budget technology, high energy physics, and related fields are not uncommon. A notably cited case involves roughly 25 scientists and engineers tied to the UK defense contractor GEC Marconi in the 1980s, many of whom were linked to the Reagan-era Star Wars Defense Initiative. The goal at the time was to develop a system to detect and destroy nuclear missiles before they hit the United States, and a string of mysterious deaths, suicides, and disappearances within this network followed a pattern one might expect from a coordinated effort to silence these individuals. Currently, ten scientists are listed as missing, with Steven Garcia identified as the latest missing nuclear official. The names in this group are connected in various ways to black-budget technology, high-energy physics, and the search for extraterrestrial life. This occurs during a period of significant geopolitical instability and while the United States administration has publicly expressed an interest in declassifying currently classified UFO-related intelligence. The discussion raises questions about whether elements within murky, private aerospace circles—loosely connected to government programs—are concerned about daylight breaking into their black projects. While certainty is elusive, the pattern mirrors the GEC Marconi incident from the eighties, suggesting a potential suppression of certain research avenues. Among the highlighted cases, the killing of professor Nuno Larrero in 2025 stands out as a major red flag. Larrero was a leading fusion and plasma physicist, widely regarded as a top-tier scientist in exotic energy and propulsion research, areas that intersect with extreme national security secrecy and potential danger for those who disclose such secrets. Another notable case is general William McCasland, who has been missing for over a month. He was revealed in WikiLeaks emails as a senior adviser on UFO subjects to Tom DeLonge, founder of To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science, which brought figures such as Lou Elizondo, Christopher Mellon, and Jim Semivan into public view on government UFO disclosure topics. The WikiLeaks communications show DeLonge bragging to John Podesta about McCaslin being one of his top UFO advisers. The disappearance of McCaslin, alongside several prominent scientists in exotic physics, plasma research, and the search for extraterrestrial technosignatures, is cited as evidence that a coordinated situation could be occurring.

There is a concerning agenda behind the slow disclosure of UAP information, led by former National Intelligence Director Avril Haines. Two sources confirm that the goal was to create the impression that the U.S. government had not seriously investigated UAPs for the past 15 to 20 years, particularly before the Nimitz incident. This plan, spanning 15 to 20 years, consists of several phases. The first phase involves using the James Webb Telescope to release images of potential artificial structures in our solar system. The subsequent phases include identifying artificial structures on the Moon and Mars, linking them to archaeological sites on Earth, and ultimately excavating humanoid remains believed to be connected to these anomalies.

Some stories are challenging to report, especially regarding attacks on intelligence, military, and state department personnel. These incidents have occurred in over a dozen countries, revealing common patterns in the types of injuries sustained. Evidence suggests that a foreign adversary may be responsible for these attacks. The affected individuals are part of a highly vetted group, entrusted with sensitive government secrets. Acknowledging that US personnel are being targeted while on assignment sends a concerning message: no one is safe.