reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Kamala's campaign is facing serious issues, having spent $1 million on celebrity endorsements and concerts without gaining any votes, leading to a $20 million debt. Donors were misled about the campaign's viability, believing it was competitive. Internal staff felt mistreated and were hesitant to voice concerns. Despite missing fundraising goals, Kamala remained unaware of the campaign's financial troubles. She spent lavishly on events, including $500,000 for a stunt in Vegas, while losing significantly in key states. Now in debt and seeking funds for a recount after losing by 3 million votes, the party is hesitant to contribute more. Donald Trump has offered assistance, suggesting party unity and leveraging remaining campaign funds effectively.

James O'Keefe has revealed that 60% of the ActBlue donations investigated are allegedly from China. This suggests that the Chinese Communist Party is financially supporting the Democratic Party and impacting American elections. There are calls for arrests and congressional hearings regarding this issue.

Kamala Harris's campaign is accused of deliberate misinformation in a political ad. The ad features two Pennsylvania farmers who supposedly switched to supporting Kamala Harris after January 6th. However, these individuals, Robert Lang and Christina Chadwick, are allegedly actors with a history of donating to Democratic and leftist causes since at least 2016. This is seen as an example of a synthetic campaign and candidate, where narratives are manufactured. The individuals are portrayed as Trump supporters who turned, but they are allegedly Democratic actors. The question is whether this will be reported by mainstream media, and if so, it could damage the perception of Harris as an authentic candidate.

In politics, money raised is crucial. A group found suspicious donations to Democrats totaling over $200 million through ActBlue, mostly from older, liberal, lower-income individuals. Many donors seem unaware of these contributions made in their name, suggesting identity theft. Examples include a woman making 1400 donations in 7 years and another making 52,501 donations in 700 days. These irregularities raise concerns about potential election law violations and national security risks. Despite 52 complaints filed, Democrats are reluctant to investigate. The magnitude of these questionable donations far exceeds previous concerns over foreign influence, warranting a thorough investigation.

According to the speaker, the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, roughly 15 or 16 years old, equates money with freedom of expression, allowing billionaires to spend unlimited amounts to influence elections. The speaker believes this is the Supreme Court's worst decision. As a result of the decision, Elon Musk spent $270 million to elect Trump as president. The speaker believes it's absurd for one person to have that much influence. Someone spent $1.5 billion on the Harris campaign over a couple of months. The speaker clarifies that this issue is not limited to Republicans.

FEC discovered suspicious donation patterns from unemployed individuals, with large sums donated through multiple transactions to ActBlue and Democrat campaigns. Investigator Tony Saruga found 400,000 new ActBlue accounts in 30 days. Harris campaign emails requested small donations using fear tactics, including fake names in their lists. The goal appears to be creating a facade of grassroots support while potentially funneling larger sums through these transactions.

A new report alleges that the House and Senate are investigating whether foreign adversaries illegally funneled money into Democratic campaigns. Letters were sent to the Treasury Department, FBI, and the Director of National Intelligence, claiming China, Iran, Venezuela, and Russia funneled money through ActBlue. According to one speaker, 19 state attorneys general, Senator Ron Johnson, and House Administration Committee Chairman Brian Pfau are also investigating. Congressional officials are requesting Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). Congress suspects foreign money is being routed to Democratic coffers. The speaker claims that obtaining SARs was key to substantiating the Hunter Biden story by tracing foreign funds. If Trump wins the election, the speaker predicts the Justice Department will launch a major criminal investigation in 2025.

Kamala Harris raised suspiciously large amounts of money in a short time, sparking concerns about fraudulent donations. An investigation revealed potential money laundering through ActBlue, a democratic fundraising platform. Ordinary citizens' names and addresses were used for large donations they did not make. The source of the money remains unclear, but past reports suggest further scrutiny is needed.

A new report alleges that the House and Senate are investigating whether foreign adversaries illegally funneled money into Democratic campaigns. Letters were sent to the Treasury Department, FBI, and Director of National Intelligence alleging that China, Iran, Venezuela, and Russia funneled money through the ActBlue online donation portal. According to one speaker, 19 state attorneys general, Senator Ron Johnson, and House Administration Committee Chairman Brian Pfau are also investigating. Congressional officials are seeking Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). Private briefings from financial institutions have led Congress to believe that foreign money is being routed to Democratic coffers. The speaker claims that obtaining SARs allowed the Hunter Biden story to go from fiction to fact. If Trump wins the election, the speaker predicts the Justice Department will conduct a major criminal investigation in 2025.

Kamala Harris is allegedly paying people to attend rallies. The speaker claims to have proof of this through a Casting Network billboard. The billboard sought nonunion actors for a Democratic event, offering payment, a per diem for meals and transportation, and coverage of flight and other expenses. The submissions were due the day before the speaker discussed it. The speaker believes this shows that the Harris campaign's ground game is a facade, as they are willing to pay for people to attend rallies.

There are claims that the person presented as Kamala Harris is not actually her, as they look completely different. This has led to accusations of deception towards voters, suggesting the use of body doubles and a fake Kamala Harris.

Bill Gates reportedly donated $50 million to Kamala Harris's campaign via a 501c4, which is an organization allegedly set up to conceal large money donations. According to the New York Times, this was Gates's first donation in twenty years, during which he had remained bipartisan and stayed out of politics. When asked, Gates stated he donated zero to the 2020 campaign but felt the need to donate to Harris's campaign because it was different than any other. Separately, Gates was reportedly indicted in The Netherlands for lying to the public about the COVID vaccine and will have to go to trial. The speaker suggests Gates donated to Harris to avoid trial in the United States.

Kamala Harris's campaign is facing scrutiny after a $1,000,000 loss and allegations of money laundering. Just before an interview with Al Sharpton, her campaign donated $500,000 to his nonprofit, raising questions about the motives behind the donation. Critics argue that this appears to be a bribe, as Sharpton's organization has a history of questionable financial practices, including spending on private jets and limousines. The situation suggests a troubling connection between Harris's campaign and Sharpton's nonprofit, leading to concerns about transparency and integrity in political funding.

Last year, reports surfaced about lavish spending from campaign funds on luxury items by Harris. Former aides claimed she used the funds like a personal checking account. When asked about public concerns regarding her spending habits, Harris acknowledged early campaign issues were addressed through restructuring. She believes the problems have been solved.

Discoveries on fec.gov revealed suspicious donation patterns from supposedly unemployed individuals. Four unemployed donors made nearly $198,000 in donations through thousands of transactions. They donated to various Democrat campaigns and PACs, raising questions about the source of their funds. Investigator Tony Saruga found over 400,000 new ActBlue accounts created in 30 days, with Harris campaign emails urging small donations. Fake names were inserted into ActBlue lists, showing up in official emails, suggesting a potential scam to create a facade of grassroots support while funneling larger sums.

James O'Keefe claims that 60% of the ActBlue donations he investigated originate from China, suggesting that the Chinese Communist Party is financially supporting the Democratic Party and influencing U.S. elections. This raises questions about accountability, including the need for arrests and congressional hearings.

An investigation reveals potential discrepancies in campaign donations attributed to unwitting donors through platforms like WinRed and ActBlue. FEC data suggests individuals are donating large sums via numerous small transactions, raising questions about hidden agendas. One New Jersey resident, Alexandra Gina, is listed as donating over $154,000 in three years through thousands of transactions, which she denies. The investigation found that WinRed and ActBlue did not respond to requests for clarification. The report also highlights the influence of foreign money in US elections, mentioning Swiss billionaire Hans Georg Wiese's significant contributions to progressive causes. The team encourages viewers to check their own FEC records for irregularities and report findings. They are also hosting a webinar to train citizen journalists.

The speakers discuss Kamala Harris's campaign allegedly paying for Google ads to promote articles with edited headlines and subheads. These altered headlines, according to the speakers, present a more favorable view of Harris than the original articles. Speaker 1 asserts that the Harris campaign is paying for misinformation, while simultaneously criticizing others for spreading it. Speaker 2 notes that while the ads are labeled as "paid for," many people may not notice the disclaimer. He adds that the original articles are already so positive that the campaign only needs to tweak the headlines to make them even more favorable. Speaker 0 expresses disgust, pointing out Harris has never received a vote, yet was allowed to approach the nomination without scrutiny. The Harris campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

There are claims that the person presented as Kamala Harris is not actually her, as they look different. This has led to accusations of deception towards voters, suggesting the use of body doubles and a fake Kamala Harris.

Kamala received a $1,000,000 payment for an interview in September, raising questions about her motives. She previously labeled Trump a dictator, which helped her secure $1,000,000,000 in donations, but much of that was allegedly mismanaged. In a podcast appearance, she insisted the host travel to DC and used campaign funds to create an elaborate fake set in a hotel room, costing over $100,000 for just two chairs and a table. The actual cost could have been around $6, leaving uncertainty about the remaining funds. Following the election loss, her campaign sent out urgent donation requests, prompting skepticism about how donor money is being utilized.

A number of celebrities, including Cardi B, LeBron James, Martha Stewart, Taylor Swift, Ellen DeGeneres, Beyonce, Ben Stiller, Oprah Winfrey, Madonna, Jay-Z, Jennifer Lopez, and Leonardo DiCaprio, have recently come out in support of Kamala Harris. It raises the question of whether their support is genuine or if they feel pressured to endorse her. What could they possibly have in common that drives this collective backing?

There is bipartisan agreement to crack down on foreign money in elections. A Swiss billionaire, Hans Georg Weiss, is accused of funneling money through pass-through groups for political activities. Mark Hemingway discusses this issue in an article for RealClearInvestigation.

The video reveals suspicious donation patterns on fec.gov, with unemployed individuals making numerous small donations totaling tens of thousands of dollars to ActBlue and various Democrat campaigns. Investigator Tony Saruga found over 400,000 new ActBlue accounts created in 30 days, with the Harris campaign sending emails asking for $1 donations using fear tactics. Fake donors were inserted into ActBlue lists, showing the campaign's desperation for small donations to potentially facilitate a larger scam.

Kamala Harris reportedly received $1,000,000 for an interview in September, raising questions about her commitment to democracy. After calling Trump a dictator, she secured $1,000,000,000 in donations but allegedly mismanaged the funds, spending lavishly. During a podcast appearance, she insisted the host travel to DC and used campaign funds to create an elaborate set in a hotel room, which cost significantly more than necessary. Following the election loss, her campaign sent out urgent donation requests, prompting skepticism about how donor money is being utilized.

As the newly elected DNC vice chair, David Hogg has been quite busy. He's facing potential legal trouble for allegedly misusing DNC contact lists. Shortly after assuming his role, Hogg reportedly began soliciting donations via email, directing the funds to his PAC, "Leaders We Deserve." This PAC appears to be funneling money back to Hogg, potentially amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars. This isn't just a minor ethical lapse; it seems to be a deliberate scheme to exploit donor funds for personal enrichment. The irony of naming his PAC "Leaders We Deserve" while allegedly engaging in such behavior is remarkable.