reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There are around 40 race-based laws in South Africa that are anti-white. Our president recently signed into law expropriation without compensation. This is the last straw after endless anti-white laws. I'm thankful that America and Donald Trump are taking notice because we are on the edge of a socialist abyss. I don't think we can fix this internally, we have to wait until the 2029 election, and I don't think our economy will survive until then. We need an external force to change things. Donald Trump and America taking notice and intervening may be what we need. South Africa has been infected with the woke mind virus way more than America has. We've got it times two, and there's no movement in South Africa to reverse it. It's actually going in the opposite direction.

Speaker 0 asserts that there will be no more ambassador from South Africa in Israel and unleashes a barrage of harsh statements about South Africa’s Jewish community and political leadership. He calls South African Jews who support the ANC “Jew haters, Zionist haters, Zion bashers” and labels them “subhuman barbarians who took over the country there more than twenty five years ago.” He claims these people caused the death rate to be the highest in the world, stating that violent death is something in South Africa that happens more than anywhere else in the world and that it’s at a level comparable to Venezuela. He describes them as outrageous and barbaric and refers to them as “the lowest scum of the earth” who cannot build a single bridge, cannot do anything positive, steal properties from whites, kill the whites, and kill the farmers. He notes that hundreds of Jews have been killed in South Africa during this period, describing the killings as robbed and killed with a constant racial flavor. He says they decided they cannot keep their ambassador in Israel because of the Gaza Strip and tells others to “Thanks, Carl. Get out. Never come back, all of you.” He condemns all those who support the “terrorist organization called the ANC,” and all who support violence, calling them degenerates. In closing, he states, “Terrible. Terrible. I hope South Africa will become South Africa again on Africa. Del Array.” Speaker 1 adds that the government never gave a clear answer about what exactly happened. He notes that researchers and investigative journalists over the years have alleged that children were put up for adoption for wealthy international families or used perhaps for secret experiments. The statement implies that there are enduring questions or unresolved events surrounding these allegations, with claims of adoption to international families and possible secret experimentation as part of unaddressed inquiries.

The conversation centers on a shared focus on “deep state traders” and a distrust of the current political establishment. Speaker 0 insists that they are “focused on higher IQ conversations here” and that they want to “go after the deep state traders,” asking who is paying them and noting that the “Washington field office is one block away” from their location, implying proximity to the FBI in Washington, D.C. The exchange riffs on anti-establishment themes, with Speaker 1 adding that they have “gone dragged into forever wars on behalf of Israel,” questioning why the U.S. has been involved for “generations and decades” and asserting that Americans “will not allow” it, calling for white Christians to unite around “America First, America Only” and that there can be “competing interests.” The dialogue shifts to support for domestic groups and figures perceived as aligned with their cause. Speaker 0 says their priority is to gain reinforcements and to “pardon all the oath keepers.” Speaker 1 references the idea of aiding “the J sixers,” while Speaker 0 states they are focused on “the destruction of the world” and asks why they aren’t advocating for those groups. The conversation then explicitly identifies a racialized fear about the future, with Speaker 1 stating that “your children are gonna be black and Muslim,” and “your children’s children are gonna be black and Muslim,” attributing this not to genetic or demographic inevitability but to “the weak, feckless men that are allowing APAC to buy out our politicians and open up our borders.” Speaker 0 counters by describing “weak, tackless toxic, feckless men” in the country and reiterates that their priority is to “go after the traitors based on their actions and actions alone,” stressing that they have a “laundry list” of targets and that they do not care about appearances or which hair follicles or eye colors these people have. The two converge on the idea of targeting treasonous individuals, with Speaker 0 insisting that the focus is on those who have committed treason and that those who fund them come from all stripes. The overall thrust is an uncompromising approach to identifying and pursuing perceived traitors, tying together anti-war, nationalist, and white-identity rhetoric, while calling for pardons for controversial domestic groups and framing the fight as one against treason and influence from abroad.

A revolution demands killing as part of a revolutionary act. It was stated that there has been no call for the killing of white people, at least for now, but there are no guarantees about the future. If things continue as they are, there will be a revolution. When asked for clarification, it was confirmed that "we are not calling for the slaughter of white people, at least for now" means that at some future date, there may be a call for the slaughter of white people. It was stated that this may very well happen in the future. The phrase "shoot to kill Hamazah. Kill the poor, the farmer" was also stated.

Speaker 1 states that to be convinced there is no white genocide in South Africa, President Trump would need to listen to South African voices, including those of his friends. Speaker 1 believes that if there was an Afrikaner farmer genocide, his minister of agriculture would not be present. Speaker 0 claims there are thousands of stories, documentaries, and news stories about the genocide. Speaker 0 offers to show articles as evidence. Speaker 1 states that with or without parliament, people are going to occupy land.

The Afrikaans people have no other home, and their language is unique to them. They are descendants of Dutch settlers who arrived in South Africa before the British. The speaker argues against rewriting history to pretend that African tribes didn't compete for resources before settlers arrived. They recount a story about Zulu tribesmen questioning why white men cared more about rhinos than their own land. The speaker questions who has a legitimate claim to land, as they believe humanity's presence is increasingly viewed as an aberration. They claim that when farmers arrived in South Africa, the land was uninhabited and transformed into fertile land. They warn of the consequences of governments taking land without compensation, citing Zimbabwe as an example where land seizures led to violence, cronyism, and agricultural collapse. The speaker suggests that simply being Black does not qualify someone to manage a commercial farm.

Speaker 0 argues that white Americans will soon be a minority, and that this is great. Speaker 1 counters that whites will not be the majority and describes it as an exciting transformation and evolution, a progress of the country. Speaker 2 states that whites will be a minority very soon and says, “I'm okay with that.” Speaker 1 asks, if the white working class is in trouble, whether new Americans should be brought in. Speaker 3 predicts America will look very different in a hundred years, with racial labels becoming less distinct (“You're black, you're white, you're Hispanic, you're Puerto Rican, whatever”), and says that complexity will be good in the end. Speaker 2 contends that white Americans feel they are losing their country and ownership, and that they are, in the end, not the future. Speaker 3 asserts that for the first time in American history, the number of white people went down; “White population is declining for the first time in history in America.” Speaker 3 cautions that white people will not be the majority in the country anymore, noting it will be the first generation with whites as a minority. Speaker 1 proclaims, “Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.” Speaker 3 proclaims that to abolish whiteness is to abolish white people. Speaker 1 contends that white people are committed to being villains in the aggregate. Speaker 3 declares, “We gotta take these motherfuckers out.” Speaker 2 asks whether it was the duty of every good revolutionary to kill all newborn white babies. Speaker 3 responds, “We have to kill white people,” and, when pressed, mirrors that sentiment with, “When we say we wanna kill whites, we don't really mean we wanna kill whites. We do. We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem.” Speaker 1 comments, “When do we start killing white people?” and then, “start killing all white folks, but maybe?” Speaker 3 reiterates the extermination goal, stating, “We have to exterminate white people off of the face of the planet to solve this problem.” Speaker 5 adds, “An unrelenting stream of immigration. Nonstop. Nonstop. Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent will be in an absolute minority in The United States Of America. Absolute minority.” He concludes that this shift is not a bad thing and calls it a source of strength.

South Africans are concerned about issues like potholes, job shortages, and daily power outages. Crime is rampant, and farm murders involve extreme violence, including the gang rape of elderly women. Some believe external forces stir up racial tensions, contributing to the destruction of the country. White farmers face brutal attacks, including rape, torture with boiling water or hot irons, and being dragged behind vehicles. Children are murdered in front of their parents, sometimes without any theft occurring. Political figures incite violence with slogans like "kill the farmer, shoot the farmer," and one leader, Julius Malema, has said "slit their throats," while gesturing the action. He stated he is not currently calling for the slaughter of white people, but cannot rule it out in the future.

Speaker: False as provided; transcript translation and summary below. Summary: The speaker asserts that racists and Zionist supremacists today aim to end the Palestinian people and, at the same time, all Arab and Muslim peoples. They claim these groups have sown an ideology of hate and racism for 75 years with Western support. The speaker warns that this ideology is more dangerous than Nazism, beginning with the Palestinian people through extermination, genocide, bombs, and atomic weapons, and then targeting all Arab peoples and all Muslims. They add that Christians and Catholics would be next. The message calls to stop the genocide in time and halt what they describe as the Zionist genocide against the beloved Palestinian people.

The speakers present a nationalist and xenophobic framing of national interest and ethnic conflict. The first speaker argues that “The German nation does not wish its interest to be determined and controlled by any foreign nation,” listing France, England, and America—repeatedly emphasizing different nations as external controllers. He states, “This … we are resolved to prevent the settlement in our country of a strange people which was capable of snatching for itself all the leading positions in the land and to oust it.” A second portion asserts that “This is all done on purpose. None of this is an accident,” claiming that “what they do is they construct as many divisions amongst the peasants as possible.” He describes attempts to inflame societal tensions by promoting division: “Make sure the blacks hate the whites. Men hate the women by promoting degeneracy in the whole month of June.” He adds, “Republicans hate the Democrats,” and that people are “so busy fighting with each other they can laugh from the talk.” The first speaker then shifts to a statement about historical anti-Jewish policy, claiming, “Hitler didn't want to exterminate the Jews at the time. He wanted to expel the Jews.” He asserts, “For Europe cannot settle down until the Jewish question is cleared up.” He concludes with a call to collective action: “Workers of all classes and of all nations, recognize your common enemy.” The dialogue ends with a reframing of political conflict: “It's not right versus left. It's about right versus wrong.” Throughout, the speakers articulate a conspiracy-theory style narrative centered on foreign influence, ethnic and racial antagonism, and the alleged manipulation of social divisions to achieve political ends.

The speaker presents articles and videos depicting violence against white South Africans, claiming white South Africans are fleeing due to violence and racist laws. They cite attacks on white South African couples and the burning of white farmers. The speaker references President Trump's reaction to the situation, mentioning Trump asked about a jet that was given. The speaker claims officials are saying, "kill the white farmer and take their land." They state that friends who left South Africa warned that people there want to take land and kill.

I think most Americans stopped paying attention to South Africa after the end of apartheid in 1994, but the situation there has deteriorated. The democratic system set up in the 90s is being used to promote socialist ends. Black Economic Empowerment, for example, has nothing to do with economic empowerment. The ANC, South Africa's ruling party, has strong communist ties and is implementing policies that are actively discriminating against taxpayers. The government isn't protecting lives or property and is pushing to expropriate private property without compensation. This is coupled with a radical ideology being taught at universities that dehumanizes white people and could be a predicate for genocide. It's a collapsing society and the West cheers it on, but it's time to wake up to what's happening there.

South Africans don't understand white people. Science shows white people are inferior, with Neanderthal blood. White populations are shrinking, along with their leadership and wealth. We are dealing with the weakest whites ever. We expect humanity, but whites are below human. It's like negotiating with a wild dog – you can't expect it to guard your house. We seek justice for stolen land and butchered people, but we're not out for blood. Why don't white people understand Ubuntu? They don't have a heart because they're incapable. You can't expect human behavior from a dog.

Speaker 0: South Africa is, what, 75% black. Is that correct? 80%? That's right. Speaker 0: Why is it that once apartheid was removed why black South Africans were not able to see their material economic net worth go up in the last twenty or thirty years? Speaker 1: neocolonial control supply chains, and you own 72% of, you know, agriculture farmland. Speaker 1: Less than 3%. They are the richest racial group in America. Speaker 1: Land is basically all owned by white people in America. Speaker 1: One is driven in resentment and greed and envy and confiscation, and one is rooted in creation and entrepreneurship and optimism. I'd like to see the latter. Speaker 0: Let's work harder. Let's prove the boar wrong. Let's start a business.

Speaker discusses Julius Malema recently appearing on FrontPage News for singing the chant "kill the boer" at an EFF rally. A video of the rally is mentioned as possibly available with Aria. The moment sparked a huge controversy, described by the speaker as "a whole humongous crapstorm," framing it as "victim self victimization by the colonizers and the oppressors." The speaker then asks for the listeners' background on the phrase, noting their own position as a white member of the EFF, and invites a comparison between the controversy over "kill the boer" and the current demonization of the phrase "from the river to the sea."

Julius Malema, the far-left opposition leader of South Africa from the Economic Freedom Fighters, and former president Jacob Zuma were shown in a video. Malema was singing "kill the boar, kill the farmer," which is described as an anti-apartheid song from the struggle against white minority rule in South Africa. It is claimed this is not a literal call to attack and kill farmers because of its historical nature. However, it's allegedly been weaponized by groups in South Africa and the MAGA right in the United States to misrepresent what is happening in the country.

The speaker says that to be convinced there is no white genocide in South Africa, President Trump would need to listen to the stories and perspectives of South Africans, including his friends. Another speaker claims there are thousands of stories, documentaries, and news stories about it. They show a video of what they claim are burial sites of over a thousand white farmers, with cars lined up to pay respects. They say each white cross represents a white farmer or their family member who was killed. The first speaker expresses unfamiliarity with the scene and asks where it is located. The other speaker says it is in South Africa. The first speaker says they need to find out where it is.

South Africa struggles with high crime rates, including farm murders. Some claim these attacks are targeted and brutal, leading the Trump administration to grant Afrikaners refugee status. Dairy farmer Hendrik's wife was brutally attacked in their home, but survived. Victims are often elderly, and security is costly. Some see attacks on farmers as justified. The EFF, led by Julius Milema, sings "Shoot the Boar," deemed hate speech but later overturned. In 2025, South Africa passed a law allowing the state to seize farms without compensation, reminiscent of Zimbabwe's disastrous land seizures. Livestock farmer Adrian Voss was attacked and his farm destroyed. Neighbors report increased crime and inadequate police response, with farm attacks removed as a specific crime category. Farmers live in constant fear. Motivations for attacks vary, but the "kill the boar" chant and the disproportionate number of attacks on white farmers raises concerns about racial motivations. The ANC, in power for 30 years, has not condemned the song.

The speaker claims the media is corrupt and refuses to report on a situation in South Africa that is the "opposite of apartheid." According to the speaker, the media constantly reported on apartheid, but now "nobody knows" about the current situation. The speaker states that the U.S. is being "inundated with people, with white farmers from South Africa," creating "a big problem." Marco Rubio reportedly told the speaker that he has "never seen anything like" the number of people wanting to leave South Africa because they "feel they're gonna be dead very soon."

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they are ruling out the possibility of calling for the slaughter of white people in the future. Speaker 1 responds by saying they don't know what will happen and it may or may not be them. Speaker 0 clarifies that it could be Speaker 1 and asks what would necessitate that. Speaker 1 doesn't know and questions why they would do that. Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to pledge to never call for the slaughter of white people, but Speaker 1 refuses to make that pledge. Speaker 0 understands.

Targeting a white mayor is effective because it causes significant emotional pain within that community. We are directly confronting the issue of whiteness. Another politician, from the Black First Land First party, incited violence at a rally, urging the crowd to kill white people, their children, and pets. This demonstrates a political leader openly calling for the genocide of white people.

The speaker draws a parallel between the current situation and what happened in Zimbabwe. They mention the demonization of white people, similar to what occurred in Zimbabwe before its collapse. The collapse was triggered by scapegoating white farmers who were the main producers in the agricultural industry. The government's corruption and mismanagement led to poverty and discontent among the people. Instead of taking responsibility, the government shifted blame to the white farmers, accusing them of taking land and causing problems. This rhetoric didn't exist before.

White South African farmers are being hunted from their land by black gangs. These gangs attack white farmers at night. The attacks involve torture, not just burglary. The number of white farmers being killed is incredible. South Africans have expropriation without compensation, meaning the government is taking land. The speaker went and slept on the farms to feel the fear. White people are denied treatment in hospitals in South Africa. It's an extreme situation that no one will talk about.

The speaker asserts that the mayor of DA in PE is a white man, and that targeting white men inflicts significant pain on "these people." The speaker states that while Mashaba and Soli will also be targeted, the focus is currently on "whiteness," which they are "cutting the throat of." The speaker expresses a willingness to condemn murder, but not when the victims are white. They refuse to play into the hands of white supremacists, and makes an extreme statement: "Shoot to kill your mother."