reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: Were I a Jew, I would be a Zionist. And my father pointed out to me, I did not need to be a Jew to be a Zionist, for I am. Israel is essential to security of Jews worldwide. Speaker 1: That this is not theoretical. This is not just about things that happen on Twitter. Antisemitism kills. Hate kills. Speaker 2: I come before you not only as The United States Secretary of State, but also as a Jew. My grandfather, Maurice Blinken, fled pogroms in Russia. My stepfather, Samuel Pizar, survived concentration camps, Auschwitz, Dachau, Maidanic. Speaker 3: We have a common agenda to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and preventing Iran's aggression, maintaining the security and prosperity of this region, and seeking to expand the circle of peace. Speaker 4: On October 7, Hamas terrorists murdered nearly 1,200 people, including over 40 Americans, and kidnapped hundreds of civilians. They perpetrated the deadliest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. Speaker 5: Holocaust. Holocaust. My grandfather fled Nazi Germany. Fled Nazi Germany. If we wanna create peace in the Middle East, resolve the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, we don't need boycotts. We need business. We don't need divestment. We need investment. We don't need sanctions. We need startups. We need startups. They met with several Israeli companies looking to expand into The United States. Speaker 1: Actual, literal, no shit, Jews will not replace us anti Semites as very fine people. Speaker 6: I support Israel's ability to defend itself. Speaker 7: It's about time we stop those of us who support as most of us do, Israel and this body for apologizing for our support for Israel. There's no apology to be made. None. It is the best $3,000,000,000 investment we make. $3,000,000,000 investment we make. Speaker 8: two of us were brought together by Apex Education Foundation for a mission to Israel. We hear the call of our Jewish brothers and sisters. Israel was this place I had always felt an, I don't know, unexplainable pull. Speaker 5: And the Jewish people have been the recipients of boycotts for hundreds, if not thousands of years. Speaker 6: So I just had a frank and constructive meeting with prime minister Netanyahu. I told him that I will always ensure that Israel is able to defend itself, including from Iran and Iran backed militias such as Hamas and Hezbollah. Speaker 3: Israelis do not need to be lectured about the importance of peace by foreign leaders. Speaker 9: Why does Israel need our help? We need to get out of their way. Speaker 6: I've said it many times, but it bears repeating. Israel has a right to defend itself. Speaker 2: The message that I bring to Israel is this. You may be strong enough on your own to defend yourself, but as long as America exists, you will never ever have to. We will always be there by your side. Speaker 1: He is a friend of the Jewish people by aligning not even with Israel, but with a certain kind of politics within Israel. And I just think that the American Jewish community are a lot smarter than that. Speaker 7: And even suggested breaking from the long standing US policies on settlements. Jerusalem. Jerusalem. Speaker 9: I was one of the few in congress that said it's none of our business, and Israel should take care of themselves. Speaker 8: Perhaps he does not know that I am the child of a holocaust survivor. Perhaps he does not know that my mother lost almost all her family at the hands of the Nazis. At the hands of the Nazis. Speaker 9: Israel has 200, 300 nuclear missiles, they can take care of themselves. Why should we commit? We don't even have a treaty with Israel. We don't even have a treaty with Israel. Speaker 7: Were there not an Israel, The United States Of America would have to invent an Israel to protect her interest in the region. Speaker 9: Why why do we have this automatic commitment that we're gonna send our kids and send our money endlessly, to to Israel?

The speaker argues that online discourse on Israel is split into two extreme camps and that US politics mirrors this division, creating a harmful national distraction. To heal the relationship and conversation, four steps are proposed: 1) Global perspective: The United States is a 350,000,000-strong powerhouse; Israel is tiny with 9,000,000 people and few natural resources. The US has spent at least $30,000,000,000 defending Israel since 10/07/2023, and about $300,000,000,000 overall; two THAAD batteries in Israel represent a quarter of the world’s supply. Prominent claims: "The United States needs Israel" and "Israel could not survive without The United States." 2) Self-respect: stop being treated as a client state; cited incidents include Pollard and Israeli officers in the Pentagon; Netanyahu's "I control Donald Trump" remark. 3) Citizenship: end dual citizenship; APAC to register under FAIR. 4) Theology: reject Christian Zionism; "the chosen people in Christianity are those who choose Jesus."

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a historic shift in American public opinion regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict. - Speaker 1 notes that public opinion on who voters sympathize with shifted dramatically in the wake of the current war. In October 2023, Americans favored Israel by 48 points; now, they favor the Palestinians by 1 point. He says he reviewed polls since the question began in the 1980s and that this is the first time Palestinians lead on this question, marking a historic shift away from the Israeli position toward the Palestinians. - He emphasizes that the shift was led by Democrats, moving from Democrats favoring Israel by 26 points to Palestinians by 46 points, describing it as a roughly 70-point swing and stating that, for the first time ever, more Americans sympathize with the Palestinians over the Israelis. - Speaker 0 adds that the shift is “a first that I have seen in my lifetime” and credits independent media and journalists reporting from Gaza for bringing images to social media, including images of civilians and alleged Israeli actions. He asserts that without on-the-ground reporting, people wouldn’t have seen certain images, asserts that journalists were killed by the IDF, and claims those images contributed to waking people up. - He contends that APAC is panicking, citing a new ad and a rebranding as “America first,” and argues Israel has lost the media war and the narrative, including some conservative and evangelical support (referencing Charlie Kirk’s base). - Speaker 1 details a parallel shift within the Republican Party, noting a significant age-based divide. Among Republicans over 50, they sympathize with Israel by 66 points; among those under 50, they sympathize with the Palestinians by 25 points. This creates about a 40-point gap, with younger Republicans leaning more toward the Palestinians than older Republicans. - Speaker 0 adds that Israel has hired pro-Israel influencers—paid about $7,000 per post—targeting the youth to reel back pro-Israel sentiment in the conservative youth vote. He notes these influencers were primarily young, implying a deliberate strategy to mobilize younger voters, while older voters are less in need of such outreach. - The speakers conclude that this combination of media exposure, shifts in party and demographic alignments, and targeted influencer campaigns constitutes a broad, historic realignment in American attitudes toward the conflict.

“If their government came out and said, we have a five year plan to decouple from USAID, would that help people's view of Israel if they said, hey, we want to be self reliant? Absolutely.” “We're now gonna decouple over the next five years and and basically transition.” “319,000,000,000 being sent to Israel over all these years, that's comparable to the amount we've sent to Ukraine.” “I believe Israel has a right to exist. I believe that they are the only state in that region with the right to exist.” “But why are we treating them differently than any other ally? Should we not be judging them, holding them to the same standard?” “Do you find it persuasive when the Israeli tourism board is bragging about how many gay pride parades they have in Tel Aviv?” “No.”

In this video, everyday Israelis in Jerusalem share their thoughts on living in Israel. Some express their love for the country and feel safe despite misconceptions. Others discuss the threat they perceive and the need to retaliate when harmed. One person mentions an organization against Jews marrying Arabs, believing in the importance of preserving Jewish identity. Some express strong opinions about Arabs, advocating for their removal or even violence. However, there are also mentions of Jewish civilians who support Arabs. Overall, the video captures a range of perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian situation, highlighting differing views on coexistence and conflict resolution.

Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening, despite movements in the region by Israel prompted by advocacy. The pursuit of what is necessary for the United States to be clear about ending the war will continue.

They faced backlash after being expelled from their 110th country, with claims of a looming holocaust being made. The Israeli government stated that Jews are under brutal attack, describing it as a modern-day pogrom. Critics argue that this narrative is hypocritical, pointing out that similar claims have been made about Palestine for years. The ongoing wars in the Middle East have led to a migration crisis, with millions of migrants entering Europe and North America, which some blame on Israeli actions. This situation has fueled tensions and protests, as the narrative of victimhood is used to justify aggressive actions. In a recent incident in Amsterdam, those who instigated violence faced consequences, highlighting the complexities of these conflicts.

Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening, despite movements in the region by Israel prompted by advocacy. The pursuit of what is necessary for the United States to be clear about ending the war will continue.

The piece profiles US influencers Netanyahu met at Israel's consulate in New York to take over TikTok and X and shore up support during the genocide in Gaza. Yen Netanyahu: "from the river to the sea, this flag, the Israeli flag, is all you'll see." He has denied the genocide in Gaza and blamed images showing malnutrition on genetic issues, attributing them to Palestinian incest. "forty five percent of the marriages in Gaza are between first cousins, so there is some genetic problem there." "APAC is not an Israeli organization. It has no ties whatsoever to the government of Israel." "The people that are sympathizing with Palestine right now literally rot in hell." Shay Sabo: "I care about their future so much that I refuse to endorse a plan that traps them under corrupt and extremist ideology and leadership." Xavier DeRusso: "If I were Israel, I wouldn't even provide matching socks to Gaza." These influences are part of a coordinated effort to normalize and obscure the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

Is the media presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Ethnic cleansing: the idea that population movement is equivalent to ethnic cleansing. If people want to leave, they can, but they're not being forced to leave. Moving people out of areas honeycombed with terrorist booby traps is not the same thing as ethnic cleansing. Ethnic cleansing is very often used as a softer form of the genocide attack, the idea that Israel is trying to kill everyone. Legacy media are radically anti Israel overall. The New York Times cannot be accused of being a pro Israel outlet. They're gonna say Ben pro Israel. You Jews own the media, Ben. I'm a Jew, I'm a Zionist. BB said 'you can't be MAGA if you're anti Israel.' You can disagree with Bibi's policies and still be MAGA. If you're pro Hamas, you're something darker, and we shouldn't put up with that.

Many people on the internet are discovering that Jewish and Israeli music often sounds similar to Arab and other Eastern music. This has confused and angered some individuals. It is important to note that most Israeli citizens and Jews are not Ashkenazi Jews from Europe. Many Jews from Arabic-speaking countries and other Islamic majority nations migrated to Israel, France, and the United States due to various reasons such as persecution and expulsions. The majority of Israeli citizens are of Mizrahi, Sephardic, Ethiopian, or mixed backgrounds. Additionally, a significant portion of Israeli citizens are Palestinian Arabs. It is also worth mentioning that many "Russian Jews" are actually Farsi-speaking Jews from Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, known as Mountain Jews.

Diamonds are forever. De Beers’ mines used a segregated compound system, where miners were virtual prisoners unable to leave until their contracts ended; once released, they had no free movement in the country. At the height of its power, Beers controlled over 90% of the world’s diamonds. Although diamonds are relatively common in nature, De Beers could regulate how many reach consumers. They ran aggressive ad campaigns and increased the diamonds’ worth in the eyes of the general public, convincing people that there should always be shiny diamonds in wedding rings. Happy anniversary. Steven, it’s beautiful. A diamond is forever. De Beers. Ernest Oppenheimer, seeing the potential in controlling this giant, began to buy shares in De Beers in the early nineteen twenties, and by 1929, he became the chairman of De Beers, gaining control over the company’s vast diamond interests. You may have heard that diamonds are a girl’s best friend, but a lot of those come from Israel. If you have a diamond or ever bought one, you were probably supporting US–Israel trade even though you probably didn’t know it. The Israeli diamond industry contributes about $1,000,000,000 a year to the IDF, and every time someone buys a diamond from Israel some of that money goes to the military. Diamonds and all the associations we have with diamonds is a product of a marketing strategy. This is probably the most successful campaign in history. This is the closing line: Diamonds are forever forever.

"But October 7 in the Hamas raid in Southern Israel changed minds on this app. Explain how." "over 60% of the content that is pro Hamas, pro Palestine content, it's actually generated in Bangladesh, Malaysia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and then it is actually amplified in TikTok users' feeds in The United States." "the majority of the anti Israel content, it's actually generated and created overseas, and then the algorithm is tailored to push that content here in America." "it's not actually generated here in The United States. It's not a reflection of the sentiment here in The United States." "But think about the fact that in Israel, they have TikTok, and in Israel, they have manipulated the algorithm to show 90% of the sentiment is for pro Hamas in Israel." "Do you really think that Israelis after October 7 feel that that is the case?"

Speaker 0: "I'm very pro Israel" and "defensive of their right to defend themselves," but "I have absolutely no skin whatsoever in defending any lobbyist group, including AIPAC" and asks, "what they do to get the loyalty of politicians." She refuses outreach to visit Israel, wanting to "cover this conflict from here" and insisting she is not "on Hamas" side. Speaker 1: "'APAC is not registered under FARA' and explains lobbying tactics: taking freshmen on 'a very special trip to Israel,' inviting 'influencers,' and that Israel receives '3.8 billion dollars in funding for Israel.' He notes 'Israel is the only democracy in The Middle East' and says Israel can 'use that money to buy from Israeli defense contractors' instead of American ones. He cites Judge McFadden on flag-burning and says, 'We don't have time to fund what you're doing.' Ad: 'text m k to the number 989898.'

Speaker accuses the Prime Minister of Israel of showing disrespect toward the president of my country, asserting he never had any respect at all. Netanyahu is pictured here as mocking Bill Clinton and the American people as "a bunch of grasshoppers that he can do whatever he wants with us, including lie our fathers into sending their sons to die in his wars." In this video, he is no longer the prime minister at a settler's house in the living room. He tells the boy, turn off the video camera, and the boy either fails to turn it off or turns it back on; the video keeps rolling as Netanyahu blabs. He adds, "America is a thing that is easily moved. 80% of them support us." "I'm not afraid of Bill Clinton." He says, "I made it where Area C is this huge military area, two thirds of the West Bank."

Speaker 0 asks for comments on Israel, and someone responds by saying that Israel should leave Palestine. Another person points out that the people in Palestine are occupied and it is their land. The question is raised about where they should go, and someone suggests they go back to Poland and Germany. Another person adds that they should go back to America and other places as well.

We are Israeli and I often learn recipes from Arab people. I'm currently in New York City, feeling scared for my safety. I believe that being a hot white girl here is difficult. As Israelis, we defend our illegal settlements, claiming that God is our real estate agent. Americans are not allowed to criticize us. Identity politics is important to us, and we label anyone who disagrees with us as anti-Semitic. We believe in "my body, my choice," except when it comes to Ethiopians. We feel entitled to American taxpayer money and dismiss complaints about it. We also dismiss any questioning of our atrocity propaganda. We support the right to return, but only for those born there. We have a special regard for people like Harvey Weinstein.

Israel's actions, such as spying, assassinations, and attacks on American citizens and military, call into question its status as a friend to the United States. Instances like the Jonathan Pollard spy case, the Herzog affair, the Apollo affair, and attacks on American naval vessels raise concerns about the true nature of the relationship between the two countries. Despite these events, some still argue that Israel is a friend to America.

The prime minister advises advocating for Israel on social media by telling the truth. He emphasizes that Israel is a beacon of liberalism, pluralism, and freedom, while criticizing the Palestinian attackers for their lack of respect for human rights and freedom. He highlights Israel's enduring connection to the land, dating back 4000 years, and asserts that they are not colonials but back in their ancestral homeland. The prime minister encourages viewers to stand up for truth, stand up for Israel, and be proud.

Speaker 0: Do we need this connection with Israel? What is it? No one ever explains what it's for. I feel like. Right? That would help everybody have a much better understanding, you know, because it starts to feel like America is just a shell company, an LLC for Israel. That's what it starts to feel like a lot of times, you know? Do you feel like that that's realistic, or do you feel like that that's off base? Speaker 1: I would I wouldn't send them a dime. Like, that's my position. I don't think whatever we're getting isn't worth it.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss being pro-Israel and defending Israel’s right to defend itself, while defending American Jews on campuses, and they insist they’re not defending any lobbyist group, including AIPAC. They describe being approached to visit Israel and declining due to family and work, noting growing pressure to stay aligned. They explain that APAC takes freshmen on trips to Israel and that Israel receives 3.8 billion dollars annually, with Israel able to buy from Israeli defense contractors. They contrast Israel’s debt (less than 400,000,000,000) with the US debt (37,000,000,000,000) and question why the US funds Israel. They cite Judge McFadden’s ruling about burning flags: 'burn any flag in The United States Of America, except you can't burn the Israeli flag in'. They advocate America first amid high costs of living, insurance, and housing. An ad for Birch Gold Group invites text m k to the number 989898.

Speaker 0 describes the backlash: "The behavior by a lot, both privately and publicly, are pushing people like you and me away." He adds: "I am learning biblical Hebrew and writing a book on the Shabbat. I honor the Shabbat, literally the Jewish Sabbath. I visit Israel and fight for it." He asserts identity and support: "Yes. I'm an American citizen." "Yes. I want Israel to win." "But my moral character is now being put into question." He emphasizes the impact of online discourse: "Well, you and I believe that we're Americans and Americans first, period. End of story. We are citizens of this nation." He cites: "And the thing about Epstein is just so bizarre. I don't know who he was an agent for. It might have been Israel or an asset, or it might have been nobody, but we're allowed to speculate about that. It's like just some rule. You can't go there when it comes to Israel." He concludes with: "I love Israel."

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the basis for Jewish connection to the land and who has a legitimate claim to it. Speaker 0 begins by stating that there are about 16,000,000 Jews in total worldwide, with 8,000,000 living in the area being discussed, and the remainder living mainly in New York, South Florida, and a few other places. He notes that this is a small population with historical and biblical connections to the land, and asks if such a connection exists. Speaker 1 responds that Bibi’s family lived in Eastern Europe and that there is no evidence they ever lived in the land, and that he isn’t religious. He questions whether there is a true ancestral link. Speaker 0 asks whether there is evidence of any genuine ancestral connection. Speaker 1 asks if there is a family tree for Bibi, and if not, whether anyone has one. Speaker 0 asks how they know, and Speaker 1 elaborates that the point is to establish an ancestral connection to the land. He notes that there has been a practice of Judaism and a connection to the language, suggesting that Bibi has fought for the land, and that his family has fought for it. He raises an obvious, meaningful question: where does this right come from? He explains that many people in the territory Israel controls, particularly in the West Bank, have genetic evidence of having been there for thousands of years, with many identified as Christians for two thousand years, and even if some did not practice Judaism or were Samaritan or pre-Islam, the question remains: how do they compare in terms of rights to someone whose ancestors lived in Latvia or Poland and were Jewish? He questions the basis of being “Jewish” by faith, language, or Torah. Speaker 0 challenges the question, asking how we know if Bibi’s ancestors ever lived there, and expresses confusion about what Speaker 1 is trying to determine. Speaker 1 emphasizes that a claim of rights based on ancestral presence is significant because many claims hinge on whether ancestors lived there, whether money flowed, and whether displacement occurred. He reiterates that it is not a theoretical issue like a grandparent’s distant past, but a real question of who has the right to be there. Speaker 0 remains unable to fully process Speaker 1’s point.