reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A congresswoman questioned where the money would come from to cover deployments within the limited budget. The speaker responded by recalling 2020 when Minnesota Governor Walz abandoned a police precinct and allowed it to be burned, leading to days of chaos in Minneapolis. Because of this, the National Guard mobilization was too late. The speaker stated that President Trump recognized that such situations are bad for citizens. The speaker believes ICE has the right to safely conduct operations in any state, especially after 21,000,000 illegals crossed the border under the previous administration. The congresswoman reiterated her budget question. The speaker stated that the National Guard and Marines were deployed to protect ICE in Los Angeles so they can enforce immigration law, unlike what Governor Walz did in 2020.

Disaster relief funds are not being used for undocumented immigrants in the U.S. This claim is false. No money is being diverted from actual disaster response needs.

Disaster relief funds are not being used for undocumented immigrants in the U.S. This claim is false. No money is being diverted from actual disaster response needs.

Official A states that in 2022, the office found that president Biden's DHS allowed some Afghans into the country before they were fully vetted, including one who had been liberated from prison by the Taliban. Official A notes that over 50 known or suspected terrorists had entered the United States as a result of Biden administration screening or lack thereof, and that last month the director of national intelligence said that 2,000 Afghans in America may have ties to terrorism. Official A asks whether a formal vetting process was in place, and asserts that the department did not have a formal process at the start of the OAW. Official A repeats the figure and corrects it to 36,000, calling it astounding. Official B replies that CARE, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, is the organization in question, stating that CARE was founded at a 1993 meeting and that they specifically state they are going to present themselves as a legitimate civil rights organization while furthering the mission of Hamas. Official A asks how much money CARE received from the federal government to shepherd Afghan parolees. Official B responds that CARE received $15,000,000 in California and more than $1,000,000 in Washington. Official A adds that when they check federal databases for CARE, they find nothing, and Official B explains that the money did not go directly from the federal government to CARE, but rather through an intermediary, and that this is how they’ve hidden the money. Official A states, “We need to find out where this money has gone. This is a scandal. This is corruption, and we've gotta figure out how taxpayer money has ended up in the hands of yet another organization terrorized.”

Is it standard for your department to meet with dark money groups secretly? I can't speak to actions taken by the former deputy secretary, who is no longer with us. But you are the secretary of the interior, correct? Yes, I am. Do the people here work for you? They work with me. So you're not in charge? I provide vision and direction. Do you take responsibility for the department? Yes, I do. Then why are your leaders meeting with dark money groups off the books? This is the first I've heard of this. I can't comment on my deputy's actions. What did they gain from canceling leases at their request? I don't know who that individual is. You seem unaware of your department's issues. We have a corruption problem in your department.

You treating migrants humanely? No, reports show they’re on planes without water. That’s nonsense. Our detention facilities exceed all standards. Check the ICE website for our performance-based standards; they’re the highest in the industry. But are you only detaining illegal criminals? There are reports of students showing bruises from deportation flights. That’s absurd. We investigate any claims. The ICE professionals I led uphold the highest standards. We care for detainees while enforcing the law without apology. Are you using military planes for deportations as a tactic? No, we’re securing the border, which is a national security risk. Illegal entry is a crime. The current crisis overwhelms border security, leading to increased drug trafficking and terrorism. President Trump will secure the border and enforce immigration laws without hesitation. Expect our efforts to intensify soon.

AOC is doing webinars that give advice to undocumented immigrants about how to avoid being caught and how to stay in the United States, which may be gaming the system. I've contacted the Deputy Attorney General to see if this is obstructing law enforcement. I need the DOJ to determine if a line has been crossed. In my opinion, this is an impediment. We need advice on how to move forward. If necessary, we will take every federal dollar out of the city. This is a matter of public and community safety. Releasing dangerous people endangers the public, our officers, and even undocumented immigrants. If sanctuary cities won't act to make their communities safer, President Trump will.

The speaker directs viewers to fireaid.org to search for grant round two and find Cal Volunteers. The speaker identifies Cal Volunteers as Newsom's nonprofit. Upon viewing the Cal Volunteers page, the speaker observes that the individuals pictured do not appear to be fire victims. The speaker notes that their clothes do not look burned out. The speaker concludes that Cal Volunteers did not need fire aid money.

The speaker states that disinformation is dangerous because it may prevent people from asking for needed help. They claim over $200,000,000 has been provided to impacted areas. The speaker asserts that Congress needs to provide additional funding to the disaster relief fund. They state that the way the question was asked is misinformation. The speaker says there is money available to help survivors of Hurricane Helene and Hurricane Milton, but additional funding will be needed due to the unknown impact of Hurricane Milton. The speaker claims Congress needs to come back and do their job by providing extra assistance and funding to the disaster relief fund.

FEMA is denying my reports that over a billion dollars intended for disaster relief is being diverted to address the current immigration situation. They call it a rumor and a lie. However, my source is FEMA's own website and press releases. They've publicly boasted about using this money for immigration purposes for years. Now, they claim they have enough money for disaster response, contradicting DHS Secretary Mayorkas who stated they lack sufficient funds for hurricane season. They’re hoping no one will fact-check their conflicting statements. I have archived their statements in case they remove them from their website. This money, meant for American citizens in need, is being redirected.

I asked about the border wall funding and suggested redirecting the money. However, they refused to do so. According to the law, they are obligated to use the money appropriately.

Trump and Tom Homan, we want you to take action against those protecting illegals. You claim you won't raise property taxes, yet here we are facing a $1 billion deficit, with half spent on illegals. You promised not to allow Trump to come in and enforce the law, but now you’re trying to take him to court using our tax dollars. We’re here to hold you accountable and let your constituents know how you’re spending their money to protect illegals. This is serious, and we will make sure everyone knows what you’re doing.

The government allocated $584 million to assist illegal immigrants through Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Services while claiming they couldn't find funds to help American victims of hurricanes and wildfires. During this time, families in North Carolina were living in tents, and those in Los Angeles were facing wildfires, yet the government couldn't provide them with housing. This stark contrast raises serious concerns about priorities. Regardless of political affiliation, if you think this is acceptable, it reflects a disregard for American citizens. Complaining about the exposure of this issue only shows a lack of concern for the situation at hand.

We are halting all grant funding to NGOs that facilitate illegal immigration. Millions of taxpayer dollars have been misused to support this issue, and we are reevaluating how these funds are spent to ensure they strengthen our country and enhance safety. Many NGOs operate not only in the U.S. but also in Mexico, encouraging illegal immigrants to cross the border. Initially, I viewed NGOs as charitable organizations, but I've come to see that some function as shadow governments, using taxpayer money for actions the federal government cannot legally undertake. This has compromised our national security, and we will no longer support these operations with federal funding.

If law enforcement officers forsake their oath of office by failing to act when they see people swarming detention centers, obstructing traffic, burning cars, and trying to injure people, they are in violation of their oath. Mayor Bass and Governor Newsom are asked to state their position on the 12,000,000 people residing illegally in the U.S. amidst a $2,000,000,000,000 deficit, and what their solution is for the 300,000 to 500,000 people believed to have criminal records. The speaker questions the Mexican government's position, suggesting a bill to tax remittances, which could lead to higher taxes on these remittances. The speaker states that violent demonstrators believe they will be subsidized with social services to free up money to send to Mexico, its greatest source of foreign exchange, while the cartels kill between sixty and eighty thousand Americans. Gavin Newsom is accused of siding with people committing violence and pouring gasoline on a volatile situation.

We're announcing that we've halted all grant funding to NGOs that facilitate illegal immigration. It's shocking how much federal money has been misused in this way. I've taken action to reevaluate these funds to ensure taxpayer dollars are used to strengthen our country and keep it safe. We need to scrutinize how federal grants are utilized. No more money will be spent to undermine our nation. We will uphold President Trump's commitment to secure our border, remove those here illegally, and ensure taxpayer funds are not used to support this situation.

The first speaker contends that Congress is trying to give $5,000,000,000 of your money for refugee resettlement programs, and that money ends up in places like this. The second speaker identifies the International Rescue Committee as the largest refugee NGO in the country, noting that they get government funds and subcontract the work out to places like this. The first speaker describes the Somali American Community Center as a location that receives grants from the IRC in order to help refugees resettle in America. The second speaker reports that when they went in, they found this: an almost completely abandoned retail space that hasn’t filed taxes in almost ten years. The first speaker states that almost every business in the area is focused on getting refugees on taxpayer funded welfare programs. The second speaker asserts that this is how the largest refugee city in the country is funded. The first speaker adds that this is how over 87% of Somali immigrants end up on taxpayer funded public assistance. The second speaker notes that they spent three days in Little Somalia in Atlanta, Georgia. The first speaker concludes by saying that in the largest refugee center in the entire country, this is what they found.

We're providing free meals for fire victims today, but some individuals taking food from the distribution center do not have burned homes. I confirmed that their houses did not burn down. To investigate further, I visited an evacuation shelter and found that they do not inquire about the legal status of those present. It appears that tax-funded resources are being redirected by the Red Cross to provide food and shelter for illegal migrants instead of solely for fire victims.

A list shows cities, states, and NGOs receiving $1 billion from FEMA to house illegal aliens, funded by American taxpayers. It's unacceptable to spend this money on migrants while Americans in North Carolina, Georgia, and Florida remain homeless and without support. Congress is changing direction to prioritize American citizens over migrants, as this situation is viewed as a failure to the American people. Many are outraged that their tax dollars are used to assist those who have entered the country illegally, while Americans suffer. This misallocation of resources is seen as a significant failure, and there are serious consequences for the American public due to border issues. We cannot allow this to continue.

Secretary: Today, we are announcing that we have stopped all grant funding that's being abused by NGOs to facilitate illegal immigration into this country. It's amazing to me the hundreds of millions of dollars that have been spent by the federal government that has been sent to NGOs to facilitate this invasion of our country. I have taken action to stop that funding, to reevaluate it, and to make sure that we're actually using taxpayer dollars in a way that strengthens this country and keeps us safe. People are curious how grants given out by federal agencies are utilized, and that evaluation needs to be done. We're not spending another dime to help the destruction of this country. We're going to follow through on what president Trump promised, to secure our border, depart those who are here illegally and committing criminal actions, and ensure taxpayer dollars aren't spent to assist it. Speaker: And, Madam Secretary, I don't think people fully understand the role that NGOs play in facilitating illegal immigration. I want to share these numbers up on the screen: we spend over $380,000,000 in 2024 for sheltering and service programs for illegal immigrants. But the vast network of NGOs that help facilitate it through Panama, through Mexico, and make it a landing spot here in the United States is a massive contributor to illegal immigration. So what you're telling us today is that now stops? At least the federal funding of that stops? Secretary: Yes. The Department of Homeland Security has stopped spending those dollars to fund those NGOs. What’s been revealing is that many of these NGOs actually have infrastructure and operations set up in Mexico on that side of the border, telling illegal immigrants to come to them, and they will get them across the border. So they're not just operating in the United States. They're operating outside of the United States to help make it easier for those who want to break our laws. And while I was one of those Americans years ago when somebody said NGO to me, I thought, oh, that's amazing—a nonprofit telling somebody about Jesus or spreading faith and charitable work, helping people less fortunate. Then I realized over the years it's been perverted into this shadow government. An NGO is sometimes an operation that does things the government cannot do, can't legally do, so they create an entity to use government dollars, taxpayer dollars, to do something that the federal government isn't allowed to do—to perform a shadow government operation that has recently been used to undermine our country's national security.

We are announcing the cessation of federal grant funding to NGOs that facilitate illegal immigration. Hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars have been misused to support this issue, and we are committed to reevaluating these funds to ensure they strengthen our country and enhance safety. Many NGOs operate in Mexico, encouraging illegal immigrants to cross the border. Initially, NGOs were seen as charitable organizations, but they have evolved into entities that sometimes undermine national security by performing actions the government cannot legally undertake. While some NGOs do valuable work, their role in facilitating illegal immigration is concerning.

We're talking about $2.3 billion saved, but where's the proof? You won't be satisfied until you see the 10,000 pages of evidence. Specifics are needed. If we have to go to Congress, we will show where the money is going. Some details have emerged, like the $59 million spent on luxury hotels, but that was FEMA money abused for migrants. I'm not saying it's okay, don't put words in my mouth. The portrayal isn't factually accurate. I saw what FEMA does, I believe it. These are congressionally appropriate funds.

FEMA is refuting reports that they are diverting disaster relief funds to address the "illegal invasion" occurring in the country, labeling it a rumor and denying any money is being taken from disaster response. The speaker claims their reporting is based on FEMA's own press releases, where they have been "bragging" about allocating funds to "invaders" for years. The speaker says that FEMA is now denying this because they need more money from Congress. The speaker suggests FEMA is calling the report a lie and a conspiracy theory. According to the speaker, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas stated they may not have enough money to get through hurricane season. The speaker claims FEMA is also denying being broke, asserting they have sufficient funds for immediate response and recovery needs.

"Would you allow these cities to ignore the federal law regarding the reporting of illegal immigrants and in fact provide sanctuary to these immigrants?" "The reason the cities ignore the federal law is the fact that there is no funding at the federal level to provide for the kind of enforcement at the federal level you need." "Pick up the New York Times today. There's a city not far across the river from my state that imposed a similar sanctions." "And what they found out is, as a consequence of that, their city went in the dumps in in the dumpster. Stores started closing." "Everything started to happen, and they changed the policy."

Speaker 0 explains that transparency has been lacking and that tracking money through organizations is difficult. He says there is now at least a parameter for opacity, and that this parameter must be solidified to understand how money moves internally—through contractors, subcontractors, sub-subcontractors, and networks of friends and associates. He predicts that over the next five years criminal activity will be uncovered as these money flows are examined more closely. Speaker 1 adds that there is a distinction between the border situation and how funds were dispersed north and south. As NGOs realize their federal funding is drying up, he questions whether there is enough momentum or private-sector money to sustain them, and what will happen to groups that no longer receive taxpayer dollars. Speaker 0 responds that hundreds of NGOs will close, noting that hundreds were created specifically for the mass migration crisis—serving as bus companies or as handlers at the border to assist migrants. He implies these organizations were established to address a surge and suggests their disappearance will follow as government funding wanes. Speaker 2 raises the issue of blanket preemptive pardons and asks if there should be an investigation into how the large influx of people—10 to 15 million—came about, characterizing the situation as not chaotic but well thought through. He asks if a thorough investigation is warranted. Speaker 0 calls for a full-throated investigation, including a presidential committee if needed, targeted at the DOJ under the new FBI director and the Attorney General. He argues there should be a focus on the political appointee class rather than only high-level officials like Mayorkas. He references his book, Overrun, Chapter Four, asserting that the situation was orchestrated and engineered at the political appointee level within the Domestic Policy Council, the DOJ, and all DHS agencies. He identifies people brought in from the NGO world, such as Tyler Moran, Esther Olavaria, Lucas Guten Tag, and Amy Pope, claiming they orchestrated the effort and undermined federal law and statutes that require faithful execution of laws. Speaker 2 adds that hundreds of millions of dollars flowed to the former NGO employers, implying a link between the orchestration and financial rewards. The dialogue ends with a continued assertion of movement toward an expansive influx, described as an invasion, and a call for accountability at the administrative and policy-making levels.