reSee.it - Related Video Feed

This speaker claims that SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated or purified, and the PCR test is not reliable for detecting infectious virus. They argue that autopsies are not being conducted to hide the truth about COVID-19. The speaker questions the validity of the vaccine and criticizes the government's handling of the pandemic, including the use of the PCR test. They mention a document sent to the Chief Constable regarding these issues.

Andrew Bridgen recounts his time in the Conservative Party, his expulsion for speaking out about COVID-19, and his current views on vaccines, governance, and global policy agendas. He states the evidence about vaccines has existed for a long time and is now receiving more mainstream coverage, though he believes the “controlled hangout” is not complete and that those responsible for what he calls the biggest crime against humanity should be held to account. He mentions a fear that the situation could repeat itself. Bridgen describes his awareness in 2022 that government vaccine plans were alarming, including proposals to vaccinate babies as young as six months. He says many Brexiteer colleagues privately doubted vaccines or knew of harms, but would not publicly speak out. He narrates personal anecdotes from MPs and their relatives who suffered vaccine harms, and alleges attempts to bribe him to betray constituents. He recalls a final warning before his expulsion, including a meeting with a senior party figure in which he discussed vaccine harms, NG163 (the supposed end-of-life policy) and the alleged euthanization of vulnerable elderly patients in hospitals during the first COVID wave. Bridgen claims NG163 involved giving respiratory suppressants (midazolam and morphine) to suspected COVID-19 patients to hasten death, arguing vulnerable elderly were euthanized to create fear and push vaccine uptake. He asserts the party line then was there was no political appetite for his views, while warning about the powerful vested interests resisting scrutiny. He ties these experiences to broader political corruption and explains his own rise from an electorate he won against expectations to a financially successful private life that later collapsed due to government actions, including HS2. He argues HS2 is a “massive fraud” with a long timeline but little tangible progress, including laying no track despite vast spending. Bridgen connects his experiences to broader revelations: exposing the Post Office Horizon scandal (involving Michael and Susan Rudkin, constituents), involvement in pushing for a public inquiry he says was ultimately dismissed, and his belief that the public inquiry system is designed to delay accountability, enrich lawyers, and avoid criminal responsibility. He argues for private criminal prosecutions instead of public inquiries. He highlights his other campaigns, such as exposing modern slavery in Leicester’s fast-fashion industry (sweatshop conditions, underpaid workers, overcrowded housing), and his 2023 Thalidomide documentary. He notes the Thalidomide cover-up, the role of Grunenthal, and the Strasbourg Court of Justice ruling that Parliament had suppressed debate for 11 years, which he links to lessons about accountability and pharmaceutical accountability. He asserts parallels between Thalidomide and COVID-19 vaccines, alleging marketing claims of “safe and effective” violated by later warnings. Bridgen claims that, after his vaccine activism, he became financially ruined by political power and judicial manipulation. He argues the system is broken and favors elites over the public, advocating a complete governance overhaul toward direct democracy. He envisions reducing MPs, enlarging constituencies, banning external interests from MPs, limiting terms, and creating referendums every three months with the people acting as a second chamber, provided there is a free and fair press to inform voters. He cites Switzerland as a model for direct democracy and prosperity. Regarding digital ID, Bridgen calls it the cornerstone of Agenda 2030, noting all parliaments have signed up and that it is not debated in Parliament, yet is essential to implementing Agenda 2030 and the supposed control over carbon, banking, and speech. He argues that digital ID will enable a form of social control and a centralized, surveillant state, potentially resembling a Chinese social-credit system. He criticizes both major parties for not opposing digital ID and for celebrating reforms or international alignments that he sees as erosive of freedoms. The discussion also covers the X platform (Twitter) and freedom of speech, with Bridgen suggesting government pressure to suppress alternative media and noting international interest from Australia. He mentions recent arrests for social media posts, and says there is a broader pattern of state control, including concerns about child trafficking, child abuse, and alleged occult or Luciferian networks as part of a global corruption scheme. Towards the end, Bridgen touches on education issues, including concerns about gender ideology and indoctrination in schools, arguing for science-based education free from political influence, and calling for reform to prevent what he terms a descent into a dystopian future. He argues that the root cause is a deliberate, systemic shift toward centralized power and surveillance, and he believes decisive action can halt it.

According to the speaker, there was no COVID pandemic or novel virus. They believe it was a behavior modification exercise driven by financial interests. They quote Peter Daschick to support their claim and accuse the Biden administration of domestic terrorism. They argue that the administration used lockdowns and media manipulation to win the election. The speaker also mentions the adverse effects of vaccines. They conclude by stating that the government's actions are treasonous and call for the replacement of the current administration.

Speaker asserts that "the state, however you define that, the military, CDC, Tony Fauci, Ralph Barack at the University of North Carolina created a weaponized virus. Correct? Gain of function research. They contracted it out to China, and it caused a pandemic around the world once it was released. The government created a weaponized virus that then got out and caused a global pandemic." They ask, "When are we gonna have accountability for that?" They seek accountability for "the COVID era," and for "the CDC has known since 1999 that vaccines cause autism, and they've covered it up for twenty six years." They ask, "How do we begin to have accountability?" and conclude, "You want to call it something different? Truth Commissions, criminal trials? You're I would love to comparing"

Former vice president of Pfizer, Speaker 1, shares his insights on the events of early 2020. He noticed inconsistencies in statements made by colleagues and realized something was amiss. The simultaneous lockdowns across multiple countries convinced him that this was a coordinated effort beyond the local level. Speaker 1 accuses those in power of lying and implementing ineffective measures. He believes that the vaccines being administered are intentionally harmful, based on his extensive experience in drug design. He is unafraid of legal action and challenges them to sue him, confident that he would win.

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and the establishment of a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for an eradicated disease and suggests that there may be a conspiracy to commit acts of terror. They provide evidence of patents and statements indicating the weaponization of coronaviruses. The speaker accuses the World Health Organization and various foundations of criminal collusion and points out the involvement of MI5. They conclude by stating that the current situation is a marketing ploy to deprive people of their liberty.

Former vice president of Pfizer, Speaker 1, shares his insights on the COVID-19 pandemic. He noticed discrepancies in what his former colleagues, including Sir Patrick Valens, were saying on television. This led him to believe that there was a supranational operation at play, orchestrated by organizations like the WHO or the World Economic Forum. He accuses these individuals of lying and claims that the pandemic response measures were ineffective and not part of any country's preparedness plans. Speaker 1 also expresses concerns about the safety of the vaccines, stating that he believes they were intentionally designed to harm people.

The speaker presents evidence suggesting that the events of the past four years were orchestrated to infringe on people's liberties. They claim that the manipulation of coronaviruses began in 1966 and that various organizations colluded to establish a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for a disease that was declared eradicated. They argue that this is an act of domestic and international terrorism. The speaker also highlights patents and statements indicating the weaponization of coronaviruses. They assert that there was a planned release of a respiratory pathogen in 2019.

Retired police constable Mark Sexton raises concerns about the contract between Pfizer and the South African government regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. He highlights that the contract states the long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not known, contradicting claims made by the UK government. Sexton suggests that if the UK contract is similar, the government knowingly misled the public. He calls for legal action against the government and Pfizer, accusing them of fraud and crimes against humanity. Sexton urges the Metropolitan Police to investigate and emphasizes the need for accountability and justice for the victims. He provides a link to the contract for further examination. (147 words)

"there wasn't a pandemic, there wasn't a public health emergency, there was nothing unusual happening." "In order for an emergency to be declared, which I think he did in 2020, March, whatever it was, He has to have some evidence of that." "There is nowhere in the world you can find increased frequency of respiratory illness and respiratory deaths anywhere until after the WHO called a pandemic." "They called a pandemic with no evidence of a pandemic." "They were lying to you." "Then they created the we, all our governments, created the impression of a pandemic by using misusing a test that doesn't measure what it says, PCR." "It's not a mistake. They they knew it was rubbish." "It's as simple as that." "If you go and look for it, you'll not find the evidence."

The speaker presents evidence suggesting that the events of the past four years were orchestrated to infringe on people's liberties. They claim that the manipulation of coronaviruses began in 1966 and that various organizations colluded to establish a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for a disease that was declared eradicated. They also discuss the potential weaponization of coronaviruses and the release of a respiratory pathogen in 2019. The speaker implies that these actions constitute acts of terrorism.

A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel with sinister plans to enrich themselves and harm humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and provide evidence to support their claims. The speaker argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was not a public health crisis but a deliberate act of genocide. They criticize the WHO's immunity from legal prosecution and highlight the financial ties between the organization and the Gates Foundation. The speaker also accuses the WHO and pharmaceutical companies of engaging in biological warfare and profiting from the pandemic. They call for the dismantling of the WHO.

Alex Jones claims that there is a global agenda to depopulate the world through forced medical treatments, specifically vaccines. He believes that vaccines are intentionally designed to have adverse effects and slowly kill people. He suggests speaking to Dr. Rima Lobo, a medical doctor who understands the situation. The governor arranges a meeting with Dr. Lobo, who explains that she left the United States because she feels unsafe. She believes that compulsory vaccination will soon be enforced under the guise of voluntary vaccination, leading to a genocidal holocaust and permanent sterility. She shares a conversation with a patient who mentioned a "great calling" to thin the population, which she claims is orchestrated by the aristocrats.

Speaker 1, a former vice president of Pfizer, discusses his experience in the pharmaceutical industry and his concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic. He claims that global lockdowns indicate a supranational operation orchestrated by organizations like the WHO or the World Economic Forum. He accuses public figures of lying about the virus and asserts that the vaccines are intentionally harmful. Despite facing censorship and defamation, he remains convinced that the injections were designed to cause harm and even death. He expresses worry and believes that his knowledge and experience in drug development support his claims.

Speaker 0 questions the idea that Doctor Fauci is involved in a plot to kill millions, seeking clarity on the claim. Speaker 1 says they are reasonable and that Fauci is not an innocent bystander; he is aware of what he’s doing, but the extent of involvement is not known to them. Speaker 2 cites the Center for Countering Digital Hate, stating Dirashad Bhattar is one of the top spreaders of COVID disinformation, once with more than a million followers. Bhattar allegedly claimed “More people are dying from the COVID vaccine than from COVID,” and that “the Red Cross won’t accept blood from people who have had the COVID nineteen vaccine.” He posted that “most who took COVID vaccines will be dead by 2025,” and promoted the overarching conspiracy that COVID was a planned operation as part of a secret global plot to depopulate the earth. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 2 believes the pandemic was planned; Speaker 2 confirms there is a suspicion of a plan to reduce the population, though Speaker 1 says they have no idea. Speaker 2 criticizes Bhattar, saying it would be laughable if it weren’t so dangerous and that Qatar (Qatar’s commentary) compares COVID and the vaccine to World War II and Doctor Anthony Fauci to Adolf Hitler. Speaker 1 pushes back by asking to what extent Fauci would be equated with Hitler. Speaker 3 asserts that lies cost lives in a pandemic, and that encouraging people not to vaccinate will cause people to lose their lives. Speaker 2 describes Qatar as encouraging distrust of life-saving vaccines and using false, twisted information and unproven conspiracies to do so. Speaker 0 asks if the COVID vaccine works. Speaker 1 states the vaccine is very effective at what it was designed for, but “it’s not preventing death. Certainly not.” Speaker 2 contradicts, claiming that Bhattar believes life-saving vaccines are more dangerous than the virus itself, and Speaker 1 asks why the vaccine would cause more deaths than the problem itself, noting 6,340,000,000 doses administered. Speaker 0 requests the completion of a sentence about what each vaccine is geared up for, but Speaker 1 says he’s not a vaccine developer and mentions “Scientific corruption.” Speaker 2 notes Qatar has been removed from Facebook and Instagram due to disinformation but remains on Twitter, Telegram, and his own site, filled with falsehoods. Speaker 0 recalls a September 5 retweet of a doctored AstraZeneca packaging photo suggesting the vaccine was made in 2018; Speaker 1 says the photo was perhaps fake, and questions why Speaker 0 would challenge the agencies that have caused deaths. Speaker 0 argues it’s reasonable to question agencies, noting Speaker 1 had 1,200,000 followers who received false information; Speaker 1 admits if a tweet with a doctor’s photo was sent in error, it was a mistake, and he cannot make mistakes on the numbers. Speaker 2 notes vaccine studies showing vaccines remain ninety percent effective in preventing hospitalization and death, while Qatar claims the vaccine is the danger. Speaker 1 counters that thousands are dying and the delta variant is “vaccine injured,” citing CDC data, which Speaker 0 disputes as not true. Speaker 1 asserts he does not want to be part of a mass genocide and suggests this era will be remembered as a worst time in history, even worse than World War II. Speaker 0 concludes by calling Speaker 1 crazy. Speaker 2 ends with a reference to North Carolina’s Board of Medicine reprimanding someone prior to COVID.

The speaker claims that the chief medical officer of health and Alberta Health Services have stated on record that there is no proof of the virus and no material evidence to support the use of the Public Health Act against the COVID-19 pandemic. They urge people to request their transcripts and court documents under the Freedom of Information Act. The speaker provides their contact information on Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter, mentioning their difficulties with multiple Facebook accounts and being censored. They also mention that their previous work and investigations have been erased from the internet, including interactions with First Nations, Hereditary Chiefs, and a pipeline project. They mention attending the Bilderberg conference and filming Canadian delegates with access to a large sum of Canadian taxpayers' money.

The discussion centers on COVID-19 misinformation and the roles of public figures and disinformation spreaders. Speaker 0 questions whether doctor Fauci is involved in a plot to kill millions. Speaker 1 says he cannot confirm involvement but asserts Fauci is not an innocent bystander and is aware of his actions; he doesn’t have the information to determine the extent of Fauci’s involvement. Speaker 2 identifies Dr. Dirashid Bhattar as one of the top spreaders of COVID-19 disinformation on social media, citing the Center for Countering Digital Hate, noting Bhattar once had more than a million followers. The dialogue includes several false or debunked claims attributed to Bhattar. Speaker 1 states that “More people are dying from the COVID vaccine than from COVID,” a claim Speaker 2 labels as not true, along with Bhattar’s assertion that “the Red Cross won’t accept blood from people who have had the COVID vaccine,” and his claim that “most who took COVID vaccines will be dead by 2025.” Bhattar’s broader theory is that COVID was a planned operation, politically motivated as part of a secret global plot to depopulate the earth. Speaker 0 asks if Speaker 1 believes the pandemic was planned; Speaker 1 responds affirmatively but says he has no idea who is behind it. Speaker 2 warns that praising or repeating Bhattar’s views is dangerous, noting Bhattar’s use of false or twisted information to distrust vaccines. The conversation touches on whether the COVID vaccine works; Speaker 1 says the vaccine is “very effective at what it was designed for perhaps,” but “not preventing death.” Speaker 0 challenges this, and Speaker 2 counters that Bhattar doubles down on vaccines being more dangerous than the virus, even in the face of data. A numerical claim is raised: “6,340,000,000 doses of this vaccine have been given,” with implications if the claim were true. Speaker 1 says vaccines are designed with ingredients published and that each vaccine appears to be different, though he concedes not being a vaccine developer. Speaker 2 notes Bhattar has been removed from Facebook and Instagram for disinformation but remains active on Twitter, Telegram, and his own site. Speaker 0 references a September 5 retweet of a photo suggesting AstraZeneca was made in 2018; Speaker 1 acknowledges it could have been fake and questions why Bhattar would share such content. A combined exchange discusses questioning agencies and the consequences of misinformation, with Speaker 0 accusing Bhattar of contributing to a mass misinformation problem and Speaker 1 acknowledging the existence of a large follower base that has received false information. The dialogue closes with a mention of a statement from North Carolina’s Board of Medicine prior to COVID, implying regulatory context or action.

The speakers claim the push for a COVID vaccine was motivated by money, and they believe there's a connection between the vaccine and subsequent deaths and blood clots. They express frustration that people aren't acknowledging this connection. One speaker shares a story about a veteran who was allegedly told that the hospital treating him was not allowed to connect his adverse side effects to the vaccine, even when listed as side effects. They say corporations don't want to talk about it because they mandated the vaccine. They believe people who got vaccinated don't want to admit they made a bad decision, leading them to deny any link between the vaccine and increased mortality rates, strokes, cancer, and heart attacks. One speaker recalls being gaslit by a former prime minister who denied coercing anyone into getting vaccinated, despite restrictions placed on the unvaccinated. Another speaker says they were misrepresented on CNN during their own recovery from COVID.

Speaker 0 raises concerns about the current policies that are damaging our way of life and questions why such drastic measures are being taken. They mention influential globalists, like Claus Schwab, who see the pandemic as an opportunity to reset the world. Speaker 1, the Prime Minister, claims to be unaware of Schwab's book but advises against conspiracy theories. Speaker 0 presents evidence of a letter from the Prime Minister to Schwab, thanking him for his book and calling it a hopeful analysis. Speaker 1 dismisses it as a polite gesture and implies that they cannot read every book they receive. Speaker 0 points out the contradiction, and Speaker 1 deflects the accusation.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was premeditated and an act of terrorism by a state. They argue that the United States and the UK, along with researchers worldwide, planned to use the virus to impose tyrannical reforms on society. They emphasize that there are many people who did not comply with these measures. Another speaker praises the evidence presented by the first speaker, stating that it is all based on published documents and facts. They encourage others to read the documents and draw their own conclusions.

The transcript centers on a heated discussion about COVID-19 misinformation and prominent figures blamed by conspiracy theories. Key points include: - Speaker 0 questions whether doctor Fauci is involved in a plot to kill millions; Speaker 1 responds that Fauci is not an innocent bystander but is not privy to the full extent of his involvement. The exchange emphasizes uncertainty about Fauci’s exact role. - Speaker 2 describes Dirashad Bhattar (Dr. Bhattar) as one of the top spreaders of disinformation about COVID-19, noting he once had more than a million followers and is cited by the Center for Countering Digital Hate. Bhattar is accused of spreading dangerous misinformation on COVID-19 across social media. - The dialogue presents multiple disinformation claims attributed to Bhattar: - “More people are dying from the COVID vaccine than from COVID.” - “Red Cross won’t accept blood from people who have had the COVID nineteen vaccine.” - A post claiming most who took COVID vaccines will be dead by 2025. - The overarching conspiracy theory that COVID was a planned operation, politically motivated as part of a secret global plot to depopulate the earth. - The participants debate whether the pandemic was planned. Speaker 0 asks if the pandemic was planned; Speaker 1 says yes but admits uncertainty about who organized it and why. Speaker 1 suspects research suggesting population reduction or minimized reproduction rates. - Qatar (Bhattar) is criticized for comparing COVID and the vaccine to World War II and for labeling Fauci as Adolf Hitler; Speaker 1 rejects comparing Fauci to Hitler and references Nazis who killed six million Jews. - The conversation includes a warning from Speaker 3: “Lies cost lives in a pandemic. If you're encouraging people not to vaccinate, you will cause people to lose their lives.” - The dialogue describes Bhattar’s messaging as using “false twisted information and unproven conspiracies” and notes his removal from Facebook and Instagram, while he remains active on Twitter, Telegram, and his own website. - Vaccine effectiveness is debated. Speaker 1 asserts the vaccine is “very effective at what it was designed for perhaps, but it's not preventing death,” and claims “the delta variant is all vaccine injured,” citing CDC data as evidence. Speaker 2 counters that vaccines remained ninety percent effective in preventing hospitalization and death and asserts Bhattar asserts the vaccine is the danger. - A claim about a doctored AstraZeneca packaging photo from September 5 is discussed: Bhattar retweeted a photo that appeared to indicate the vaccine was made in 2018; Speaker 1 labels the image as fake, while Speaker 0 questions why he would share it. The discussion highlights accountability for misinformation and the impact of misrepresentations on followers (Bhattar reportedly had 1,200,000 followers at one point). - The dialogue ends with a remark from Speaker 0 calling Bhattar’s views “crazy,” and a brief, abrupt note that, before COVID, North Carolina’s board of medicine reprimanded (incomplete thought).

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and the establishment of a mandate for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker questions the need for a vaccine for an eradicated disease and suggests that there may be a conspiracy to commit acts of terror. They provide evidence of patents and statements indicating the weaponization of coronaviruses. The speaker accuses the World Health Organization and various foundations of criminal collusion and points out the involvement of MI5. They conclude by stating that the current situation is a marketing ploy to deprive people of their liberty.

The speaker claims that the COVID-19 pandemic was premeditated and an act of terrorism by a state. They state that the United States, the UK, and researchers planned to use the virus to enforce tyrannical reforms on society. The speaker emphasizes that their statements are supported by documented evidence, which they have provided in a speech to the EU parliament. They encourage others to read the documents and draw their own conclusions.

The speaker believes it's time for the truth about the COVID-19 crisis. They accuse the government of causing harm to millions of people physically, mentally, and financially. They claim that the lockdown was senseless and the COVID vaccine has minimal benefits and significant side effects. The speaker suggests that the government was influenced by a network aiming to profit from COVID patents. They accuse specific individuals of committing serious crimes and argue that these actions must be brought to court. The speaker concludes by stating that the COVID crisis will only end when those responsible are held accountable.

Steve Kirsch calls Ben Haynes, the Director of Media Relations for the CDC, to inform him that he possesses record-level data on COVID-19 vaccinations and deaths, which has never been available to the CDC before. Kirsch offers to provide this data to the CDC for independent analysis to determine vaccine safety. He emphasizes that the data can be authenticated and that it shows a concerning increase in mortality rates after vaccination. Kirsch urges Haynes to take this offer seriously, as ignoring it would be a dereliction of duty and could cost lives. He provides his contact information and offers assistance in analyzing and authenticating the data.