reSee.it - Related Video Feed

She's criticized US intelligence and promoted Russian propaganda. Debbie Wasserman Schultz referred to her as likely a Russian asset. Given our military backgrounds, what are your thoughts on her? I believe she's compromised. Her support for a brutal dictator in Syria raises concerns. Russian media has labeled her a Russian asset, which is alarming. The US intelligence community has noted her troubling relationships with adversaries. My concern is that she wouldn't pass a background check.

Normally, a nominee to lead intelligence agencies would have relevant experience. Chelsea Gabbard has none. This is disqualifying, especially considering she's echoed Kremlin talking points on the Ukraine war, promoted Russian propaganda about US biolabs, and praised Bashar al-Assad despite intelligence showing he gassed his own people. Russia Today even calls her "our girl." Republican opposition to such unqualified nominees has, unfortunately, vanished, leaving these terrible choices headed for confirmation. This is disastrous for the country.

The transcript claims that Tulsi Gabbard “walked into the Oval Office” and personally handed President Trump her resignation letter after her husband, Abraham Williams, was “diagnosed with an extremely rare form of bone cancer.” It quotes her letter: she “must step away from public service to be by his side,” cannot “ask him to face this fight alone” while she continues in her demanding position, and her resignation is effective June 30. The transcript says President Trump praised her publicly afterward and that “that is what happened.” It then claims that “within hours” Reuters published that the White House “had fired Gabbard,” describing her departure as “a victory for the intelligence community,” and that “the Internet exploded” with that narrative. The transcript offers explanations including that deep state and British intelligence had been “gunning for her for over a year,” that “they could not bang her,” and that “they planted fake stories.” It alleges she was banned from Iran war deliberations, was planning to run for president in 2028, and was “scheming against the president.” It also claims she was surrounded with “fake people” such as Joe Kent to argue that Netanyahu and Israel ran Trump, describing it as an operation to “poison a relationship” with President Trump and “split the MAGA coalition” ahead of the midterms. The transcript further claims that “rogue elements of the CIA and the Senate Intelligence Committee” kept firing at her, citing Katherine Harwich as writing that the CIA tracked “every keystroke on the government computers” of Gabbard’s Directors’ Initiatives Group to disband or diminish the group’s impact. It states that the group continued producing declassifications “which will result in prosecutions,” and claims her work showed Russiagate was a coordinated hoax between Barack Obama and British intelligence. It says disclosures are before a grand jury in Florida and that she opposed “the deep state conspiracy” used to impeach President Trump in 2019 and “the election rigging of 2020.” The transcript also claims she was investigating “Havana syndrome” and “directed energy attacks” that agencies have spent four years on. It states her investigations would “see the light of day before she leaves office,” and argues that the intelligence community claimed victory while her husband begins cancer treatment. Finally, it proposes “a test” for any new DNI appointment under Biden, alleging CIA and MI6 were “completely integrated, fused operationally,” and asks whether that arrangement still operates, claiming the “war” would continue using the same methods used against Tulsi Gabbard.

Liz Cheney, Dick Cheney's daughter, is running against Kamala Harris, which I believe hurts Harris. Cheney is a deranged person who has always wanted to go to war. She wanted to stay in Syria and Iraq, while I chose to withdraw. If it were up to her, we’d be involved in conflicts in many countries. She's a radical war hawk. It’s easy for her to advocate for sending troops from the comfort of Washington, but she wouldn’t feel the same if she were in the line of fire. I’ve had meetings with many people, and she consistently pushed for military action.

They prioritize endless work for ideological and financial reasons. A notable example is Tulsi Gabbard, who, despite her liberal views, was quickly promoted to vice chair of the DNC. However, when she questioned U.S. opposition to Assad, she became an enemy to the establishment. Hillary Clinton labeled her as "the favorite of the Russians," highlighting the harsh criticism she faced from fellow Democrats. The Democratic Party is influenced by the foreign policy establishment and the military-industrial complex. They emphasize the importance of NATO and military support for Ukraine, revealing their focus on war as a source of funding. This contrasts with Trump's opposition to such conflicts.

Tulsi Gabbard has met with controversial figures and violated State Department guidelines by secretly visiting Syria to meet with Assad, who has used chemical weapons against his own people. Many view her as a potential Russian asset. Given her position, this raises serious concerns about her access to sensitive intelligence information, which could pose a risk to national security. The implications of her appointment are seen as highly irresponsible.

Senator Dick Durbin is allegedly working with other members of Congress to bring Gaza refugees to the United States without public input. This move is seen as a national security threat, as these individuals are unvetted and their intentions could be dangerous. If successful, major American cities could become like Gaza.

Tulsi Gabbard states that U.S. leaders are selfish, shortsighted, and leading the country further into war, failing to understand its unpredictable nature. While war's unpredictability is a given, its costs, suffering, devastation, destruction, and death are not. Gabbard questions how much suffering Americans and the world will have to endure, given events like the sabotage of an energy pipeline. She raises concerns about potential attacks on internet access, satellites, and GPS, ultimately leading to a potential nuclear outcome. Gabbard claims U.S. and European leaders are fueling and funding the war, giving them leverage to push for a ceasefire and negotiated outcome. She concludes that if leaders aren't fighting for peace and prosperity, they are pushing for more destruction, war, and suffering.

Tulsi Gabbard released new evidence asserting that former president Barack Obama and top aides conspired to subvert President Trump’s February victory and undermine the democratic will of the American people. She claims that while publicly maintaining a peaceful transfer of power, Obama privately worked to sow discord and sabotage his successor, and that the Obama administration manufactured politicized intelligence used to justify baseless smears against Trump to delegitimize his victory before he took the oath of office. She contends that Trump never had anything to do with Russia and that the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud known to be false by Obama and others, including former CIA director John Brennan, former director of national intelligence James Clapper, former FBI director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and more. Gabbard says the report confirms there was no collusion or corruption by Trump, but rather by Obama and weaponized intelligence agencies, with the Russia hoax being a lie driven by Democrat political operatives approved by Obama and leaked to the media to launch a years-long witch hunt against Trump and his first administration. She asserts that allies of the president, including Donald Trump Jr., were smeared as Russian assets, with some having their lives destroyed due to the lie. According to her, the first two years of Trump’s presidency were consumed by debunking these lies at the highest government levels. She notes that nearly ten years later, declassification of documents shows the truth, vindicating Trump, his family, and his allies. She claims this new evidence strengthens the case that those who sabotaged a duly elected president did grave harm to the republic. Gabbard credits CIA Director Ratcliffe, Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, and the declassification of a 2020 House Intelligence Committee report, which she says shows the intel community did not have any direct information that Vladimir Putin wanted to help elect Trump in 2016; instead, Russia was actively preparing for a Hillary Clinton victory, but, at Obama’s unusual direction, the intel community published implausible intelligence to sabotage the incoming president. She describes this as one of the greatest political scandals in American history and contends that Legacy outlets like the New York Times and Washington Post were awarded Pulitzer Prizes for perpetuating the hoax, arguing it’s time those awards be stripped for journalism that propagates political disinformation in service of the Democrat Party and certain intelligence officials.

She is unqualified to be DNI, with positions that are far outside mainstream American politics. Her visit to Assad in Syria, who was aligned with Russia and Iran, was justified by her claim that Syria wasn't a direct threat to the U.S., which is incorrect. The alliance between Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah poses direct threats to Americans in the region and to key allies like Israel and Jordan. It will be interesting to see what information may emerge from the Syrian government if the rebels capture Damascus, particularly regarding Americans involved.

Hillary Clinton initiated the narrative branding Tulsi Gabbard as a Russian asset due to Gabbard's rising status in the Democratic Party. Gabbard, a combat veteran and articulate leader, began aligning with Bernie Sanders' views, which angered Clinton. This led to a rift, especially after Gabbard exposed the DNC's unfair treatment of Sanders during the 2016 nomination process. Clinton's campaign had previously fabricated claims about Donald Trump being a Russian asset, and Gabbard became another target. Gabbard's independent views, including her stance on the Ukraine-Russia conflict, were used against her, and her meeting with Bashar al-Assad further fueled the accusations. The discussion emphasizes that diplomacy often requires engaging with adversaries, not just allies.

Kamala Harris chose Tim Waltz as her running mate, a move criticized for being too radical. Waltz, a controversial figure, has been accused of allowing riots and supporting extreme policies like gender-affirming healthcare for children. Some speculate that Waltz was picked to create a sacrificial ticket by the Democratic party. The choice of Waltz has raised questions about the true intentions of the Democratic party and their strategy for the upcoming election.

Tulsi Gabbard labeled Kamala Harris a "deep state communist" influenced by the military-industrial complex, which she claims makes foreign policy decisions for profit, keeping the country in a constant state of war. Gabbard argues that Harris lacks the strength to oppose this complex. Following her criticism of President Biden, Gabbard was placed on a terror watch list, referred to as the "quiet eyes list." This incident has sparked concerns about government overreach and the lack of outrage from the public regarding the situation.

Hillary Clinton started the Tulsi narrative because Tulsi was a rising star. She was a woman, a minority, and combat vet. Tulsi began 'to be kind of open minded to what Bernie Sanders was saying' and spoke up, making enemies in the party. She was outraged when she learned the DNC 'cheated on behalf of Hillary to try to make sure she got the nomination and screwed Bernie.' Hillary Clinton allegedly called her a 'Russian asset,' part of the 'Russia, Russia, Russia hoax.' 'Her campaign made up the all the stuff about there being a server in Trump Tower Right.' Don Junior was using it to commute. Tulsi left the party. She argued the Russia-Ukraine war 'didn't have to happen' if Putin's views on NATO expansion had been listened to. She met with Bashar al Assad; Trump opened negotiations with Kim Jong Un; 'Diplomacy means you talk to your enemies.'

Ashwin Rutansi hosts Going Underground from Dubai, discussing the unfolding Trump-Netanyahu campaign against Iran and Lebanon, amid claims of a failed ceasefire and a chaotic US policy that could lead to peace talks or mass US casualties. The conversation centers on how US military operations were conducted with unclear objectives, the blockade of Hormuz, and broader questions about international alignments, domestic politics, and the integrity of US national security. Key points and claims discussed - James Webb, former senior foreign policy adviser to RFK Jr., discusses the conflict’s origins and the US military response: - The Iran conflict is described as atypical for the US military, with a lack of contingencies for evolving events, including the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Webb contrasts this with the Iraq War era, noting that past conflicts saw hundreds of thousands of troops staged for various contingencies. - He asserts the Strait of Hormuz closure is a significant, probable danger, and claims it was “the most probable and dangerous course of action” by the Iranian government, though later remarks acknowledge it was “closed for some.” - Webb accuses the President of denying the risk of such a closure and asserts this has harmed the US’s reputation and economic partnerships, painting the war as one fought on behalf of another country; he notes this stance as anomalous and unpopular domestically. - Assassination of Khamenei and Netanyahu’s involvement: - Webb describes waking to news of the assassination attempt on Khamenei as indicative of an Israeli planning cycle, arguing that assassinating foreign leaders risks violating norms and has long-term strategic consequences. - He claims the operation “bloody[s] the United States” and creates a blood feud between the US and Iran, undermining state-to-state negotiation dynamics. - Netanyahu’s influence and possible foreign power infiltration: - Webb questions what Netanyahu might have over Trump that resonates with MAGA voters, touching on theories involving foreign influence and the Epstein files, and suggesting long-standing efforts to cultivate influence within US politics. - He describes a broader pattern of neoconservative and pro-war pressures predating the Iraq War and accuses various political actors of co-opting Congress and government for an ongoing Iran-focused agenda. - Webb cites corruption in the US military procurement system and sanctions dynamics, noting cases where private-sector investments allegedly intersect with sanction decisions. - War powers, legality, and governance: - Webb emphasizes the constitutional requirement that Congress holds war powers (Article I, Section 8) and argues that the war with Iran did not follow proper processes or a legitimate declaration. - He critiques the War Powers Resolution’s applicability in this context, suggesting the administration acted beyond its constitutional authority. - RFK Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, and broader political dynamics: - Webb says he resigned from the RFK Jr. campaign after RFK Jr. equivocated on IDF tactics in Gaza, arguing this demonstrated an external influence on policy. He notes Tulsi Gabbard as DNI and expresses hope she can influence decisions, while acknowledging restricted access to the White House. - He believes there is bipartisan concern about the drift toward war and notes polling showing growing public wariness of foreign entanglements, including U.S.-Israel dynamics. He highlights potential shifts toward a more America-first foreign policy. - Military hardware, strategy, and vulnerability: - Webb discusses modern anti-ship and ballistic missile capabilities from Iran, Russia, and China, arguing US carriers require significant standoff distance and are vulnerable to advanced missiles, limiting traditional carrier-based operations. - He mentions USS George H.W. Bush’s unusual movements and raises questions about naval readiness and procurement integrity, as well as unexplained incidents aboard ships (e.g., clogging sewage systems) used to illustrate perceived internal disruptions. - Regional realignments and the petrodollar: - Webb suggests that aggressive Middle East actions could push regional allies to rethink loyalties and alliances, with potential implications for the dollar’s status as the global reserve currency. - He expresses cautious optimism that public sentiment toward “America first” and opposition to endless wars could drive political renewal, including a return to merit-based leadership and reduced foreign entanglements. - Final reflections: - Webb laments civilian casualties and school-targeting incidents, emphasizing the need for accountability and a reconsideration of strategic aims, while reiterating concern about the influence of powerful interests on national security decisions. - The program closes with condolences to those affected by NATO-related conflicts and a tease of continued coverage of the Trump-Netanyahu war. Note: The summary preserves the speakers’ names and quotes as presented, without adding external evaluation or commentary.

According to Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, multiple intelligence community assessments released before the November 2016 election concluded that Russia lacked both the intent and capability to impact the election's outcome. Gabbard has been making public statements and releasing documents to support her allegation that President Obama is guilty of treason and conspired with Hillary Clinton regarding the intelligence community's assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 election.

I'm confirming that Tulsi Gabbard has appointed someone with a history of being untrustworthy, potentially aiding adversarial nations. In Connecticut, the leading Democratic candidate in a major US Senate race is facing scrutiny after being caught misrepresenting his military service. Richard Blumenthal, the state attorney general, previously stated he served in Vietnam, but reports indicate he received five wartime deferments and served stateside in the Marine Reserves. I misspoke, and I won't let a few misplaced words tarnish my record of service to our country. However, video evidence exists of Blumenthal claiming he was in Vietnam.

Key national security confirmations for the Trump administration are underway in the Senate. Tulsi Gabbard's important confirmation hearing is scheduled for Thursday. Gabbard, a former congresswoman and military veteran, has been a strong advocate for truth on the House Armed Services Committee. She has shown courage by opposing her own party's impeachment efforts against President Trump and standing up to Kamala Harris during presidential debates. As the director of National Intelligence, she is expected to defend constitutional rights and challenge those promoting unnecessary wars.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claims that multiple intelligence community assessments released before the November 2016 election concluded that Russia lacked both the intent and capability to influence the election's outcome. Gabbard alleges that President Obama is guilty of treason and conspired with Hillary Clinton regarding the intelligence community's assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 election. She supports this "extreme allegation" with public statements and released documents.