TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I, along with six colleagues, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID vaccines. The EMA responded, revealing shocking facts. They clarified that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization, not for controlling or preventing infections. The EMA emphasized the lack of data on contagiousness and even stated that repeated exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection in vaccinated individuals. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA also highlighted the importance of carefully considering safety information before administering vaccines. The government's failure to report vaccine side effects within the first 14 days was not only fraudulent but also endangered lives. The vaccination campaign should be halted as it does not meet EMA standards. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception.

I am Retsef Levy from MIT, with over 30 years of experience in data and analytics related to health systems. I believe all COVID mRNA vaccination programs should be halted immediately due to their failure to meet efficacy promises and the growing evidence of harm, including deaths among young people. My concerns began in mid-2021 when reports of myocarditis emerged. An analysis of Israeli EMS data revealed a 25% increase in cardiac arrest cases among ages 16 to 39 coinciding with the vaccination campaign. Further studies from various countries support these findings, indicating higher rates of heart damage than previously diagnosed. Autopsies also suggest vaccine-induced myocarditis as a cause of death in some cases. Given this evidence, I urge the cessation of mRNA vaccines, as they represent a significant failure in both efficacy and safety in medical history.

A group of European Parliament members wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA responded, stating that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization and not for controlling or preventing infections. They also admitted a lack of data on vaccine effectiveness against infections. The government's campaign to vaccinate for the sake of others was based on misinformation. Furthermore, the EMA emphasized the need to carefully consider safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination campaign should be halted as it does not meet the EMA's requirements and puts people's health at risk. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception.

Today, we are here to inform the public and representatives about the serious errors and safety issues related to mRNA injections. The previous speakers discussed the deadly political mistakes made by the EMA and the European Commission, who deliberately deceived the public and used pseudoscience to push people into potentially deadly experiments. The EMA admitted to providing misleading information to the public, and the lack of evidence for transmission control makes the vaccination campaign a fraudulent and illegal marketing campaign. The argument that this is for the benefit of vulnerable and elderly individuals is false, as the entire population has been forced to participate in this potentially deadly experiment. We demand the removal of all mRNA injections from the market and accountability for those responsible.

I am Max Melling, the statistician behind this study, with Viveke as the medical expert. The main result of our study is shown on the screen. It displays the number of adverse effects in each vaccine batch, based on official Danish data created for the study. Some batches are small, while others are large. Normally, a good vaccine would show a nearly perfect line, while a very bad vaccine would have scattered points. However, we observe three almost perfect lines, which is unexpected and suggests a problem with the product. Participants were unable to give informed consent due to the unknown risks. This is a concerning safety signal that requires further investigation.

Last month, a group of European Parliament members, including myself, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA's response revealed shocking facts. They admitted that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization and not for controlling or preventing infections. Furthermore, there is a lack of data supporting the vaccines' effectiveness in preventing infections. In fact, the EMA stated that repeated exposure to the virus increases the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA also emphasized the need to carefully consider safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination efforts were in direct contradiction to the approved use of the vaccines. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception. The vaccination campaign needs to be halted as it is not safe and does not meet EMA requirements.

We apologize for interrupting. Thank you for your contributions. We, as citizens, would like to address the letter from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) that contradicts the narrative presented by doctors for the past three years. We have a victim, a mother affected by the Pfizer vaccine, and the report from the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM) on the vaccine's side effects. We believe it is important to discuss these issues as citizens. We request that Mr. Villani, who has been speaking about citizens and humanity, acknowledge our concerns. Thank you.

Willem Engel, a pharmaceutical scientist and human rights activist, discusses the concerns and safety issues surrounding COVID vaccines. He criticizes the spread of misinformation by governments and the lack of accurate registration of vaccine risks. He questions the validity of informed consent when crucial information is not shared with the public. Another speaker highlights the patterns of adverse reactions in different vaccine batches, suggesting that informed consent was impossible due to the unknown risks associated with each batch. The statistician presents data showing three distinct patterns of adverse reactions in different vaccine batches, indicating a concerning safety signal. The speakers call for the withdrawal of vaccine marketing authorizations and accountability for the alleged mishandling of the vaccination campaign.

Today, we are here to inform the public and representatives about the serious errors and safety issues related to mRNA injections. The previous speakers discussed the deadly political mistakes made by the EMA and the European Commission, who deliberately deceived the public and used pseudoscience to push people into potentially deadly experiments. The EMA admitted that the information provided to the public was not for informed consent. The lack of evidence for transmission control from the start makes the vaccination campaign a fraudulent and illegal marketing campaign. The argument that it is a disservice to vulnerable and elderly individuals is false, as the entire population has been forced to participate in this potentially deadly experiment. We demand the removal of all mRNA injections from the market and accountability for those responsible.

I'm a doctor and scientist who has worked with the NHS and the World Health Organization. I sent an urgent report to the MHRA stating that the COVID vaccines were unsafe and causing harm. The yellow card scheme showed 250,000 adverse event reports and 1,253 deaths associated with the vaccines. The MHRA responded, suggesting that some reports may be coincidental. Since then, the Vigi access database has recorded over 5,000,000 reports of COVID vaccine harms, injuries, and deaths. These vaccines are genetic therapies, not safe or effective. Trust me, I am a scientist and doctor.

The speaker discusses a paper from Denmark that reveals a significant variation in suspected adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine. The data shows a 1,000-fold difference in incidence depending on the batch of vaccines administered. This information is currently gaining popularity.

I'm Philippe Boucalt, a cancer genomics researcher at the University of South Carolina. I've sequenced the DNA in the Pfizer vaccine and found that it contains fragments of DNA. This DNA could potentially cause rare but serious side effects, such as cardiac arrest and future cancer risks. The regulatory process that allowed this contamination is concerning. The DNA could integrate into long-lived somatic cells and potentially cause autoimmune attacks or disrupt tumor suppressors. To produce the vaccine, they cloned the PCR product into a plasmid vector, which led to the contamination. We can easily measure the amount of this substance in the vaccine and should conduct further studies to understand its implications. The FDA should require Pfizer to remove the DNA from the vaccine.

The speaker states: "We found circulating Pfizer mRNA in his exosomes three point six years after his last shot, and we also found plasmid DNA from the manufacturing process SV40 ORI segments, as well as the spike expression segments in his skin, in his Grover's disease area. He developed this skin disease after the shots." They add: "We also found vaccine spike protein and no nucleocapsid in this skin area as well." The speaker emphasizes timing: "Three point six years after his last shot, he suffered from myocarditis, pulmonary embolism, multisystem vaccination syndrome, neurological adverse events as well." They conclude: "And so the fact that we are finding this material forty three months after the last shot means we were lied to completely." The speaker claims: "We were told it would stay in the arm, it would degrade within weeks, that was wrong and we expect lawsuits to begin to flood in."

Marcel de Graaf, Willem Engel, and others discuss the safety issues and lack of informed consent surrounding COVID vaccines in a press conference. They highlight the existence of different batches of vaccines with varying risks, the failure of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to properly inform the public, and the potential long-term side effects. They also question the classification of the vaccines as vaccines rather than gene therapy and raise concerns about the manipulation of data and the lack of transparency. The speakers call for the withdrawal of market authorizations and accountability for those responsible.

Four studies are cited as showing significant lot variability in the vaccine batches. The speaker notes that the variability is substantial across lots, with some batches from the early 2021 period appearing to be the most dangerous. They state that some lots are linked to large numbers of adverse events, while other lots are linked to no adverse events at all, describing these as “duds.” According to the speaker, these problematic batches may result from several issues: the mRNA being degraded, or the cold-chain failure such as being left out of the refrigerator for too long, or problems in the manufacturing process that rendered the batch ineffective. The implication is that these dud batches were not manufactured properly. The speaker emphasizes that some of these batches had devastating effects on individuals. They further claim that these batches were probably contaminated with high levels of DNA plasmids from the manufacturing process, extremely high levels of mRNA, and even heavy metal contamination. The range of issues is described as broad, indicating multiple types of contamination or quality problems in different batches. The overall assertion is that not a single batch appears to be the same as another; there is clear heterogeneity across batches, with some batches causing major adverse events and others causing none.

Last month, I, along with six colleagues from the European Parliament, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID vaccines. The EMA's response revealed shocking facts. They admitted that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization, not for controlling or preventing infections. The EMA emphasized the lack of data on the vaccines' ability to prevent transmission. In fact, repeated exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA also stated that vaccinations were solely for the protection of the vaccinated individual, and each case should be carefully evaluated for safety before administering the vaccine. The government's vaccination policy disregarded reporting of side effects within the first two weeks after vaccination, falsely attributing any complaints to the virus. This information exposes the flaws in the vaccination strategy and calls for an immediate halt to the campaign.

I analyzed data showing a consistent 1.3 mortality gap between Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, with Moderna being 30% more likely to cause death. Pfizer reduced its active ingredient dosage due to toxicity concerns. The medical community must address this issue to maintain credibility. I reached out to a journal editor to review the data, which could potentially damage the reputation of health authorities and regulators.

I am one of the scientists involved in a study on the safety and dependency of vaccine batches. We found three types of side effects: mild, severe, and even death. These adverse effects were present in the initial batches, which were later changed, possibly due to Pfizer altering the product or during transportation. Patients were not informed of the risks and some received poor-quality batches. The study also reveals a safety issue that both Pfizer and regulatory institutions should have addressed. Pfizer had already informed the European Medicines Agency (EMA) about the safety problem in August 2021. Our data from Sweden indicates that this is a European issue, not just a Danish one. We are concerned about long-term side effects and their potential links to cancer and increased mortality rates. The EMA should have taken action based on the data and informed the public. The vice-president of Pfizer's statement about building the plane while flying is apt, as we have shown that one wing has fallen off.

Last month, Joachim Küs and six other colleagues from the European Parliament wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding concerns about the arrival of vaccines. The EMA responded, stating that the vaccines were only authorized for individual immunization, not for infection control, prevention, or reduction. The EMA also highlighted a lack of data on contagion and stated that repeated exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The government's massive vaccination campaigns, aimed at protecting others, were not authorized and lacked factual basis. The EMA emphasized the importance of carefully considering safety information before administering vaccinations. The government's policy of not reporting complaints within the first 14 days of vaccination was seen as deliberate endangerment of human life. The speaker called for an end to vaccination campaigns and accountability for the government's lies and deception.

Nederlandse samenvatting: Afgelopen maand schreef ik met Joachim Koez en zes EU-parlementscollega’s een brief aan de EMA over de Covid-vaccins en vroeg om opheldering en mogelijk intrekking van de markttoelating. De EMA antwoordde met schokkende feiten: "de corona vaccins alleen en uitsluitend op de markt heeft toegelaten voor individuele immunisatie En absoluut niet voor beheersing van besmetting en absoluut niet voor het voorkomen of verminderen van besmettingen." "EMA's beoordelingsrapporten over de toelating van vaccins benadrukken het gebrek aan gegevens over besmettelijkheid." "De vaccins waren niet bedoeld voor het voorkomen van besmettingen en er zijn al helemaal geen gegevens die onderbouwen dat de vaccins helpen tegen besmettingen." "Sterker nog, de EMA verklaart herhaalde blootstelling aan het virus verhoogt de kans op infecties, zelfs in gevaccineerden." "Vaccinaties zijn uitsluitend voor de bescherming van het gevaccineerde individu." "alle veiligheidsinformatie zorgvuldig worden overwogen alvorens een vaccinatie toe te dienen of aan te bevelen." Verder: "de eerste 14 dagen na vaccinatie juist niet werden gemeld omdat het vaccin 10 tot 14 dagen nodig zou hebben om effectief te worden. Alle klachten in die periode werden juist aan het coronavirus toegeschreven." De regering wist dat de vaccins niet zouden beschermen tegen de verspreiding van het virus maar deelde deze informatie niet met de burgers. "De vaccinatiecampagnes dienen zo snel mogelijk stopgezet te worden. Het is gewoonweg niet veilig en ze voldoen niet aan de eisen die de EMA stelt." De regering en alle politieke partijen die dit steunden behoren op hun leugens en bedrog afgerekend te worden. English translation: Last month I, together with Joachim Koez and six colleagues from the European Parliament, wrote a letter to the EMA about the Covid vaccines and asked for clarification and possibly withdrawal of market authorization. The EMA replied with shocking facts: "the corona vaccines were only and exclusively authorised on the market for individual immunization And absolutely not for controlling infection or for preventing or reducing infections." "EMA's assessment reports on the authorisation of vaccines emphasise the lack of data on transmissibility." "The vaccines were not intended for the prevention of infections and there are absolutely no data to support that the vaccines help against infections." "Moreover, the EMA states that repeated exposure to the virus increases the risk of infections, even in vaccinated individuals." "Vaccinations are solely for the protection of the vaccinated individual." "all safety information should be carefully considered before administering or recommending a vaccination." Furthermore: "the first 14 days after vaccination were not reported because the vaccine would take 10 to 14 days to become effective. All complaints in that period were indeed attributed to the coronavirus." The government knew that the vaccines would not protect against the spread of the virus but did not share this information with the citizens. "The vaccination campaigns should be stopped as soon as possible. It is simply not safe and they do not meet the requirements set by the EMA." And the government and all political parties that supported this should be held accountable for their lies and deception.

Today's press conference featured Marcel De Graff, a European Parliament member, along with Joachim Kus, Evi Becquehmanish, and Max Schmeling. They discussed the shocking response from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding the authorization of COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA explicitly stated that the vaccines were only authorized for individual immunization and not for infection control or prevention. This contradicts the government's messaging and raises concerns about the safety of the vaccines. The speakers also highlighted the lack of proper reporting of side effects and the potential risks associated with different vaccine batches. They called for an immediate halt to vaccination campaigns and accountability for the government's misleading information.

I spent 9 months researching the Pfizer vaccine with whistleblowers and scientists. Trials showed a 1 in 800 risk of serious harm from the vaccine, higher than COVID hospitalization rates. Other vaccines were pulled for less harm. Serious harm included hospitalization, disability, and life-changing events, with 40% related to clotting disorders.

The speaker raises concerns about the WHO's failures and the contamination of mRNA vaccines with DNA. They mention a research team in the US finding high levels of DNA contamination in the vaccine. German investigations also found significant exceedances of the allowable DNA limit. The speaker highlights the distribution of the vaccine throughout the body, including the ovaries, and appeals to the chairwoman to address the issue for vaccinated women of childbearing age. They mention having evidence to share but were prohibited from doing so. The speaker directs interested individuals to their website for more information.

I, along with six colleagues, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID vaccines. The EMA's response revealed shocking facts. They admitted that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization, not for controlling or preventing infections. The EMA emphasized the lack of data on contagiousness and stated that repeated exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection, even for the unvaccinated. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on false information. The EMA also highlighted the importance of carefully considering safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination efforts were in direct contradiction to the approved use of the vaccines. The EMA expected reports of side effects, but the government failed to report them, endangering lives. The vaccination campaign should be halted immediately.

Willem Engel, a human rights activist, and other speakers discuss the safety issues and lack of informed consent surrounding COVID vaccines. They highlight the problem of adverse events not being properly registered within the first 14 days after vaccination, leading to a false sense of security. They also raise concerns about the classification of mRNA injections as vaccines and the potential long-term side effects. The speakers present data showing different patterns of adverse reactions in different vaccine batches, indicating a lack of consistency and informed consent. They criticize the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for not taking appropriate action and call for the withdrawal of market authorizations.