reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses Agenda 21, a plan agreed upon by 179 nations in 1992. They claim it is a totalitarian state being developed worldwide, aiming to control all aspects of life, including land, water, minerals, plants, animals, food, energy, and information. The plan involves moving populations into city centers and achieving centralized control. The three pillars of Agenda 21 are economy, ecology, and equity, with social equity being used to impoverish populations and bring down developed nations. The speaker emphasizes the need for individuals to educate themselves, spread awareness, and work together to preserve personal freedom.

The future being built for us by the ruling class is a sustainable one, represented by 15-minute city smart grid apartments. These small living spaces are designed to monitor citizens' every movement, similar to China's smart grid system. In China, citizens' actions are recorded to determine their social credit score. Those who misbehave or refuse to comply face social shaming and loss of access to public facilities. Even their friends on social media suffer consequences, as their social credit score is affected. This system aims to train humans to be obedient. Get ready for these smart cities, brought to you by Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum, and BlackRock.

The WEF has introduced the concept of 15-minute cities, called C40 cities. In these cities, petrol and diesel cars will be banned in favor of electric vehicles. Residents will receive calorie-controlled food sent by text. Violating rules may result in frozen bank accounts. This plan, supported by the WEF and London's mayor, aims to be implemented worldwide. The speaker opposes this idea, calling it a form of lifelong confinement and criticizing its lack of public awareness.

This video suggests that the COVID pandemic was a test to see how far governments could go in forcing compliance. The speaker believes that the next step will be the establishment of "15 minute ghettos," which are actually about control and imprisoning people. The speaker points out that these areas are being built with barricades and surveillance cameras, not with schools or hospitals. They predict that digital ID will be used for control, similar to what is happening in China. The speaker warns that this future is not far off and urges viewers to fight against it.

The WEF has introduced 15 minute cities, known as C40 cities. In these cities, petrol and diesel cars will be banned in favor of electric vehicles. Residents will receive calorie-controlled meal plans via text. Violations could lead to frozen bank accounts. This plan, supported by the WEF and London's mayor, aims to be implemented globally. Critics fear it will restrict freedom and create a perpetual state of lockdown. This information has not been widely discussed.

The concept of 15-minute cities is being criticized for its potential negative impact on personal freedom and small businesses. These cities aim to make everything easily accessible within a 15-minute walk or a 5-minute bike ride, reducing traffic and promoting sustainability. However, the implementation of low-traffic neighborhoods and restricted driving zones has led to a decline in passing trade for small businesses. Critics argue that these measures are causing economic damage and curtailing our way of life. The state's control over our movements through surveillance cameras and number plate recognition systems is seen as an unprecedented assault on personal freedom. While the goal of cleaner air is commendable, the policy feels more like something that would happen in China rather than in liberal democracies like Britain.

The 15 minute cities plan by c40 cities will ban petrol and diesel cars, implement calorie-controlled food systems, and freeze bank accounts for non-compliance. The WEF and London mayor are pushing this globally. It's seen as a form of control, leading to a future where work is limited to within these cities. This plan is concerning and not widely discussed.

In Great Britain, some counties have passed legislation to impose climate lockdowns. These lockdowns require the establishment of 15-minute cities, where people are only allowed to leave their immediate area a few times a year. However, those with more money can buy passes from others, leaving the less fortunate in these restricted neighborhoods while the wealthier individuals can freely travel wherever they want.

The 15-minute city initiative by c40 cities will ban petrol and diesel cars, control food intake, and freeze bank accounts for non-compliance. The WEF and WBF are pushing this agenda globally, with London's mayor as the chair. This plan is concerning as it restricts freedom and could lead to a lifetime of limitations. It's a hidden agenda that needs more public awareness.

The speaker claims the WEF created the "15-minute cities" concept through an organization called c40 cities. They urge listeners to research this and view related TikTok content. According to the speaker, the plan involves banning petrol and diesel cars, mandating electric vehicles, and implementing a calorie-controlled food system dictated via text message. Violations will result in frozen bank accounts. The speaker states that the WEF and the mayor of London, as chair, are promoting c40 to countries worldwide, with many considering adoption. The speaker intends to abolish it, characterizing it as an "open prison" akin to permanent COVID restrictions. They claim work will be restricted to within the 15-minute city, deeming the plan "diabolical" and alleging it is being hidden from the public.

The WEF's 15 minute cities initiative, c40, aims to eliminate petrol and diesel cars, implement calorie-controlled food systems, and freeze bank accounts for violations. The plan, supported by the WEF and London's mayor, is being promoted worldwide. The speaker opposes this "open prison" concept, fearing a perpetual COVID-like state. They criticize the lack of public awareness and call for its abolition.

The speaker compares the concept of a 15-minute city to the situation in Gaza, highlighting the presence of AI machine guns, constant surveillance, lack of rights and prosperity, and limited access to food and water. They argue that this represents a worst-case scenario of a controlled existence and lack of freedom. The speaker suggests that globalism, which aims to eliminate war by removing nations, could lead to a similar situation worldwide, with continuous warfare against those who resist or refuse to submit to globalist powers. They conclude by urging people to recognize the parallels between Gaza and the potential future they envision.

The speaker claims the C40 consortium, composed of 40 of the world's largest cities, is pursuing an agenda that includes limiting citizens to three articles of clothing per year and a 95% reduction in private car ownership. They allege this is why electric cars are being promoted, even though there won't be enough electricity to power them. Additionally, the speaker states the agenda includes one short-haul flight per person every three years, which they believe will decimate the travel and tourism industries. They claim the ultimate goal, though not directly from C40, is an 85% reduction in Western living standards, which they say is deemed necessary by "green virtuous globalist utopians" for a green planet. The speaker believes bureaucrats are using this agenda to advance their careers, and radical leftists are willing to sacrifice the working class and the poor to achieve their ambitions.

The speaker expresses concern about surveillance technology in modern cars, particularly ADAS (Automated Driver Assistance Systems). These systems, mandated by EU regulations and rolling out worldwide, include multiple cameras, many facing inward, constantly recording the driver. The speaker believes this technology is not for assistance but to ultimately remove driver control. The speaker raises the issue of "fifteen-minute cities" and how geofencing, enabled by these connected cars, could restrict movement. They claim that vehicles might be disabled upon crossing the boundary of a designated zone. They cite an example of someone whose car update included terms allowing manufacturers and authorities to activate geofencing. The speaker suggests this technology will be linked to digital IDs, allowing authorities to identify car occupants via facial recognition. They speculate that attempts to mask one's face might prevent the car from starting. The speaker concludes by expressing a desire to disconnect from the internet and digital devices to avoid a world controlled by a few.

The 15-minute city initiative by c40 cities will ban petrol and diesel cars, implement calorie-controlled food systems, and freeze bank accounts for non-compliance. This plan, supported by the WEF and London's mayor, aims to restrict movement and work to designated areas. The speaker opposes this as a form of permanent lockdown, criticizing the lack of public awareness.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a concept they refer to as a climate lockdown in Knokke, a town on the Belgian coast they describe as the “rich town.” They claim that on days that are too hot, Knokke will implement a climate lockdown in which the city is totally shut down and nobody can come in anymore “just because, you know, they wanna try it.” They state that this would mean local restaurants, bars, and business people would be ignored or sacrificed as the city is shut off. They say this is the plan they’ve warned about all along: that climate lockdowns would be implemented. They identify Knokke at the Belgian coast as the first city to start implementing it in the summer, asserting that people would simply drive there and that the highways “go through,” making the lockdown feel invasive and extreme. They describe the action as absolutely crazy and a dangerous precedent, arguing that citizens would not be able to go where they want to go anymore. The speakers emphasize that this area would be off limits, framing it as a violation of freedom since people should be able to go anywhere they want in their country and on public property. They describe the idea as a very dangerous precedent and express strong opposition, concluding the video by saying they do not like this development. The video ends with them signing off and thanking viewers, saying goodbye.

A fifteen-minute city is defined as a neighborhood where all necessities are within a fifteen-minute walk. The speaker claims that this concept could lead to total control via digital ID and a social credit system, restricting people to their immediate area. Pilot projects are allegedly underway in Bologna ("Bologna Wallet") and Vienna ("Vienna Token"). These programs are currently voluntary, offering incentives like discounted tickets. The speaker asserts that participation will eventually become mandatory, requiring a digital certificate or QR code to dictate permissible activities and locations.

The speaker claims the WEF created the "15-minute cities" concept through C40 Cities. They urge listeners to research it online and on TikTok. According to the speaker, the plan involves banning petrol and diesel cars, mandating electric vehicles, and implementing a calorie-controlled food system dictated via text message. Violations will result in frozen bank accounts. The speaker states that the WEF and the mayor of London have promoted C40 to countries worldwide, with many considering adoption. The speaker aims to abolish it, characterizing it as an "open prison" akin to perpetual COVID restrictions. They claim work will be restricted to within one's 15-minute city, deeming the plan "diabolical" and hidden from the public.

In 1992, the restructuring of Canadian mayors in New South Wales began under the United Nations. The concept of the 15-minute city is seen as a way for technocrats to collect data and design efficient cities. However, this focus on efficiency raises concerns about surveillance and control. The ability to easily implement and prolong lockdowns is a potential consequence. Questions are raised about citizens' rights to travel freely and access essential services without restrictions. Overall, there is an agenda to monitor and control cities, which prompts important questions for city councils. In summary, the message is about the potential implications of the 15-minute city concept.

Speaker 0 presents a critical view of “fifteen minute cities,” arguing the goal is to corral people into an area where they can be easily surveilled and controlled. The speaker contends the central interest is how a small, ruling elite can govern the many forever without the many ever being able to complain or act. The result, they claim, is a global governance project that uses big tech and mass surveillance to create a new way of life and system of living, with a particular aim of reducing the share of wealth or resources held by the many—the 99 or so. The speaker connects these ideas to the COVID era, suggesting that groups like the World Economic Forum (WEF) popularized policies framed as sustainability but ultimately designed and implemented to limit ownership and control by individuals. Specifically, the speaker cites WEF proposals such as not owning cars—renting them instead—and the deployment of autonomous fleets to drive people around within a defined radius. They also note proposals around not owning homes but renting and sharing apartments when unoccupied. A concrete example given is the Columbus smart city initiative tied to the Columbus Partnership, which Wexner chaired for roughly twenty years (2001–2021). The speaker notes that Columbus received a large Department of Transportation grant and private funding, possibly from Wexner, to implement a system where private car ownership would disappear in favor of fleets of autonomous vehicles. In this system, the autonomous cars would determine where people go, with specific routes available for payment and use. The speaker references the National Security Commission on AI, chaired by Eric Schmidt of Google, which reportedly described, as part of a strategy to beat China in AI, the need to end private car ownership in the United States and replace it with autonomous fleets (Waymo-like) guided by AI to manage where people go and work, implying a nationwide shift toward centralized planning of mobility. Finally, the speaker connects these initiatives to the Technocracy Inc. model, noting influence from Taylorism and industrial-revolution-era thinking that prioritized efficiency and micromanagement. The implication is that the new systems aim to extract data and monetize daily life, elevating efficiency and control above individual autonomy.

Speaker 0: Control structure for taking over The United States and the rest of the world has been revealed. Please check this out. Speaker 1: The biggest part of the great reset that you're all missing is the carbon credit scan. And what is the carbon credit scan? This is where they're telling you where they want to monitor, track and trace every so called kilogram of CO2 that you emit. And they say the global average needs to be two tons per person per year and you're using 16 tons per person per year, which means your activity has to go down by 800%. So how do they plan to do that? Well, first of all, they got the new first Mastercard in the world that is going to show a carbon allowance for every single purchase you buy. And to make sure that everything has a so called carbon credit, food. When you buy food now, if it's vegan, it's gonna show you this nice low score of only one kilogram, 1.3 kilograms of CO2 per serving. Now meat will be off the charts, so that's gonna be a no no. Check this out. If you go to a restaurant, even an Italian pizza place, they're gonna show you the amount of CO2 for your dish. So literally everything you eat, everything you buy, is your clothes made of leather, that's going to cost more CO2 because it came from a cow. So every single thing you do is going to be tracked. Why? Because they want to put limits on how much you can spend monthly. They're telling you you're using 16 tons a year and they want you to use two tons a year. What does two tons look like? Well, check this out. Say you wanted to fly from Toronto to Amsterdam and now Google, by the way, Google Flights shows the carbon emissions on that flight. That flight from Toronto to Amsterdam is four seventy eight kilograms of CO2. That's almost 25% of your yearly allowance. But don't worry, if you go over your limit, they're going to charge you $170 for every kilogram, for every kilogram of carbon credits you need. This is how they're going to control where you go, how you're going to get there, what you can buy, what you can eat, who you can see. And now imagine that in a world without cash. And imagine that in a world where the government gets to control every single transaction. And this is why they're constructing fifteen minute cities, aka prison camps, because when they put these carbon credit allowances into these cities, they're gonna have you on perpetual lockdown like they did with COVID without having a virus. Thank you, everybody.

The speaker discusses a future being built by the ruling class, referred to as a sustainable future. They mention the concept of 15-minute city smart grid apartments, which are designed to confine humans. China is presented as a blueprint for this smart grid system, where citizens' every movement is recorded to monitor their social credit score. Those who misbehave or refuse to comply are socially shamed and denied access to public facilities. Additionally, their friends on social media also face consequences through a reduction in their social credit score. The speaker suggests that this is a method of training humans to behave, and implies that smart cities sponsored by Klaus Schwab, the World Economic Forum, and BlackRock are on the horizon.

Speaker 0 argues that facial recognition will be used to unlock your digital identity, which will be a tool of control for upcoming agendas. Speaker 1 notes that elements of this control are already with us, citing Alexa as an example. Speaker 0 contends you are never alone in your home, because all devices and smart appliances are connected on a wireless network, many with cameras and microphones, monitoring everything all the time. Smart appliances communicate with the smart meter, sending real-time usage data. If a Ring camera is in the home, a mesh network is formed and all devices are being tracked within the home, including location and usage, with data going to Amazon’s servers. Speaker 1 adds that when you leave your home, modern vehicles are connected to the Internet and tracked continually. On the streets, smart LED poles and smart LED lights form a wireless network that track your vehicle. They claim data is collected 24/7 continuously on every human being within these wireless networks. Speaker 0 asserts this is not good for health due to electromagnetic radiation. Speaker 0 further states that in the long term the plan is to lock up humanity in smart cities, a super set of a fifteen minute city. Speaker 1 says they’ve sold smart cities to state and local governments and countries as about sustainability and the city’s good, but claims the language from the UN and WEF and their white papers is inverted. The monitoring is described as about limiting mobility and no car ownership. Surveillance via LED grid is described as why smart lighting is death. Water management is about water rationing; noise pollution about speed surveillance; traffic monitoring about limiting mobility; energy conservation about rationing heat, electricity, and gasoline. Speaker 0 explains geofencing as an invisible fence around you where you cannot go beyond a certain point, related to face recognition, digital identity, and access control. Speaker 1 mentions that smart contracts can enable Softbrick to turn off your digital currency beyond a certain point from your house. The world is described as turned into a digital panopticon. Speaker 0 concludes that this means you can be monitored, analyzed, managed, and monetized.

Speaker 0 describes being on the Belgian coast on a very nice day in June and talks about a town on the Belgian coast implementing what they call a climate lockdown. The town mentioned is Kunuku, described as a wealthier town further from the coast. The claim is that on hot days the town will “totally shut down the city,” and nobody will be able to come in anymore “just because” they want to try it. Local restaurants, bars, and business people would be affected because no more people can come in after the city is supposedly full. The speaker states that this is part of a plan they have been warning about, to “decline the logos,” and that Knucker on the coast is the first city where this would be implemented in the summer. They claim that people would simply drive there and the highway would be closed. The speaker calls this “absolutely crazy” and says it’s a dangerous precedent, because as a citizen you wouldn’t be able to go where you want to go anymore. The speaker asserts that the area would be off-limits and that this constitutes a violation of freedom, since people should be able to go anywhere they want in their country and because it is public property. The speaker reinforces the notion that this is a very dangerous precedent and expresses personal disapproval of the plan. The video ends with the speaker saying that is all for this video and signs off, promising to see the audience next time and thanking them.

The speaker discusses various global issues such as wildfires, the war in Ukraine, COVID variants, and migrant crises. They claim that national currencies are on the verge of collapse and predict the rise of central bank digital currencies. The speaker then introduces Agenda 21, a sustainable development plan, and argues that it aims to control all aspects of life, concentrating the population in cities and removing power from the people. They criticize the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group for its proposals to combat climate change, which include banning flying and shipping, cutting home heating, and using alternative building materials. The speaker concludes by expressing their opposition to this future, calling it joyless, totalitarian, and anti-human.