reSee.it - Related Video Feed

It's frustrating dealing with content takedowns, especially for the community. I've been on Instagram since I was 13, starting my kink account at 15. I began with APDL content, gradually exploring pup play, which I'm currently into. It's disheartening to lose that connection because I've made so many amazing friends over the years and have tons of pictures.

Hey, guys, I'm back! I know many of you were wondering where I've been. I've been exhausted and burnt out from social media, dealing with personal stuff behind the scenes, and working a lot. As you know, I'm a part-time photographer and full-time laser show designer. I'm also considering joining the military in a year or two. I'm thinking of coming back to this platform, but I took a break because I was super exhausted after my account kept getting spammed with suspension warnings. I've been on Instagram since I was 13 and started my kink account around 15, so it sucks to have that burn out. I have so many wonderful friends and hundreds of photos I haven't been able to share.

The speaker states they were able to open an account and get a blue check mark after having to rebuild from losing an account with over 95,000 followers. The speaker believes "they" enjoy letting people build themselves up only to tear them down and make them rebuild. The speaker's account is "doctor Suzanne h seven" (drsuzanneh7). The speaker posts about vaccines and tries to stay in that lane, rather than posting opinions or pictures of pets.

A person is unable to get a post taken down from X (formerly Twitter), even though it has millions of views and continues to gain more every hour. They claim that X will not remove the post if asked. They believe it shouldn't be solely up to the individual to address the issue, especially after the post has already gained significant traction. They suggest there should be a mechanism in place where they can send a cease and desist to X and have the content removed.

The speaker went from being a GameStop investor to creating content about financial corruption. He realized the GameStop community was uncovering corruption but needed a wider audience. Seeing short-form video as the place with the most eyes, he started a TikTok account, intentionally avoiding GameStop at first. His first video was about who owns the media companies, which resonated with a large audience. In the first three months, he gained almost a million followers. At the time, he was working as an ultra running guide and Uber Eats driver to make ends meet, having left cooking and narrowly avoided starting a nursing program. After one month of content creation, it became clear he could do it full time.

Don Lemon, Joy Reid, Stephen King, and others are leaving X, formerly Twitter, citing inappropriate content. Even the Clifton Suspension Bridge's account has shut down, opting for Instagram instead. Their departure reflects a harsh truth: their opinions were not valued, and their presence became counterproductive, even driving some to support Trump. Under Elon Musk, X has allowed for a more competitive exchange of ideas, exposing the fragility of elite narratives. As these figures exit, it’s clear their influence has diminished. They may try to distance themselves from past controversies, but the reality is that they can't escape accountability. The landscape has shifted, and many may soon find themselves returning to X, as it remains a vital platform for discourse.

They express that recognition by Microsoft or the UN means little in the face of ongoing genocide, emphasizing that “the genocide, that's when you will have our respect” and that words from politicians or organizations do not solve the problem. Shadow banning is described as a process where big tech restricts content reach for users, aligning with policy or regularity to support the propaganda they serve. Content labeling before model training could be biased (e.g., from IDEV), leading to content being flagged and pro-Palestinian users banned. Meta later calls such issues “bugs,” but they are viewed as deliberate actions to suppress certain content. They claim Larry Ellison, owner of Oracle, is the biggest contributor to the “Friends for Idea Yeah. Charity,” with last contribution around 16,000,000. They assert that if a person who is friends with Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel owns 80% of TikTok, and Netanyahu promotes using TikTok and X to spread their narrative, it demonstrates the danger of social media in shaping global views and the propaganda machine. They accuse these entities of trying to control social media to brainwash younger generations, potentially restricting pro-Palestinian speech. Lobbying is described as highly structured, with knowledge of where to go, who to speak with, and organizations that move money to actions aligned with those goals. They urge each person to contribute their own skills toward free Palestine, noting strengths in tech, music, journalism, etc., and to create alternatives and support one another to change the dynamic. They argue that Zionists became powerful by mutual support, while others are weaker due to lack of unity, asserting that unity would strengthen their movement. Hejazi introduces himself as the founder of Upscroll. He is Palestinian, born in Jordan, currently living in Australia, with seventeen years of experience in Big Tech. The genocide’s ongoing impact changed his life, leading him to feel complicit via his work at big tech and to witness shadow banning of friends, family, and others posting about Gaza. He mentions that 60 relatives were killed in Gaza. He quit his successful professional career to build an alternative social media platform and decided to devote himself to creating Upscroll, an independent platform to counter the influence of Meta, X, and TikTok. Upscroll launched a couple of months ago and is similar to Instagram, X, and soon TikTok, with tens of thousands joining monthly. On launch, the platform saw rapid uptake: hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands as users sought an alternative to shadow bans, seeking to have their content reach others. The platform is presented as a response to the pain of posting without reach and the desire to become independent from dominant platforms.

Hey everyone, PupNikon here. I've been exhausted and burnt out from social media, dealing with personal stuff, photography work, and laser show design. I'm also considering joining the military. I took a break because my account was getting flagged, which was frustrating after years of building this community since I was 13. I miss sharing content and connecting with friends I've made. I'm planning a comeback but unsure whether to revive my old Pupunknowns account or stick with this new one, PupNikon. Should I turn the old one into a backup or delete it? Let me know your thoughts. I miss you all and will see you soon. Regarding the eclipse, cloud models suggest potential breaks in Arkansas, especially mid-afternoon. But Dallas now looks like a better viewing spot than Indianapolis.

The speaker is concerned about a post with 6,000,000 views that continues to gain 200,000 views per hour. They are unable to get the post removed. The speaker believes the responsibility for removing such content should not solely fall on the individual, especially after it has already gained significant traction. They claim that attempting to have X (formerly Twitter) remove the content is futile. The speaker suggests there should be a mechanism, such as sending a cease and desist to X, to facilitate content removal.

Pup Nikon states they have been exhausted and burnt out from social media due to personal issues and work as a photographer and laser show designer. They are considering joining the military. Pup Nikon's Instagram account was spammed with suspension warnings, possibly from a hater or Instagram's automated system. They have been on Instagram since age 13 and started their kink account at 15, evolving from ABDO to pup play. They miss the friends and photos they've accumulated. Pup Nikon is unsure whether to return to their old account (Pupunknowns), stick with the new one (Pup Nikon), turn the old account into a backup, or delete it entirely and start fresh. They seek recommendations on which account to use and express excitement about returning to the platform.

The speaker went from being a GameStop investor to creating content about financial corruption. He realized the GameStop community was uncovering corruption but needed a broader audience. Seeing short-form video as the place to reach more people, he started a TikTok account. He intentionally avoided GameStop at first, focusing on broader topics like media ownership. His first video resonated, quickly gaining a large audience. Within the first three months, he gained almost a million followers. At the time, he was working as an ultra running guide and Uber Eats driver to make ends meet, having left cooking and avoided a nursing program due to COVID. After one month of content creation, it became clear that it could be a full-time job.

Hey everyone, it's Troll Slayer Mama, also known as shove your backs up your mask, 34. My previous account got suspended, like all my others, but you can follow me here on Troll Slayer Mama on Twitter, for now at least. Who knows when that might change?

Elon, a content creator, pleads with Elon Musk about being unfairly banned for a tweet. He denies promoting violence and highlights the harassment and threats he and his family face. He urges Elon to protect him from doxxing and swatting incidents orchestrated by individuals on the platform. The creator emphasizes his non-violent nature and military background, expressing concern for his safety and the safety of his family. He requests Elon to reconsider the ban, claiming he is being targeted unjustly.

Hey, friends. Steve Baldwin here to share important tech info about Elon Musk and Twitter. It's not a glitch; everything Twitter does is intentional. There are no glitches, just actions influenced by Elon Musk, the government, and other forces.

The X app has turned into a breeding ground for scams. It's filled with crypto Ponzi schemes, political manipulation, and religious bait. Real users are drowned out by bots and fake accounts, all trapped in a closed loop. This isn't a social network anymore. It's an emotional data farm. They don't care about your opinion. They want your reaction, your outrage, your division. Every post is designed to provoke rage or sell you false hope while pushing an agenda. Nobody's questioning anything. We're stuck in algorithm driven cycles of fear and distraction. This place isn't about connection. It's about wearing you down and manipulating your mind, all while pretending to be the public square. I'm done with it.

I finally decided to let go of my 1.9 million followers on that platform. I hadn’t been posting for a while, especially after it was purchased by a new owner. I held onto the account to prevent someone from misusing the name. Occasionally, I used it to check trending news, but I realized that sifting through the negativity and abuse wasn’t worth it. It became clear that the effort to stay updated was overshadowed by the unpleasant content.

A person is unable to get a post taken down from X (formerly Twitter), even though it has millions of views and continues to gain more every hour. They claim that X will not remove the post if asked. They believe it shouldn't be solely up to the individual to address the issue, especially after the post has already gained significant traction. They suggest there should be a mechanism in place allowing them to send a cease and desist to X and have the content removed.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a sudden, unexplained YouTube ban impacting Speaker 1’s entire account, including the ability to watch YouTube, with no violations or warnings on the channel and no explanation given. The channel was deleted for not following community standard guidelines, which Speaker 1 notes is surprising given the channel’s focus on personal experiences, scientific conversations, and lack of strikes. Speaker 1 explains the last interview they did was with Jim Sikala, and mentions frequent contact from Harvard University’s neurology department seeking real experiences to place boxes in homes for real scientific data collection, not ufology. He says the interview with Sikala was “the last thing we did” about a week or two prior, and asserts there was no explanation for the termination and ban from the app. Speaker 2 frames this as part of a broader pattern of suppression since they started filming a documentary and releasing it on November 5. They describe their YouTube presence as minimal in size and influence, yet they’ve observed a lack of visibility across Twitter and other platforms, with posts “invisible” or unseen by audiences. They had expected the Rogan mention to boost visibility, given some discussions around the documentary and agent disclosure, but instead experienced continued suppression. Speaker 0 notes that both their channels and individual accounts are not reaching audiences despite heavy cross-promotion, and they question how to generate interest or reach when content remains unseen. They reference a Rogan appearance last night that mentioned Speaker 1, and then the next day Speaker 1’s channel is wiped out, prompting speculation about a possible connection. Speaker 1 acknowledges that several thousand people think the ban is connected to the Rogan mention and Doctor Michael Masters’ discussions, though he emphasizes he does not monetize his channel and aims to help others share experiences. Speaker 1 emphasizes the documentary’s impact on people who feel unable to discuss certain topics in everyday society, noting that the content has helped many to rediscover suppressed ideas and experiences. He describes the emotional and personal toll of the work, including sleep issues and a period of sleepwalking, which he attributes to stress and exposure, and recounts a recent incident of seeing a face in a kitchen window, which turned out to be himself in a mirror-like reflection. Speaker 2 summarizes the sense of ongoing coincidence and timing that feels significant, comparing it to the sense of the phenomenon experienced prior to their first filming. They acknowledge receiving messages from viewers inspired by the documentary, thanking them for the work.

This video addresses growing concerns about censorship on the X platform. It outlines the structure of the discussion, including the reasons for making the video, the context of current censorship issues, a detailed timeline of events, lingering concerns, and recommendations for the platform. The speaker expresses a deep appreciation for X's free speech policies, which have significantly impacted their life and career. They emphasize the importance of platform security for content creators and users, highlighting recent abrupt account suspensions and removals without clear explanations. The speaker urges X leadership to provide clarity and a transition period for users facing penalties, advocating for the preservation of trust in the platform. They conclude by encouraging viewers to support X Premium, despite the current uncertainties surrounding account eligibility.

I had an amazing January and February, gaining traction on X and enjoying my journalism. I was excited to share news and information, which led to growth in followers and subscribers. There’s nothing like betting on yourself and succeeding in independent journalism. However, I feel frustrated because T-Mobile and Big Tech have taken that away from me, making it difficult to earn money online. It’s disheartening to lose that momentum and connection with my audience.

Hey guys, PupNicon here. I've been exhausted and burnt out from social media, dealing with personal stuff, photography work, and laser show design. I'm even considering joining the military. I'm thinking of coming back to this platform, but I took a break because of the constant account suspension warnings from Instagram. It's frustrating, especially after being on Instagram since I was 13 and building my kink account since I was 15. I miss all my friends and sharing the hundreds of photos I've taken. I'm unsure whether to return to my old account, PupUnknowns, or stick with this new one, PupNicon, and make the old one a backup or delete it entirely. Recommendations would be appreciated! I miss engaging with you all and seeing your stories and photos. I'm excited to return, so let me know what you think. I'll see you all very soon. Love you!

Today, I received an email from YouTube stating that my account and channel had been deleted. I was shocked and thought it might be a scam, but it turned out to be true. The email was vague, so I don't know the exact reason for the takedown. I want to advise two groups of people: creators and individuals. Creators should diversify their platforms to avoid losing all their revenue if something like this happens. As for individuals, we are all targets because we go against the mainstream narratives. I have appealed to YouTube to get my channel back, but I'm also exploring other platforms like x.com and rumble.com. I appreciate the support and will continue creating content regardless of the outcome.

The speaker reports a direct online attack aimed at them that has escalated beyond typical harassment. They describe that the assault not only involved the deletion of their Instagram account but also that the attacker appears to wield power well beyond what the speaker can comprehend. The speaker notes that the attacker gained access to and removed the domain markplummer.com, which is described as a site that "only sells hoodies and training plans." In addition, the attacker managed to delete the processor, and as a result, their Shopify payment processor has been suspended, affecting their online coaching business. The speaker conveys a sense of being overwhelmed, stating that they believe they are in over their head because they do not know who is responsible for these actions. They emphasize the extent of the attacker’s capabilities by outlining a sequence of harm: the attacker can delete a presence from YouTube, delete a presence from Instagram, and then cause the payment processor to be shut down. This combination of actions leads the speaker to feel genuinely concerned for their life. Throughout, the speaker asserts a personal certainty about threats to their safety, insisting that they are genuinely concerned for their life. In a final, explicit assertion about their own stance in relation to self-harm, they state, “I will never kill myself,” conveying a clear commitment to their own safety despite the severity of the situation.

Today, I received an email from YouTube stating that my account and channel had been deleted. I was shocked and thought it was a scam, but it turned out to be true. The email was vague, providing no clarity on why my channel was removed. I suspect the reasons but won't mention them to avoid encouraging similar actions against other creators. I want to share two messages: for creators, diversify your platforms to avoid losing all revenue if one is taken down, and for individuals, be aware that we are targets for going against the norm. While I've appealed to get my channel back, I can't rely solely on YouTube. I'll be posting videos on x.com and rumble.com. Please share and tag YouTube for support. Regardless, I'll continue pursuing my dreams.

In this video, the speaker mentions that the content they are about to show is very rare. With 500 million users on TikTok, they believe it is unlikely that viewers will come across their account again. They clarify that they are not asking for followers.