reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In May 2024, 194 WHO member states will vote on international agreements for pandemic prevention behind closed doors. These agreements give the WHO leadership in health matters related to pandemics, but the process is not widely reported or discussed in the media, parliaments, universities, or society.

WHO did not impose lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Their role is to provide guidance and support to governments. The pandemic agreement was created by countries for countries, affirming national sovereignty and responsibility. WHO is not a party to the agreement, which focuses on countries working together to prevent pandemics.

These new pandemic agreements involve 194 member states and the World Health Organization. They ignore scientific evidence on collateral damages and give WHO unprecedented power to declare emergencies without clear standards. The agreements allow mandates, including experimental injections, on a global scale. WHO can declare any public health emergency under the concept of "one health," from fighting influenza to addressing climate change, potentially leading to future pandemics.

There is no way for people or member states to question the WHO's assessments, whether it's about public health emergencies, measures, or experimental vaccination regimes. Member states and citizens have no power to challenge these decisions.

The WHO is set to have a final vote on two international agreements involving pandemic prevention and preparedness. This process is conducted privately and is not widely reported or discussed in the media, national parliaments, universities, or society. The WHO asserts its unquestionable leadership in all health matters through these legal instruments.

The speaker discusses the power of the World Health Organization (WHO) during a public health emergency or pandemic. They mention that the WHO can declare recommendations and impose various restrictions, such as lockdowns and surveillance. They also highlight the potential requirement for proof of vaccination. The speaker emphasizes that the WHO will have control over health-related information, including the right to censor and interfere in social communication. These provisions are present in the International Health Regulations and the proposed pandemic treaty. The summary concludes by mentioning the importance of discussing these matters.

The WHO states it did not impose lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting it lacks such power and does not seek it. The WHO says its role is to support governments with evidence-based guidance, advice, and supplies to help them protect their people.

The speaker discusses the global implementation of measures like mask mandates and testing requirements, following the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendations. The WHO is set to gain more authority, with member states recognizing it as a coordinating authority. The speaker raises concerns about the WHO's power to command states to enforce lockdowns or vaccine mandates, with countries deploying their police and military against their own citizens. There are discussions about potentially removing human rights and freedoms from the regulations, while an independent advisory committee is created to protect human rights. The goal is to advance the WHO's new world order at the upcoming World Health Assembly, with finalized agreements in a year's time, unless people pressure their governments to stop the plans.

The WHO is portrayed as a lobby organization funded by pharmaceutical companies and influenced by billionaires. It is claimed the WHO is not interested in public health. Governments are said to relinquish power to the WHO to avoid electoral repercussions for unpopular decisions. Politicians can then blame the WHO for policies like lockdowns and school closures, claiming they had no choice. This arrangement allegedly shields politicians from accountability.

The WHO states it did not impose lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting it lacks the power and desire to do so. The organization says its role is to support governments with evidence-based guidance, advice, and supplies to help them protect their people.

WHO cannot order lockdowns or mask mandates, countries decide based on their own assessment. Negotiating countries added a statement saying WHO and the director general will not have this power, ensuring sovereignty is not affected. This agreement clarifies the truth.

This work is challenging due to the abundance of fake news, lies, and conspiracy theories surrounding the pandemic agreement and IHR. Some claim that the agreement will give WHO the power to impose lockdowns or vaccine mandates on countries, but these claims are false. The agreement, written by us, will not cede sovereignty to WHO. We need your support to counter these lies and assure your citizens that the agreement safeguards national sovereignty while enhancing global health security. It is negotiated and implemented by countries in accordance with their own laws.

In May 2024, 194 WHO member states will vote on international agreements for pandemic prevention and response. The process is secretive and not publicly discussed. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism for its push to extend its powers and control over countries and people's self-determination. An independent evaluation will be conducted to review pandemic preparedness and response. The WHO's proposed pandemic treaty and international health regulations have raised concerns about its authority over health decisions, including vaccines, treatments, and surveillance. The treaty could impose restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments without respecting human rights. The WHO claims absolute leadership in all health matters, but some argue that this level of authority has never been seen before. Supporters argue that these measures are necessary to protect the global population. The final vote on these agreements will take place in May 2024.

The WHO states it did not impose lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic, clarifying it lacks such power and does not seek it. The WHO asserts its role is to support governments with evidence-based guidance, advice, and supplies to help them protect their people.

In May 2024, 194 member states of the WHO will vote on international agreements regarding pandemic prevention. The process is secretive and not publicly discussed. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

The WHO was selected to execute a "soft coup bloodlessly" through amendments that change international health regulations and a new pandemic treaty (aka pandemic accord/instrument). The new version removes language from the current health regulations that ensures implementation respects dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms. The IHRs are changing from recommendations to binding enforcements, requiring countries to create enforcement mechanisms. This includes enforced surveillance of people and microorganisms, enforced censorship, a single narrative, and harmonization of vaccine and drug regulation. Liability for these products will allegedly be eliminated. These documents come into force when the WHO director general declares a public health emergency of international concern, or even a risk of one, and his powers can continue after the emergency is contained.

The speaker addresses the issue of fake news and conspiracy theories about the pandemic agreement, clarifying that the WHO does not have the power to impose lockdowns, vaccine mandates, or restrict travel. These claims are false, and the WHO is not seeking such authority.

WHO did not impose lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine mandates during the pandemic. Our role is to provide guidance and support to governments. The pandemic agreement is written by countries for countries, affirming national sovereignty and responsibility. WHO is not a party to the agreement, only governments are. The agreement emphasizes working together to keep each other safe from pandemics.

WHO did not impose lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine mandates during COVID-19. Their role is to provide guidance and support to governments, not to make decisions for them. The pandemic agreement is written by countries for countries, affirming national sovereignty and responsibility. WHO is not a party to the agreement; only governments are. The agreement emphasizes countries working together to keep each other safe from pandemics. Translation: WHO no impuso bloqueos, mandatos de mascarillas o vacunas durante COVID-19. Su papel es brindar orientación y apoyo a los gobiernos, no tomar decisiones por ellos. El acuerdo pandémico es redactado por países para países, afirmando la soberanía y responsabilidad nacional. WHO no es parte del acuerdo; solo los gobiernos lo son. El acuerdo enfatiza que los países trabajen juntos para mantenerse seguros de las pandemias.

The European Union developed a COVID-19 certification system to facilitate safe travel during the pandemic, which has now been adopted by WHO as part of a global digital health certification network. This network will initially include the COVID-19 certificate and will later expand to include other health documents. There is a need to address the challenges posed by anti-vaccine sentiments, as vaccines are effective and supported by evidence. WHO clarified that it did not impose any mandates during the pandemic, emphasizing its role in providing guidance and support to governments rather than enforcing policies.

The WHO will have a final vote on two international legal instruments. These instruments give the WHO complete authority over health matters, specifically in pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. The vote will involve 94 member states, but these instruments have not been widely discussed in newspapers, national parliaments, universities, or society.

The speaker believes that the World Health Organization (WHO) should only serve as a platform for countries to exchange ideas and information, and provide assistance when requested. They argue that the WHO should not have the power to enforce lockdowns or dictate vaccination policies, as it infringes on national sovereignty. The speaker also highlights concerns about the WHO's funding, suggesting a conflict of interest due to significant contributions from private interests, particularly those with pharmaceutical investments. They question the expertise of the WHO and criticize its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, including its understanding of immunity, mask usage, and the impact of school closures. The speaker concludes that it is illogical to grant more power to the WHO in shaping health policies.

It's easy to blame those who believe or spread mis/disinformation. Governments, internet, and social media companies have a responsibility to prevent the spread of harmful lies and promote access to accurate health information. The WHO is working with partners, companies, and researchers to understand how misinformation and disinformation spreads, who is targeted, how they are influenced, and what can be done to counter this problem.

This morning, the United Nations approved a political declaration on pandemic prevention. In May 2024, the WHO will have a final vote on international agreements behind closed doors. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.