reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Rogan O'Hanley suggests Trump should consider suspending the writ of habeas corpus for illegal aliens, citing Article One, Section Nine of the U.S. Constitution, due to what he considers an "invasion" of 15 million illegal aliens under Biden. He notes past presidents Lincoln, Grant, and FDR used this measure, though against American citizens. He asks if the Trump administration plans to use this to circumvent "radical judges" and deport illegals en masse. The speaker responds that the administration is open to all legal and constitutional remedies for deporting illegal criminals and agrees it's absurd that the previous administration allowed 15 million illegal aliens into the country with little judicial pushback. Another speaker adds that a judge was arrested for impeding ICE enforcement, stating that while officials can support sanctuary cities, they cross a line when they impede or knowingly harbor illegal aliens.

Entering the U.S. legally and ignoring a judge's deportation order are crimes. Choosing to have a U.S. citizen child while in the country illegally puts the family in a difficult position. The speaker claims they removed children with mothers who requested it, calling it a parental decision. The speaker argues that if they hadn't removed the children with their mothers, they would be accused of separating families. They assert that when a parent wants their child to go with them, they facilitate it, and that the parents, not the government, made the decision. The speaker then references Lincoln Riley and Rachel Moran, stating they will never see their children again, and concludes that the administration is doing the right thing.

I've asked the DOJ where the line is regarding impeding or interfering with law enforcement. Some members of Congress are educating people on how to evade law enforcement, claiming they're educating about constitutional rights. But in reality, they're telling people who are in the country illegally, have committed crimes, and been ordered removed by a federal judge to not open their doors and hide from ICE. As a member of Congress, they should let us enforce the laws that have been enacted. If someone physically prevents an arrest, that's obstruction, but where's the line when it's just telling people to hide? I want to know where that crosses into impeding law enforcement, so I've asked the Department of Justice to define that line.

What's your name? Where are you from? I was born in Thailand. Have you ever been deported from the U.S.? No, I've never been deported. What have you been charged with? I'm not a citizen; my mother is. I've seen Dr. Phil on TV. This is an example of sanctuary cities, where illegal immigrants, like those involved in sex crimes against children, are walking the streets instead of being detained by federal agents. You've been charged with sex crimes? Not really. So, you've never been deported? Nope. We need to process and lock them up.

Are you worried about migrant groups working to obstruct ICE? Federal officials report that activists are increasingly tracking ICE movements and educating migrants on their rights, such as not answering questions or allowing entry without a warrant. Some believe these actions protect criminals and hinder law enforcement. In New Jersey, Governor Phil Murphy has housed a migrant at his home, challenging federal authorities to find her. This approach is seen as reckless, with concerns that it endangers people and defies legal processes. If charges arise against the governor for his actions, some believe he deserves them for protecting someone unlawfully present in the country.

Chicago leaders are urging residents to resist Trump's deportation policies. New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy acknowledged he was hiding someone without full documentation above his garage. The government’s response to this could lead to prosecution for knowingly harboring an illegal alien, as it violates U.S. law. The Trump administration plans to sue sanctuary cities, claiming they protect criminals. An example cited is a case in New York City where a failure to share information led to the death of a child. Sanctuary cities are blamed for numerous deaths, and the administration is prepared to take this issue to the Supreme Court to end their protections. A 2011 study indicated there were 3 million criminal aliens in the U.S.

A judge in San Francisco issued a nationwide injunction regarding the defunding of sanctuary cities. The speaker believes it's unbelievable that judges in San Francisco or San Diego would rule this way, stating that the U.S. shouldn't have sanctuary cities. According to the speaker, sanctuary cities are sanctuaries for criminals, protecting them, and should be closed down to ensure a safe country. The speaker says "we have to get rid of sanctuary cities."

Speaker 1 confirmed signing a memo but denied being the author of the family separation policy. Speaker 1 stated they gave Secretary Nielsen numerous recommendations on how to secure the border and save lives. Speaker 2 claimed that Speaker 1 recommended family separation as option three. Speaker 1 stated they recommended zero tolerance, the same as when any US citizen parent gets arrested with a child. Speaker 2 stated that legal asylees are not charged with any crime. Speaker 1 stated that being in the country illegally is a violation and that if one wants to seek asylum, they should do it the legal way at the port of entry. Speaker 1 referred to a congresswoman as the dumbest ever to listen to congress.

The speaker claims that sanctuary cities violate federal law and that individuals involved are committing a federal crime. They assert that these cities lack the authority under federal law and the Constitution to disregard even a civil warrant for someone who has violated a federal offense when a detainer notice is received.

AOC is doing webinars that give advice to undocumented immigrants about how to avoid being caught and how to stay in the United States, which may be gaming the system. I've contacted the Deputy Attorney General to see if this is obstructing law enforcement. I need the DOJ to determine if a line has been crossed. In my opinion, this is an impediment. We need advice on how to move forward. If necessary, we will take every federal dollar out of the city. This is a matter of public and community safety. Releasing dangerous people endangers the public, our officers, and even undocumented immigrants. If sanctuary cities won't act to make their communities safer, President Trump will.

The speaker asserts that the Democratic party opposes federal enforcement of immigration laws and arrests/deportations of illegal alien criminals, using a "violent mob" to obstruct immigration law enforcement. They claim President Trump has a mandate to reverse Biden's open border policies and end the lawlessness of California's leaders, promising a large-scale deportation campaign undeterred by left-wing riots. Sanctuary cities will allegedly no longer shield illegal criminals. Examples of removed individuals include a Vietnamese national convicted of murder, a Mexican national convicted of child molestation, a Filipino national convicted of rape, and others with convictions for statutory rape, narcotics violations, domestic violence, and assault. An illegal alien from Mexico was arrested for allegedly throwing a Molotov cocktail at law enforcement. The speaker claims law-abiding citizens don't want these individuals in their communities. Any attempts to copy the violence to stop deportation efforts will fail, and lawlessness will strengthen the president's resolve to defend Americans from violent criminal illegal aliens.

Rogan O'Hanley claims radical judges are thwarting Trump's agenda with national injunctions, giving more due process to illegal aliens than January 6 protesters. He suggests Trump should consider suspending habeas corpus for illegal aliens, citing Article One, Section Nine of the Constitution, arguing that the 15 million illegal aliens who entered under Biden constitute an invasion. O'Hanley notes that Presidents Lincoln, Grant, and FDR used this measure, even against American citizens. He asks if the Trump administration plans to suspend habeas corpus to deport illegals en masse. The speaker responds that the administration is open to all legal and constitutional remedies for deporting illegal criminals. They agree that the previous administration allowed 15 million illegal aliens into the country with little judicial pushback. Another speaker mentions the arrest of Judge Panbani for impeding ICE enforcement removals. They state that while officials can support sanctuary cities, they will be prosecuted if they impede or knowingly harbor illegal aliens.

The speaker claims that under the current administration's policies, individuals can face significant jail time for child trafficking. They allege the Biden administration trafficked 500,000 children into the U.S. and helped them disappear, which they consider criminal. The speaker asserts that sanctuary states and cities violate laws against harboring, evading authorities, smuggling, concealing, and obstructing justice. They state President Trump is preparing an executive order to clamp down on sanctuary cities, calling them a "cancer on our democracy." The speaker says President Trump will soon take action against the radical left's efforts to shield illegal aliens, with measures more robust and aggressive than anything done before.

AOC is doing webinars to help illegals avoid apprehension and remain in the country by gaming the system. I've contacted the Deputy Attorney General to determine if this impedes law enforcement efforts and whether she's crossing a line. The DOJ will advise if further action is needed, including impeachment. If necessary, we'll defund sanctuary cities because public and community safety is the priority. Releasing criminals endangers the public, law enforcement, and even the individuals themselves. If sanctuary cities won't act to make their communities safer, President Trump will. Blue cities across America, get ready.

AOC may be in trouble for obstruction of justice. Tom Homan referred AOC to the Department of Justice for impeding federal officers. AOC is doing webinars giving tips to illegals about how to remain in the country. They're telling people to hide and not open the door for ICE. The DOJ needs to give guidance on where the line is crossed. If necessary, every federal dollar will be pulled from cities. Sanctuary cities need to step aside because President Trump is going to make the community safer. Warning that gangs are being tipped off by FBI agents about ICE raids, making them accessories to murder. Also, some congressmen and women are morally influencing people to fight back and get aggressive against federal agents. To keep fighting, go to infowarsstore.com to support. Pray for President Trump and Tom Homan.

Mayor O'Connell is accused of obstructing justice and harboring criminal illegal aliens in Nashville. His office allegedly released the names of Homeland Security investigators, doxxing ICE enforcement officers, which they claim was a mistake. This action is believed to be intentional and will have repercussions. ICE enforcement officers are reportedly facing a 400% increase in assaults, and the mayor's office is accused of providing intelligence to criminal gangs, enabling them to target ICE officers. The actions are considered wrong and beneath the city of Nashville, and the speaker hopes O'Connell will face consequences.

Mayor Wu, does ICE arresting a child rapist threaten everyone's safety? No. Does ICE arresting a murderous MS-13 gang member threaten everyone's safety? No. I'd like to point out that you, Mayor Michelle Wu, have said that ICE's efforts actually threaten the safety of everyone. You're a hypocrite.

Let's be clear, the sanctuary city mayors are here with legal counsel. Things have changed since the election. We've exposed how quickly the border could be secured if the executive branch enforced the law. Now, cities are paying attention and lawyering up. These mayors' policies, like those of the previous president, have real consequences. I have with me a family who lost their son to an illegal immigrant. You mayors have a responsibility to everyone. You cooperate with other law enforcement agencies, but not ICE, which removes criminal illegals. America is tired of this betrayal. Some of you said you'd go to jail. We might take you up on that. People are separated from their children all the time when they commit felonies, but at least they get to come home. This young man will never come home, and it never should have happened. We're entering a new era of enforcing our laws.

The president signed an executive order this week threatening to defund sanctuary cities. The speaker questions why the leaders of these cities, who are allegedly harboring and shielding illegal aliens and terrorists from deportation, are not arrested instead.

The speaker stated they want ICE to target Democratic inner cities, specifically sanctuary cities, because that's where the people are. They cited New York, Chicago, and LA as examples. The speaker believes Chicago has a bad governor, Pritzker, who is possibly the worst in the country. They claim Chicago, New York and LA have been overrun by criminals, many of whom are not from those cities or California. The speaker alleges Biden allowed 21 million people into the country, vast numbers of whom were murderers, killers, gang members, and people from jails emptied into the U.S. They believe most of these people are in blue, Democrat-run cities and that Democrats think they will use them to vote, but that this will not happen.

The speaker states that because they are in a sanctuary city, they do not report illegal immigrants. They claim to have released a double homicide suspect due to this policy. The speaker says someone came to pick up $320,000 from their grandparents and is working their way through it. The speaker is asked to call ICE but refuses, citing the sanctuary city status. They are asked to take seriously that someone is repeating an offense while being illegal. The person is reportedly in Chinatown, New York.

Tom Homan and the host discuss ICE detention capacity and trafficking concerns, along with political rhetoric and safety in sanctuary cities. - Kevin Cork highlights the administration’s efforts to curtail trafficking across the border, noting it as a major issue for young women and children who are trafficked. He references reporting that there are around 66,000 ICE detainees, a 70% increase since the president took office, and mentions ICE considering large warehouses to hold more detainees. He asks for insight into whether capacity is a real issue and how it’s being managed. - Tom Homan updates ICE detention figures at the time of the conversation, stating about 65,000 detainees, and says a surge to 100,000 beds is coming soon. He explains that the plan is to have 100,000 beds because an average bed turns over 10 times a year, with an average stay of 30 to 35 days. Therefore, 100,000 beds could effectively handle about a million bed-overnights annually. He emphasizes the need for a bed for every person arrested to coordinate travel documents and removal itineraries, and asserts the administration’s goal of bringing 100,000 beds online along with 10,000 new agents. He notes there have been historic deportation numbers under President Trump and suggests those numbers will compare to the next year. - Nicole Sapphire transitions to the New York City mayoral race and cites mayor-elect Zoran Mandani’s threats toward ICE. The discussion returns to safety for ICE personnel, with Sapphire asking what is being done to protect agents and whether current laws deter violence or if Congress must do more. - Tom Homan responds by pointing to the actions of Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice, highlighting prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. 111 (impeding and injuring federal law enforcement officers) as at historic levels and continuing. He criticizes sanctuary cities like Chicago and New York for releasing perceived public safety threats back into communities, and asserts that the administration will flood sanctuary zones with more agents, planning to hire 10,000 more officers to operate in those cities. He says they will arrest thousands of people in Chicago weekly, with operations tonight and tomorrow, and asserts a commitment to make New York safer with or without cooperation from local leadership. He references the President’s promise to make neighborhoods safer by removing criminal aliens, including in Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York, and urges people to thank President Trump for making neighborhoods safer. - The program closes with gratitude to Tom Homan and acknowledgment of his ongoing work.

I'm proud to be part of this effort. We've taken significant action against sanctuary cities, halting federal funding and filing lawsuits against Chicago and Illinois for their policies. Sanctuary cities prioritize illegal aliens over the safety of their citizens and law enforcement. We are holding city and state leaders accountable, including the mayor and governor. If they don't comply with federal law, they will face consequences. What about those who tipped off the trend day, Arawak?

A Democratic primary winner, Zorraine Mamdani, vowed to kick the "fascist ice" out of New York City. In response, Speaker 1 stated that federal law trumps Mamdani's plans. Because New York City is a sanctuary city, ICE will double and triple down their efforts there. Speaker 1 claims that sanctuary cities release public safety and national security threats back to the street. Since they can't arrest individuals in county jails, they will send teams to find them, along with others who have been arrested. Worksite enforcement will increase tenfold. Speaker 1 stated that if they can't arrest individuals in jail or find them in neighborhoods, they will find them at worksites.

The speaker discusses protests in New York City where participants chanted: “Christy Noem will hang.” The speaker notes Christy Noem is the secretary for homeland security and says Democrats are “out en masse” saying she will hang. They also chant “save a life, kill an ICE,” and the speaker states this amounts to talking about killing ICE agents. The speaker argues that this demonstrates a permission structure for violence and that the left is openly encouraging violence against ICE agents and cabinet members of the president. The speaker says it will be interesting to see how many Democrats condemn these actions. The speaker asserts that the left has a problem with political violence and that it is visible “more and more.” They claim this is unacceptable and criticize the left for portraying themselves as more virtuous and morally superior, describing this behavior as inconsistent with that portrayal. The speaker emphasizes the need to call this out and to raise awareness about what they view as the violence being promoted by the left. Additionally, the speaker promotes a free email newsletter, stating that it is sent every morning around 7 AM Central. They mention that the link to subscribe is in their profile and urge viewers to drop their email and subscribe. The segment ends with the speaker noting they will see the audience in the next update.