reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There have been numerous incidents in Europe where migrants have randomly stabbed people, including children, women, and the elderly. These attackers often target vulnerable individuals. The media tends to downplay these incidents, possibly to protect the establishment from accountability. However, due to the increasing frequency of such attacks, people in Ireland are now protesting against them.

The speaker contrasts European political responses to immigration and crime with American policies, arguing that European left-wing politicians ignore urgent problems. They claim: - In Spain, “they just legalized residents of half a million illegal aliens.” - In France, “they throw grenades into hair salons in a broad daylight.” - In Germany, “not a single day goes by without someone being murdered with a knife.” - In Sweden, “you have bomb attack every other day.” The speaker asserts that these are real problems for the European left-wing politicians, yet contends that those politicians do not care. The immediate target is a European debate about the rule of law in the United States and deportation policies: the speaker says, “You are seriously discussing here the rule of law in United States and criticizing American government for deporting illegal aliens, for deporting criminals out of their territory in the same time when Western European cities are gradually turning into a war zone.” A call is made to apply the same approach in Europe: “We should do exactly the same. We should deport them from Europe and not legalize their stay.” The speaker urges listening to them and not to “what you are proposing to all of us,” asserting that “Everybody can see, no, you are enemies of Europe. You hate Europe.” The rhetoric culminates in a warning: “You hate our nations, and you want to destroy the future for our children. We should stop you. We should defeat you politically if we want to survive. Otherwise, it will be the end of Europe.”

The transcript presents a contrived media discussion framing mass immigration from India as a crisis-like trend sweeping Western countries. It begins with claims that Canada, especially British Columbia and Vancouver, is overrun with East Indians, and that Canada’s openness to Indian immigration has made cities like Vancouver and Brampton “unrecognizable” to natives. A montage introduces Brampton as “Canada's little India,” where roughly 53 of the entire population is foreign-born and India is the top country of origin. Interviewees from Brampton describe Punjabis and other groups, suggesting diminished cultural integration and attributing local changes to immigration—though some acknowledge Indian immigrants as “nice people” and “cheap” labor. The segment then pivots to Europe, citing Ursula von der Leyen’s announcement of an “EU legal gateway office in India” and a mobility agreement intended to facilitate movement of students, researchers, and workers as evidence that Europe will mirror Canada’s approach. The show asserts this will lead to large-scale Indian immigration into Europe, claiming Europe is already collapsing under energy policies and open borders. Lauren Chen, a Canadian guest, is invited to discuss perceived negative outcomes in Canada due to mass migration, including what the hosts call a “mass migration” program. Chen contends that Canada has seen a general decline in the standard of living for Canadians, with high school and college graduates unable to obtain jobs because many Indians are willing to work for cheaper. She alleges a government wage-subsidy program that subsidizes Indian immigrant wages, connects to rising housing costs, and notes that Canada’s birth rate among natives is below replacement. She asserts that immigration has led to housing prices “skyrocketing” and that millennials struggle to achieve independence. Chen adds that Indian migrants bring cultural incompatibilities, citing inappropriate public defecation on beaches as an example, and argues that Canada’s former merit-based immigration system under Trudeau shifted toward mass migration and low-skilled chain migration. She warns about fraudulent universities in India and similar fraud in the U.S. with H-1B programs, urging caution about high-skilled immigration deals with developing countries like India. She points to truck-driver deaths linked to varying licensing standards and suggests many Western countries lack effective assimilation requirements. She contrasts European policy with practices in Italy or Portugal where language tests and cultural proficiency are required for citizenship, arguing Western governments show self-sabotage of their own cultures. The discussion includes later remarks on crime statistics, alleging increases in Canada among permanent residents from India and other countries, and predicting similar trends in Europe if mass immigration continues. Speakers discuss the ideological motivation behind open borders and assimilation policies, with concerns about the impact on native populations, youth prospects, and welfare usage by certain immigrant groups. The segment closes with light, off-topic banter about beach signage and social media, briefly returning to the idea that Canada serves as a warning for Europe.

A 28-year-old Afghan migrant allegedly stabbed and killed a two-year-old child and a 41-year-old man in Aschaffenburg, Germany. The speaker expresses frustration, stating that these incidents are recurring. They claim that migrants "take take take from us" and hate the native population to the point of violence. The speaker says that politicians promise change and deportations, but fail to deliver due to international human rights treaties. The speaker questions the country's sovereignty and democratic options to demand change. They ask if more videos and "thoughts and prayers" are the only recourse.

In three minutes, that man that assaulted that young woman yesterday will be released from custody. He'll be released from custody because he's not a citizen of Germany. He's not a citizen of the EU for that matter. He doesn't even belong in here. He's an immigrant, an illegal one, a drug dealer, and very popularly known here, especially by the police. This is not the first time this has happened. It's not the first time that man had beat up a woman. And it's not the first time that the other guy decided to take a swing at my face with a six inch blade. If they could do this to the people of Germany and then just get released twelve hours later, even less at this point, where is the law? Where is the structure? If the Germans are held to that law and that structure, but these people could just come in, swing knives, and hurt, abuse, terrorize, and oppress citizens of Germany then. What do we do?

On August 31, 2015, Angela Merkel, the prime minister of Germany, declared "we can do this" as she opened the borders to millions of refugees. It is claimed that Merkel did not consider whether this action was good for Germany. It is asserted that Germany had no legal or moral responsibility to open its borders to millions of Muslim welfare recipients and that this violated international law. The speaker alleges that the international left supports this because it results in the displacement and destruction of Europeans. The speaker claims that the opening of borders led to mass rape, terrorism, crime, and welfare fraud. Angela Merkel is described as one of the greatest traitors in history, and it is stated that the full consequences of her actions have not yet been realized.

The speech argues that the migration turnaround announced by Chancellor Merz and Interior Minister Dobrindt is a total bluff. It claims that hundreds of thousands still enter Germany’s social system each year, with 150,000 asylum applications last year and a matching number through family reunification, indicating ongoing immigration pressure. The speaker asserts that newly designated safe countries of origin affect only a fraction of illegal migration and that misuse of the asylum system persists. The speaker accuses the current and previous governments of “plundering” Germany, noting that more than half a billion euros in child benefits were sent abroad in 2025 alone. It is claimed that child benefit transfers have risen sharply over the last decade, totaling 5,000,000,000 euros since 2010. The main asylum-origin countries are described as among the world’s most violent, and the speaker contends that uncontrolled mass migration has brought escalating crime and the wars and conflicts of the Middle East into German streets. According to the speech, the migration policy harms the native population and erodes essential elements such as homeland, freedom, security, and educational opportunities. It is asserted that established policy has created No-Go areas and parallel societies within the country and at schools, and that it has opened and even naturalized Islamist subversion. The overall claim is that current policy is failing to protect German society, culture, and the social contract, while enabling ongoing and amplified immigration and its perceived negative consequences.

Violence in New York City has escalated in the past two weeks, with various migrant groups forming sub gangs. The murder and assault rates have skyrocketed. According to an NYPD officer, they have been instructed not to arrest these individuals unless it is for a serious crime, which is disturbing. Meanwhile, citizens are being fined heavily for minor offenses like jaywalking. One notable incident involved a man from Venezuela who tried to flirt with a girl belonging to a Peruvian guy in a food line. This led to a fatal stabbing. These stories are just the beginning, and the situation is expected to worsen.

The conversation focuses on Citizen Vigilante and why it received major attention after Elon Musk brought it up. Tommy Robinson is discussed as an example of a real-world figure the movie’s themes are perceived to align with, and the guest says he shares some of Musk’s concerns about illegal immigration while also identifying as an immigrant and legal beneficiary of Australia’s immigration system. Asked to explain the movie, the guest frames Citizen Vigilante as a vigilante-genre story meant to “correct errors” and respond to injustice, built on real crimes he says happen in Europe daily. He describes an escalation of scandals and violence he associates with immigration, and he says the story escalates further because officials and governments “lie to the population,” prompting people to vote for parties that “aren’t getting anything done.” He also criticizes streaming and TV writing for enforcing political correctness and demands for specific identities, saying he wanted the story to be told on its own terms with production based on qualification rather than identity categories. He calls the film “merciless” and depicts a vigilante targeting not only perpetrators but also corrupt judges. A plot summary read by the host describes Europe “choking on migrant-fueled rape and murder epidemics” while “gutless officials” look away. The key emphasized scene involves the vigilante killing a judge after the judge argues that victims are victimized but frames the offenders in a way the guest portrays as justifying or minimizing responsibility. The host says the movie links to real life feelings and emotions and notes speculation that the inspiration is a real case in the UK, and then asks about those connections. The guest says the gang rape case in the movie is “actually basically happened in Hamburg in Germany, 2020,” with the defendants reportedly getting released and later being treated in a way he presents as inadequate. He says press supported the judge’s view, and he claims the offenders were incarcerated briefly, evaluated, and received one to three year terms and probation, leading to release before the trial had fully played out. He also says the judge’s reasoning in the film matches what the judge allegedly said in real life, including claims that the perpetrators were not integrated properly. When discussing why the movie focuses on migrants and whether it implies perpetrators are only migrants, the host raises a concern that critics argue other forms of crime should also be considered. The guest responds that the point is the broader system failing to prosecute crime consistently and that the movie is a “catalyst” to address what he calls an imbalance in enforcement and prosecution. The host then recounts comments by Patrick Bet-David: he claims the movie could inspire vigilantes, predicts more dangerous escalation, and worries it could lead to a new wave of chaos similar to mob eras in New York. The host asks the guest whether he worries this could happen and whether he would feel responsibility if someone acted by referencing the movie. The guest rejects censorship as a filmmaker, comparing it to debates about violent video games and school shooters, and argues the “problem makes the violence.” He also references viral violent incidents and says police actions in at least one case included arresting a stabbing victim after the victim was labeled racist, which he presents as “insane.” The conversation highlights the film’s most viral scene where the vigilante kills a family, which the guest connects to separate events: he says another real incident involved migrant girls posting messages online that German girls “deserved to be raped” because of how they dressed. The host argues that immigrants should be treated as guests who contribute and that crimes and inflammatory social posts are treated as violations of the social contract; he asks how the director can be accused of endorsing what happens in the film. The guest emphasizes a concept he calls “suicidal empathy,” which he describes as a destructive form of empathy that places the “murder” inside one’s own home, and he links it to how countries and institutions allegedly excuse harm to avoid conflict. Religious and political themes also come up. The guest argues religion should remain personal but draws lines against political enforcement of religious views, giving examples such as people praying publicly in spaces and universities and insisting that political correctness allows it. He then ties these themes to anger in Europe and argues that escalating demographic and political pressures could lead to cultural and legal changes. He also claims Jewish people in Germany are scared, and says he has examples of people being attacked for visible religious symbols. In response to the host’s question about solutions, the guest argues for stopping future entry “at the border,” stopping housing and staying, and deporting offenders, emphasizing immediate removal of immigrants who commit crimes. He also proposes disrupting smuggling operations by turning back intercepted arrivals and bringing people back instead of allowing them to stay, aiming to destroy the smugglers’ business model. He adds a plan to support origin countries by helping develop industries locally, including manufacturing in Africa to create jobs and reduce incentives to migrate. He concludes by arguing that politics lacks long-term vision and focuses mainly on election cycles rather than long-term planning. The host closes by contrasting “empathy” with “suicidal empathy,” saying empathy is good if managed, while suicidal empathy is destructive, and thanks the guest.

There is a troubling pattern of violent crimes committed by immigrants who were supposed to be deported. Recent incidents, like the stabbing of a 41-year-old man in Germany by an Afghan migrant, highlight the severity of this issue. In Norway, between 2003 and 2015, 12 people were killed by immigrants who should not have been in the country. Notable cases include a rejected asylum seeker who murdered his girlfriend and a man who had been deported multiple times. Many lives could have been saved if borders were closed. Victims like Benjamin, who was murdered during a robbery, and Mariamne, who was killed while picking up her daughter, are often overlooked. The focus seems to be on certain victims while others, like Lynn and Marie Louise, remain forgotten.

Mass immigration, especially illegal immigration, poses a threat to women's safety because no one knows who these people are or the lives they led before arriving. In 2024, Afghans were the top nationality arriving by small boats. In Afghanistan, women are banned from education, need male escorts in public, and face severe punishment for rebelling. Child marriages are the norm, and women are covered head to toe. The majority of immigrants are men accustomed to seeing women treated this way, and it is naive to think they will immediately adapt to Western views of women. Seeing a Western woman in revealing clothing could provoke a reaction. In Sweden, Afghans commit 69 times more rapes than Swedes, and Algerians commit 122 times more. In the UK, one in four sex crimes are committed by foreign nationals.

I moved to Sweden in 1987, obtaining permanent residency in 1991. Back then, it was paradise: clean, safe, and beautiful. But the decline of Sweden has been staggering. This year alone, there have been 32 bombs already, along with weekly shootings and the highest rape rate in Europe. One in four girls will be raped before 20. I've faced ridicule for speaking out about these issues. The problems aren't limited to major cities; they're nationwide. Lowering the prison sentence age won't solve anything. Multiculturalism has failed here. Importing so many people with different cultures simply doesn't work. Sweden is being destroyed, and authorities seem powerless. It's a tragedy that this was allowed to happen. I hope increased media coverage will awaken Sweden to demand change because right now, they are letting more people in than deporting. Sweden is a warning to the rest of Europe: We need to address these issues.

Many Americans are unaware of the dangers posed by illegal immigrants. A survivor of sex trafficking shares a harrowing experience of being abused by a cartel member. Despite fearing for her family's safety, she was too afraid to seek help. She emphasizes that children are at risk in Biden's America and supports Donald Trump due to her traumatic experiences with illegal immigrants.

The German parliament is full of left-green traitors and egomaniacs who will virtue signal us to hell to push their ideology. How many more times must we endure Aschaffenburg, Magdeburg, Mannheim, and Zolling? How many more rapes, stabbings, and murders, even of children, must we expect? This could happen to your family; you could be next.

A woman says her daughter was stalked at Walmart and chased by immigrants with a machete on the way to work. After the incident, the police did not return her call to file a report. Speaker 1 responds that if someone's first act upon entering the country is breaking the law, they are more likely to break the law again. He states that 350,000 mothers are in prison in the U.S., but they are not forced to take their children with them. He says shoplifting has doubled and auto thefts are up over 50% in the last two years. He believes many crimes go unreported. He concludes that the U.S. needs to restore the culture of the rule of law from top to bottom, because criminals see top law enforcement agencies not following the law.

Nonwestern migrants have been entering Europe for years, causing concerns about the changing political landscape and cultural clashes. Some individuals express fear that their way of life is being threatened and worry about the rise of Sharia law. There are also claims of a supposed increase in rape cases attributed to immigrant non Western males. Police statistics from Oslo indicate that all assault cases between strangers were committed by these immigrants, with the majority of victims being native Norwegian women.

The speakers discuss what they describe as a global rise in Islamist-linked threats and the impact of migration on security in Western countries. They begin by asserting that France’s government can no longer keep its own people safe from “potential radical Islamic terrorists that they have welcomed into their country,” and claim that France has allowed so many Middle East and North African migrants that crowds can no longer be assembled. They extend the concern to other Western nations, stating that the threat is now widespread, including in Germany, where they say many people are afraid to attend famous Christmas markets because they have become highly dangerous targets for radical Islamists. Speaker 1 provides details: since 2014, seven European Christmas markets have been attacked—three in France and four in Germany. Authorities arrested five men suspected of planning attack number eight in Germany last week; among them is described as a Muslim cleric from a German mosque who allegedly urged his followers to kill as many people as possible. The report notes that an attack in Poland on a Christmas market was foiled as well. The German case is characterized as a migrant who came from Egypt, moved to Germany, and, according to the speakers, worked at a mosque in a country they describe as tolerantly allowing him to operate there. They claim this individual began indoctrinating other Muslims to murder Christians. They describe attending a German Christmas market at this point as akin to playing Russian roulette, expressing fear that an asylum seeker living on tax dollars could drive a car into a market and kill many people. The speakers reference Australia, stating that 16 people were murdered on a beach “this past Sunday,” and claim that there is a heightened threat as their government imported tens of thousands of migrants from Muslim-majority countries, with the Muslim population purportedly doubling in a decade. They criticize Australia’s Labour Party as “left-wing,” asserting it has “the strictest gun laws in the world” yet intends to add more, while instructing viewers to light a candle as a symbolic response. They describe the current government as being led by people who are detached from reality and who prioritize political orthodoxies over people’s lives, claiming that the media feeds the same narratives and spin. Speaker 2 endorses a symbolic action: “Light a candle. Put it in their front window tonight at 06:47PM to show that light will indeed defeat darkness.” They state that a national cabinet meeting will consider a proposal to empower agencies to examine what can be done in this area. Overall, the dialogue emphasizes a narrative of increasing Islamist terrorism linked to migrant populations in Europe and Australia, argues for stronger security measures and altered political responses, and frames mainstream reporting as insufficient.

There's a concerning trend of immigrants who were supposed to be deported committing violent crimes in Europe, including Norway. Recent incidents, like the murder of a man in Germany by an Afghan migrant, highlight this issue. Between 2003 and 2015, 12 people in Norway were killed by immigrants who should not have been there. Notable cases include a rejected asylum seeker from Rwanda who killed his girlfriend and a man who was repeatedly deported but returned to commit murder. These tragic events raise questions about border policies and the safety of citizens. Many victims, like Benjamin and Mariamne, are forgotten, overshadowed by other narratives. The call for stricter border controls is growing as more lives are lost to preventable violence.

In Europe, recent incidents like stabbings, riots, and church burnings highlight the link between mass migration and crime. The native white Christian European population is being replaced by migrants from non-Western countries, leading to a reality where cities like Amsterdam and Brussels have majority migrant populations. The establishment celebrates this shift as "diversity," while pushing for forced immigration against the will of the people. The ultimate goal is to create a homogenized, unrecognizable Europe devoid of traditional values and cultural identity. This vision clashes with the desire of many to preserve their heritage and resist the imposition of a new world order. Translation: The video discusses the impact of mass migration on crime in Europe, highlighting the replacement of native populations by migrants from non-Western countries. The establishment promotes this shift as "diversity," while imposing forced immigration against the will of the people. The goal is to create a homogenized, unrecognizable Europe devoid of traditional values and cultural identity, leading to a clash with those who seek to preserve their heritage and resist a new world order.

A 28-year-old Afghan migrant has stabbed and killed a 2-year-old child and a 41-year-old man in Aschaffenburg, Germany. This tragic incident highlights a recurring issue where violence occurs, yet promises for change from politicians lead to inaction due to international human rights treaties. The frustration is palpable as democratic options seem limited, leaving many feeling helpless. As a parent, the emotional weight of such violence is even more profound, as it could easily affect anyone's loved ones. There is a desperate call for immediate action to address this ongoing crisis.

A 14-year-old girl was found dead, drugged, and abused by an Afghan migrant in Vienna. Similar incidents involving migrants in Germany and Vienna have occurred recently. The speaker expresses frustration over the lack of change in policies despite ongoing tragedies. They highlight the lack of attention given to victims of these crimes and pledge to make a film to raise awareness about the issue.

Germany is facing a troubling situation. A Saudi Arabian man, well-integrated since 2006 as a psychiatrist, went on a rampage, driving into a Christmas market, injuring 200, and killing 5. He had previously announced his intentions on social media and was warned three times by Saudi Arabia about his plans. Despite this, German authorities seemed more focused on hunting down Germans for hate crimes rather than addressing real threats. The media is framing this as linked to the far-right AFD party, but it was an anti-German act, as the perpetrator explicitly stated his intent to harm Germans. There is a call for a proper remigration program to address these issues, rather than the narratives pushed by mainstream media.

One country that concerns me is Germany. Historically, in the early 20th century, Germany went to war against the world, which was unexpected and surprisingly close. About 30 years later, Germany chose to go to war again, this time with a notorious leader at the helm. You would think the world would respond by saying to Germany, "You can’t keep attacking the world and expect to remain a country."